Re: enumeration depth
Thank you very much, I got the point!
\renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
\renewcommand\labelenumii{\roman{enumii}.}
\renewcommand\labelenumiii{\roman{enumiii}.},
made the Job.
Did not find this in the User Gidd, although this must be
a very common probelm. Could this issue be included there??
Staffan
Herbert Voss wrote:
> Staffan Ringbom wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > The default enumeration style in lyx is
> > [(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
> >
> > 1.
> >a
> > i
> > b
> > i
> > ii
> > 2.
> >
> > Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration
>depth as default.
> >
> > Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
>
> in latex preamble or anywhere in the text
>
> \renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
> \renewcommand\labelenumii{\alph{enumi}.\roman{enumii}.}
> \renewcommand\labelenumiii{\alph{enumi}.\roman{enumii}.\roman{enumiii}.}
>
> Herbert
>
header spacing
Hello again, Sorry, but I have another LaTex related question. I'm writing a document with onehalf spacing. But to me, the headings (chapter, section etc.) don't look very nice this way. So I want to set them to single spacing. At the moment, I'm using the setspace commands to do this: \singlespacing 1. Chapter one \onehalfspacing blabla... This is a little bit uncomfortable :-) Is there a way to set this in the preamble? I'm using KOMA-book. Thanks again, Juergen. begin:vcard n:Spitzmüller;Jürgen tel;fax:07644/ 930643 tel;home:07644/ 930642 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] adr;quoted-printable:;;Dorfstr. 55=0D=0A;Hecklingen;;79341; x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Jürgen Spitzmüller end:vcard
LOF and LOT in one chapter
Hello out there! This is a LaTeX-related question, but maybe someone has an idea... I'd like to have the List of Figures and the List of Tables in one chapter (in the appendix), like this: D. List of Figures and Tables 1. Figures ... 2. Tables I'm using KOMA-book-class. Thanks in advance! Juergen begin:vcard n:Spitzmüller;Jürgen tel;fax:07644/ 930643 tel;home:07644/ 930642 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] adr;quoted-printable:;;Dorfstr. 55=0D=0A;Hecklingen;;79341; x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Jürgen Spitzmüller end:vcard
exporting paths
Hello, I try yo use \custom_export_command. My problem is that the output file is written in a temporary directory. Is it possible to specify where to write the output, and if not at least to have by some parameter the original lyx document path? I remember that such questions have been asked before, but I haven't seen (or I've forgotten) answers about it... Can anyone help me? Bye, BG
Re: Status of pdflatex support in lyx?
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:29:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Beaubert Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | Hi, | > | | > | I'm wondering about the status of pdflatex support in lyx | > | To me the only tool avaible to produce pdf directly from lyx files is | > | lyx2pdf which work well on my computer | > | But is there plan to include pdflatex support in lyx in 1.1.6? | > | > No, not directly... but there will be support for exporting to latex. ^^^ And I really meant to write pdf here | > And that export can use pdflatex. | > | > More integrated support will not come until 1.2.x | | No, there will be a direct support for pdflatex in 1.1.6, | i.e. in the File->Export menu, one of the options is to export as PDF | (using pdflatex). Yes, and that is what I call indirect support. We will not have any special pdf support in 1.1.6, Lgb
Re: Status of pdflatex support in lyx?
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:29:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > Beaubert Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Hi, > | > | I'm wondering about the status of pdflatex support in lyx > | To me the only tool avaible to produce pdf directly from lyx files is > | lyx2pdf which work well on my computer > | But is there plan to include pdflatex support in lyx in 1.1.6? > > No, not directly... but there will be support for exporting to latex. > And that export can use pdflatex. > > More integrated support will not come until 1.2.x No, there will be a direct support for pdflatex in 1.1.6, i.e. in the File->Export menu, one of the options is to export as PDF (using pdflatex).
Re: lyx on BeOs?
Michael McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | These are all available under beos as far as I know. I've not tried | setting any of them up, however. An X server is available as part of | the "Geekgadgets" package. and xforms is available on | www.bebits.com so you should try to compile it then... it should break _only_ at a couple of places, the same places where we have special code for cygwin and OS/2. Lgb | | On 18 Oct 2000 16:08:11 +0200, you wrote: | | >"Henrico Wanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | >| I have a question whether it is possible to use either precompiled | > packages that can be used on a system that works with BeOS, or how | > to compile the existing source code? | >| If I am right, BeOs has some X functionality and the structure of | >| the system is influenced by both *nix and Mac-systems. | > | >You need: | > - the xforms graphics lib | > - an X server + X libs | > - posix functions | > | >If you have the above it is likely that LyX can be compiled for BeOS. | > | >Lgb
Re: lyx on BeOs?
These are all available under beos as far as I know. I've not tried setting any of them up, however. An X server is available as part of the "Geekgadgets" package. and xforms is available on www.bebits.com On 18 Oct 2000 16:08:11 +0200, you wrote: >"Henrico Wanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >| I have a question whether it is possible to use either precompiled > packages that can be used on a system that works with BeOS, or how > to compile the existing source code? >| If I am right, BeOs has some X functionality and the structure of >| the system is influenced by both *nix and Mac-systems. > >You need: > - the xforms graphics lib > - an X server + X libs > - posix functions > >If you have the above it is likely that LyX can be compiled for BeOS. > >Lgb
the most annoying feature...
This is a comment for anyone who wants to take notice (hint hint, you developers out there). I am ever annoyed that when I have a footnote standing at the end of a line I cannot place my cursor after the footnote using my mouse, without opening the footnote window. I have to use my arrow keys to get my cursor there. Nor can I select such a line to delete it, without the same thing happening. I have to use . I hope that's clear. And in case I am griping about something which is fixable, please let me know how.
Re: enumeration depth
Staffan Ringbom wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The default enumeration style in lyx is
> [(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
>
> 1.
>a
> i
> b
> i
> ii
> 2.
>
> Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration depth
>as default.
>
> Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
in latex preamble or anywhere in the text
\renewcommand\labelenumi{\alph{enumi}.}
\renewcommand\labelenumii{\alph{enumi}.\roman{enumii}.}
\renewcommand\labelenumiii{\alph{enumi}.\roman{enumii}.\roman{enumiii}.}
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://perce.de/lyx/
LyX Development News for 20001018
It will be available RSN. You just have to wait for the automatic updates to take place although I'm sure I committed it early enough that there should have been two updates by now. Lots of details about soon-to-be-released and future releases of LyX. http://www.lyx.org/news/20001018.php3 Allan. (ARRae) P.S. If you reply top message just follow up to you respective mailing list.
Re: One think I don't understand about creating layout file
> "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> So what are my options? I need to understand where lyx's layout
Paul> file separates in function from the kbk.cls file. It is a bit
Paul> discouraging to me.
The layout files purports to describe for LyX what's in the .cls file.
Paul> What is the absolute minimum needed for a workable layout file?
Paul> I tried a "skeleton" layout file:
Paul> #% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this #
Paul> \DeclareLaTeXClass[kbk,kbkps.sty]{book (kbk)} Preamble
Paul> \usepackage{kbkps} EndPreamble
Change it to
==
#% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this
# \DeclareLaTeXClass[kbk,kbkps.sty]{book (kbk)}
Preamble
\usepackage{kbkps}
EndPreamble
Input book.layout
===
Paul> Lyx finds the document type, but it cannot use it. The error is
Paul> "Conversion errors! unable to switch to new document class". So
Paul> I'm missing at least one fundamental element.
Yes, you have to describe all the possible types of paragraphs in the
class. That's what the Input does.
Paul> But once I find the minimum layout file, won't I be able to
Paul> generate documents that match the kbk.cls information? I
Paul> understand the "on screen" appearance of LyX will not be
Paul> accurage because I may not have not defined fonts in the layout
Paul> file. I will not have "point and click" access to any special
Paul> environments that exist in kbk.cls. If there are special things
Paul> to be inserted, I have to use ERT. OK.
Then you can add the missing parts and do the customizations after
inputing book.layout.
Paul> But won't the dvi and postscript output be true to the kbk.ps?
Yes, they will.
JMarc
Re: enumeration depth
Try:
\renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
\renewcommand{\theenumii}{\roman{enumii}}
.
.
.
... in the preamble
jan
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Staffan Ringbom wrote:
> Hi,
> The default enumeration style in lyx is
> [(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
>
> 1.
>a
> i
> b
> i
> ii
> 2.
>
> Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration depth
>as default.
>
> Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
>
> (The nasty way to do it is to export the file as Latex and force the
> enumeration with \begin{enumerate} [(a)])
> It would be more productive to do it directly from LyX. Any suggestions?
>
> Staffan.
--
---
Jan Goebel (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
DIW German Institute for Economic Research
SOEP
Königin-Luise-Str. 5
D-14195 Berlin
Germany
phone: 49 30 89789-377
---
One think I don't understand about creating layout file
Christian Schmitt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote:
>
>
> You have to create / get a corresponding lyx layout file for your latex
> package. Just check out chapter 6 of the lyx customization manual.
>
> Christian
Yesterday I asked about using the Kluwer company's kbk.cls with lyx.
Christian pointed me in the right direction. There is one part I don't
understand about it. If I could use just a bit more of your patience:
Here is my problem. kbk.cls is a big, long confusing file and I don't
understand all the stuff in there! I'm looking at the Kluwer sample
document trying to figure out which TeX markup refers to general LaTeX
things and which are specific to the kbk.cls file. It is puzzling, for
sure. I don't think I could ever feel confident that all elements of
the kbk.cls had been entered into the layout file I create.
So what are my options? I need to understand where lyx's layout file
separates in function from the kbk.cls file. It is a bit discouraging
to me.
What is the absolute minimum needed for a workable layout file? I tried
a "skeleton" layout file:
#% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this
# \DeclareLaTeXClass[kbk,kbkps.sty]{book (kbk)}
Preamble
\usepackage{kbkps}
EndPreamble
Lyx finds the document type, but it cannot use it. The error is
"Conversion errors! unable to switch to new document class". So I'm
missing at least one fundamental element.
But once I find the minimum layout file, won't I be able to generate
documents that match the kbk.cls information? I understand the "on
screen" appearance of LyX will not be accurage because I may not have
not defined fonts in the layout file. I will not have "point and
click" access to any special environments that exist in kbk.cls. If
there are special things to be inserted, I have to use ERT. OK.
But won't the dvi and postscript output be true to the kbk.ps?
--
Paul E. Johnson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Political Sciencehttp://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn
University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086
Lawrence, Kansas 66045FAX: (785) 864-5700
Re: lyx on BeOs?
"Henrico Wanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I have a question whether it is possible to use either precompiled packages that can |be used on a system that works with BeOS, or how to compile the existing source code? | If I am right, BeOs has some X functionality and the structure of | the system is influenced by both *nix and Mac-systems. You need: - the xforms graphics lib - an X server + X libs - posix functions If you have the above it is likely that LyX can be compiled for BeOS. Lgb
enumeration depth
Hi,
The default enumeration style in lyx is
[(1)], [(a)],, [(i)] "number, letter, i" something like this
1.
a
i
b
i
ii
2.
Would like to skip the first level and get directly to the second enumeration depth as
default.
Is there any quick fix (in the LaTeX preamble)??
(The nasty way to do it is to export the file as Latex and force the
enumeration with \begin{enumerate} [(a)])
It would be more productive to do it directly from LyX. Any suggestions?
Staffan.
lyx on BeOs?
I have a question whether it is possible to use either precompiled packages that can be used on a system that works with BeOS, or how to compile the existing source code? If I am right, BeOs has some X functionality and the structure of the system is influenced by both *nix and Mac-systems. Yours sincerely, drs H.L.T. WandersFaculty of Management and OrganizationPO Box 800NL-9700 AV GRONINGEN
Re: cannot compile lyx
> "CEO" == CEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: CEO> I am sending the output of ./configure as attachement. Is it CEO> posiible, that= I have wrongly installed the librrary? I just CEO> downloaded *.tgz for the 4.11= version and copied coresponding CEO> files to subdirectories of /usr/X11R6 ? I= am still little CEO> newbie. Try to run 'ldconfig' (to make linux aware of the library) as root and re-run configure. JMarc
Re: cannot compile lyx
At 10:58 16.10.2000 'ã.'tory.lst, you wrote:
>> "CEO" == CEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>CEO> Hi Trying to compile LyX 1.1.5 after ./congigure I get the
>CEO> following: ... Cannot find libXpm library ... This library exist
>CEO> in my /usr/X11R6/lib directory, version 4.11. Following
>CEO> instructions in ISTALL file I tryed: ./configure
>CEO> --with-extra-lib=/usr/X11R6/lib and received the same error
>CEO> message at the end of the screen output. Am I doing something
>CEO> wrong?
>
>Are you sure that LyX is choking on the library itself? It could be
>also on the xpm.h header file.
>
>JMarc
I am sending the output of ./configure as attachement. Is it posiible, that I have
wrongly installed the librrary? I just downloaded *.tgz for the 4.11 version and
copied coresponding files to subdirectories of /usr/X11R6 ? I am still little newbie.
CEO
creating cache ./config.cache
configuring LyX version 1.1.5
checking host system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu
checking config.cache system type... same
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for prefix by checking for lyx... no
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for kpsewhich... kpsewhich
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for POSIXized ISC... no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for AIX... no
checking for HP-UX... no
checking for SunOS 4.x... no
checking for SCO 3.2v4... no
checking for Cygwin environment... no
checking for mingw32 environment... no
checking for executable suffix... no
checking for a working C++ compiler... g++
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C++... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking for object suffix... o
checking for executable suffix... (cached) no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.lo... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... -static
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries...
yes
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking dynamic linker characteristics... Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... no
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking for objdir... .libs
creating libtool
loading cache ./config.cache
checking if C++ compiler supports mutable... yes
checking if C++ compiler supports partial specialization... yes
checking whether the C++ compiler understands explicit... yes
checking whether the included std::string should be used... yes
checking for correct namespaces support... yes
checking for C headers wrappers... yes
checking for conforming std::count... yes
checking for ostream... no
checking for istream... no
checking for sstream... no
checking for modern STL streams... no
checking for regex.h... yes
checking for sin in -lm... yes
checking for fopen in -lc... yes
checking for extra library directory... NONE
checking for extra include directory... NONE
checking for extra lib+include directory... NONE
checking for main in -liberty... yes
checking for ptsname in -lpt... no
checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet... no
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet_stub... no
checking for gethostbyname... yes
checking for connect... yes
checking for remove... yes
checking for shmat... yes
checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking for XOpenIM... yes
checking for XpmCreateBufferFromImage in -lXpm... no
checking for X11/xpm.h... yes
checking xpm header version... 4.11
checking for fl_initialize in -lforms... yes
checking for X11
Re: cross-reference limit?
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> This is a known problem, which is caused by a limitation of the Dekel> XForms library. It has been fixed in 1.1.6cvs, and it will Dekel> probably be fixed in 1.1.5fix2. Yes it will. JMarc
Re: Status of pdflatex support in lyx?
Beaubert Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | I'm wondering about the status of pdflatex support in lyx | To me the only tool avaible to produce pdf directly from lyx files is | lyx2pdf which work well on my computer | But is there plan to include pdflatex support in lyx in 1.1.6? No, not directly... but there will be support for exporting to latex. And that export can use pdflatex. More integrated support will not come until 1.2.x Lgb
Re: Can you help me work with Kluwer style?
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote: pauljo>Writing a book in LaTeX, and I'd like to use LyX. Incidentally, pauljo>yesterday I installed pybliographic and observed its wonderful ability pauljo>to use the LyX serverpipe to input citations, and I was really pauljo>impressed, and I'm more determined than ever to make this work. pauljo> pauljo>My publisher, Kluwer, has a latex package and you can get it here if you pauljo>want to see the issues I face: pauljo>http://www.wkap.nl/kaphtml.htm/BOOKSTYLES pauljo> pauljo>I've installed the Kluwer stuff (.cls and .sty files) in my tetex pauljo>distribution and I'm able to run latex to process raw tex files. But I pauljo>want to use lyx, and here is what I don't understand. pauljo> pauljo>1. In Lyx, there is no "kluwer" or "kbkps" document class in the menu. pauljo>The first part of the latex document declares a class kbk and it uses it pauljo>when it runs latex, but Lyx does not see it. (I've read in the LyX pauljo>customization documentation. I did texhash, run lyx, run LaTex pauljo>reconfigure and restart lyx). pauljo> You have to create / get a corresponding lyx layout file for your latex package. Just check out chapter 6 of the lyx customization manual. Hope this helps, Christian
Re: EPSTOPDF breaks -- SOLVED
> /usr/bin/epstopdf: syntax error near unexpected token `("'
> /usr/bin/epstopdf: /usr/bin/epstopdf: line 67: `my @bool = ("false", "true");'
>
> After brief inspection of the file /usr/bin/epstopdf I have
> found in its head following construct:
>
> eval '(exit $?0)' && eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+"$@"}' && eval 'exec perl -S $0
>$argv:q'
^^-- This seems to be the real problem.
Andre'
--
Andre' Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
