Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread K. Elo
Hi,

2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
 Hello!
 
 I actually have a problem with Lyx 1.4.1 and Bibtex (running on Windows XP)
 similar to one reported few days ago. But I couldn´t manage to solve it.
 
 I included a Bibtex Bibliography in my Document and chose Natbib Style for
 Citations. Everything worked fine for almost 2 months. Unfortunately something
 went wrong. I still can cite in Lyx, Lyx itself displays my citations 
 properly,
 so everything is fine, the path therefore seems to be correct. However, when I
 try to convert to DVI, all citations are lost and replaced by a [?]. The
 Reference section at the end of the document is completely missing.
 When I try to convert a recent file, everything works properly. I haven´t
 changed any configurations since then. Actually, the current file has worked
 properly before, I haven´t changed anything, not even a single letter. I tried
 the files on another computer, same problem. The recent files work, the new 
 one
 fails. 
 I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
 Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
 missing.
 The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
 any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So 
 what
 is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
 
 Thanks a lot in advance

Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
was an incompatible bibtex style.

Hope this helps,
Kimmo




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
K. Elo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Hi,
 
 2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
  
 
 Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
 bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
 one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
 was an incompatible bibtex style.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Kimmo
 
 
Thanks for your answer, the style itself is working, its the same in my old and
new documents. Actually it is the same document, the old file is a backup I
saved few days before. I have neither changed the style nor the path since then.

Greets,
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Karin Eichele wrote:


I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are missing.
The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So what
is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.



What happens if you try the following: View-DVI the new file, to get 
the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
get error messages?


Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?

/Paul



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Karin Eichele wrote:
 
  I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, 
Bibtex,
  Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
missing.
  The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot 
find
  any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. 
So what
  is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
  
 
 What happens if you try the following: View-DVI the new file, to get 
 the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
 open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
 latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
 get error messages?
 
 Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?
 
 /Paul
 
 
Hello,
Sorry for asking,but how exactly can I start the third and fourth run 
manually? What do I hace to do?
The Bibtex .aux file should have the same file name as my .bib file? If yes, I 
don´t have such a file in the Temp.

Thanks a lot
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele

 
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck

Karin Eichele wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.

That's what you should have.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Karin Eichele wrote:
  Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the 
lyx 
  file itself.
 That's what you should have.
 
 Richard
 

Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?

Karin




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck


Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?
  
My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#..repeat as necessary...

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Richard Heck wrote:



My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#..repeat as necessary...

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.



Yes.  Assuming that we're in the temp directory, with LyX still open, 
after View-DVI has failed, there should already be a .tex file 
containing the exported document.  Call it mydoc.tex.  Assuming that the 
MikTeX bin directory (or the bin directory for whatever LaTeX 
distribution Karin has) is on the system command path, she should run


latex mydoc
bibtex mydoc
latex mydoc (repeated as needed).

If the bin directory is not on the system path, supply a full path to 
each command (e.g., C:\Program Files\MikTeX\bin\latex.exe mydoc, etc.).


Again, View-DVI appears to be doing the first two runs, so it might be 
worthwhile to start with the third run (second latex run).  If that does 
not provide useful information, Karin should run the entire sequence above.


If Karin's .bbl file exists but is empty, chances are that BibTeX has 
failed.  This sometimes happens if a defective bibliographic entry 
(meaning one that is incorrectly formatted in the .bib file) is used. 
When that happens, the easiest way to track it down is bisection search. 
Remove half the citations and try to compile.  If the document compiles, 
add in half the omitted citations; if it fails, remove half the 
remaining citations.  Keep doing this until the offending citation is 
identified.


/Paul



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread K. Elo
Hi,

2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
 Hello!
 
 I actually have a problem with Lyx 1.4.1 and Bibtex (running on Windows XP)
 similar to one reported few days ago. But I couldn´t manage to solve it.
 
 I included a Bibtex Bibliography in my Document and chose Natbib Style for
 Citations. Everything worked fine for almost 2 months. Unfortunately something
 went wrong. I still can cite in Lyx, Lyx itself displays my citations 
 properly,
 so everything is fine, the path therefore seems to be correct. However, when I
 try to convert to DVI, all citations are lost and replaced by a [?]. The
 Reference section at the end of the document is completely missing.
 When I try to convert a recent file, everything works properly. I haven´t
 changed any configurations since then. Actually, the current file has worked
 properly before, I haven´t changed anything, not even a single letter. I tried
 the files on another computer, same problem. The recent files work, the new 
 one
 fails. 
 I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
 Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
 missing.
 The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
 any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So 
 what
 is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
 
 Thanks a lot in advance

Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
was an incompatible bibtex style.

Hope this helps,
Kimmo




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
K. Elo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Hi,
 
 2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
  
 
 Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
 bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
 one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
 was an incompatible bibtex style.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Kimmo
 
 
Thanks for your answer, the style itself is working, its the same in my old and
new documents. Actually it is the same document, the old file is a backup I
saved few days before. I have neither changed the style nor the path since then.

Greets,
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Karin Eichele wrote:


I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are missing.
The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So what
is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.



What happens if you try the following: View-DVI the new file, to get 
the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
get error messages?


Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?

/Paul



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Karin Eichele wrote:
 
  I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, 
Bibtex,
  Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
missing.
  The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot 
find
  any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. 
So what
  is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
  
 
 What happens if you try the following: View-DVI the new file, to get 
 the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
 open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
 latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
 get error messages?
 
 Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?
 
 /Paul
 
 
Hello,
Sorry for asking,but how exactly can I start the third and fourth run 
manually? What do I hace to do?
The Bibtex .aux file should have the same file name as my .bib file? If yes, I 
don´t have such a file in the Temp.

Thanks a lot
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele

 
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck

Karin Eichele wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.

That's what you should have.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Karin Eichele wrote:
  Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the 
lyx 
  file itself.
 That's what you should have.
 
 Richard
 

Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?

Karin




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck


Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?
  
My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#..repeat as necessary...

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Richard Heck wrote:



My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#..repeat as necessary...

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.



Yes.  Assuming that we're in the temp directory, with LyX still open, 
after View-DVI has failed, there should already be a .tex file 
containing the exported document.  Call it mydoc.tex.  Assuming that the 
MikTeX bin directory (or the bin directory for whatever LaTeX 
distribution Karin has) is on the system command path, she should run


latex mydoc
bibtex mydoc
latex mydoc (repeated as needed).

If the bin directory is not on the system path, supply a full path to 
each command (e.g., C:\Program Files\MikTeX\bin\latex.exe mydoc, etc.).


Again, View-DVI appears to be doing the first two runs, so it might be 
worthwhile to start with the third run (second latex run).  If that does 
not provide useful information, Karin should run the entire sequence above.


If Karin's .bbl file exists but is empty, chances are that BibTeX has 
failed.  This sometimes happens if a defective bibliographic entry 
(meaning one that is incorrectly formatted in the .bib file) is used. 
When that happens, the easiest way to track it down is bisection search. 
Remove half the citations and try to compile.  If the document compiles, 
add in half the omitted citations; if it fails, remove half the 
remaining citations.  Keep doing this until the offending citation is 
identified.


/Paul



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread K. Elo
Hi,

2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
> Hello!
> 
> I actually have a problem with Lyx 1.4.1 and Bibtex (running on Windows XP)
> similar to one reported few days ago. But I couldn´t manage to solve it.
> 
> I included a Bibtex Bibliography in my Document and chose Natbib Style for
> Citations. Everything worked fine for almost 2 months. Unfortunately something
> went wrong. I still can cite in Lyx, Lyx itself displays my citations 
> properly,
> so everything is fine, the path therefore seems to be correct. However, when I
> try to convert to DVI, all citations are lost and replaced by a [?]. The
> Reference section at the end of the document is completely missing.
> When I try to convert a recent file, everything works properly. I haven´t
> changed any configurations since then. Actually, the current file has worked
> properly before, I haven´t changed anything, not even a single letter. I tried
> the files on another computer, same problem. The recent files work, the new 
> one
> fails. 
> I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
> Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
> missing.
> The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
> any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So 
> what
> is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance

Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
was an incompatible bibtex style.

Hope this helps,
Kimmo




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
K. Elo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> 2006-10-24 11:50 +, Karin Eichele:
> > 
> 
> Do you use a natbib compatible bibtex style? Please compare the
> bibliography styles in Your older, correctly working files and the new
> one (which is not working). I have had a similar problem and the problem
> was an incompatible bibtex style.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Kimmo
> 
> 
Thanks for your answer, the style itself is working, its the same in my old and
new documents. Actually it is the same document, the old file is a backup I
saved few days before. I have neither changed the style nor the path since then.

Greets,
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Karin Eichele wrote:


I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, Bibtex,
Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are missing.
The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot find
any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. So what
is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.



What happens if you try the following: View->DVI the new file, to get 
the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
get error messages?


Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?

/Paul



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> Karin Eichele wrote:
> 
> > I observed that the old file is converted the following: Latex Run 1, 
Bibtex,
> > Latex 2,3,4 and buffer write. With the new file, Latex runs 3 and 4 are 
missing.
> > The Temporary file however contains the .bib database, at least, I cannot 
find
> > any discrepancy between the Temps of the recent files and the new files. 
So what
> > is going on with my document. There aren´t any Latex errors.
> > 
> 
> What happens if you try the following: View->DVI the new file, to get 
> the first two latex runs and the bibtex run in between; with LyX still 
> open, go to the temp directory and do the third and if necessary fourth 
> latex runs manually (from a command prompt)?  Does this work, or do you 
> get error messages?
> 
> Also, does the bibtex run successfully produce a .aux file?
> 
> /Paul
> 
> 
Hello,
Sorry for asking,but how exactly can I start the third and fourth run 
manually? What do I hace to do?
The Bibtex .aux file should have the same file name as my .bib file? If yes, I 
don´t have such a file in the Temp.

Thanks a lot
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele

> 
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.
Karin





Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck

Karin Eichele wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the lyx 
file itself.

That's what you should have.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Karin Eichele
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> Karin Eichele wrote:
> > Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have one .aux file named the same as the 
lyx 
> > file itself.
> That's what you should have.
> 
> Richard
> 
>
Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?

Karin




Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Heck


Ok, thanks. Sorry again for asking, but how can I manage to figure out where 
the problem is.   The .bbl file in the temp obviously is empty, so how can I 
fix that?
  
My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#<..repeat as necessary...>

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.

Richard



Re: Lyx Bibtex Problem

2006-10-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Richard Heck wrote:



My default technique here is as follows: Export to LaTeX and do 
everything manually. If that works, then, well, it works, and you can at 
least deal with it that way. If not, then I would hope to figure out 
thereby what's wrong. And if you're not getting LaTeX runs after the 
first, then I'm guessing you're getting an error during the BibTeX run. 
Why, I don't know, but doing it all manually should show you. The other 
option, suggested earlier, is to go to the temporary LyX directory and 
run everything manually there. Since I'm not on Windows, I don't know 
exactly how you'd do that. On Linux, it'd be:


#latex filename
#bibtex filename
#latex filename
#<..repeat as necessary...>

from the shell. Presumably, it's something similar in Windows.



Yes.  Assuming that we're in the temp directory, with LyX still open, 
after View->DVI has failed, there should already be a .tex file 
containing the exported document.  Call it mydoc.tex.  Assuming that the 
MikTeX bin directory (or the bin directory for whatever LaTeX 
distribution Karin has) is on the system command path, she should run


latex mydoc
bibtex mydoc
latex mydoc (repeated as needed).

If the bin directory is not on the system path, supply a full path to 
each command (e.g., "C:\Program Files\MikTeX\bin\latex.exe" mydoc, etc.).


Again, View->DVI appears to be doing the first two runs, so it might be 
worthwhile to start with the third run (second latex run).  If that does 
not provide useful information, Karin should run the entire sequence above.


If Karin's .bbl file exists but is empty, chances are that BibTeX has 
failed.  This sometimes happens if a defective bibliographic entry 
(meaning one that is incorrectly formatted in the .bib file) is used. 
When that happens, the easiest way to track it down is bisection search. 
Remove half the citations and try to compile.  If the document compiles, 
add in half the omitted citations; if it fails, remove half the 
remaining citations.  Keep doing this until the offending citation is 
identified.


/Paul