Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. [...] Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. I posted this question because, when I put problem with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is rigth. Thanks Helge, Marc Marcelo OK, I see you reported #2566. Didn't check emails. IMO, the best solution is to make LFUN_WORDS_COUNT display both printable and absolute words in the info dialog, but I suppose this would require some non-trivial code. countWords should be redesigned to parse environments instead of simply counting chars. This requires further discussion, I guess. I suggest marking #2566 as a duplicate / depending on #2064 and posting more descriptive comments there. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9wAEu4rFT+k3kmQRAjzaAJ9mRw2+ZODVXApPoOPJwQiq21qGFQCfdVGK kENd7XIb80LFczcKQi0Eom8= =56cB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. [...] Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. I posted this question because, when I put problem with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is rigth. Thanks Helge, Marc Marcelo OK, I see you reported #2566. Didn't check emails. IMO, the best solution is to make LFUN_WORDS_COUNT display both printable and absolute words in the info dialog, but I suppose this would require some non-trivial code. countWords should be redesigned to parse environments instead of simply counting chars. This requires further discussion, I guess. I suggest marking #2566 as a duplicate / depending on #2064 and posting more descriptive comments there. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9wAEu4rFT+k3kmQRAjzaAJ9mRw2+ZODVXApPoOPJwQiq21qGFQCfdVGK kENd7XIb80LFczcKQi0Eom8= =56cB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: >>> Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. >>> This is not usefull for me. >>> I think that command in ERT must not be counted. [...] > Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. > I posted this question because, when I put problem > with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a > mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is > rigth. > > Thanks Helge, Marc > Marcelo OK, I see you reported #2566. Didn't check emails. IMO, the best solution is to make LFUN_WORDS_COUNT display both printable and "absolute" words in the info dialog, but I suppose this would require some non-trivial code. countWords should be redesigned to parse environments instead of simply counting chars. This requires further discussion, I guess. I suggest marking #2566 as a duplicate / depending on #2064 and posting more descriptive comments there. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9wAEu4rFT+k3kmQRAjzaAJ9mRw2+ZODVXApPoOPJwQiq21qGFQCfdVGK kENd7XIb80LFczcKQi0Eom8= =56cB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to do. Ok. ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible to have some words of normal printed text inside ERT. For example, if you need to do: \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} The Special words will print, and should therefore be counted. I not think in this. Is very complex. Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a perfect word count is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better choice. This work in most of cases. The counting issue above may then be avoided by having two ERT boxes containing the commands only. Between them the special words will be written as normal text. The downside of this approach is that the two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cutpaste errors may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, which will cause odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is a real problem? Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. Helge Hafting Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. I posted this question because, when I put problem with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is rigth. Thanks Helge, Marc Marcelo __ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to do. Ok. ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible to have some words of normal printed text inside ERT. For example, if you need to do: \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} The Special words will print, and should therefore be counted. I not think in this. Is very complex. Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a perfect word count is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better choice. This work in most of cases. The counting issue above may then be avoided by having two ERT boxes containing the commands only. Between them the special words will be written as normal text. The downside of this approach is that the two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cutpaste errors may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, which will cause odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is a real problem? Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. Helge Hafting Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. I posted this question because, when I put problem with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is rigth. Thanks Helge, Marc Marcelo __ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
> > Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. > > This is not usefull for me. > > I think that command in ERT must not be counted. > > I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in > > original language for further revision of > translation, > > and so on. > > Again, count words in notes not make usefull > > information for me. > > What think about this other Lyx´s users? > > > I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to > do. Ok. > ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible > to have some words of normal printed text inside > ERT. > For example, if you need to do: > \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} > The "Special words" will print, and should therefore > be counted. I not think in this. Is very complex. > > Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a > perfect word count > is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better > choice. This work in most of cases. > The counting issue above may then be avoided by > having two ERT boxes > containing the commands only. Between them the > "special words" will > be written as normal text. The downside of this > approach is that the > two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cut > errors > may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, > which will cause > odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. > > Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is > a real problem? > Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. > > Helge Hafting > Marc, said that this is in bugzilla. I posted this question because, when I put problem with notes and word counter in bugzilla, I received a mail from Lyx team saying that this behaviour is rigth. Thanks Helge, Marc Marcelo __ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
Marcelo Acuña wrote: Hello, Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to do. ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible to have some words of normal printed text inside ERT. For example, if you need to do: \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} The Special words will print, and should therefore be counted. Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a perfect word count is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better choice. The counting issue above may then be avoided by having two ERT boxes containing the commands only. Between them the special words will be written as normal text. The downside of this approach is that the two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cutpaste errors may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, which will cause odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is a real problem? Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. Helge Hafting
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
Marcelo Acuña wrote: Hello, Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to do. ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible to have some words of normal printed text inside ERT. For example, if you need to do: \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} The Special words will print, and should therefore be counted. Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a perfect word count is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better choice. The counting issue above may then be avoided by having two ERT boxes containing the commands only. Between them the special words will be written as normal text. The downside of this approach is that the two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cutpaste errors may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, which will cause odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is a real problem? Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. Helge Hafting
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
Marcelo Acuña wrote: Hello, Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? I agree that skipping notes is the right thing to do. ERT is more tricky, for it is perfectly possible to have some words of normal printed text inside ERT. For example, if you need to do: \begin{myhighlight}Special words\end{myhighlight} The "Special words" will print, and should therefore be counted. Unfortunately, parsing latex in order to get a perfect word count is hard, so perhaps skipping ERT is the better choice. The counting issue above may then be avoided by having two ERT boxes containing the commands only. Between them the "special words" will be written as normal text. The downside of this approach is that the two latex boxes _must_ be matched pairs. Cut errors may then leave you with an extra ERT box somewhere, which will cause odd latex errors when you try to print or preview. Do you really have so much code in ERT that this is a real problem? Consider filing bugs at bugzilla.lyx.org. Helge Hafting
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: Hello, Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? Regards. Marcelo Hi. I think this is annoying, and *commands* in ERT should not be counted. For instance, write an equation and put an alpha in it, then write $\alpha$ in ERT. The ERT alpha will be counted, while the equation's will be ignored. However, this behaviour has already been reported, see bugs #2064 and #2566. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8zqiu4rFT+k3kmQRAmoeAJ0UbcIzikmKZtDi3e4Dkgq0VNUf5gCghLeF 7vb/uaDicmTKCJCJNUxrdQg= =VW/5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: Hello, Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. This is not usefull for me. I think that command in ERT must not be counted. I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in original language for further revision of translation, and so on. Again, count words in notes not make usefull information for me. What think about this other Lyx´s users? Regards. Marcelo Hi. I think this is annoying, and *commands* in ERT should not be counted. For instance, write an equation and put an alpha in it, then write $\alpha$ in ERT. The ERT alpha will be counted, while the equation's will be ignored. However, this behaviour has already been reported, see bugs #2064 and #2566. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8zqiu4rFT+k3kmQRAmoeAJ0UbcIzikmKZtDi3e4Dkgq0VNUf5gCghLeF 7vb/uaDicmTKCJCJNUxrdQg= =VW/5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: word counter: feature not usefull for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 En/na Marcelo Acuña ha escrit: > Hello, > Word counter count words in Notes and ERTs. > This is not usefull for me. > I think that command in ERT must not be counted. > I use notes for reminders, for keep quotes in > original language for further revision of translation, > and so on. > Again, count words in notes not make usefull > information for me. > What think about this other Lyx´s users? > > Regards. > Marcelo Hi. I think this is annoying, and *commands* in ERT should not be counted. For instance, write an equation and put an alpha in it, then write $\alpha$ in ERT. The ERT alpha will be counted, while the equation's will be ignored. However, this behaviour has already been reported, see bugs #2064 and #2566. Marc. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8zqiu4rFT+k3kmQRAmoeAJ0UbcIzikmKZtDi3e4Dkgq0VNUf5gCghLeF 7vb/uaDicmTKCJCJNUxrdQg= =VW/5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-