Re: RE:N810 internet tablet pc

2009-07-03 Thread daniel wilms
Hi Lokesh,

generally spoken I would not really recommend to run java on the tablets. But 
what do you need it for? Why do you want to take java?

I don't know, which instructions you followed to install it on the device, so 
that I think nobody can really help you, based on the information you've 
provided. But anyway, you could try to follow these [1] instructions.

[1] http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/Getting_started_with_Java_on_maemo

Cheers Daniel
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/

2009-07-03 Thread David Greaves
I thought this would be of interest to the list.

Also some good comments here:  http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/

David

-- 
Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once...

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/

2009-07-03 Thread Valerio Valerio
HI,

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves da...@dgreaves.com wrote:

 I thought this would be of interest to the list.

 Also some good comments here:  http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/


well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
problem with NM.
To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
rants here :P).

Best regards,

-- 
Valério Valério

http://www.valeriovalerio.org



 David

 --
 Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once...

 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/

2009-07-03 Thread Faheem Pervez
Agreed. I hate NetworkManager so badly. I had nothing but trouble with
it on a tablet (Mer) and on a desktop computer. I had to pin the
NetworkManager from Ubuntu Hardy when I upgraded as the newest version
gave me nothing but trouble.

icd2, the Network Manager used in Diablo, is probably the most
reliable manager I've used.

I find it hard to agree with the article due to my own experiences and
it is heavily biased.

More power to ConnMan!

Best Regards,
Faheem

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Valerio Valeriovdv...@gmail.com wrote:
 HI,

 On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves da...@dgreaves.com wrote:

 I thought this would be of interest to the list.

 Also some good comments here:  http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/

 well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
 with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
 'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
 gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
 problem with NM.
 To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
 a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
 rants here :P).

 Best regards,

 --
 Valério Valério

 http://www.valeriovalerio.org


 David

 --
 Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once...

 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers





 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Accessing contacts via d-bus

2009-07-03 Thread Tatu Lahtela
Hi,
Are there any examples on how I can access the addressbook via d-bus? By
looking at the dbus-monitor logs I seet that interfaces such as
org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook are used, but I've had no luck
getting anything out of them.

If anyone has done it, a short example with e.g. dbus-send or code would be
really appreciated on how I can e.g. get a list of my contacts.

cheers,
-- 
Tatu Lahtela laht...@iki.fi
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Accessing contacts via d-bus

2009-07-03 Thread Fred
Hi,

Contact-infos does access contact but not via DBus (via libebook API if 
I remember correctly) !
It then offers a DBus interface to allow users to choose the contact 
they want via a dialog.

ContactInfos can access built-in contact or GPE contacts ...

Fred


Tatu Lahtela a écrit :
 Hi,
 Are there any examples on how I can access the addressbook via d-bus? By 
 looking at the dbus-monitor logs I seet that interfaces such as 
 org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook are used, but I've had no 
 luck getting anything out of them.
 
 If anyone has done it, a short example with e.g. dbus-send or code would 
 be really appreciated on how I can e.g. get a list of my contacts.
 
 cheers,
 -- 
 Tatu Lahtela laht...@iki.fi mailto:laht...@iki.fi
 
 
 
 
 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Accessing contacts via d-bus

2009-07-03 Thread Antonio Aloisio
Hi,
I don't know if a D-Bus API exists or it it is public, but you could use the
C API as Fred told before.
In case you are using Qt, you have to use QLibrary [1] as we have done with
GConf [2].

BR,
Antonio

[1] http://doc.qtsoftware.com/4.5/qlibrary.html
[2]
http://qt.gitorious.org/+qt-maemo-developers/qt/qt-maemo/trees/maemo-internet-connectivity/src/network/maemo

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Fred f...@lefevere-laoide.net wrote:

 Hi,

 Contact-infos does access contact but not via DBus (via libebook API if
 I remember correctly) !
 It then offers a DBus interface to allow users to choose the contact
 they want via a dialog.

 ContactInfos can access built-in contact or GPE contacts ...

 Fred


 Tatu Lahtela a écrit :
  Hi,
  Are there any examples on how I can access the addressbook via d-bus? By
  looking at the dbus-monitor logs I seet that interfaces such as
  org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook are used, but I've had no
  luck getting anything out of them.
 
  If anyone has done it, a short example with e.g. dbus-send or code would
  be really appreciated on how I can e.g. get a list of my contacts.
 
  cheers,
  --
  Tatu Lahtela laht...@iki.fi mailto:laht...@iki.fi
 
 
  
 
  ___
  maemo-developers mailing list
  maemo-developers@maemo.org
  https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

 ___
 maemo-developers mailing list
 maemo-developers@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers




-- 

Rita Rudner http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/rita_rudner.html
- I was a vegetarian until I started leaning toward the sunlight.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Accessing contacts via d-bus

2009-07-03 Thread Ross Burton
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 14:45 +0300, Tatu Lahtela wrote:
 Are there any examples on how I can access the addressbook via d-bus?
 By looking at the dbus-monitor logs I seet that interfaces such as
 org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook are used, but I've had no
 luck getting anything out of them.
 
 If anyone has done it, a short example with e.g. dbus-send or code
 would be really appreciated on how I can e.g. get a list of my
 contacts.

Don't.  The DBus API to evolution-data-server isn't really stable (it
hasn't changed much recently but there are no assurances that it won't
change overnight) and if you do access it directly you'll need to
provide a vCard parser.  Just use libebook.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: r...@burtonini.com
  jabber: r...@burtonini.com
   www: http://burtonini.com


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for Fremantle and Diablo released

2009-07-03 Thread Mohammed Hassan
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Faheem Pervez wrote:
  You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
  already violating the GPL.
 
  Dave Neary wrote:
  I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
  that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
  Google's changes to the Linux kernel and Apache back upstream. It seems
  that I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
  tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.
 
 But Google isn't distributing their Linux Kernel or Apache, Nokia is
 distributing the initfs.

Which is why Nokia is violating the GPL (I haven't checked myself that
code is not being distributed for stuff in initfs).

I'd say the best option is to poke Quim Gil as I assume he's the correct
person to handle this (I'm CC'ing him although I assume he reads this
list).

Cheers,
 
-- 
Maemo Software
Nokia Devices

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Maemo Eclipse Integration project has just announced Beta 2 release

2009-07-03 Thread Jarmo.Tikka
Hi,

Maemo Eclipse Integration project has just announced Beta 2 release for Maemo 
IDE support and related components (that are ment to be used also without IDE 
like PC Connectivity).

http://maemo.org/news/announcements/maemo_eclipse_integration_2nd_edition_beta_2_released/

Have a nice time with IDE (or text editor of your own choice) programming...

Cheers,
//Jarmo

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for Fremantle and Diablo released

2009-07-03 Thread Mohammed Hassan
Oops. Forgot to CC him.

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Faheem Pervez wrote:
  You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
  already violating the GPL.
 
  Dave Neary wrote:
  I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
  that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
  Google's changes to the Linux kernel and Apache back upstream. It seems
  that I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
  tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.
 
 But Google isn't distributing their Linux Kernel or Apache, Nokia is
 distributing the initfs.

Which is why Nokia is violating the GPL (I haven't checked myself that
code is not being distributed for stuff in initfs).

I'd say the best option is to poke Quim Gil as I assume he's the correct
person to handle this (I'm CC'ing him although I assume he reads this
list).

Cheers,
 
-- 
Maemo Software
Nokia Devices

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for Fremantle and Diablo released

2009-07-03 Thread Nils Faerber
Dave Neary schrieb:
 Hi,
 
 Faheem Pervez wrote:
 You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
 already violating the GPL.
 
 I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
 that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
 Google's changes to the Linux kernel and Apache back upstream. It seems

Well, Google publishes all the sources, see
http://android.git.kernel.org/
This git seems impressively complete.

But this is OT here since we are talking about Nokia/Maemo.

Concerning obligations, Nokia nor anyone else is obliged by the license
to push changes upstream - it is just good practise. You only have to
give access to the changes or the whole (modified) source package, which
Nokia in 99.9% of the cases properly did and which Google using the git,
as far as we can tell from just looking at it, also did.

What we can really moan and complain about is the lack of good practise
with some businesses, since already mentioned, e.g. Google. They did a
pretty bad job in working *together* with the communities to get their
thing done. This is quite in contrast with Nokia which collaborated
quite well from the very early beginning of the Maemo project.
There is always room for improvement, but hey...

But what really sucks badly is the tivolization taking place especially
in the mobile phone area, where you get all the sources (due to license)
and probably most of the tools but you f*ckn' cannot get a modified
version of some part onto the device. This *really* sucks!
And frankly it really hurts me.
(For the Google stuff by some lucky coincidence the engineering
bootloader leaked and a way to root the device but this was not
intended neither by Google, HTC nor T-mobile). And here Nokia again is a
little more open than many others by providing the flasher util, which
basically allows you to install anything onto your tablet.

I sincerely hope that this openness continues when Nokia releases Linux
based mobile phones some day...

 that I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
 tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.

I might be wrong here but I am pretty sure that the GPL also requires
you to give access to the tools that were used to generate the shipped
version from the (L)GPLed sources.

A little more specifically see:

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/compliance-guide.html

section 4.2.3

So you need at least have to say which *exact* tools were used and how
they were used to produce the binary you shipped.
So you do not necessarily have to directly supply them but you have to
exactly name them and the way they ought to be used to reproduce the
binary you shipped.
Well, fair enough...
I would also expect, though it is not mentioned there directly, that
those tools have to available to everyone - with a price-tag maybe, but
must be available.

 Cheers,
 Dave.
Cheers
  nils faerber

-- 
kernel concepts GbRTel: +49-271-771091-12
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57072 Siegen Mob: +49-176-21024535
http://www.kernelconcepts.de
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: closed tools, Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for Fremantle an d Diablo released

2009-07-03 Thread quim.gil
Hi, I'm following the discussion but bare with me these days since I'm in the 
Desktop Summit well away from the office and the people to ask about this are 
very possibly on holidays until August (just like myself after the Summit).

If you think we are violating any license or doing something wrong in general 
please file a bug or ping in an existing one, CCing me. This is the best way to 
discuss and solve a problem between different people across the Summer.

Thank you!

Quim

--- original message ---
From: Hassan Mohammed.2 (Nokia-D/Helsinki) mohammed.2.has...@nokia.com
Subject: Re: closed tools,  Re: Maemo Flasher-3.5 Tool Beta for Fremantle 
and Diablo  released
Date: 3rd July 2009
Time: 3:53:52 pm


Oops. Forgot to CC him.

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 14:33 +0200, ext e...@okerson.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Faheem Pervez wrote:
  You sure you have a choice in the matter? Considering how you're
  already violating the GPL.

  Dave Neary wrote:
  I don't know the details of the situation. I just want to remind you
  that the GPL is a distribution licence. That's why we don't get all
  Google's changes to the Linux kernel and Apache back upstream. It seems
  that I've seen people say that Nokia doesn't even distribute the initfs
  tools. If that's the case, there wouldn't be any GPL violation.

 But Google isn't distributing their Linux Kernel or Apache, Nokia is
 distributing the initfs.

Which is why Nokia is violating the GPL (I haven't checked myself that
code is not being distributed for stuff in initfs).

I'd say the best option is to poke Quim Gil as I assume he's the correct
person to handle this (I'm CC'ing him although I assume he reads this
list).

Cheers,

--
Maemo Software
Nokia Devices

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers