Re: Download statistics

2010-03-19 Thread Cornelius Hald
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:37 +0100, Niels Breet wrote:
 On Wed, March 17, 2010 20:27, Cornelius Hald wrote:
  Nothing wrong with communicating such a change, though.
 
 I sometimes need a post-commit hook which sends a mail to the list, it
 seems :)

Wouldn't be bad :) I was just feeling stupid, because suddenly
everything worked as expected and I thought I did report a non-issue.

Anyways, thanks for fixing it!
Conny


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-18 Thread Niels Breet
On Wed, March 17, 2010 20:27, Cornelius Hald wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 19:58 +0100, Thomas Waelti wrote:

 Ok, that sounds good. Is app karma documented somewhere? I can only
 find this: http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Karma_for_applications



 Yes, http://wiki.maemo.org/Karma
 In fact, it's even nicely linked from your profile page Karma :-)


 That is karma for people. We were talking about karma for applications.


The karma for applications discussion was on this list, google should know.


 BTW, thanks Niels for silently fixing the Popular link. It's now
 pointing to http://maemo.org/downloads/score/Maemo5/25/
 instead of http://maemo.org/downloads/downloads/Maemo5/25/
 which makes a huge difference.

Sorry, doing many things at the same time so I forgot to answer your mail.
That link was obviously a bug that needed to be fixed. Thanks for
noticing.

 Nothing wrong with communicating such a change, though.

I sometimes need a post-commit hook which sends a mail to the list, it
seems :)



 Conny

--
Niels Breet
maemo.org webmaster


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Cornelius Hald
Hi,

it's great to have nicely working download statistics now! I'm just
wondering, what they are counting? Only downloads from Extras or also
from Extras-testing and Extras-devel? I assume it's only Extras, but I'm
a bit unsure because downloads are spiking during the last days and I've
only updated -devel versions.

Another thing: The graphs for OS2008 software are stuck in the middle of
January, whereas the graphs for Maemo5 show the middle of March. However
the Last updated information for both is 2010-03-16.

Thanks!
Conny


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Niels Breet
On Wed, March 17, 2010 10:01, Cornelius Hald wrote:
 Hi,


 it's great to have nicely working download statistics now! I'm just
 wondering, what they are counting? Only downloads from Extras or also from
 Extras-testing and Extras-devel? I assume it's only Extras, but I'm
 a bit unsure because downloads are spiking during the last days and I've
 only updated -devel versions.

It combines data for your package from all repositories.

 Another thing: The graphs for OS2008 software are stuck in the middle of
 January, whereas the graphs for Maemo5 show the middle of March. However
 the Last updated information for both is 2010-03-16.

That data is actually updated too. But the download figures are very low.
The graph only shows when there are real data points. Doesn't fill in the
days where there are no downloads.

Check omweather for instance, there you see data every day. Although the
numbers are low.

 Thanks!
 Conny

- Niels


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Cornelius Hald
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:43 +0100, Niels Breet wrote:
 It combines data for your package from all repositories.

Ok, this explains the spikes I'm currently seeing.

 Check omweather for instance, there you see data every day. Although the
 numbers are low.

Ok, I see. Thanks for explaining.

Would it be possible to give finer grained data to the developers? We
don't have to show that on the Downloads page, but it would be nice if
we could get downloads of an individual version in a specific
repository. That way I could see how many end users (extras) download my
application and whether or not downloads are increasing with each
version. Also I could see how many people actually using -devel releases
etc.

Also using the current download count for the Popular section of
Downloads seems a bit unfair then. Shouldn't it be at least
downloads/num_of_releases? Or better
downloads_from_extras/num_of_releases?
The way it is now, an application that pushes updates every day gets way
more downloads than an application with updates every month and that
even if the end users never see those updates because they have been to
extras-devel.

I realize this is probably a lot of work. But I think having finer
grained statistics would be really useful. What do other think?

Cheers!
Conny


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Cornelius Hald

Alberto Mardegan wrote:

Cornelius Hald wrote:

Also using the current download count for the Popular section of
Downloads seems a bit unfair then. Shouldn't it be at least
downloads/num_of_releases? Or better
downloads_from_extras/num_of_releases?


I don't think it's possible to know whether it is a new download, or an 
update.


No, I don´t think either. But if we get numbers for each release, we 
could see something like:


Ver  Downl.
0.2  1000
0.3  1200
0.4  1300
0.5   700
0.6   200

This would at least show, that with version 0.5 people have somehow lost 
interest. Maybe I´ve made some radical UI changes that most people don´t 
like. Or maybe there is another (better) tool for the same task, etc...


But maybe limiting the download count for the packages downloaded from 
Extras only makes more sense.


I would think so. I´m often releasing to extras-devel with really 
minimal changes - often primary to test something for myself. Other 
people who have extras-devel activated, will receive this updates as 
well but often it´s just too unimportant to count those as official 
downloads.


But I like the idea that a package with more frequent releases gets more 
visibility than others. :-)


That could still be possible. We could have Most frequently updated 
packages or something. We could also use the number of releases for the 
popularity rating. But I think the numbers first should be separated.


For example:
* AppA 20 releases with 20.000 total downloads. First release 1 year ago.
* AppB  2 releases with  5.000 total downloads. First release 1 month ago.

Which application is more popular? Which has more downloads? This shows, 
that is is especially unfair to young applications.


If we would have downloads/releases the situation would look differently:
* AppA: 1.000 average downloads
* AppB: 2.500 average downloads

Also, if we want to use the number of releases for popularity or 
something similar, we could set them in relation to time on market. 
Having something like average number of releases in the last month.


I think it would make the statistics between old and new applications 
more comparable and it could encourage community members to invest more 
in their young project if they can see that they basically have the same 
user base as, for example, omweather.


Cheers!
Conny
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Niels Breet
On Wed, March 17, 2010 12:58, Cornelius Hald wrote:
 Alberto Mardegan wrote:

 Cornelius Hald wrote:

 Also using the current download count for the Popular section of
 Downloads seems a bit unfair then. Shouldn't it be at least
 downloads/num_of_releases? Or better
 downloads_from_extras/num_of_releases?

 I don't think it's possible to know whether it is a new download, or an
  update.

 No, I don´t think either. But if we get numbers for each release, we
 could see something like:

 Ver  Downl.
 0.2  1000
 0.3  1200
 0.4  1300
 0.5   700
 0.6   200


 This would at least show, that with version 0.5 people have somehow lost
 interest. Maybe I´ve made some radical UI changes that most people don´t
 like. Or maybe there is another (better) tool for the same task, etc...

Lot of work, there are other more important things to fix first.
Statistics are nice to look at every once in a while, other than that..
There is this saying about lies.

 But maybe limiting the download count for the packages downloaded from
 Extras only makes more sense.


 Which application is more popular? Which has more downloads? This shows,
 that is is especially unfair to young applications.


This is why we have app karma, which drives the Popular list.

If you look that design discussion up, you'll see that we use _relative_
download change, comments and ratings on a daily basis.

Popular certainly doesn't show the most downloaded apps.


 Cheers!
 Conny

- Niels

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Cornelius Hald

Niels Breet wrote:

Lot of work, there are other more important things to fix first.
Statistics are nice to look at every once in a while, other than that..
There is this saying about lies.


When I was starting with maemo development, I also found it a source of 
motivation.



This is why we have app karma, which drives the Popular list.

If you look that design discussion up, you'll see that we use _relative_
download change, comments and ratings on a daily basis.


Ok, that sounds good. Is app karma documented somewhere? I can only find 
this: http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Karma_for_applications



Popular certainly doesn't show the most downloaded apps.


Hmm, well... partially. If you look at the Downloads start page, it 
looks like Hot/Popular is sorted by app karma. But if you follow the 
Popular link[1], you get the 25 most downloaded applications. No app 
karma there.


Cheers!
Conny

[1] http://maemo.org/downloads/downloads/Maemo5/25
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Thomas Waelti
 Ok, that sounds good. Is app karma documented somewhere? I can only find
 this: http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Karma_for_applications
 

Yes, http://wiki.maemo.org/Karma
In fact, it's even nicely linked from your profile page Karma :-)

Happy hacking
-Tom

___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


Re: Download statistics

2010-03-17 Thread Cornelius Hald
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 19:58 +0100, Thomas Waelti wrote:
  Ok, that sounds good. Is app karma documented somewhere? I can only find
  this: http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Karma_for_applications
  
 
 Yes, http://wiki.maemo.org/Karma
 In fact, it's even nicely linked from your profile page Karma :-)

That is karma for people. We were talking about karma for applications.

BTW, thanks Niels for silently fixing the Popular link. It's now
pointing to
http://maemo.org/downloads/score/Maemo5/25/
instead of
http://maemo.org/downloads/downloads/Maemo5/25/
which makes a huge difference.

Nothing wrong with communicating such a change, though.

Conny


___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers


download statistics and package changes

2010-02-01 Thread koos vriezen
Hi,

Is the download statistics going to be enabled again? For a month now,
I see that it can take two weeks to get statistics.

Also, at least for kmplayer, the changes on
http://maemo.org/downloads/product/Maemo5/kmplayer/ are updated to the
changes from the package in extras-(devel/testing) and not the one
that is in  extras.

Br
Koos
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers