N800/OS2008-Diablo and Bluetooth Headsets

2008-07-25 Thread John Holmblad
All,

I have gotten my GN/Jabra5020 bluetooth headset to pair successfully 
with my N800 running OS2008-Diablo and it works with the Internet radio 
app (mplayer?). However it does not seem to be useable with the FM radio 
on the N800.And in fact, if I plug in the headphones to the Headphone 
jack of the N800 even while the FM radio is off, it disables the 
bluetooth headset but does not cause the bluetooth connection to be 
disconnected. Does anyone know of a solution to this problem that would 
allow the use of a bluetooth headset with the FM radio?

-- 

Best Regards,

 

John Holmblad

 

Acadia Secure Networks, LLC


mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N800/OS2008-Diablo and Bluetooth Headsets

2008-07-25 Thread Julius Szelagiewicz
John,
you need the heaphones plugged in, since the wire is used as the
antenna. If i'm not mistaken, plugging the headphones in disables any
other sound output - very simple electrical disconnect.
julius

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, John Holmblad wrote:

 All,

 I have gotten my GN/Jabra5020 bluetooth headset to pair successfully
 with my N800 running OS2008-Diablo and it works with the Internet radio
 app (mplayer?). However it does not seem to be useable with the FM radio
 on the N800.And in fact, if I plug in the headphones to the Headphone
 jack of the N800 even while the FM radio is off, it disables the
 bluetooth headset but does not cause the bluetooth connection to be
 disconnected. Does anyone know of a solution to this problem that would
 allow the use of a bluetooth headset with the FM radio?

 --

 Best Regards,



 John Holmblad



 Acadia Secure Networks, LLC


 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N800/OS2008-Diablo and Bluetooth Headsets

2008-07-25 Thread Tuukka Tolvanen
Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:

   you need the heaphones plugged in, since the wire is used as the
 antenna. If i'm not mistaken, plugging the headphones in disables any
 other sound output - very simple electrical disconnect.

You're mistaken :) The fm radio ui has buttons to toggle between speaker 
and headphone output. As for the bt headset case, dunno.

 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, John Holmblad wrote:

 I have gotten my GN/Jabra5020 bluetooth headset to pair successfully
 with my N800 running OS2008-Diablo and it works with the Internet radio
 app (mplayer?). However it does not seem to be useable with the FM radio
 on the N800.And in fact, if I plug in the headphones to the Headphone
 jack of the N800 even while the FM radio is off, it disables the
 bluetooth headset but does not cause the bluetooth connection to be
 disconnected. Does anyone know of a solution to this problem that would
 allow the use of a bluetooth headset with the FM radio?

't.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: N800/OS2008-Diablo and Bluetooth Headsets

2008-07-25 Thread John Holmblad
Tukka,

and as far as I have been able to determine, there is no third position 
for the toggle (i.e. connect the radio output  to the processor so it 
can be handed off to the bluetooth headset).

Best Regards,

 

John Holmblad

 

Acadia Secure Networks, LLC

* *




Tuukka Tolvanen wrote:
 Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:

   
   you need the heaphones plugged in, since the wire is used as the
 antenna. If i'm not mistaken, plugging the headphones in disables any
 other sound output - very simple electrical disconnect.
 

 You're mistaken :) The fm radio ui has buttons to toggle between speaker 
 and headphone output. As for the bt headset case, dunno.

   
 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, John Holmblad wrote:
 

   
 I have gotten my GN/Jabra5020 bluetooth headset to pair successfully
 with my N800 running OS2008-Diablo and it works with the Internet radio
 app (mplayer?). However it does not seem to be useable with the FM radio
 on the N800.And in fact, if I plug in the headphones to the Headphone
 jack of the N800 even while the FM radio is off, it disables the
 bluetooth headset but does not cause the bluetooth connection to be
 disconnected. Does anyone know of a solution to this problem that would
 allow the use of a bluetooth headset with the FM radio?
   

 't.
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


   

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread Erik Hovland
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:11:48AM -0500, Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
 Will the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?

Yes.

 Can it redirect all audio in/out to a bluetooth headset?

It can and it does when the headset is active.

 Can skype on the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?

Yes, I have used skype with my N810 to conduct skype calls.

 Is A2DP supported?

No idea.

E

-- 
Erik Hovland
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://hovland.org/
PGP/GPG public key available on request

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread Jeffrey Mark Siskind
Will the N810 work with a bluetooth headset? Can it redirect all audio in/out
to a bluetooth headset? Can skype on the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?
Is A2DP supported?

Jeff (http://www.ece.purdue.edu/~qobi)
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread DrFredC.com
The n800 with OS2008 works well with most every single ear/mic bluetooth 
headset I've used. Pairs with USB blue tooth dongles for laptops that 
are now running less than $10 a unit.  Connects with bluetooth phones 
easily for pushing files to your phone.  It's supposedly the same in the 
n810 -- same OS.  All the audio goes thru to the bluetooth headset when 
they are paired.  You can walk around most of the house without losing 
bluetooth connection between your earpiece and tablet. 

Fine print -- I don't know about stereo bluetooth headsets playing 
stereo or audio quality of the stereo signal, if it's in stereo...

Also, if you've got a lot of bluetooth devices in the house that you've 
connected to, they all can show up on your bluetooth neighborhood if 
they are active.

* I'm not sure what the tablet's power comsumption issues having a
  robust bluetooth neighborhood might be.  It seems it could be
  significant...
* I also noted that my laptop with a bluetooth dongle was picked up
  by my n800 and, after pairing up, using the file manager on my
  n800, I was able to move files around on my wife's laptop thru the
  house wireless LAN thru the bluetooth to my laptop which is on the
  house wireless LAN.  I also grabbed some mp3s and moved them to my
  tablet. It wasn't a real fast transfer, but workable. 
* If my son is using his bluetooth headset with his laptop dongle, I
  can also connect to his laptop in his bedroom thru bluetooth if he
  returns the pairing code. 
* Supposedly, I might be able to pair with his headset in his
  bedroom if its not already paired with his laptop dongle and is
  put into discovery mode and I grab it before he pairs with it on
  his laptop.
* I can pick up his cell phone's bluetooth if it's on, ditto for my
  cell phone.  You can transfer files between the tablet and phone
  and phone's micro SD card via bluetooth.  Works to put mp3s on the
  phone to make it an MP3 player.  I'm not sure about audio
  bluetooth hookup with the phone -- I've not gone there.  We don't
  have data services enabled, so I've not gone there...  I recall
  when connecting my phone to my laptop via bluetooth, there may
  have been icons for audio in the phone's bluetooth list. 


Again, I'm not sure of the tablet's power comsumption for all this 
bluetooth activity.  Could be high with so much bluetooth stuff going 
on... 

Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
 Will the N810 work with a bluetooth headset? Can it redirect all audio in/out
 to a bluetooth headset? Can skype on the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?
 Is A2DP supported?

 Jeff (http://www.ece.purdue.edu/~qobi)
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


   

-- 

Always, Dr Fred C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread Frédéric Crozat
On Feb 6, 2008 5:25 PM, Erik Hovland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:11:48AM -0500, Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
  Will the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?

 Yes.

  Can it redirect all audio in/out to a bluetooth headset?

 It can and it does when the headset is active.

But sound will be crappy because A2DP is not supported officially yet.

  Can skype on the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?

 Yes, I have used skype with my N810 to conduct skype calls.

  Is A2DP supported?

 No idea.

Not yet officially. It is available but disabled and you need to play
with mplayer if you want to get it working (somehow).


-- 
Frederic Crozat
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread John Holmblad
DrFredC

Thanks for sharing that. It reminds me of why I should want to upgrade 
to OS2008.

The bluetooth lives to pair nature of the N800/N810 w OS2008 reminds 
me of the work that Joshua Wright of Aruba Networks has done to 
investigate and document some of the security weaknesses of the protocol 
and its implementations. Here is the url to the www page for a video 
where he discusses this and serves 
as..wellthe man in the middle:


http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/clips/how-to-eavesdrop-on-bluetooth-headsets-328664.php

Hey wait a minute isn't that perp using a Nokia Internet Tablet to 
commit his nefarious act?


Best Regards,

 

John Holmblad

 

Acadia Secure Networks, LLC

* *

*Serving the entrepreneurial enterprise, emerging network service 
provider, and SmartDigital^TM home markets*

* *

*GSEC Gold,  GCWN Gold,  GAWN,  GGSC-0100,  NSA-IAM,  NSA-IEM***

*Microsoft Small Business Specialist | Speakeasy Certified VOIP Partner 
| Linksys Authorized LVS Partner | Qualys Certified Qualysguard Specialist*

* *

(M) 703 407 2278

(F)  703 620 5388

 

(W) www.acadiasecure.com

 

primary email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

backup email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



DrFredC.com wrote:
 The n800 with OS2008 works well with most every single ear/mic bluetooth 
 headset I've used. Pairs with USB blue tooth dongles for laptops that 
 are now running less than $10 a unit.  Connects with bluetooth phones 
 easily for pushing files to your phone.  It's supposedly the same in the 
 n810 -- same OS.  All the audio goes thru to the bluetooth headset when 
 they are paired.  You can walk around most of the house without losing 
 bluetooth connection between your earpiece and tablet. 

 Fine print -- I don't know about stereo bluetooth headsets playing 
 stereo or audio quality of the stereo signal, if it's in stereo...

 Also, if you've got a lot of bluetooth devices in the house that you've 
 connected to, they all can show up on your bluetooth neighborhood if 
 they are active.

 * I'm not sure what the tablet's power comsumption issues having a
   robust bluetooth neighborhood might be.  It seems it could be
   significant...
 * I also noted that my laptop with a bluetooth dongle was picked up
   by my n800 and, after pairing up, using the file manager on my
   n800, I was able to move files around on my wife's laptop thru the
   house wireless LAN thru the bluetooth to my laptop which is on the
   house wireless LAN.  I also grabbed some mp3s and moved them to my
   tablet. It wasn't a real fast transfer, but workable. 
 * If my son is using his bluetooth headset with his laptop dongle, I
   can also connect to his laptop in his bedroom thru bluetooth if he
   returns the pairing code. 
 * Supposedly, I might be able to pair with his headset in his
   bedroom if its not already paired with his laptop dongle and is
   put into discovery mode and I grab it before he pairs with it on
   his laptop.
 * I can pick up his cell phone's bluetooth if it's on, ditto for my
   cell phone.  You can transfer files between the tablet and phone
   and phone's micro SD card via bluetooth.  Works to put mp3s on the
   phone to make it an MP3 player.  I'm not sure about audio
   bluetooth hookup with the phone -- I've not gone there.  We don't
   have data services enabled, so I've not gone there...  I recall
   when connecting my phone to my laptop via bluetooth, there may
   have been icons for audio in the phone's bluetooth list. 


 Again, I'm not sure of the tablet's power comsumption for all this 
 bluetooth activity.  Could be high with so much bluetooth stuff going 
 on... 

 Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
   
 Will the N810 work with a bluetooth headset? Can it redirect all audio in/out
 to a bluetooth headset? Can skype on the N810 work with a bluetooth headset?
 Is A2DP supported?

 Jeff (http://www.ece.purdue.edu/~qobi)
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


   
 

   

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread Kevin T. Neely
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:11:48AM -0500, Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
 Is A2DP supported?
 

IIRC, there was a relatively involved post to this list regarding the hack to 
make the tablet talk A2DP, check the archives.  

I suspect that before the year is out, we'll have relatively simple to use A2DP 
for the tablet.  The state of support now reminds me of the support for 
bluetooth keyboards about two years ago.

hope that helps,
K

-- 
In Vino Veritas
http://astroturfgarden.com



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: bluetooth headsets

2008-02-06 Thread Brad Midgley
fwiw

bluez-utils 3.25 has the best sbc codec performance yet on the omap
processor. Cidorvan Leite has been combing over generated code and
working in reorganization  assembly to make it hum along much better.
:)

there's still integration to be done with maemo of course. When it's
all done, we should be able to do hardware audio mixing and then
compress and transmit the resulting stream. It would be mostly
transparent to the audio apps.

Brad
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-07 Thread Mike Klein
Toshiba was able to cram multiple forms of cellular into their toughbook
series...all mini-pci I think.

There was a new ultra-rugged military-grade umpc recently announced
(hi-vol sales only...$5K!!!) that had multiple forms of radios.

What happened to those software-programmable radios man?

So folks...when the OpenMoko linux phone (large touchscreen display...I
think)...is released...will they sell well? I think so. Form factor is
so close to N800...and so many parts redundant (speaker, mic, bt, etc,
etc.)...

Well folks...time for me to end thread...I've ridden this horse long
enough and need to get off...


thanks all...

mike

Neil MacLeod wrote:
 Mike Klein wrote:

 I'm in the no built-in cellular camp - for me, this was a smart move
 as I can use the N800 with whatever phone I have now (GSM/GPRS) and
 with whatever phone I get with my next upgrade (almost certainly a
 GSM/HSDPA phone).

 Nokia probably took a look at the data plans offered by most network
 providers around the world, saw things were bad (ie. charging the
 Earth per megabyte with all sorts of usage restrictions - no voip etc.
 - and transfer caps) and decided the World simply isn't ready for mass
 consumer internet on the move over mobile networks. In which case, why
 bother complicating the N800 with this potentially unnecessary
 hardware? And aside from business users, few people will have
 data-only SIMs when they can just as easily use their mobile phone
 over Bluetooth.

 Also, by adding cellular hardware the Internet Tablet suddenly becomes
 regionalised - CDMA for USA/Korea, GSM for the rest of the world, not
 to mention all the HDSPA/EDGE/EVDO/Whatever high-speed variants.
 Different hardware and possibly different firmware for each region -
 nice!

 Summary: No phone hardware == Master stroke

 :)

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 01:05 -0500, Mike Lococo wrote:
  The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.
  It's a long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's
  a conscious decision.
  
  No argument here - It seems like the exclusion was conscious, but I
  can't figure out why.
 
 It's being actively worked on.  The reason for the delay is, I believe, 
 the work required to get things running in the bluetooth driver within 
 in the linux kernel.  Not that any of this excuses how long it's taken, 
 but the request isn't being ignored.

Here are the tickets for bluetooth headsets:

Current:
https://maemo.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474

Old:
https://maemo.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=668

Laurent
http://guerby.org/blog/

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Brian Waite
I do not intend this as a flame, but you chose the wrong device. 
You want a laptop/tablet PC and you'll have to pay for it in both size and 
cost. Just putting together a package like the N800.770 is is a feat. Look at 
UMPCs and see what you can find, but I'd challenge you to find one that will 
do what you want for twice the price of the N800.

On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
  The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.  It's a
  long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's a conscious decision.
 
  With BT headsets, these would be THE internet devices.
 
  sean

 Correction...single worst problem is that N800 doesn't perhaps have
 enough cpu to stream videos cleanly. This issue can't be fixed perhaps
 by a better driver. Re-encoding stuff sucks.
N800 is getting close, but to stream video (that people don't adequately 
encode) you really need power. Power == CPU speed (DSP) == Power consumption 
== BIgger battery.

 2nd is no builtin keyboard of any kind. Handheld bt keyboards suck.
This is an internet tablet. Browsing/reading email does not really need a 
keyboard. A keyboard makes this already a bit to large device, way to large 
to fit in a pocket.


 3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.

OpinionBy far the best choice! 
Why? Well adding cell support jumps the cost up probably another $100 US. and 
secondly this puts pressure on the cell market. Right now there is no 
competition. I know wifi is still not ubiquitous, and the N800 does not 
replace the cell phone, but it adds some pressure that will keep growing. 
Maybe cell cos will start dropipping prices/adding features to stay 
competitive. 
/Opinion

Again, this is not a flame. I am just expressing the fact that your 3 major 
drawbacks to the device are the 3 most interesting features for me. (well I 
would like more CPU power, but who doesn't).
I do look forward to BT headsets tho! I hate the wire to my head when 
listening to music. It is the last wire ! 


Thanks
Brian

  ___
  maemo-users mailing list
  maemo-users@maemo.org
  https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Kimmo Hämäläinen
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, ext Jonathan Greene wrote:
...
 It would also be nice if we could get (think it's called) OBEX support
 built in so you could bluetooth beam files back and forth between
 phones and computers.  The file manager does a nice job letting you
 browse a bluetooth device (at least my phone) but it's not quite the
 same thing.

OBEX is there already, and File Manager uses it. It's implemented
through the Gnome VFS. 
You can use it manually from Xterm like this:

gnomevfs-copy file:///home/user/MyDocs/foo.jpg
obex://[xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx]/folder/foo.jpg

where xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx is the Bluetooth address of the destination
(it must be paired first).

BR; Kimmo

 
 Let's hope future firmware updates include enhancements as well as fixes.
 
 JG
 
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Mike Klein
Zoran Kolic wrote:
 Correction...single worst problem is that N800 doesn't perhaps have
 enough cpu to stream videos cleanly. This issue can't be fixed perhaps
 by a better driver. Re-encoding stuff sucks.
 

 More cpu, more power consumption. Buy desktop.

   
Actually no...buy a Pepper Pad 3. It's small enough to carry between
home/car/work. N800 is minimal fill-in for situations other than these
three.

My PP3 mounted on my car dash is a far superior car computer than N800.
Better display, more rugged, etc.
 2nd is no builtin keyboard of any kind. Handheld bt keyboards suck.
 

 Laptop has it.

   
 3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
 

 Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.

 Zoran


 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
   

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Mike Klein
Brian Waite wrote:
 I do not intend this as a flame, but you chose the wrong device. 
 You want a laptop/tablet PC and you'll have to pay for it in both size and 
 cost. Just putting together a package like the N800.770 is is a feat. Look at 
 UMPCs and see what you can find, but I'd challenge you to find one that will 
 do what you want for twice the price of the N800.

   
My iPAQ hx4700 doesn't require re-encoding video...and I can play at
resolutions that match device capabilities. It cost me $600 several
years ago. Very powerful Intel Bulverde cpu.

My Pepper Pad 3 (cost $600?) streams 95% of formats I want (except
realplayer w/auth and certain newer flash) and has ended up being the
more versatile device for me...whether at home or in car or at work and
in meetings.

 On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
   
 The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.  It's a
 long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's a conscious decision.

 With BT headsets, these would be THE internet devices.

 sean
   
 Correction...single worst problem is that N800 doesn't perhaps have
 enough cpu to stream videos cleanly. This issue can't be fixed perhaps
 by a better driver. Re-encoding stuff sucks.
 
 N800 is getting close, but to stream video (that people don't adequately 
 encode) you really need power. Power == CPU speed (DSP) == Power consumption 
 == BIgger battery.
   
My hx4700 ipaq and PP3 batteries last long enough for me...and both
stream large format huge file size mpegs/etc.

 2nd is no builtin keyboard of any kind. Handheld bt keyboards suck.
 
 This is an internet tablet. Browsing/reading email does not really need a 
 keyboard. A keyboard makes this already a bit to large device, way to large 
 to fit in a pocket.

   
I feel you are presenting too simplistic a usage scenario...yeah 60% of
the time I'm just clicking...but opening an xterm to do linux stuff or
entering data into any web form is a pain in the arse. If I'm using the
N800 to check email (valid, right?)...do I not reply to things I'm
reading? Same goes for IM. Cmon man...every other device now has builtin
retractable or other kind of keyboard. PP3 did it right with backlit
keypad...which you can get quite proficient with.

I find the N800 screen soft like pudding, too easily scratchable
w/stylus and quite fond of misrecognition of keystrokes...notice how it
beeps even when a keypress isn't recognized? It's a real pain to type in
any kind of data.

With my PP3 I have builtin keypad...with my iPAQ I have snap-on keyboard
which integrates fairly well into cases/etc.
 3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.

 
 OpinionBy far the best choice! 
 Why? Well adding cell support jumps the cost up probably another $100 US. and 
 secondly this puts pressure on the cell market. Right now there is no 
 competition. I know wifi is still not ubiquitous, and the N800 does not 
 replace the cell phone, but it adds some pressure that will keep growing. 
 Maybe cell cos will start dropipping prices/adding features to stay 
 competitive. 
 /Opinion

   
Money isn't the issue for me...we're all geeks spending boatloads of
money on this technology. I am more than willing to spend extra $$$ for
cpu, disk, 3g, etc. I just want it open (as much as possible) and WORKING.

 Again, this is not a flame. I am just expressing the fact that your 3 major 
 drawbacks to the device are the 3 most interesting features for me. (well I 
 would like more CPU power, but who doesn't).
 I do look forward to BT headsets tho! I hate the wire to my head when 
 listening to music. It is the last wire ! 


 Thanks
 Brian

   
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
   
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
 

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Jonathan Matthews-Levine

On 2/6/07, Mike Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Tobacco...buy it at your corner store. Next year when Nokia releases
next model w/3G we can discuss further.


Over my dead 770 ... :-)


Dude...you just don't understand. There are two models which are equally
valid...each device to it's own and the convergence model. People want
both...not everybody wants to wear a geek jacket with pockets for
their iPod, phone and N800.


You ... you've been SPYING on me?!?? ;-)

I agree, though - there /are/ two models.  I think that Nokia's
addressing the convergence-luvvas quite nicely with their (much much
much more numerous) smart phone offerings.  The N800, however, is a
deliberate step to the other end of the spectrum - single device,
single purpose (where purpose==Internet, not www, IM, or
VOIP.)


Why should I carry around 2 devices of roughly same form factor?!?


You shouldn't.

In my idealised PAN-filled future, your phone doesn't have the same
form factor as today; it's merely a voice/audio conduit, attaching
itself wirelessly to the connectivity cube that talks
wifi/BT/3G/GPRS/etc and is the gateway router out of your PAN.


Why
should I deal with the BT-pairing/bonding crap involved with two
different devices?


*More* than two ...
... but only once each :-)


Have you ever been jamming to tunes on your ipaq/pod
and a call came in? It is an often unelegant scramble to answer the
phone on your headset.


Not personally, no.
Maybe I need more friends ... :-(


Every high-end umpc or ppc form factor has cellular as option...larger
tablets...umpcs...and ppc devices like treo/etc.

You state: I don't *want* convergence...I don't *want* a browser on my
phone

But guess what? Many people DO want convergence...phones are getting
crammed with PIM/web features and screen sizes are shooting upand
conversely pocket pcs/etc. are getting cellular capability.


Cool - let them buy the N93 or other such devices. *I've* got the 770
and N800 ... :-)


It's a computer...not a phone.


Absolutely.  Why, therefore, should it have dedicated cellular phone
hardware in it?

Jonathan
--
Jonathan Matthews-Levine|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 That sounds vaguely obscene, and if there's one thing I
 cannot *stand*, it's vagueness. -- Dean Grennell
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread DJ Delorie

Mike Lococo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 It's being actively worked on.

Not that we can tell.  Hey Nokia, we want to help!  Really!

 The reason for the delay is, I believe, the work required to get
 things running in the bluetooth driver within in the linux kernel.

If they had published the key specs back when it would be done by
now.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Mike Klein
Depending upon device and it's features/quality...I could go either
dedicated device route or convergence all-in-one route.

Knock with all-in-one devices (like stereos) is you often get crap you
don't want and solution is watered downvalid points.

I thought at one time that my eensy-teensy T68i BT phone was ideal
conduit for my PDAs/tablets/etc. for connectivity purposes.

But you know what? I can't deal with a phone the size of a chiclet. I
have piano fingers and still can't reliably press those little buttons.

I recently purchased the Freedom BT mini-keyboardbig mistake.
Finger ergonomics and keycodes available are pathetic. Holding keyboard
dongle while also holding/balancing N800 will be a trick.

I'm willing to defer my last 2 points for next-gen model...at least
there are workarounds. But fact that N800 won't reliably play most
videos...and at resolution of device...is a big problem for me. Software
and hardware on device s/be in sync w/each other.

The nokia N80 phone supports upnp (as do other models I think)...but
given N800 support for video...I can't imagine N80 being any better.

Phone? PDA? All the same to me...I'm just looking for features.


mike

Jonathan Matthews-Levine wrote:
 On 2/6/07, Mike Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tobacco...buy it at your corner store. Next year when Nokia releases
 next model w/3G we can discuss further.

 Over my dead 770 ... :-)

 Dude...you just don't understand. There are two models which are equally
 valid...each device to it's own and the convergence model. People want
 both...not everybody wants to wear a geek jacket with pockets for
 their iPod, phone and N800.

 You ... you've been SPYING on me?!?? ;-)

 I agree, though - there /are/ two models.  I think that Nokia's
 addressing the convergence-luvvas quite nicely with their (much much
 much more numerous) smart phone offerings.  The N800, however, is a
 deliberate step to the other end of the spectrum - single device,
 single purpose (where purpose==Internet, not www, IM, or
 VOIP.)

 Why should I carry around 2 devices of roughly same form factor?!?

 You shouldn't.

 In my idealised PAN-filled future, your phone doesn't have the same
 form factor as today; it's merely a voice/audio conduit, attaching
 itself wirelessly to the connectivity cube that talks
 wifi/BT/3G/GPRS/etc and is the gateway router out of your PAN.

 Why
 should I deal with the BT-pairing/bonding crap involved with two
 different devices?

 *More* than two ...
 ... but only once each :-)

 Have you ever been jamming to tunes on your ipaq/pod
 and a call came in? It is an often unelegant scramble to answer the
 phone on your headset.

 Not personally, no.
 Maybe I need more friends ... :-(

 Every high-end umpc or ppc form factor has cellular as option...larger
 tablets...umpcs...and ppc devices like treo/etc.

 You state: I don't *want* convergence...I don't *want* a browser on my
 phone

 But guess what? Many people DO want convergence...phones are getting
 crammed with PIM/web features and screen sizes are shooting upand
 conversely pocket pcs/etc. are getting cellular capability.

 Cool - let them buy the N93 or other such devices. *I've* got the 770
 and N800 ... :-)

 It's a computer...not a phone.

 Absolutely.  Why, therefore, should it have dedicated cellular phone
 hardware in it?

 Jonathan
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Levi Bard

I agree, though - there /are/ two models.  I think that Nokia's
addressing the convergence-luvvas quite nicely with their (much much
much more numerous) smart phone offerings.  The N800, however, is a
deliberate step to the other end of the spectrum - single device,
single purpose (where purpose==Internet, not www, IM, or
VOIP.)


I agree (I'm in the second group).  There are people that want the ITs
to be smartphone replacements, PC replacements, PDA replacements, etc,
and they're all clamoring for that one thing that was *so obvious*
that they can't see how Nokia left it out.

IMO the great thing about the ITs is that they're so customizable that
it's like having a blank slate.  Here, I have GNU/Linux, wifi, and a
web browser; make me into whatever you want.

--
Just stop and take your secret journey, you will be a new box. --Leeta
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Wiktowy

On 2/6/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
 3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.


Sarcasm aside, Zoran has a very good point. Putting cellular
capability on the IT would be as appropriate as putting it on a
washing machine. While it would be great to be able to talk to someone
while doing laundry, it is not really the purpose of the machine.

I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
next-gen phone built in.

Reasons:
- It would add $100 to the cost
- It would be a purchase that keeps on costing a monthly fee and cost
even more when using it traveling
- I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine
... most people have
- It would tie it to region/plan that would be difficult to transfer out of
- It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the
longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT
- It would consume a great deal more power

I think these ITs make a good break from legacy tech like cellular and
leave that crowded market to other models.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Paul Klapperich

On 2/6/07, Michael Wiktowy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
next-gen phone built in.



Me neither

- I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine

... most people have
...


- It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the

longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT



GSM in the N800 would be cool for interweb, but this thing is horribly
designed for a phone. It would only work well with a headset, and we all saw
how the Palm Tungsten W flopped.

Phones like Treos and the upcomming iPhone have screen too small for
browsing, but make decent phones. Other phones make great phones. I'd rather
have a great phone and a great tablet.

I'm just looking for a small, barebones phone that has bluetooth.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Acadia Secure Networks

Michael,

in the U.S. all three of Cingular (HSDPA), Verizon (EVDO), and Sprint 
(EVDO) have deployed broadband mobile wireless services with a national 
footprint that, if Sprint's vision is correct will become, in Sprint's 
case,  a stepping stone to full WIMAX deployment a few years down the road.


Nokia is, in fact working with Sprint in the area of WIMAX and  and I 
would be very surprised if Nokia are not considering to put WIMAX into a 
future version of the N800 or something close to it. 

I happen to use Verizon's EVDO service and it is very good in terms of 
bandwidth and U.S. geographic footprint. It supports VOIP satisfactorily 
and it is being upgraded to higher (Rev. A) performance, as is Sprints 
EVDO network.


I have managed to test out how the wireless tethering of the N800 to 
the Verizon EVDO service via a Verizon handset using bluetooth works but 
it would be much nicer if I could lose the handset and use a future 
version of the N800 with EVDO and eventually WIMAX in its place.


I actually think that the biggest impediment to such a scenario is not 
so much the need to jam another radio into the N800 form factor as it is 
the fact that Windows Mobile proves to be much more useful in the 
corporate world (which is where most of the money to purchase these high 
end handsets comes from) than a N800.  If the Nokia product cannot meet 
the same application needs then it will not be competitive in this 
market segment.


Although they are expensive, several handset manufacturers, and, in 
particular, HTC and its reseller UTStarcom, have produced multi radio 
handsets (EVDO/802.11/CDMA/Bluetooth/IR) that are quite compact, albeit 
power-hungry, especially with 802.11 turned on.  Here is the url to one 
such product available for both the Sprint and the Verizon Networks in 
the U.S.:


  
http://www.utstar.com/pcd/view_phone_details.aspx?mcode=PPC6700sAct=0


Most of these high end handsets run Windows Mobile 5.0 but it would be 
nice for Nokia to provide some competition in this segment by adding, 
for the US market, a CDMA/EVDO radio or GSM/HSDPA chipset to a future 
version of the N800 product.



Best Regards,



John Holmblad







[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 2/6/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
 3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.


Sarcasm aside, Zoran has a very good point. Putting cellular
capability on the IT would be as appropriate as putting it on a
washing machine. While it would be great to be able to talk to someone
while doing laundry, it is not really the purpose of the machine.

I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
next-gen phone built in.

Reasons:
- It would add $100 to the cost
- It would be a purchase that keeps on costing a monthly fee and cost
even more when using it traveling
- I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine
... most people have
- It would tie it to region/plan that would be difficult to transfer 
out of

- It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the
longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT
- It would consume a great deal more power

I think these ITs make a good break from legacy tech like cellular and
leave that crowded market to other models.
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Wiktowy

On 2/6/07, Paul Klapperich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm just looking for a small, barebones phone that has bluetooth.


I really think this is the way to go. I would love to find something
even simpler; a barebones little box that acts like a GSM modem with a
BT interface ... I don't even care if it has a keypad or a screen.
Unfortunately, all the cell providers in my area like to sell bundles,
don't have unlimited data-plans and gouge for data transfers. There
are roll-outs of Wimax starting but that emphasizes my point about not
building in a cellular technology that will be obsolete.

I currently have a BT GPS that works well with my ITs and I can put it
on the dashboard of my vehicle where it will get good reception. If I
want to use the upcoming European Galileo or the Russian GLONASS or
the Chinese Beidou system then I can buy a little BT transceiver for
those systems (maybe ... I have never tried).

That kind of modularity works really well and allows piece-wise
replacement and mixing-matching of components if things stop working
or infrastructure need/provision changes.

I think the above also addresses John Holmblad's comments that came in
after I started this email.

/Mike
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Mike Klein


Michael Wiktowy wrote:
 On 2/6/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
  3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
 Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.

 Sarcasm aside, Zoran has a very good point. Putting cellular
 capability on the IT would be as appropriate as putting it on a
 washing machine. While it would be great to be able to talk to someone
 while doing laundry, it is not really the purpose of the machine.

Sarcasm aside?!?...and you back up the washing machine quote?? Sigh...

I'll bet you $100 american  that it comes to the N800...prob' by next
year. Openmoko and other open source linux phones are arriving...
 I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
 next-gen phone built in.

You might not but I think many would. My ipaq 4700 cost $650 and they
flew out the door. Zero cellular.

N800 + cellular = $500...a deal to me.
 Reasons:
 - It would add $100 to the cost
 - It would be a purchase that keeps on costing a monthly fee and cost
 even more when using it traveling
So does your phone. Swap the sim from your phone to your N800done.
 - I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine
 ... most people have
Bare bones cell phones don't generally have BT. Addnly verizon phones
have crippled BT.
 - It would tie it to region/plan that would be difficult to transfer
 out of
 - It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the
 longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT
 - It would consume a great deal more power

Unlike perhaps many on forums...battery life isn't the biggest deal for
me. I'm content to have 1 or 2 extra battery packs around. If I had a
FULLY loaded N800...I'd be content with 2 hour battery life. Can plug
into my car for charging or use the packs.

I'm rarely climbing the himalayas and without power sources.
 I think these ITs make a good break from legacy tech like cellular and
 leave that crowded market to other models.
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Mike Klein
I have been holding off on 3G data plan due to horrific costs and
questions about availability/robustness.

Cingular's plan is like $80/mo for all you can eat. Given there are
comments regarding voice calls dropping when data is incoming and vice
versa...I'll be a late adopter thanks.

In S.F. there are supposedly multiple forms of 3gbut none of them
work any significant length down 280 freeway...another deal-breaker for me.

Additionally there is no coverage where my 2nd home is. The thought of
going to cellular possibly for voice and data (no dsl/cable for isp)
is somewhat appealing. I have even considered a 3g/cellular
repeater/antenna installed on my house ($500 generally).

I recently dropped newspaper subscriptions due to owning PepperPad3 and
being quite pleased with streaming/reading capabilities...and am looking
to drop cable tv ($70/mo) when Netflix's streaming service comes of age.


mike

Acadia Secure Networks wrote:
 Michael,

 in the U.S. all three of Cingular (HSDPA), Verizon (EVDO), and Sprint
 (EVDO) have deployed broadband mobile wireless services with a
 national footprint that, if Sprint's vision is correct will become, in
 Sprint's case,  a stepping stone to full WIMAX deployment a few years
 down the road.

 Nokia is, in fact working with Sprint in the area of WIMAX and  and I
 would be very surprised if Nokia are not considering to put WIMAX into
 a future version of the N800 or something close to it. 

 I happen to use Verizon's EVDO service and it is very good in terms of
 bandwidth and U.S. geographic footprint. It supports VOIP
 satisfactorily and it is being upgraded to higher (Rev. A)
 performance, as is Sprints EVDO network.

 I have managed to test out how the wireless tethering of the N800 to
 the Verizon EVDO service via a Verizon handset using bluetooth works
 but it would be much nicer if I could lose the handset and use a
 future version of the N800 with EVDO and eventually WIMAX in its place.

 I actually think that the biggest impediment to such a scenario is not
 so much the need to jam another radio into the N800 form factor as it
 is the fact that Windows Mobile proves to be much more useful in the
 corporate world (which is where most of the money to purchase these
 high end handsets comes from) than a N800.  If the Nokia product
 cannot meet the same application needs then it will not be competitive
 in this market segment.

 Although they are expensive, several handset manufacturers, and, in
 particular, HTC and its reseller UTStarcom, have produced multi radio
 handsets (EVDO/802.11/CDMA/Bluetooth/IR) that are quite compact,
 albeit power-hungry, especially with 802.11 turned on.  Here is the
 url to one such product available for both the Sprint and the Verizon
 Networks in the U.S.:

   
 http://www.utstar.com/pcd/view_phone_details.aspx?mcode=PPC6700sAct=0

 Most of these high end handsets run Windows Mobile 5.0 but it would be
 nice for Nokia to provide some competition in this segment by adding,
 for the US market, a CDMA/EVDO radio or GSM/HSDPA chipset to a future
 version of the N800 product.


 Best Regards,

  

 John Holmblad

  

  



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 2/6/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
  3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
 Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.

 Sarcasm aside, Zoran has a very good point. Putting cellular
 capability on the IT would be as appropriate as putting it on a
 washing machine. While it would be great to be able to talk to someone
 while doing laundry, it is not really the purpose of the machine.

 I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
 next-gen phone built in.

 Reasons:
 - It would add $100 to the cost
 - It would be a purchase that keeps on costing a monthly fee and cost
 even more when using it traveling
 - I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine
 ... most people have
 - It would tie it to region/plan that would be difficult to transfer
 out of
 - It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the
 longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT
 - It would consume a great deal more power

 I think these ITs make a good break from legacy tech like cellular and
 leave that crowded market to other models.
 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
 

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
   
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 15:28:34 Mike Klein wrote:
 I have been holding off on 3G data plan due to horrific costs and
 questions about availability/robustness.

 Cingular's plan is like $80/mo for all you can eat. Given there are
 comments regarding voice calls dropping when data is incoming and vice
 versa...I'll be a late adopter thanks.

 In S.F. there are supposedly multiple forms of 3gbut none of them
 work any significant length down 280 freeway...another deal-breaker for me.

I'm in that area use a Nokia 6130, edge service (additional 29.99 a month 
t-mobile) it runs about isdn speed.  Now as for going down 280 while surfing.  
Haven't tried.  I'm too busy dodging the people who are trying *grin*.  



 Additionally there is no coverage where my 2nd home is. The thought of
 going to cellular possibly for voice and data (no dsl/cable for isp)
 is somewhat appealing. I have even considered a 3g/cellular
 repeater/antenna installed on my house ($500 generally).

 I recently dropped newspaper subscriptions due to owning PepperPad3 and
 being quite pleased with streaming/reading capabilities...and am looking
 to drop cable tv ($70/mo) when Netflix's streaming service comes of age.


 mike

 Acadia Secure Networks wrote:
  Michael,
 
  in the U.S. all three of Cingular (HSDPA), Verizon (EVDO), and Sprint
  (EVDO) have deployed broadband mobile wireless services with a
  national footprint that, if Sprint's vision is correct will become, in
  Sprint's case,  a stepping stone to full WIMAX deployment a few years
  down the road.
 
  Nokia is, in fact working with Sprint in the area of WIMAX and  and I
  would be very surprised if Nokia are not considering to put WIMAX into
  a future version of the N800 or something close to it.
 
  I happen to use Verizon's EVDO service and it is very good in terms of
  bandwidth and U.S. geographic footprint. It supports VOIP
  satisfactorily and it is being upgraded to higher (Rev. A)
  performance, as is Sprints EVDO network.
 
  I have managed to test out how the wireless tethering of the N800 to
  the Verizon EVDO service via a Verizon handset using bluetooth works
  but it would be much nicer if I could lose the handset and use a
  future version of the N800 with EVDO and eventually WIMAX in its place.
 
  I actually think that the biggest impediment to such a scenario is not
  so much the need to jam another radio into the N800 form factor as it
  is the fact that Windows Mobile proves to be much more useful in the
  corporate world (which is where most of the money to purchase these
  high end handsets comes from) than a N800.  If the Nokia product
  cannot meet the same application needs then it will not be competitive
  in this market segment.
 
  Although they are expensive, several handset manufacturers, and, in
  particular, HTC and its reseller UTStarcom, have produced multi radio
  handsets (EVDO/802.11/CDMA/Bluetooth/IR) that are quite compact,
  albeit power-hungry, especially with 802.11 turned on.  Here is the
  url to one such product available for both the Sprint and the Verizon
  Networks in the U.S.:
 
 
  http://www.utstar.com/pcd/view_phone_details.aspx?mcode=PPC6700sAct=0
 
  Most of these high end handsets run Windows Mobile 5.0 but it would be
  nice for Nokia to provide some competition in this segment by adding,
  for the US market, a CDMA/EVDO radio or GSM/HSDPA chipset to a future
  version of the N800 product.
 
 
  Best Regards,
 
 
 
  John Holmblad
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 2/6/07, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Monday 05 February 2007 22:28, Mike Klein wrote:
   3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.
 
  Also my wash machine lacks it. I cannot sleep for that reason.
 
  Sarcasm aside, Zoran has a very good point. Putting cellular
  capability on the IT would be as appropriate as putting it on a
  washing machine. While it would be great to be able to talk to someone
  while doing laundry, it is not really the purpose of the machine.
 
  I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper
  next-gen phone built in.
 
  Reasons:
  - It would add $100 to the cost
  - It would be a purchase that keeps on costing a monthly fee and cost
  even more when using it traveling
  - I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine
  ... most people have
  - It would tie it to region/plan that would be difficult to transfer
  out of
  - It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the
  longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT
  - It would consume a great deal more power
 
  I think these ITs make a good break from legacy tech like cellular and
  leave that crowded market to other models.
  ___
  maemo-users mailing list
  maemo-users@maemo.org
  https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
 
  
 
  

[maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-06 Thread Neil MacLeod

Mike Klein wrote:



I'm in the no built-in cellular camp - for me, this was a smart move as I can 
use the N800 with whatever phone I have now (GSM/GPRS) and with whatever phone I get with 
my next upgrade (almost certainly a GSM/HSDPA phone).

Nokia probably took a look at the data plans offered by most network providers 
around the world, saw things were bad (ie. charging the Earth per megabyte with 
all sorts of usage restrictions - no voip etc. - and transfer caps) and decided 
the World simply isn't ready for mass consumer internet on the move over mobile 
networks. In which case, why bother complicating the N800 with this potentially 
unnecessary hardware? And aside from business users, few people will have 
data-only SIMs when they can just as easily use their mobile phone over 
Bluetooth.

Also, by adding cellular hardware the Internet Tablet suddenly becomes 
regionalised - CDMA for USA/Korea, GSM for the rest of the world, not to 
mention all the HDSPA/EDGE/EVDO/Whatever high-speed variants. Different 
hardware and possibly different firmware for each region - nice!

Summary: No phone hardware == Master stroke

:)

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


[maemo-users] N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Acadia Secure Networks


All,

I am interested in using  a Gennum 5500 nxzen bluetooth headset with the 
N800 and a VOIP client.


Does anyone here have any info (e.g. perhaps a compatibility list from 
Nokia itself) that indicates what headsets have been confirmed to work 
with the N800?


Gennum has released a version of its headset that includes a bluetooth 
dongle for use with a PC that allows it to be used for VOIP including 
with Skype. Here is the url to the www page at the Gennum www site for 
this item:


   http://www.nxzen.com/headsets/voip1.php


Best Regards,



John Holmblad



Acadia Secure Networks

GSEC Gold, GCWN Gold, GGSC-0100, NSA-IAM, NSA-IEM
serving the digital home, entrepreneurial enterprise, and emerging 
carrier markets




(M) 703 407 2278

(F)  703 620 5388

primary email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

backup email address:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:16:24PM -0500, Acadia Secure Networks wrote:
 I am interested in using  a Gennum 5500 nxzen bluetooth headset with the 
 N800 and a VOIP client.
 
 Does anyone here have any info (e.g. perhaps a compatibility list from 
 Nokia itself) that indicates what headsets have been confirmed to work 
 with the N800?

None at all yet.  But I expect this will change in the future.  People
are working on Bluetooth headset support for the Nokia tablets.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
2B OR NOT 2B == FF


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:58:14PM -0500, Jonathan Greene wrote:
 what's most interesting is that the N800 connects with a headset and
 recognizes that it can do audio... No apps seem to recognize it's
 there though beyond the control panel.

Yes.  The part that is not implemented yet is the actual streaming of
audio data between the N800 and the headset.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
It's not illegal to disagree with my opinions (*).
[...]
(*) Although it obviously _should_ be. Mwhaahahahahaaa... You unbelievers
will all be shot when the revolution comes!
-- Linus Torvalds


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


[maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread sean

Acadia Secure Networks wrote:


All,

I am interested in using  a Gennum 5500 nxzen bluetooth headset with the 
N800 and a VOIP client.


Does anyone here have any info (e.g. perhaps a compatibility list from 
Nokia itself) that indicates what headsets have been confirmed to work 
with the N800?


Gennum has released a version of its headset that includes a bluetooth 
dongle for use with a PC that allows it to be used for VOIP including 
with Skype. Here is the url to the www page at the Gennum www site for 
this item:


http://www.nxzen.com/headsets/voip1.php



The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets. 
 It's a long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's 
a conscious decision.


With BT headsets, these would be THE internet devices.

sean

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Jonathan Greene

On 2/5/07, sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Acadia Secure Networks wrote:

 All,

 I am interested in using  a Gennum 5500 nxzen bluetooth headset with the
 N800 and a VOIP client.

 Does anyone here have any info (e.g. perhaps a compatibility list from
 Nokia itself) that indicates what headsets have been confirmed to work
 with the N800?

 Gennum has released a version of its headset that includes a bluetooth
 dongle for use with a PC that allows it to be used for VOIP including
 with Skype. Here is the url to the www page at the Gennum www site for
 this item:

 http://www.nxzen.com/headsets/voip1.php


The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.
  It's a long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's
a conscious decision.

With BT headsets, these would be THE internet devices.



No argument here - It seems like the exclusion was conscious, but I
can't figure out why.  If VOIP is a marketed feature (Gizmo and now
Skype) why require us to remain tethered.  This is Nokia man, it's not
like they don't make their own bluetooth headsets which I am sure
could be nicely bundled.

It would also be nice if we could get (think it's called) OBEX support
built in so you could bluetooth beam files back and forth between
phones and computers.  The file manager does a nice job letting you
browse a bluetooth device (at least my phone) but it's not quite the
same thing.

Let's hope future firmware updates include enhancements as well as fixes.

JG

--
Jonathan Greene
m 917.560.3000
AIM / iChat - atmasphere
gtalk / jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gizmo - JonathanGreene
blog - http://www.atmasphere.net/wp
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Mike Klein


 The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.  It's a
 long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's a conscious decision.

 With BT headsets, these would be THE internet devices.

 sean

Correction...single worst problem is that N800 doesn't perhaps have
enough cpu to stream videos cleanly. This issue can't be fixed perhaps
by a better driver. Re-encoding stuff sucks.

2nd is no builtin keyboard of any kind. Handheld bt keyboards suck.

3rd worst problem is no 3G/cellular capability built-in.

 ___
 maemo-users mailing list
 maemo-users@maemo.org
 https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Re: N800 and Bluetooth Headsets

2007-02-05 Thread Mike Lococo

The SINGLE worst problem with the 770/800 is NO BT headsets.
It's a long standing complaint. I've come to believe it's
a conscious decision.


No argument here - It seems like the exclusion was conscious, but I
can't figure out why.


It's being actively worked on.  The reason for the delay is, I believe, 
the work required to get things running in the bluetooth driver within 
in the linux kernel.  Not that any of this excuses how long it's taken, 
but the request isn't being ignored.


Thanks,
Mike
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


[maemo-users] Bluetooth Headsets on 770 or N800?

2007-01-11 Thread Gopi Flaherty


Does anybody know whether the N800 supports Bluetooth headsets or not?

I'd be very unhappy if support for the 770 ended before Nokia added  
that to their Bluetooth driver. I find having to hold the phone up to  
my ear for VoIP to be very irritating.


Nokia wrote the Bluetooth driver for the 770, and as far as I can  
tell, the information needed to add SCO support to the driver is not  
publicly available, so it's up to Nokia to do it.



___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users


Re: [maemo-users] Bluetooth Headsets on 770 or N800?

2007-01-11 Thread Anders Rune Jensen
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 11:40 -0500, Gopi Flaherty wrote:
 Does anybody know whether the N800 supports Bluetooth headsets or not?
 
 I'd be very unhappy if support for the 770 ended before Nokia added  
 that to their Bluetooth driver. I find having to hold the phone up to  
 my ear for VoIP to be very irritating.
 
 Nokia wrote the Bluetooth driver for the 770, and as far as I can  
 tell, the information needed to add SCO support to the driver is not  
 publicly available, so it's up to Nokia to do it.

Couldn't agree more. I have been using my N770 for VOIP using gizmo a
lot and it really hurts not being able to use the bluetooth headset
lying on the table in front of me ;-)

-- 
Anders Rune Jensen
http://people/iola.dk/arj/

PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/62C2D7F0 @ pgp.mit.edu
Fingerprint: 6A03 907E 92E1 47EB 4EAB  76B6 068A ACD1 62C2 D7F0



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users