Re: [Mailman-Users] compare lists setup

2017-03-21 Thread Hirayama, Pat
I think that config_list is what you want:

config_list -o list1config list1
config_list -o list2config list2
diff list1config list2config

---
[root@lists ~]# config_list
Configure a list from a text file description.

Usage: config_list [options] listname

Options:
--inputfile filename
-i filename
Configure the list by assigning each module-global variable in the
file to an attribute on the list object, then saving the list.  The
named file is loaded with execfile() and must be legal Python code.
Any variable that isn't already an attribute of the list object is
ignored (a warning message is printed).  See also the -c option.

A special variable named `mlist' is put into the globals during the
execfile, which is bound to the actual MailList object.  This lets you
do all manner of bizarre thing to the list object, but BEWARE!  Using
this can severely (and possibly irreparably) damage your mailing list!

--outputfile filename
-o filename
Instead of configuring the list, print out a list's configuration
variables in a format suitable for input using this script.  In this
way, you can easily capture the configuration settings for a
particular list and imprint those settings on another list.  filename
is the file to output the settings to.  If filename is `-', standard
out is used.

--checkonly
-c
With this option, the modified list is not actually changed.  Only
useful with -i.

--verbose
-v
Print the name of each attribute as it is being changed.  Only useful
with -i.

--help
-h
Print this help message and exit.

The options -o and -i are mutually exclusive.


One of -i or -o is required

-p

--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here 
CIT | Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the Elimination of Disease

> -Original Message-
> From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-
> bounces+phirayam=fredhutch@python.org] On Behalf Of jdd
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:53 AM
> To: mailman-users@python.org
> Subject: [Mailman-Users] compare lists setup
> 
> Hello :-)
> 
> Gmail recipient anti spam filters get me mad.
> 
> After some work, I have one list that reaches the gmail recipients, good!
> 
> but I have an other list that get bounces. same server, same domain.
> 
> I guess I forgot some setup on the other list
> 
> comparing on the web interface is very difficult.
> 
> is there a way to read these setups directly on the server in a config
> file where I could make a diff?
> 
> thanks
> jdd
> --
> Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__mail.python.org_mailman_listinfo_mailman-
> 2Dusers=DwICAg=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ=lnQBMkNb1mBsioi6aP6ts4Sw0Ua5nVh
> 4esYOAh4qTKU=WxlwhOInW3PJh3_MqjRt1pvf7mVa5W2x1Kaar73VjUw=GW0lapInWnCgO_
> n5bfTAP7p0W4m3L0MyL_OoSuJqCas=
> Mailman FAQ: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__wiki.list.org_x_AgA3=DwICAg=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ=lnQBMkNb1mBsio
> i6aP6ts4Sw0Ua5nVh4esYOAh4qTKU=WxlwhOInW3PJh3_MqjRt1pvf7mVa5W2x1Kaar73VjUw
> =Uj6rRj8h-rxKR-PMyg-kA91_Np18W-NfaBJ0BSte4rs=
> Security Policy: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__wiki.list.org_x_QIA9=DwICAg=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ=lnQBMkNb1mBsio
> i6aP6ts4Sw0Ua5nVh4esYOAh4qTKU=WxlwhOInW3PJh3_MqjRt1pvf7mVa5W2x1Kaar73VjUw
> =xI7O1DkQtfX722dVADWdV3UUVufYUDWt9DQpvWfn5ow=
> Searchable Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_mailman-2Dusers-
> 2540python.org_=DwICAg=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ=lnQBMkNb1mBsioi6aP6ts4S
> w0Ua5nVh4esYOAh4qTKU=WxlwhOInW3PJh3_MqjRt1pvf7mVa5W2x1Kaar73VjUw=PfOEBS
> 2LfKZdRmJjbuWl0pjkVJkn_sGaTEIYsFwasRE=
> Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__mail.python.org_mailman_options_mailman-2Dusers_phirayam-
> 2540fredhutch.org=DwICAg=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ=lnQBMkNb1mBsioi6aP6ts
> 4Sw0Ua5nVh4esYOAh4qTKU=WxlwhOInW3PJh3_MqjRt1pvf7mVa5W2x1Kaar73VjUw=he7b
> iG1QSVFTbfjX2BOlwYPvRF0HoRKpntjpux1bshc=
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


[Mailman-Users] Mailman and Mimecast

2016-11-18 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Greetings,

I am having issues with some addresses on a couple of the few thousand lists 
that I am hosting in mailman.  The addresses in question are using Mimecast for 
their email protection.  So, I'm asking all of you for your opinion/advice.  

Problem 1:  One list gets their email rejected with a 550 Rejected by header 
based Anti-Spoofing policy: ... https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550

If I am reading the referenced 
(https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1419-anti-spoofing-policies) page 
correctly, the problem is that the sender of the list is at domain A, the 
recipients of the lists are at domain A, but the listserv itself is in domain 
B, and from Mimecast's POV, there shouldn't be mail from A to A being relayed 
by B.  And then it goes on to say that you should reconfigure your Mimecast to 
put in a bypass policy for this server. 

What the mail folks at domain A would prefer is that I (domain B) fix this.  
I'm thinking that I could fix this by using either anonymous_list or changing 
the setting of from_is_list.  But, what isn't clear to me is if this is really 
the correct step to take (my initial inclination is that they should follow 
Mimecast's direction of putting in a bypass policy).  

Problem 2:  Another list I have -- they actually accept the mail, and then send 
it back.  So, I see status=sent in my postfix logs, but the members don't get 
it.  Apparently, it is running into a problem because the HELO greeting from my 
mail gateways (MX) doesn't match the FQDN of the mailman server.  

So, the mailman server is smarthosted to my MX servers, which do some scanning 
of the message before sending it out.  Apparently, what these Mimecast users 
want me to do is to rewrite the envelope so that instead of the mailman 
server's FQDN, I replace it with either the FQDN of the MX server, or just my 
domain.  

In the /etc/aliases file on my MX servers, I have the 'post' address listed, so 
mail sent to listname@domain gets routed to the mailman server.  I haven't 
listed any of the other 9 mailman addresses (i.e. -admin, -bounces, -confirm, 
-join, -leave, -owner, -request, -subscribe, -unsubscribe).  So, my thinking is 
that if I do the rewrite, so the message comes from listname-bounces@domain, 
instead of listname-bounces@lists.domain, I will need to add this and the other 
addresses on my MX server so that mail routing will work. Since I have 3000+ 
lists, that's like 27k more lines in /etc/aliases to add/manage.  

Again, I'm thinking that they should put in some exception in their Mimecast 
configuration. 

Am I just being obstinate here for no reason?  Should I just assume the pain 
and change the behavior of my mailman server?  Thoughts?

Thanks!

-p
--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here 
CIT | Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the Elimination of Disease


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Sending mails to all list administrators

2016-07-28 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Thanks, Mark!
-p

-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Users 
[mailto:mailman-users-bounces+phirayam=fredhutch@python.org] On Behalf Of 
Mark Sapiro
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 9:45 AM
To: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Sending mails to all list administrators

On 07/28/2016 09:23 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote:
> I suppose you could generate a list of people to send by doing something like:
> 
> /usr/lib/mailman/bin/list_admins --all | sed 's/.*Owners: //'|sed 
> 's/,/\r/g'|sed 's/ //g'|sort|uniq


You can produce the same result with

/usr/lib/mailman/bin/list_owners

without the post processing.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/phirayam%40fredhutch.org
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Sending mails to all list administrators

2016-07-28 Thread Hirayama, Pat
I suppose you could generate a list of people to send by doing something like:

/usr/lib/mailman/bin/list_admins --all | sed 's/.*Owners: //'|sed 
's/,/\r/g'|sed 's/ //g'|sort|uniq

And that use that to send your email.  Maybe combine it with xargs to do 
something like:

/usr/lib/mailman/bin/list_admins --all | sed 's/.*Owners: //'|sed 
's/,/\r/g'|sed 's/ //g'|sort|uniq | xargs -I {} mail -s 'subject' {} < 
message.txt 

At least, I think that last might work. :)

-p


--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here 
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease

-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Users 
[mailto:mailman-users-bounces+phirayam=fredhutch@python.org] On Behalf Of 
Martin Stein
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:15 AM
To: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Sending mails to all list administrators

Hi,

I'm looking for an easy way, as site administrator, to send a message to 
all list administrators. Is there any possibility to set up a 
autogenerated list with all list administrators of the site or another 
smooth solution?

Regards,

Martin

-- 
Martin Stein
Attac Deutschland Webteam

Attac Deutschland
Münchener Str. 48
60329 Frankfurt am Main
Mail: martin.st...@attac.de

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/phirayam%40fredhutch.org
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

2016-07-08 Thread Hirayama, Pat
All,

User was reusing an old message that was previously sent to the list, and then 
using Outlook's 'Send Again' feature, which caused the message to contain 
headers that mailman placed into the original message.  When the IncomingRunner 
process saw the message come through 'again', it discarded the message.

Thanks to Mark Sapiro (mark_at_msapiro.net) for catching that those headers 
were there when they shouldn't have been!

-p 

-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] 
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Hirayama, Pat <phira...@fredhutch.org>; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 10:37 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> 3892 is the IncomingRunner process.  
> 
> And I'm still running 2.1.9, since that is what was provided with CentOS 5.x. 
>  I will have to upgrade that box soon to CentOS 7.x -- which comes with 
> 2.1.15.  


Do you have an example message? If not, have her Cc: you on the next
post. I might be able to see something in the headers of the message.

Also, you could patch IncomingRunner as indicated at
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/revision/1502/Mailman/Queue/IncomingRunner.py>
(and restart Mailman) to get the handler name.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

2016-07-08 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Hi Mark,

3892 is the IncomingRunner process.  

And I'm still running 2.1.9, since that is what was provided with CentOS 5.x.  
I will have to upgrade that box soon to CentOS 7.x -- which comes with 2.1.15.  

-p

-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] 
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:55 AM
To: Hirayama, Pat <phira...@fredhutch.org>; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 9:33 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote:
> 
> This is the message (from just a few minutes ago, in fact):
> 
> Jul 08 09:17:51 2016 (3892) Message discarded, msgid: <...>
> 
> I am stumped.  The sender is a non-moderated member.  She is in fact, listed 
> as a moderator.  filter_content is set to no.  ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER does 
> not appear to be set.  dmarc_moderation_action is set to ACCEPT.   
> header_filter_rules = [].


The fact that she is listed as a moderator is irrelevant to this.

Just to be sure, do 'ps -fww 3892' and verify that the process is
IncomingRunner.

Also note that starting with Mailman 2.1.19, the log message includes
the name of the handler that raised the discard. See
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/558096> and
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/revision/1502>.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

2016-07-08 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Hi Mark,

This is the message (from just a few minutes ago, in fact):

Jul 08 09:17:51 2016 (3892) Message discarded, msgid: <...>

I am stumped.  The sender is a non-moderated member.  She is in fact, listed as 
a moderator.  filter_content is set to no.  ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER does not 
appear to be set.  dmarc_moderation_action is set to ACCEPT.   
header_filter_rules = [].

As near as I can tell, everywhere in the admin interface where one can select 
"Discard" is not checked.  

-p



-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] 
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:27 AM
To: Hirayama, Pat <phira...@fredhutch.org>; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 9:00 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote:
> 
> WRT Content filtering -- if filter_content is set to NO, then nothing else in 
> that section should apply, right?  That is, even if there is stuff defined 
> for pass_mime_types and filter_filename_extensions?  

That's correct.

Note that what I wrote below applies only to the exact log entry
"Message discarded, msgid: <...>". It seems that's the one you've seen,
but there can be other messages such as "No command, message discarded,
msgid: <...>" which is logged for messages sent to the -request address
with no command or to -confirm with incorrect format.


> 
> -Original Message-
...
> If the message in the vette log is "Message discarded, msgid: <...>",
> that message is only produced in standard Mailman by IncomingRunner when
> a handler raises DiscardMessage. Again in standard Mailman, the only
> Handlers that do that are:
> 
> MimeDel
>  - content filtering removes the entire message and filter_action is
> other than Reject
> 
> Moderate
>  - a post is from a moderated member with member_moderation_action Discard
>  - a post is from a non-member in discard_these_nonmembers or with
> generic_nonmember_action Discard
> 
> Scrubber
>  - if the top level MIME type is text/html and ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER =
> 0 (not the default, and this only applies if scrub_nondigest is Yes)
> 
> SpamDetect
>  - when a message matches KNOWN_SPAMMERS
>  - A post is From: a domain with DMARC p=reject (or maybe quarantine)
> and dmarc_moderation_action is Discard
>  - a message matches header_filter_rules with Discard action or with
> Reject action and the message is to -owner


-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


[Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

2016-07-07 Thread Hirayama, Pat
So, I found a 10 year old post where Mark Sapiro described some of the reasons 
why "Message discarded" with only a message id and no reason happens:

Examples are when nothing is left after content filtering, a post from
a moderated user when action is discard, a post from a non-member in
discard_these_nonmembers, a post from a non-member with generic action
discard, some cases of a text/html post when ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER =
0 and a post matching a header_filter_rule with discard action.

I was wondering if there was a more complete list someplace?  Mostly because I 
had this happen to one of my users 3 weeks ago, and I think that I've managed 
to rule out everything that Mark wrote back then.

Thanks,
-p
--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] How do I prevent subscribers from sending to -bounces address instead of list address?

2016-03-08 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Ah!  include_sender_header does sound like it would be helpful in this case.  
(And I'm the site admin, actually).  Have to decide if it is worth it to either 
(a) switch from supplied RPMs to source code; or (b) rebuild this server with 
CentOS 7 instead of CentOS 5 it is currently running.  Thanks!

> -Original Message-
> On 03/04/2016 07:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >
> > You can't control what MUA's your user's use. Attempting to educate
> > them, at least in most user populations, is futile.
> 
> 
> In my zealousness to rant about the clueless, I forgot to mention that
> starting with Mailman 2.1.14 There is an include_sender_header setting
> (if not disabled by the site admin) which can be set to no to prevent
> Mailman from adding a Sender: header with the list-bounces address. This
> *shouldn't* affect normal bounces as they *should* be sent to the
> envelope sender, not to the Sender: header.
> 

--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease



--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] How do I prevent subscribers from sending to -bounces address instead of list address?

2016-03-08 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Mark,
 
> It depends on how much work you want to do. If YOU have a decent MUA,
> you can open the original attached "unrecognized bounce" message and
> resend it to the list. It might be held for implicit destination, but
> you can avoid that by adding the -bounces address to the list's
> acceptable_aliases, at least in the non-verp case, but it's probably
> better to edit the original To: before resending so other innocent
> reply-all messages don't go to the bounces address. I.e., there are ways
> to resend that message To: the list and From: the original sender; how
> much work they are depends on what tools you have at your disposal.
> 
> But, this is the wrong answer because it puts all the effort on the list
> owner. The right answer is to compose a nice helpful message explaining
> the situation and what the correct list posting address is and keep that
> handy on your desktop so when you get one of these you can just forward
> it back to the original sender together with your message and put the
> burden back on them. Maybe some will even learn. Others will just blame
> your list because obviously their Microsoft software can't be doing
> anything wrong.
> 

Pretty much what I expected.  Ah well. 

Thanks!

-p

--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease



--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


[Mailman-Users] How do I prevent subscribers from sending to -bounces address instead of list address?

2016-03-04 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Greetings,

Apparently, many of my subscribers must be using Outlook, so they see the 
mailto:listname-bounces@domain hypertext and are copying that to send new 
messages to the list. Aside from repeatedly telling the users that they need to 
send to listname@domain, have any of you found a better solution?

Thanks,

-p

--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] How do I prevent subscribers from sending to -bounces address instead of list address?

2016-03-04 Thread Hirayama, Pat
Sorry, I should add this salient point.  Since the subscriber has sent to 
-bounces, it is going to the list admins, but there is no indication to the 
subscriber that this has happened.  As far as they know, their message has been 
posted to the list.  This seems bad, but it doesn't seem like a good idea to 
have the list admins forward the message, since that will change the sender.  

Thanks,

-p 

-Original Message-
From: Hirayama, Pat 
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 10:30 AM
To: 'mailman-users@python.org'
Subject: How do I prevent subscribers from sending to -bounces address instead 
of list address?

Greetings,

Apparently, many of my subscribers must be using Outlook, so they see the 
mailto:listname-bounces@domain hypertext and are copying that to send new 
messages to the list. Aside from repeatedly telling the users that they need to 
send to listname@domain, have any of you found a better solution?

Thanks,

-p

--
Pat Hirayama
Systems Engineer / 206.667.4856 / phira...@fredhutch.org / Fred Hutch / Cures 
Start Here
CIT | Enterprise IT Services / Advancing IT and Data Services to Accelerate the 
Elimination of Disease


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org