Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-02 Thread Chip Davis
 I wish.  All my listservers are on various shared hosts running 
cPanel.  An experience not unlike making love in haz-mat suits... :-/


-Chip-

On 6/2/2019 11:17 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

On 6/2/19 7:49 AM, Chip Davis wrote:


Thanks to Mark's help crafting the proper RE, I haven't had an '.icu'
UCE in over 15 hours (knock wood).



If you have access to Mailman's logs, the discards are logged in the
'vette' log with entries like

Message discarded, msgid: <...>


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 6/2/19 7:49 AM, Chip Davis wrote:
> 
> Thanks to Mark's help crafting the proper RE, I haven't had an '.icu'
> UCE in over 15 hours (knock wood).


If you have access to Mailman's logs, the discards are logged in the
'vette' log with entries like

Message discarded, msgid: <...>

-- 
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-02 Thread Chip Davis
No, and No.  Apparently you missed my original post (5/30 11:57AM) on 
this topic where I asked if my RE that would do exactly that.



I've supported a dozen Mailman listservers for over a dozen years. This doesn't 
represent much real effort most of the time.  I've had to block specific users 
often and specific domains rarely, but this is the first time I've had to block 
an entire TLD.

Recently I've been gifted with an inordinate amount of UCE from many different 
domains under the '.icu' TLD.

Since Python RE's are _almost_ the same as the UNIX RE's I used many years ago, 
if I put

^@.*\.icu$

in discard_these_nonmembers, will it block all domains in that TLD?

And not block anyone else?


Thanks to Mark's help crafting the proper RE, I haven't had an '.icu' 
UCE in over 15 hours (knock wood).


For a more general solution for all of my lists, I'm looking into his 
suggestion of using a Spam Filter that triggers on the SpamAssassin 
score header inserted by my ISP.


Thanks, Mark for you patience and help.

-Chip-

On 6/1/2019 3:42 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:

On 6/1/19 1:44 PM, Chip Davis wrote:

 I guess my question wasn't so "easy" after all ... :-(

What was a daily trickle is now a flood of UCE from different domains
in the .icu TLD.  I hope someone can suggest some sort of prophylaxis
that I haven't tried.


Do you get any actual, legitimate mail from .icu?  Do you have any real
subscribers from .icu?  If not, I'd consider just blocking the entire
TLD.  I've blocked several of the new shit TLDs from which I was
receiving nothing but spam, and it's enormously reduced my volume of spam.



--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-01 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 6/1/19 1:44 PM, Chip Davis wrote:
>  I guess my question wasn't so "easy" after all ... :-(
> 
> What was a daily trickle is now a flood of UCE from different domains 
> in the .icu TLD.  I hope someone can suggest some sort of prophylaxis 
> that I haven't tried.

Do you get any actual, legitimate mail from .icu?  Do you have any real
subscribers from .icu?  If not, I'd consider just blocking the entire
TLD.  I've blocked several of the new shit TLDs from which I was
receiving nothing but spam, and it's enormously reduced my volume of spam.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  ph...@caerllewys.net
  p...@co.ordinate.org
  Landline: +1.603.293.8485
  Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 6/1/19 10:44 AM, Chip Davis wrote:
> 
> Is it possible that 'general_nonmember_action = Hold' is overriding my
> Spam Filter Rule?  I still need to intercept legitimate subscribers who
> attempt to post under a different address, depending on which device
> they happen to be using.  :-/


You need to adjust the regexp. It isn't matching because of the '>' at
the end of the address in From:

Try

^from: .*@.*\.icu[>\s]


> Is there any way to tell Mailman to honor my ISP's SpamAssassin score?

You can use header filter regexps like

^X-Spam-Status: Yes

or

^X-Spam-Bar: \+{6,}

where the 6 above is the minimum number of '+' characters to match.

-- 
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-06-01 Thread Chip Davis

 I guess my question wasn't so "easy" after all ... :-(

What was a daily trickle is now a flood of UCE from different domains 
in the .icu TLD.  I hope someone can suggest some sort of prophylaxis 
that I haven't tried.


Is it possible that 'general_nonmember_action = Hold' is overriding my 
Spam Filter Rule?  I still need to intercept legitimate subscribers 
who attempt to post under a different address, depending on which 
device they happen to be using.  :-/


Is there any way to tell Mailman to honor my ISP's SpamAssassin score?
The headers of a UCE that got though and was Held for Approval may be 
seen at http://www.aresti.com/UCEheaders/


===
dmarc_moderation_action = Munge From
dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action = Yes
dmarc_none_moderation_action = No
 -
accept_these_nonmembers = [list if specific userids]
hold_these_nonmembers = []
reject_these_nonmembers = []
discard_these_nonmembers = []
generic_nonmember_action = Hold
forward_auto_discards = Yes
 -
header_filter_rules = Spam Filter Rule 1: ^from: .*@.*\.icu\s
  Action = Discard
===

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

-Chip-
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-05-31 Thread Chip Davis
Thanks, Mark.  I hadn't thought of the "from:" being embedded in the 
Subject: header.  And your RE correction makes perfect sense once I 
see it. ;-)


I'm pretty sure I don't have access to 'mm.config.[anything]' so I 
assume it's the default value.  Odds are, it was my imperfect RE that 
was keeping if from tripping.


Thanks All,

-Chip-

On 5/31/2019 10:11 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

On 5/30/19 9:20 PM, Chip Davis wrote:


About 12 hours after I put that RE in place, I got another one from a
different domain in '.icu'.  It was held for moderation, not
automatically discarded.

I have:
   8 email addresses in accept_these_nonmembers
   0 email addresses in hold_these_nonmembers
   0 email addresses in reject_these_nonmembers
   ^@.*\.icu$ in discard_these_nonmembers
   'Hold' for generic_nonmember_action
   'Yes' for forward_auto_discards
but it seemed to make no difference; the UCE was still held for moderation.



The *_these_nonmembers checks only check one address which is what
Mailman considers the sender of the message. What address this is
depends on a config setting. The doc says:


 This can return either the From: header, the Sender: header or the
 envelope header (a.k.a. the unixfrom header).  The first non-empty
 header value found is returned.  However the search order is
 determined by the following:

 - If mm_cfg.USE_ENVELOPE_SENDER is true, then the search order is
   Sender:, From:, unixfrom

 - Otherwise, the search order is From:, Sender:, unixfrom


So in your case, it may not be checking the From:



I'm going to try putting "from: .*@.*\.icu" in header_filter_rules and
see if that makes any difference.



It probably should to be "^from: .*@.*\.icu\s" to avoid matching
something like

Subject: mail from: u...@server.icu not discarded

or

From: u...@sub.icure.com




--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-05-31 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 5/30/19 9:20 PM, Chip Davis wrote:
> 
> About 12 hours after I put that RE in place, I got another one from a
> different domain in '.icu'.  It was held for moderation, not
> automatically discarded.
> 
> I have:
>   8 email addresses in accept_these_nonmembers
>   0 email addresses in hold_these_nonmembers
>   0 email addresses in reject_these_nonmembers
>   ^@.*\.icu$ in discard_these_nonmembers
>   'Hold' for generic_nonmember_action
>   'Yes' for forward_auto_discards
> but it seemed to make no difference; the UCE was still held for moderation.


The *_these_nonmembers checks only check one address which is what
Mailman considers the sender of the message. What address this is
depends on a config setting. The doc says:

> This can return either the From: header, the Sender: header or the
> envelope header (a.k.a. the unixfrom header).  The first non-empty
> header value found is returned.  However the search order is
> determined by the following:
> 
> - If mm_cfg.USE_ENVELOPE_SENDER is true, then the search order is
>   Sender:, From:, unixfrom
> 
> - Otherwise, the search order is From:, Sender:, unixfrom

So in your case, it may not be checking the From:


> I'm going to try putting "from: .*@.*\.icu" in header_filter_rules and
> see if that makes any difference.


It probably should to be "^from: .*@.*\.icu\s" to avoid matching
something like

Subject: mail from: u...@server.icu not discarded

or

From: u...@sub.icure.com


-- 
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-05-30 Thread Chip Davis

Well, it was worth a try. :-/

About 12 hours after I put that RE in place, I got another one from a 
different domain in '.icu'.  It was held for moderation, not 
automatically discarded.


I have:
  8 email addresses in accept_these_nonmembers
  0 email addresses in hold_these_nonmembers
  0 email addresses in reject_these_nonmembers
  ^@.*\.icu$ in discard_these_nonmembers
  'Hold' for generic_nonmember_action
  'Yes' for forward_auto_discards
but it seemed to make no difference; the UCE was still held for 
moderation.


I'm going to try putting "from: .*@.*\.icu" in header_filter_rules and 
see if that makes any difference.


Any other ideas?

-Chip-

On 5/30/2019 7:03 PM, Robert Heller wrote:

At Thu, 30 May 2019 11:57:44 -0400 Chip Davis  wrote:



I've supported a dozen Mailman listservers for over a dozen years.
This doesn't represent much real effort most of the time.  I've had to
block specific users often and specific domains rarely, but this is
the first time I've had to block an entire TLD.

Recently I've been gifted with an inordinate amount of UCE from many
different domains under the '.icu' TLD.

Since Python RE's are _almost_ the same as the UNIX RE's I used many
years ago, if I put

^@.*\.icu$

in discard_these_nonmembers, will it block all domains in that TLD?


Yes.



And not block anyone else?


Yes.

I've done this, and then I took things a step further:

What *I* have done (because I can), is configure rejection of both domains AND
cidrs at the Postfix level, putting REJECT's in both /etc/postfix/access and
/etc/postfix/cidr.clients. (I use *REJECT* for a reason: I figure if these
idiots are going to make trouble for me, I'll make trouble for them -- eg now
they will will get reject messages. Also when the addresses are from legit
mail servers, the admins there will get a wake up call and presumably do
something -- I have discovered that there is really little point in sending
anything to the [so-called] 'abuse' addresses.)

I've also configured mimedefang and spamassassin to *reject* spam at the
Postfix as well.  Very little gets though now.



Thanks,

-Chip Davis-

Mailman 2.1.27 > shared host
linux 2.6.32-696.18.7.el6.x86_64
cPanel 80.0.10
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/heller%40deepsoft.com





--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Easy question for this crowd

2019-05-30 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 30 May 2019 11:57:44 -0400 Chip Davis  wrote:

> 
> I've supported a dozen Mailman listservers for over a dozen years. 
> This doesn't represent much real effort most of the time.  I've had to 
> block specific users often and specific domains rarely, but this is 
> the first time I've had to block an entire TLD.
> 
> Recently I've been gifted with an inordinate amount of UCE from many 
> different domains under the '.icu' TLD.
> 
> Since Python RE's are _almost_ the same as the UNIX RE's I used many 
> years ago, if I put
> 
> ^@.*\.icu$
> 
> in discard_these_nonmembers, will it block all domains in that TLD?

Yes.

> 
> And not block anyone else?

Yes.

I've done this, and then I took things a step further:

What *I* have done (because I can), is configure rejection of both domains AND
cidrs at the Postfix level, putting REJECT's in both /etc/postfix/access and
/etc/postfix/cidr.clients. (I use *REJECT* for a reason: I figure if these
idiots are going to make trouble for me, I'll make trouble for them -- eg now
they will will get reject messages. Also when the addresses are from legit
mail servers, the admins there will get a wake up call and presumably do
something -- I have discovered that there is really little point in sending
anything to the [so-called] 'abuse' addresses.) 

I've also configured mimedefang and spamassassin to *reject* spam at the 
Postfix as well.  Very little gets though now.

> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> -Chip Davis- 
>
> Mailman 2.1.27 > shared host 
> linux 2.6.32-696.18.7.el6.x86_64 
> cPanel 80.0.10 
> -- 
> Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users 
> Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 
> Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ 
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/heller%40deepsoft.com 
>
> 

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Linux Administration Services
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- Webhosting Services

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org