Re: [mailop] dmarc reports

[Sebastiaan de Vos via mailop]

Hello Eduardo,

The latest version of OpenDMARC is able to send reports. Documentation 
can be found here 
(http://www.trusteddomain.org/opendmarc/reports-README). It works with 
history-files, cron-jobs and - preferrably - a database.


Personally, I have chosen to replace Spamassassin, OpenDKIM and 
OpenDMARC with a tool that does all at once: rspamd 
(https://www.rspamd.com/doc/quickstart.html).


I hope this helps!

Kind Regards,

Sebastiaan de Vos

*From:*mailop  *On Behalf Of *Edwardo 
Garcia via mailop

*Sent:* Montag, 27. Juni 2022 10:47
*To:* mailop@mailop.org
*Subject:* [mailop] dmarc reports

Friends,

For many years we are using DMARC, DKIM and SPF, for many years, we 
are getting reports, but we want to send DMARC reports too.


I have spend much hours on google since evening (it is now 330am!) and 
i am flooded with informations on how to read them, set them up, even 
when using keywords saying  sending reports, but, nowhere can I find 
this informations.


Does someone have a URL or any kind of links to website or document 
which gives this informations as it is outside of my ability to find 
apparently, unless it end up beings page 700 on google search,  I 
wasted to much time on google already.


We are using postfix, spamassassin opendmarc, but are at loss to 
understand how to send reports out to peoples


gracious for any help or informations references for this, but for now 
I go to bed


Mapp Digital Germany GmbH with registered offices at Sandstr. 3, 80335 
München.

Registered with the District Court München HRB 226181
Managing Directors: Frasier, Christopher & Warren, Steve

This e-mail is from Mapp Digital and its international legal entities 
and may contain information that is confidential or proprietary.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute 
the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please notify the sender and 
delete the e-mail and any attachments.

Please consider the environment before printing. Thank you.


--___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports to aliexpress.com won't be delivered.

[Jan-Pieter Cornet via mailop]

On 29-1-22 13:53, Bastian Blank via mailop wrote:

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Jan-Pieter Cornet via mailop wrote:

Oh, and then there are a number of ticket systems or mailinglists behind dmarc 
reporting addresses that usually reply with something like 'Your email to our 
support system could not be accepted". Usually in such a way that it's near 
impossible to get the original destination address out automatically. Whenever I 
have some time, I tend to go through some of those bounces and plonk the 
corresponding domains for a whole year.

You don't use VERP or a similar automation to get unique addresses?  If
you write them both in the envelope and header, the remote system won't
have much possibilities to mess that up.


The envelope from has VERP, but the regular From hasn't. Probably a good idea 
to change that.

--
Jan-Pieter Cornet 
"Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."
- Grey's Law



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports to aliexpress.com won't be delivered.

[Bastian Blank via mailop]

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Jan-Pieter Cornet via mailop wrote:
> Oh, and then there are a number of ticket systems or mailinglists behind 
> dmarc reporting addresses that usually reply with something like 'Your email 
> to our support system could not be accepted". Usually in such a way that it's 
> near impossible to get the original destination address out automatically. 
> Whenever I have some time, I tend to go through some of those bounces and 
> plonk the corresponding domains for a whole year.

You don't use VERP or a similar automation to get unique addresses?  If
you write them both in the envelope and header, the remote system won't
have much possibilities to mess that up.

Bastian


-- 
We fight only when there is no other choice.  We prefer the ways of
peaceful contact.
-- Kirk, "Spectre of the Gun", stardate 4385.3
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports to aliexpress.com won't be delivered.

[Alessandro Vesely via mailop]

On Fri 28/Jan/2022 22:57:08 +0100 Jan-Pieter Cornet via mailop wrote:

On 27-1-22 11:30, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:

On Wed 26/Jan/2022 09:03:11 +0100 Mailop wrote:
In general, there are also a lot of other _dmarc. records, that have e-mail 
addresses that doesn't work and generate undelivered messages.


Yes.  I coded a way to exclude bouncing addresses, but then never set it 
up.


But if we're carping about bouncing dmarc reports, can I give a dishonorable 
mention to dm...@mailinblue.com? They have "only" been bouncing reports since 
september last year, but they receive reports for hundreds of domains.



I thought they had much less customers than that.  Their bouncing is often due 
to Gmail's "ReceivingRate" limitator.  See the discussion at

https://list.mailop.org/private/mailop/2022-January/020958.html

However, it is about one week since I saw the last such bounce.  Perhaps 
they're changing it.



Best
Ale
--





___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports to aliexpress.com won't be delivered.

[Jan-Pieter Cornet via mailop]

On 27-1-22 11:30, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:

On Wed 26/Jan/2022 09:03:11 +0100 Mailop wrote:

In general, there are also a lot of other _dmarc. records, that have e-mail 
addresses that doesn't work and generate undelivered messages.


Yes.  I coded a way to exclude bouncing addresses, but then never set it up.   
On the one hand, they are not so many, roughly less than 10%.  On the other 
hand, since outgoing reports happen to be as interesting as incoming ones, I CC 
them to my collector.  And sending reports to myself only feels rather 
nonsensical.


I did code a suppression mechanism for bouncing report addresses. aliexpress dmarc 
reports have been bouncing continuously since mid 2020. At least at the moments that we 
tried to send a report. They are now on suppression level "13 weeks", which is 
also the maximum. Which means we'll only try to send a report once every 13 weeks (about 
3 months), and junk all of the rest.

But if we're carping about bouncing dmarc reports, can I give a dishonorable mention to 
dm...@mailinblue.com? They have "only" been bouncing reports since september 
last year, but they receive reports for hundreds of domains.

I have recorded bounces for about 20% of the destinations that we send DMARC reports to. 
7% of the destinations are currently on the active "suppression list" because 
of this.

Oh, and then there are a number of ticket systems or mailinglists behind dmarc 
reporting addresses that usually reply with something like 'Your email to our 
support system could not be accepted". Usually in such a way that it's near 
impossible to get the original destination address out automatically. Whenever I 
have some time, I tend to go through some of those bounces and plonk the 
corresponding domains for a whole year.

--
Jan-Pieter Cornet 
"Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."
- Grey's Law



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports to aliexpress.com won't be delivered.

[Alessandro Vesely via mailop]

On Wed 26/Jan/2022 09:03:11 +0100 Mailop wrote:
In general, there are also a lot of other _dmarc. records, that have 
e-mail addresses that doesn't work and generate undelivered messages.



Yes.  I coded a way to exclude bouncing addresses, but then never set 
it up.   On the one hand, they are not so many, roughly less than 10%. 
 On the other hand, since outgoing reports happen to be as 
interesting as incoming ones, I CC them to my collector.  And sending 
reports to myself only feels rather nonsensical.



Best
Ale
--



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports - was Re: New server email being treated as spam by Google

[John Levine via mailop]

In article <20201122130557.gb4...@ikki.ethgen.ch> you write:
>Everything pass and ok. But the mail was in spam.

That's not in the least surprising. DMARC failures make mail more
likely to be rejected or marked as spam, but DMARC alignment is not a
whitelist.

Spammers can send DMARC aligned mail as well as anyone else.  Maybe even better.

>> 2 Google are not spamming you; you asked for those reports, and can stop
>> asking for them by removing your address from your DMARC DNS records.
>
>I only ask for mails going to quarantine but from the report, the mail
>is normal delivered.

That's not how reports work. If you ask for aggregate reports, you get
all of the aggregate reports.



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports - was Re: New server email being treated as spam by Google

[Klaus Ethgen via mailop]

Am So den 22. Nov 2020 um 13:56 schrieb Andrew C Aitchison:
> 1 That isn't what a DMARC report tells you.
> The report tells you:
>  a) that Google are receiving messages claiming to be from you,
>  b) when others are mailing google user and faking that you sent it, and
>  c) if genuine mail from you fails the DMARC checks.

Ok, here is the last:
   
   
 
   google.com
   noreply-dmarc-supp...@google.com
   
https://support.google.com/a/answer/2466580
   12460447340488768949
   
 1605916800
 1606003199
   
 
 
   ethgen.ch
   s
   s
   quarantine
   quarantine
   100
 
 
   
 5.9.7.51
 2
 
   none
   pass
   pass
 
   
   
 ethgen.ch
   
   
 
   ethgen.ch
   pass
   mail
 
 
   ethgen.ch
   pass
 
   
 
   

Everything pass and ok. But the mail was in spam.

(I can only guess, if it refers to the mail I sent as they don't give
any reference to the mail.)

> 2 Google are not spamming you; you asked for those reports, and can stop
> asking for them by removing your address from your DMARC DNS records.

I only ask for mails going to quarantine but from the report, the mail
is normal delivered.

Regards
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Alessandro Vesely via mailop]

On Fri 16/Oct/2020 22:55:52 +0200 Matthew V via mailop wrote:


On 2020-10-16 1:34 p.m., micah anderson via mailop wrote:

I do think that your point is valid, they should not be treated as spam.

However, personally, I feel like they *are* spam. I get these on a daily
basis, and I just delete them. Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting,



At least, you can direct it to a different folder, and delete old messages 
automatically.




but does anyone actually do anything with these? Is there some
convenient way to stuff these into something and produce some kind of
statistics?



From a tiny mailsite operator POV, I'm not clear what kind of statistics I may 
want to read, and when.  Weekly sums?  But then I shouldn't add apples and 
oranges (read mailing list traffic and direct mails), should I?


I still send a copy of my reports to dmarcian, but don't find their statistics 
very useful for me.



The reports are not really intended to be manually read... 



Well, certainly not in their original XML format.  However, you can 
automatically convert reports to HTML tables, displaying colored results which 
you might want to glance at on occasion.  My take at it:


http://www.tana.it/sw/dmarc-xsl/


Best
Ale
--
















___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Matthew V via mailop]

On 2020-10-16 1:34 p.m., micah anderson via mailop wrote:

I do think that your point is valid, they should not be treated as spam.

However, personally, I feel like they *are* spam. I get these on a daily
basis, and I just delete them. Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting,
but does anyone actually do anything with these? Is there some
convenient way to stuff these into something and produce some kind of
statistics?


The reports are not really intended to be manually read... There might 
be a few solutions to consider some paid, some free, some DIY: 
https://dmarc.org/resources/products-and-services/


~ Matt

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Noel Butler via mailop]

On 17/10/2020 04:12, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:

> On Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> 
> Apparently enough people like https://dmarcian.com to keep them in business.

I'll second dmarcian, used them for a while 

-- 
Regards,
Noel Butler 

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete
all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Ralph Seichter via mailop]

* micah anderson via mailop:

> However, personally, I feel like they *are* spam. I get these on a
> daily basis, and I just delete them.

Given that one has to explicitly enable DMARC reports, how can one
consider them spam?

> Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting, but does anyone actually do
> anything with these?

I do, which is why I set rua/ruf in the first place. ;-)

> Is there some convenient way to stuff these into something and produce
> some kind of statistics?

While I have written my own code for this, I expect that there are
related tools publicly available.

-Ralph
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Bill Cole via mailop]

On 16 Oct 2020, at 13:34, micah anderson via mailop wrote:


 Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting,
but does anyone actually do anything with these? Is there some
convenient way to stuff these into something and produce some kind of
statistics?


Apparently enough people like https://dmarcian.com to keep them in 
business.


John Levine has some tools at https://www.taugh.com/rddmarc/ which may 
or may not be convenient for you.


A derivative of John's rddmarc at 
https://github.com/techsneeze/dmarcts-report-parser seems slightly more 
convenient.


--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Thomas Kramer via mailop]

Yes. Feed it to https://domainaware.github.io/parsedmarc/

There is also a nice docker container for it: 
https://github.com/patschi/parsedmarc-dockerized

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: mailop  Im Auftrag von micah anderson via mailop
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2020 19:35
An: Benoît Panizzon ; mailop@mailop.org
Betreff: Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...


I do think that your point is valid, they should not be treated as spam.

However, personally, I feel like they *are* spam. I get these on a daily basis, 
and I just delete them. Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting, but does anyone 
actually do anything with these? Is there some convenient way to stuff these 
into something and produce some kind of statistics? 

Benoît Panizzon via mailop  writes:

> Come on Google, that is a joke, isn't it?
>
> That email was correctly signed with DKIM. The SPF entry is correct.
>
> Google requested that email:
>
> _DMARC.google.ch descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=reject; 
> rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com;
>
> And this is not the only one. All DMARC reports I send to recipients 
> hosted @ Google are reljected as spam.
> Anyone else seeing that issue?
>
> --- schnipp ---
>
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
> 
> (reason: 550-5.7.1 [2001:4060:dead:beef::1  12] Our system has
>detected that this)
>
>- Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to 
> aspmx.l.google.com.:
>>>> DATA
> <<< 550-5.7.1 [2001:4060:dead:beef::1  12] Our system has detected
>that this <<< 550-5.7.1 message is likely unsolicited mail. To
>reduce the amount of spam sent <<< 550-5.7.1 to Gmail, this message
>has been blocked. Please visit <<< 550-5.7.1
>https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError <<< 550
>5.7.1  for more information. n26si1426897ejg.134 - gsmtp 554 5.0.0
>Service unavailable
>
> From: dm...@woody.ch
> To: mailauth-repo...@google.com
> Subject: Report Domain: google.com Submitter: woody.ch Report-ID:
> google.com-1602654...@woody.ch Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:44:02 +0200
> (CEST) X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüssen
>
> -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar
> -- 
> I m p r o W a r e   A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
> __
>
> Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
> CH-4133 PrattelnFax  +41 61 826 93 01
> Schweiz Web  http://www.imp.ch
> __
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
-- 
micah
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[micah anderson via mailop]

I do think that your point is valid, they should not be treated as spam.

However, personally, I feel like they *are* spam. I get these on a daily
basis, and I just delete them. Ok, yes, I can turn off the reporting,
but does anyone actually do anything with these? Is there some
convenient way to stuff these into something and produce some kind of
statistics? 

Benoît Panizzon via mailop  writes:

> Come on Google, that is a joke, isn't it?
>
> That email was correctly signed with DKIM. The SPF entry is correct.
>
> Google requested that email:
>
> _DMARC.google.ch descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=reject;
> rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com;
>
> And this is not the only one. All DMARC reports I send to recipients
> hosted @ Google are reljected as spam.
> Anyone else seeing that issue?
>
> --- schnipp ---
>
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> 
> (reason: 550-5.7.1 [2001:4060:dead:beef::1  12] Our system has
>detected that this)
>
>- Transcript of session follows -
> ... while talking to aspmx.l.google.com.:
 DATA  
> <<< 550-5.7.1 [2001:4060:dead:beef::1  12] Our system has detected
>that this <<< 550-5.7.1 message is likely unsolicited mail. To
>reduce the amount of spam sent <<< 550-5.7.1 to Gmail, this message
>has been blocked. Please visit <<< 550-5.7.1
>https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError <<< 550
>5.7.1  for more information. n26si1426897ejg.134 - gsmtp 554 5.0.0
>Service unavailable
>
> From: dm...@woody.ch
> To: mailauth-repo...@google.com
> Subject: Report Domain: google.com Submitter: woody.ch Report-ID:
> google.com-1602654...@woody.ch Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:44:02 +0200
> (CEST) X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2
>
> -- 
> Mit freundlichen Grüssen
>
> -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar
> -- 
> I m p r o W a r e   A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
> __
>
> Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
> CH-4133 PrattelnFax  +41 61 826 93 01
> Schweiz Web  http://www.imp.ch
> __
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
-- 
micah
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

[Bjoern Franke via mailop]

Am 16.10.20 um 09:13 schrieb Benoît Panizzon via mailop:
> Come on Google, that is a joke, isn't it?
> 
> That email was correctly signed with DKIM. The SPF entry is correct.
> 
> Google requested that email:
> 
> _DMARC.google.ch descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=reject;
> rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com;
> 
>

Yep, I've also seen this issue. And DMARC reports which have a google
group as recipient where no external mails are allowed etc. Well...

Kind Regards
Bjoern
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] dmarc reports, was DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

[Andrew C Aitchison]

AA> I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my
AA> _dmarc record; gmail sends forensic/failure reports to the rua address.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:20 PM John Levine  wrote:

Any chance you got that backward?  I get aggregate reports from both
to the rua address and neither sends failure reports.

I'd be pretty astonished if Google were sending you failure reports.


On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Brandon Long replied:
BL> Me too.  Our lawyers would have a heart attack.

As I said in an earlier reply I did get some of this backwards, but not that 
bit.
   # grep -c gmail ~/Mail/dmarc*
   /home/werdna/Mail/dmarc.rua:0
   /home/werdna/Mail/dmarc.ruf:44
but on closer inspection all the hits are false positives - 
mostly occurrences of "gmail" in the "In-Reply-To:" or "References:" 
headers of the reported message, and not reports from google.


Your lawyers do not have to worry.

--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] dmarc reports, was DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

[Brandon Long via mailop]

Me too.  Our lawyers would have a heart attack.

Brandon

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:20 PM John Levine  wrote:

> In article 
> you write:
> >I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my
> >_dmarc record; gmail sends forensic/failure reports to the rua address.
>
> Any chance you got that backward?  I get aggregate reports from both
> to the rua address and neither sends failure reports.
>
> I'd be pretty astonished if Google were sending you failure reports.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] dmarc reports, was DKIM headers - which do you sign and why?

[John Levine]

In article  you 
write:
>I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my 
>_dmarc record; gmail sends forensic/failure reports to the rua address.

Any chance you got that backward?  I get aggregate reports from both
to the rua address and neither sends failure reports.

I'd be pretty astonished if Google were sending you failure reports.

R's,
John

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports (was: DKIM headers - which do you sign...)

[Ken O'Driscoll via mailop]

On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 10:08 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> It's clear that I'm NOT receiving Yahoo reports, I don't know why...
> Are there special requirements to receive them?

No idea. Only thing I have noticed is that not every report sender cares
about the existence of external domain authorisation records[1] so if a) 
your RUA points to an address at another domain and b) you think you're
missing reports from some providers, I'd look there first.

> About google.com I see very low volumes in your report

That's not my report - Dmarcian is nothing to do with me.

But, I would say that that report is based on senders who have Dmarcian in
their RUA and therefore that sample might not be representative of say a
commercial sender. 

Ken.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#section-7.1

-- 
Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com

Need to understand deliverability? Now there's a book:
www.wemonitoremail.com/book


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Benjamin BILLON via mailop]

Got'em, thanks!


-- 

Benjamin

2017-09-21 8:38 GMT+08:00 Brandon Long via mailop :

> All reports should now have gone out.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Sep 20, 2017 9:31 AM, "Bressier Simon"  wrote:
>
>> Sorry, my bad I meant rua indeed, sorry :)
>> Le mer. 20 sept. 2017 à 18:23, Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop <
>> mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> We've never seen any ruf from Google, only ruas.
>>> Are there are any additional limitations / requirements to get forensics?
>>>
>>> 20.09.2017 18:57, Brandon Long via mailop пишет:
>>>
>>> I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.
>>>
>>> Brandon
>>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
 > Hey guys,
 >
 > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from
 Google ?
 > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.

 We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
 00:59:59 BST

 Ken.



 ___
 mailop mailing list
 mailop@mailop.org
 https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing 
>>> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vladimir Dubrovin
>>> @Mail.Ru
>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing list
>>> mailop@mailop.org
>>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Brandon Long via mailop]

All reports should now have gone out.

Brandon

On Sep 20, 2017 9:31 AM, "Bressier Simon"  wrote:

> Sorry, my bad I meant rua indeed, sorry :)
> Le mer. 20 sept. 2017 à 18:23, Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :
>
>>
>> We've never seen any ruf from Google, only ruas.
>> Are there are any additional limitations / requirements to get forensics?
>>
>> 20.09.2017 18:57, Brandon Long via mailop пишет:
>>
>> I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
>>> > Hey guys,
>>> >
>>> > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from
>>> Google ?
>>> > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>>>
>>> We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
>>> 00:59:59 BST
>>>
>>> Ken.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing list
>>> mailop@mailop.org
>>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing 
>> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vladimir Dubrovin
>> @Mail.Ru
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Bressier Simon]

Sorry, my bad I meant rua indeed, sorry :)
Le mer. 20 sept. 2017 à 18:23, Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> a écrit :

>
> We've never seen any ruf from Google, only ruas.
> Are there are any additional limitations / requirements to get forensics?
>
> 20.09.2017 18:57, Brandon Long via mailop пишет:
>
> I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from Google
>> ?
>> > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>>
>> We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
>> 00:59:59 BST
>>
>> Ken.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing 
> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> --
> Vladimir Dubrovin
> @Mail.Ru
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop]

We've never seen any ruf from Google, only ruas.
Are there are any additional limitations / requirements to get forensics?

20.09.2017 18:57, Brandon Long via mailop пишет:
> I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  > wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from
> Google ?
> > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>
> We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after
> 18/09/17
> 00:59:59 BST
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org 
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> 
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


-- 
Vladimir Dubrovin
@Mail.Ru

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Bressier Simon]

Thx Brandon !

2017-09-20 17:57 GMT+02:00 Brandon Long via mailop :

> I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from Google
>> ?
>> > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>>
>> We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
>> 00:59:59 BST
>>
>> Ken.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Brandon Long via mailop]

I've pinged the team, thanks for the reports.

Brandon

On Sep 20, 2017 8:36 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  wrote:

> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from Google ?
> > The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>
> We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
> 00:59:59 BST
>
> Ken.
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Ken O'Driscoll]

On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:02 +0200, Bressier Simon wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from Google ?
> The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.

We get them for a couple of clients, nothing from Google after 18/09/17
00:59:59 BST

Ken.



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] DMARC reports not received from Google

[Benjamin BILLON via mailop]

Last one I got was on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:00:03 -0700 (PDT)


-- 

Benjamin

2017-09-20 22:02 GMT+08:00 Bressier Simon :

> Hey guys,
>
> Are you guys receiving ruf DMARC reports since 17th of Sept from Google ?
> The last one I have was sent on 17th, nothing since that.
>
> Best,
>
> Simon
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop