Re: [ANN] mc^2

2015-05-11 Thread Mooffie
On 5/11/15, Alexander Kriegisch alexan...@kriegisch.name wrote:

 And now there comes along Mooffie and donates something to
 the project. As I expected based on my experience with my own
 patches, people start discussing details and demanding smaller
 patches

In case you're referring here to people asking me to split my patch
into smaller ones, then they're absolutely right in their request.
It's something I certainly ought to do.


 [...] instead of discussing and staying stuck in your analysis
 paralysis?

(I think people here were all positive towards the idea behind mc^2,
so I believe your impression, in this case at least, was wrong. There
was just one guy (Paul) who showed some frustration. I don't think
harm has been done *yet* ;-)
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: [ANN] mc^2

2015-05-11 Thread Alexander Kriegisch
Hey guys.

Just my two cents because I am still subscribed to this list even though after 
several years my pet ticket with ready-to use improvement patches have still 
not been merged into the main line because the project is practically dead. No 
offense meant, it is OSS and the developers do it for free in their sparetime. 
I have a high respect for that, guys. I know there are more or less frequent 
releases, but IMO they do not bring a lot of added value, at least not for me.

And now there comes along Mooffie and donates something to the project. As I 
expected based on my experience with my own patches, people start discussing 
details and demanding smaller patches instead of just breathing some new life 
into MC by friggin' merging the patches into to code base. Sorry for being an 
Agile Coach and thus a smart-ass by nature, but can you not just apply, 
inspect, adapt instead of discussing and staying stuck in your analysis 
paralysis?

Thank you so much for bearing with me, and feel free to just ignore my rant if 
you do not like it. I have no intention of self-defending me or my theses and 
turning this discussion into a flame war. I just wanted to get this off my 
chest.

Kind regards
-- 
Alexander Kriegisch
http://scrum-master.de___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: [ANN] mc^2

2015-05-11 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 02:28 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
 
 Come on, how can I stop something new being accepted if I can't get
 even a reasonable response and dialog from maintainers regarding a
 5-year old issue with 2-years old patch at iteration #5, to which
 maintainers themselves contributed?. You overestimate my powers. 

Very simply so; let me give you a specific example: last Sunday you took
the time that I personally could have put into looking further at
mooffie's patch away by starting an nonconstructive conversation.

Unfortunately, I felt the need to engage, because I was afraid that
mooffie will get an impression that his work is not welcome; however,
I'd really like to see it merged, and to get this done, it requires him
to re-apply his changes on top of master in smaller digestible chunks,
so that it can be properly reviewed. If he gets demotivated, I don't see
this happening.

So, as the time I could donate to OSS on this day ran out, I simply had
to close the laptop lid. One could see it as a primitive denial of
service attack...

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev


___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: [ANN] mc^2

2015-05-11 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi Alexander,

On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:33 +0200, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
 Sorry for being an Agile Coach and thus a smart-ass by nature, but can
 you not just apply, inspect, adapt instead of discussing and staying
 stuck in your analysis paralysis?

If you'd actually followed the thread, you would have gathered that
inspect, adapt and apply (in this order) is exactly what the maintainers
are after in this particular case.

It would be great if you would consider using some other venue if you
just want to get something random off your chest: I have no problem with
constructive rants, but almost every single sentence of your post was
misguided.

However, very annoyingly, trying to explain something to you will most
likely not work anyways, but also take time away from actually getting
mooffie's work merged.

Thanks!

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev


___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel