[MCN-L] Quick DAM/CMS survey

[Travis Fullerton]

Thanks to all who have responded so far! This is all very helpful.

If you haven't had a chance to reply, I still welcome any additional
responses. Keep the info coming!

Thanks,

-Travis


On 6/18/12 2:41 PM, "Travis Fullerton"  wrote:

> All, I am certain this has come up before in bits and pieces, but I am
> pulling together some data and I am interested in a couple quick facts
> regarding DAM/CMS implementation. If you are willing, can you please let me
> know what DAM system your institution is currently using and when it was
> implemented, as well as what CMS you are using and when that was set up?
> 
> Hopefully, I will be flooded with quick responses. Feel free to respond
> off-list. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Travis

[MCN-L] Quick DAM/CMS survey

[Travis Fullerton]

All, I am certain this has come up before in bits and pieces, but I am
pulling together some data and I am interested in a couple quick facts
regarding DAM/CMS implementation. If you are willing, can you please let me
know what DAM system your institution is currently using and when it was
implemented, as well as what CMS you are using and when that was set up?

Hopefully, I will be flooded with quick responses. Feel free to respond
off-list. 

Thanks!

-Travis

-- 
Travis Fullerton
Photographer, Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23220
804.340.1538

[MCN-L] institutional image database

[Travis Fullerton]

There has been some interesting responses on this topic and it seems most
institutions are using an in-house DAMs. I am wondering if anyone has
explored online options for storage and distribution? Free services like
Flickr, or pay services like Smugmug? Ideally the archive would still reside
in a DAMs, but an online option might open up access and availability.
Anyone?

-Travis


On 4/18/11 4:57 PM, "SARAH PUCKITT"  wrote:

> Does anyone currently use a database for keeping track of the various photos a
> museum takes/saves of its events, volunteers, programs, etc. If so, what do
> you 
> use?
> 
> Sarah Puckitt
> ___
> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
> 
> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
> 
> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
> 
> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/

[MCN-L] museum accessibility for the visually impaired

[Travis Fullerton]

A response on behalf of our Docent/Tour Coordinators

Programs are scheduled in advance on a case by case basis and include tours
for:

Blind and Partially Sighted Visitors -

Touch Tours
Groups of visitors who are blind or partially sighted may experience works
of art through pre-arranged touch tours facilitated by VMFA Education staff.
Beginning September 2nd, Touch Tours are available to groups of adults and
students (K?12) of 10?20 as staff and gallery space are available. Contact
Tour Services at 804.340.1419 or tourservices at vmfa.museum.

Audio Tours
Audio Tours are available for selected exhibitions and the permanent
collection onsite and on the museum?s website. Transcripts of current VMFA
Audio Tours are available in Large Print for partially sighted visitors at
the Visitor Services Desk.

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Visitors -

Sign Language Interpreters can be provided with four weeks notice for guided
group tours. To book your guided tour and interpreter, please contact?Tour
Services?at 804.340.1419 or tourservices at vmfa.museum at least 4 weeks in
advance of your visit.

Audio Tours
Transcripts of audio tours are available for download from the museum?s
website. Laminated copies of audio scripts can be checked out from the
Visitor Services desk.

I can out you in touch with our programs coordinators if you are interested
in more info.


Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer
Photography Department

Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard / Richmond, VA 23220-4007
T 804.340.1538 / F 804.340.1548
travis.fullerton at vmfa.museum

www.vmfa.museum








On 10/4/10 5:11 PM, "Trilce Navarrete"  wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
> 
> A student at the Cultural Information Science program of the
> University of Amsterdam is mapping the types of heritage content
> available for the visually impaired, in archives and museums.
> 
> Do you know of projects on-line / on-site that present cultural
> heritage content for the visually impaired?
> 
> Any tips are greatly appreciated,
> 
> with kind regards,
> Trilce

[MCN-L] Online Photo Sharing

[Travis Fullerton]

David, thanks for the response. We currently use Drop Box and You Send It
for file transfers, but my goal here is not to actually transfer and allow
access to the files. What I am after is a simple method for museum staff to
simply browse the available event and publicity images. Once they found what
they wanted, they would still need to contact the image library to obtain a
copy in the appropriate size for their use.

As an example, if we photograph an event or program and generate 75-100
images, we will send "contact sheets" of the images to the original
requestor. But, often the images could serve multiple purposes for other
users and we currently have no method for other staff to then see those
images without making an appointment with the image librarian or sending
contact sheets to everyone. Both of which are a little to laborious and
inconvenient. 

My hope is that one of the online photo sharing sites will provide the
browsing and cataloging we need, but be secure and private enough to monitor
in house distribution and use.

Based on Perian's experience it seems like it should work as a temporary
solution, although we do not intend to use it for collection images.

-Travis




On 8/17/10 9:56 PM, "dlewisarfm at aol.com"  wrote:

> 
 Travis, 

For what you want to do - why not consider some sorta file-sharing
> website?There are many out there.   The one we use is "Drop Box" --
> https://www.dropbox.com   They allow 2GB free storage, easy file transfers,
> and even create "thumbnails" and gallery views for photos uploaded into your
> special "Photos" folder.

 

- David - 
David Lewis, Curator
Aurora Regional
> Fire Museum
www.AuroraRegionalFireMuseum.org
 

 

-Original
> Message-
From: Travis Fullerton 
To: Museum
> Computer Network Listserv 
Sent: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 12:07
> pm
Subject: [MCN-L] Online Photo Sharing


Sorry for the cross-posting (but,
> we should all be used to it by now...)

Hi all. 

I was wondering if anyone
> has had any experience with using online photo
sharing websites such
> Shutterfly, Picasa, Flickr, Photobucket, or the like
to share and distribute
> publicity and event images internally. We don?t have
a DAMs set up that can be
> accessed by multiple users (yet) and we are
looking for a simple and cheap
> solution for allowing image users to browse
publicity images that are ?fresh?
> and available. We would have about a dozen
people that would need private
> access. People like publications, marketing,
education, and web would be the
> primary users.

Any comments, advise, or anecdotes are
> welcome...

-Travis


-- 
Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer, Virginia
> Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard, Richmond, VA
> 23220
804.340.1538

___
You are
> currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer 
Network
> (http://www.mcn.edu)

To post to this list, send messages to:
> mcn-l at mcn.edu

To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options
> visit:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l

The MCN-L
> archives can be found at:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/


> 
___
You are currently subscribed
> to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer Network (http://www.mcn.edu)

To
> post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu

To unsubscribe or change
> mcn-l delivery options
> visit:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l

The MCN-L
> archives can be found at:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/

[MCN-L] Online Photo Sharing

[Travis Fullerton]

Sorry for the cross-posting (but, we should all be used to it by now...)

Hi all. 

I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with using online photo
sharing websites such Shutterfly, Picasa, Flickr, Photobucket, or the like
to share and distribute publicity and event images internally. We don?t have
a DAMs set up that can be accessed by multiple users (yet) and we are
looking for a simple and cheap solution for allowing image users to browse
publicity images that are ?fresh? and available. We would have about a dozen
people that would need private access. People like publications, marketing,
education, and web would be the primary users.

Any comments, advise, or anecdotes are welcome...

-Travis


-- 
Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer, Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23220
804.340.1538

[MCN-L] General photography question

[Travis Fullerton]

I would say that almost without question, even if you shoot film, the image
will end up digital in the end. Either you scan it, or the designer scans
it, or the printer scans it. There may be some perceived 'safety' in
transparencies, but in the end it doesn't matter. Going digital adds its own
series of complications related to color management and file management, but
the benefits of it far out weigh the problems.

Digital, when done correctly with high resolution and a color managed
workflow, is definitely the way to go.

Film still has a place as a fine art tool, but from a commercial and museum
reproduction perspective digital is by far the better choice.

-Travis




On 6/28/10 12:52 PM, "Maggie Hanson"  wrote:

> Hello, all!  We are in the process of deciding how we want to proceed
> with our professional photography.  Up until now, we've mostly had our
> photography done on film (4x5 transparencies).  Occasionally, we'll get
> digital photos taken, but the standard so far has been transparencies.
> I've heard varying opinions on the validity of film, its advantages and
> disadvantages, etc. and I wanted to cast a net and see if I can get a
> broader perspective.  Has everyone gone completely digital at this
> point?  Is anyone still using film for the majority of their
> photography?  Are people using a combination of the two?  For us, the
> cost is relatively equal (although the growing demand for digital images
> will increase our operating budget for scanning equipment if we stick
> with film, etc.) and there are clear preservation/migration issues
> either way we go.  I'd love to hear any stories (good experiences and
> bad) that might give us a little more information before we move forward
> in the decision making process.  Thanks, everyone!
> 
> Maggie
> 
>  
> 
> Maggie Hanson
> 
> Collections Information Manager
> 
> Portland Art Museum
> 
> 1219 SW Park Ave.
> 
> Portland, OR 97205
> 
>  
> 
> T: +1 503 276 4224
> 
> F: +1 503 276 4201
> 
> E: maggie.hanson at pam.org
> 
>  
> 
> ___
> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
> 
> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
> 
> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
> 
> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/

[MCN-L] Medium format Digital cameras

[Travis Fullerton]

The H4D40 is a camera system. The back is not separate, and cannot be put
onto a Phase One camera. And an H4 camera doesn't work with any other back.
Hasselblad only makes the CF back that is compatible with other cameras
(mostly intended for use with V-system)

Also, Hasselblad no longer makes the H2 for digital use, you would need to
find a used one to work with a P45+ back, or any other back. The only H2
still in production is the H2F. It is for film use and it is not 'tight'
enough for use with a digital back.

Again, I think you should talk to the vendors and/or manufacturers and try
this stuff out first hand. You wouldn't buy a car without test driving it
first and you are talking about the same amount of money, if not much more.
There are lots of little bits and pieces you may need in addition to the
camera and the back in order to make all of this work.

-Travis









On 3/10/10 6:38 PM, "Titus Bicknell"  wrote:

> 
> I would recommend the Hasselblad camera, either H2 or H4, but with the Phase
> One digital back since IMHO Hasselblad makes better cameras, Phase One better
> digital backs. 
> 
> We have had very good results with an H2 and a P45+.
> 
> Yours
> 
> Titus
> 
> Titus Bicknell | @titusbicknell | +1.240.271.9735
> titus at bicknell.com | http://www.titusbicknell.com
> 703 Dale Drive | Silver Spring | MD 20910 | USA
> 
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:09 AM, David Almeida wrote:
> 
>> Hi Titus,
>> 
>> The camera to use with any of those backs it would be the Phase One 645 AF.
>> 
>> 
>> David Almeida
>> Digital Library Technician
>> 
>> The Wolfsonian
>> FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
>> 
>> 1001 Washington Avenue
>> Miami Beach, Florida  33139
>> t  305-535-2634
>> f  305-53-52639
>> davida at thewolf.fiu.edu
>> www.wolfsonian.org
>> 
>> Join Us
>> Membership
>> 
>> Support Us
>> Make a Gift
>> 
>> Add Us
>> facebook
>> 
>> Follow Us
>> twitter
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On Behalf 
>> Of Titus
>> Bicknell
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:18 PM
>> To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
>> Subject: Re: [MCN-L] Medium format Digital cameras
>> 
>> Dear David,
>> 
>> you listed the Phase One P40+ and P45+ digital backs but not which camera you
>> would be using them with?
>> 
>> Titus Bicknell | @titusbicknell | +1.240.271.9735
>> titus at bicknell.com | http://www.titusbicknell.com
>> 703 Dale Drive | Silver Spring | MD 20910 | USA
>> 
>> On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:34 AM, David Almeida wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The institution I work for is in the process of acquiring two Medium
>>> 
>>> format digital cameras and we have been trying to get reviews on a
>>> 
>>> couple of cameras. Does anyone have experience using this type of
>>> 
>>> camera, specifically the "Phase One" and/or "Hasselblad"? We are looking
>>> 
>>> into getting either the Phase One P40+, P45+ or the Hasselblad H4D-40.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It would be particularly helpful to know more about image quality, ease
>>> 
>>> of use, durability, technical assistance, etc. Any feedback is welcome
>>> 
>>> and would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> David Almeida
>>> Digital Library Technician
>>> 
>>> The Wolfsonian
>>> FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
>>> 
>>> 1001 Washington Avenue
>>> Miami Beach, Florida  33139
>>> t  305-535-2634
>>> f  305-53-52639
>>> davida at thewolf.fiu.edu
>>> www.wolfsonian.org
>>> 
>>> Join Us
>>> Membership
>>> 
>>> Support Us
>>> Make a Gift
>>> 
>>> Add Us
>>> facebook>> -International-University/61756001329>
>>> 
>>> Follow Us
>>> twitter
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
>>> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
>>> 
>>> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
>>> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
>>> 
>>> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
>>> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/
>> 
>> ___
>> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
>> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
>> 
>> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
>> 
>> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
>> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
>> 
>> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
>> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/
>> ___
>> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, th

[MCN-L] Medium format Digital cameras

[Travis Fullerton]

I highly recommend you contact the vendors and have them come by and do a
demo. There is a lot of similarity in the guts of these systems, yet they
all function very differently. What I mean by that is that all of them;
Leaf, Phase One, Hassy, Sinar, will result in a good picture with great
image quality, but the way you get there can be very different. The user
interface, software, and the camera system attached to the back make a big
difference in workflow and ease of use. In the end you should choose one
that makes sense to you and you are comfortable with. Try them out.

-Travis

BTW - We use Leaf and Hasseblad, and love them both.

-- 
Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer, Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23220
804.340.1538



On 3/9/10 9:34 AM, "David Almeida"  wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> 
> 
> The institution I work for is in the process of acquiring two Medium
> 
> format digital cameras and we have been trying to get reviews on a
> 
> couple of cameras. Does anyone have experience using this type of
> 
> camera, specifically the "Phase One" and/or "Hasselblad"? We are looking
> 
> into getting either the Phase One P40+, P45+ or the Hasselblad H4D-40.
> 
> 
> 
> It would be particularly helpful to know more about image quality, ease
> 
> of use, durability, technical assistance, etc. Any feedback is welcome
> 
> and would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> David Almeida<mailto:davida at thewolf.fiu.edu>
> Digital Library Technician<mailto:davida at thewolf.fiu.edu>
> 
> The Wolfsonian<http://www.wolfsonian.org/>
> FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY<http://www.fiu.edu/>
> 
> 1001 Washington Avenue
> Miami Beach, Florida  33139
> t  305-535-2634
> f  305-53-52639
> davida at thewolf.fiu.edu<mailto:davida at thewolf.fiu.edu>
> www.wolfsonian.org<http://www.wolfsonian.org/>
> 
> Join Us
> Membership<http://membership.wolfsonian.org/>
> 
> Support Us
> Make a Gift<http://www.wolfsonian.org/donate.asp>
> 
> Add Us
> facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Miami-Beach-FL/The-Wolfsonian-Florida-I
> nternational-University/61756001329>
> 
> Follow Us
> twitter<http://twitter.com/wolfsonian>
> 
> ___
> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
> 
> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
> 
> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
> 
> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/

[MCN-L] Digital Asset and Collection Management

[Travis Fullerton]

Hello MCN-L?ers, 

The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts is currently in the process of researching
a new Collections Management System and DAM system to coincide with our 2010
Expansion. We have had an internal task force assessing our needs and
researching the DAMs and CMS marketplace. We are now looking to see, from
our peers (you all), how these systems work first hand.

We would like to know if there are any of you out there within a couple
hours drive of Richmond, VA, or really anyone in the mid-atlantic, who has
recently implemented a new system (DAM or CMS), that might be willing to
host a small group of us for a tour/demo. We are particularly interested in
what systems are most commonly being used, how your DAMs and CMS are being
integrated, and how they are being used on a day to day basis.

We would also appreciate it if anyone that has recently implemented a new
CMS or DAM system would be willing to share your RFP requirements and/or
specifications. 

Please feel free to respond on or off list.

Thanks!


Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer
Photography Department
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard / Richmond, VA 23220-4007
T 804.340.1538 / F 804.340.1548
travis.fullerton at vmfa.museum

www.vmfa.museum

[MCN-L] mac vs. pc (Scott Hisey)

[Travis Fullerton]

I don't want to feed the "tastes great - less filling" debate, but if you
decide to go with a Mac then I agree a tower is the way to go. The iMac
monitors are glossy, which can be troublesome for critical image work. We
are using both Eizo and Mac Cinema Display monitors, and after careful
profiling, they both perform well. Though we do reserve the Eizo for really
critical work since they have a broader gamma.

I will also add that we are on a government managed, strict PC environment
and our IT staff has integrated our Macs very well throughout the system.


Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer
Photography Department

Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard / Richmond, VA 23220-4007
T 804.340.1538 / F 804.340.1548
travis.fullerton at vmfa.museum

www.vmfa.museum


 

On 6/25/09 11:29 AM, "julie swiderski"  wrote:

> actually a better monitor for color critical work on a mac is the eizo, the
> color edge cg19 is what im using here.
> 
> 
> Quoting "Jeff L. La Clair" :
> 
>> I Agree, I would go with a larger MAC power horse, this way you can upgrade
>> the memory, HD space, and even replace the video card when needed.
>> If you are a small institution I would recommend saving your images to a
>> DROBO or LACIE type unit with raid level 5.  I would also recommend if
>> possible archiving the images TIFF - 1.) to your network server for D2D
>> backup or to Tape.  (Camera's - 2.)  Saving your RAWS to 2 separate External
>> HD's, one for onsite retrieval and one also for offsite (If you are doing
>> image capture from high end camera's)).
>> One of the better monitors would be a LACIE type (this is what our
>> photographer uses, or the MAC monitor is good... I believe the spectrum of
>> colors is greater though with the Lacie (for photographing).
>> 
>> Thank You,
>> 
>> Jeff La Clair
>> Director of Information Technology
>> Baltimore Museum of Art
>> 10 Art Museum Dr
>> Baltimore, MD. 21218
>> 443-573-1596
>> Jllaclair at artbma.org
>> 
>> From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On Behalf Of SCOTT 
>> HISEY
>> [scott.hisey at cincyart.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:18 AM
>> To: mcn-l at mcn.edu
>> Subject: [MCN-L] mac vs. pc (Scott Hisey)
>> 
>> Greetings all,
>> 
>> I am happy to have found the MCN list serve!  On the point regarding
>> Mac vs. PC, I had a few thoughts based from our experiences at the
>> Cincinnati Art Museum.  If your institution is PC based, as most are,
>> you might want to consider sticking with the PC at least for the first
>> phase of your digitization project.  Photoshop, Lightroom, scanning
>> software, etc., will all run just as well on a PC, provided it is set
>> up properly.  The other advantage is that you can reap the benefits of
>> technical support from your IT department.  After you scan your 6000
>> photographs, you might find issue with the PC imaging workstation and
>> make the jump to Apple.  If you do invest in Apple equipment, I would
>> highly suggest purchasing a tower rather than the 24" imac.  You will
>> have more flexibility in the future with regards to adding RAM or
>> other hardware.  I also am not a fan of the IMAC's display for color
>> critical work.  As far as image file compatibility, this is really a
>> non issue, provided you implement an appropriate file naming
>> convention.  Be careful with the external hard drive storage.  Be sure
>> to create some redundancy and I would back everything up on a set of
>> external hard drives that remain offline and unplugged.  Hard drives
>> fail when they run continuously.  Think of your imaging workstation as
>> just that.  If you go with Apple, you will still be producing TIFF
>> image files.  This is a published, non proprietary file format and you
>> will be able to open most file formats on either machine.  If you are
>> the only Apple user in the building the burden of operating system and
>> software upgrades is solely on your department budget.
>> 
>> Good Luck,
>> 
>> 
>> Scott Hisey
>> Head of Photographic Services
>> Cincinnati Art Museum
>> 953 Eden Park Drive
>> Cincinnati, OH 45202
>> 513.639.2874
>> scott.hisey at cincyart.org
>> http://www.cincinnatiartmuseum.org
>> ___
>> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
>> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
>> 
>> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
>> 
>> To unsubscribe or chan

[MCN-L] FW: photography, digitization, and a color/grey card?

[Travis Fullerton]

Hi Mark, We have been working with guide/reference prints for our original
digital captures for about a year now and we have had generally good
success. We are now working on a 'digital gray scale' to insert into the
final files to improve the quality even further. We have been trying to work
out the number of steps in the scale and the most effective size in the
final print. If you are willing, I would love to see the gray scale you are
using and any other information you can provide regarding use of it in the
prints such as size and placement.

Thanks.


Travis Fullerton
Assistant Photographer
Photography Department

Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
200 N Boulevard / Richmond, VA 23220-4007
T 804.340.1538 / F 804.340.1548
travis.fullerton at vmfa.museum

www.vmfa.museum





On 11/26/08 3:52 PM, "MParadis at Gallery.ca"  wrote:

> Hi Eve,
> 
> It's never too late to catch up...
> 
> We have found this approach to be very effective for all our publications
> staff and the printers they work with.  Initially we were asked for key prints
> when the printers were uninitiated to our concept.  The dilemma was that a key
> print was another interpretation of colour which deviates from the pure
> digital rendering.  Hence weaknesses in the key print were then translated to
> press.  We visited a number of printers with a colour temp meter and measured
> their inspection environments and light boxes.  The range of colour
> temperatures was astounding, varying up to 1500?K from one station to another.
> It was clear that we/they needed a measurable source as a starting point.  Our
> solution and guidance to the printers helped establish a new workflow for
> first proofs.  After a few growing pains the adaptation of this new approach
> made life much simpler for all concerned.  Our catalogues certainly reflect an
> increase in quality and accuracy since the inception of this approach.
> 
> If you'd like a digital copy of our gray scale I'd be pleased to share it with
> you for your applications.  Try it out and see if it can help.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Mark Paradis
> 
> Chief, Multimedia Services-Chef de services multim?dia
> 
> National Gallery of Canada, Mus?e des beaux-arts du Canada
> 
> 380 Sussex Drive,Ottawa, Ontario K1N 9N4
> 
> ph. 613-990-1788, fx. 613-991-2680
> 
> cell 613-797-0558
> -Original Message-
> From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu] On Behalf Of 
> Eve
> Sinaiko
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:01 PM
> To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
> Subject: Re: [MCN-L] FW: photography, digitization, and a color/grey card?
> 
> Catching up very late:
> 
>> From Mark Paradis:
> 
>> My objection to color bars when included at the capture/scanning
>> stage is that any global changes made in image editing software will
> also extend to
>> the color reference as well.  Send the file to printing and the
> printers will correct the
>> scale back to its know color and your original will share this bias.
> 
> This is a very good point. The designer or whomever corrects a digital
> file should provide the printer with either a match print or a set of
> notes about the corrections that have been made.
> 
>> First, calibration, calibration, calibration of all devices used in
> the reproduction
>> process.  This is now an old mantra to most image creators today but
> it cannot be
>> stressed enough.  We have a weekly regimen of systematic calibration
> of cameras
>> and monitors to ensure consistency on these variables.
> 
> I think this is an excellent rule for museums. Of course, images of
> artworks come from a million sources. Where calibration has been
> careful, notes to that effect attached to (embedded in?) the digital
> file would certainly be more useful than a grayscale or color bar. Many
> museums (not to mention other image sources) do not have best-quality
> tools or skills. Absent those, a guide to the printer is needed.
> 
>> Third step, create your own unbiased reference scale.  Yup, I said it,
> a homemade
>> solution.  Our approach was to create a digitally perfect reference
> grey scale in
>> Photoshop.  We created a 21 step, digitally created grey scale in
> Photoshop in .15
>> step increments just like the Kodak ones are supposed to be.
> Beginning at values
>> of 0,0,0 for purest digital black on up to 255,255,255 for maximum
> white.  With this
>> technique each step of the scale is measurable and digitally accurate
> for today and
>> evermore.  Once an image capture is completed by the photographer (in
> their
>> calibrated work environment), the digital scale i