RE: MD: MD good enough for vinyl archiving?

2001-09-14 Thread Simon Mackay


Hi everyone!

After reading the post about using MD for vinyl archiving, I would agree
with the concept. A good idea is to use 80-minute MDs for the job because
you could easily fit two standard-length LPs onto one disc.

This was because, during the 70s, most people I knew used to record LPs to
cassette for enjoyment in car stereos and portable equipment. In a lot of
these situations, they would record to C-90 cassettes with the goal of
fitting both sides of one album on one side of the C-90 cassette. With most
popular albums, once both sides of one album were laid down on the one side
of the cassette, there was usually 5-10 minutes worth of spare tape left,
which could allow a user to insert a bonus track.

This let them have nearly one and ha half hour's worth of music on the one
tape with 45 minutes between side-changes. The listeners would have the
choice of listening to both albums by playing one after another or they
would listen to one particular album by rewinding the cassette to the
beginning of the side that had that album.

In the inner suburbs in Australian capital cities, where there are many
university students and like-minded people, there were some funky
lounge-room bars that catered to this community. These bars were furnished
with  the kind of furniture that was common in household living areas during
the 60s and the 70s. The owners of these places often played 60s and 70s
music off vinyl and one place that I attended as part of a graduation party
had regular clients that loved the sound of the vinyl -- they  would expect
the hear the familiar crackling noises that accompanied the music.

In these situations, I would find that recording the vinyl to MD would work
wonders because the records will last longer. In this situation, the LPs
would have to be cleaned as would be expected for normal playback; then
recorded to MD. You could use a deck that is equipped with MDLP and Group
Mode for this application and record the vinyl in LP2 mode on 80-minute
discs. Each LP would be recorded as its own group on the disc. Then the
bar owner rests the LPs and plays the MDs -- the crackling sound is still
there on the MDs.

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: MZ-R900 Titling via a Handspring Visor PDA?

2001-09-14 Thread Aaron Tan


Has anybody seen any construction projects for an interface link between
a Handspring Visor  a MZ-R900?

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: recording not in realtime?

2001-09-14 Thread Gerard Naude


At the end of the day atrac is just a big math algorithm. The speed at which
the algorithm is applied does not matter. Mp3 is also just a big math
algorithm, but you don't encode your MP3's at 1x do you? :-) The only other
limit I can think of is the speed at which the platter of the actual disc
can be spun, but considering most MD players/recorders use a buffer, it
means that they spin the disc faster than 1x anyway. The reason why pcmd
is still so scarce is just because I think the recording companies (like
Sony), are afraid they are going to loose to much royalties if it is that
easy to copy pirated music to minidisc. The Net-MD technology might change
this, although I have my doubts on this. It looks like the Net-Md will be
too restrictive (copyright wise) and too regulated :-(

Hope this helps

Gerard Naude
Programmer - Universal Knowledge Software
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +27-11-7121750
Cell: +27-82-7833724


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of scumpolitician
 Subject: MD: recording not in realtime?

 i have been a supporter of the md format for a
 few years now. and have recently thought of
 upgrading. before i jump in again i would like to
 know if anyone has read anything about
 nonrealtime recording. i realize that atrac is
 designed for realtime, but with limited
 understandings of the music clip i am under the
 impression that it is possible to not record in
 realtime.  (pc-usb-md) any information would be
 appreciated.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: recording not in realtime?

2001-09-14 Thread Graham Baker


There is a definite problem with increasing the write speed to disc...
This is one of the main reasons (besides poor marketing and excessive
price) that MD data never made it big time - the write speed is limited
due to the physical properties of the disc and/or the limited amount of
laser power...
GB

- Original Message -
From: Gerard Naude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 September 2001 4:31
Subject: RE: MD: recording not in realtime?



 At the end of the day atrac is just a big math algorithm. The speed at
which
 the algorithm is applied does not matter. Mp3 is also just a big math
 algorithm, but you don't encode your MP3's at 1x do you? :-) The only
other
 limit I can think of is the speed at which the platter of the actual
disc
 can be spun, but considering most MD players/recorders use a buffer,
it
 means that they spin the disc faster than 1x anyway.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: MD good enough for vinyl archiving?

2001-09-14 Thread J. Coon


Maybe we could invent a scratch crackle inserter and sell them.  People
could make oldies but goodies out of any kind of music.   GRIN

Simon Mackay wrote:
  regular clients that loved the sound of the vinyl -- they  would expect
 the hear the familiar crackling noises that accompanied the music.



Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Advice on Inexpensive MDR for Field?

2001-09-14 Thread Colin Duport



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Alexandre Enkerli wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I'm a new member of the list. My name is Alex Enkerli and I'm a Ph.D.
 student in ethnomusicology at Indiana University.
 I'm planning for an extensive field trip to Mali, West Africa, and would
 like advice on buying a low-cost MD recorder to record both interviews and
 live music.
 At this point in time, ruggedness, battery life, overall durability and
 price (under US$200) are more important for me than additional features
 and sound quality (provided it's at least decent).
 The only additional features I'd consider interesting right now would be 2
 mic input, long ESP, timestamps, and MDLP, in descending
 order of interest. If you have suggestions for other important features,
 please feel free to tell me so.
 Thanks in advance for your help.
 Alex Enkerli
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 A good choice for me would be the Sharp SR-70 except the only feature
missing is MDLP.

Colin.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: MD good enough for vinyl archiving?

2001-09-14 Thread David W. Tamkin


Jim Coon joked,

| Maybe we could invent a scratch crackle inserter and sell them.  People
| could make oldies but goodies out of any kind of music.

There's nothing to invent; just get some crackle noises and mix them into
anything you like or play them at the same time.



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: recording not in realtime?

2001-09-14 Thread David W. Tamkin


Gerard Naude wrote,

| At the end of the day ATRAC is just a big math algorithm. The speed at
| which the algorithm is applied does not matter.

It does for processing power, and as Graham Baker has pointed out, for the
write mechanism to keep up.  But please read on; Gerard continued,

| The only other
| limit I can think of is the speed at which the platter of the actual disc
| can be spun, but considering most MD players/recorders use a buffer, it
| means that they spin the disc faster than 1x anyway.

It's not MD writing but rather the signal that has been limited to 1x.
There already, before Net MD, have been ways of writing to MD faster than
1x, such as copies between MD-B5s, track moves on an MDS-W1, or CD-to-MD
copying on combo units.  The trick was that the data did not go over a
regular cable nor, except with the B5s, even between devices.  An analog
transfer or an S/PDIF transfer is a relatively narrow tube through which
audio can move only at 1x, no matter how fast the source can try to pour it
in or the destination can try to empty it.




-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: recording not in realtime?

2001-09-14 Thread Gerard Naude



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Valid points. As I understand MD technology the laser has to heat up a
certain spot on the disc so that the magnetic head can write to that
specific spot. Like you guys said, the laser will then have to be more
powerful to heat up a certain spot faster to the right temperature (since
the platter is moving faster). My question then becomes: Will this decrease
the life of the disc, since it gets used in a lot more stressful
environment?

Gerard Naude
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of David W. Tamkin
 Sent: 14 September 2001 03:15
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: MD: recording not in realtime?


 | At the end of the day ATRAC is just a big math algorithm. The speed at
 | which the algorithm is applied does not matter.

 It does for processing power, and as Graham Baker has pointed out, for the
 write mechanism to keep up.  But please read on; Gerard continued,

 | The only other
 | limit I can think of is the speed at which the platter of the
 actual disc
 | can be spun, but considering most MD players/recorders use a buffer, it
 | means that they spin the disc faster than 1x anyway.

 It's not MD writing but rather the signal that has been limited to 1x.
 There already, before Net MD, have been ways of writing to MD faster than
 1x, such as copies between MD-B5s, track moves on an MDS-W1, or CD-to-MD
 copying on combo units.  The trick was that the data did not go over a
 regular cable nor, except with the B5s, even between devices.  An analog
 transfer or an S/PDIF transfer is a relatively narrow tube through which
 audio can move only at 1x, no matter how fast the source can try
 to pour it
 in or the destination can try to empty it.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: MD good enough for vinyl archiving?

2001-09-14 Thread Kevin Brown


I have a Sony MDS-JA333ES MD machine, and a Tascam
DA-40 DAT machine.

My personal viewpoint is that if you are archiving
*for personal use*, then yes, MD is OK.

But if you are archiving for *historical
documentation*, or for record label purposes, my
personal opinion is that MD is not OK.

MD is a loss-ful medium.  DAT is lossless. 
Theoretically, DAT, or even CD-R or CD-RW, makes
identical copies of the original signal.  This is not
true for MD.  MD has become a great recording
technology over the years.  But there are still
artifacts present depending on the attributes of the
source signal.

I don't know if I believe it, but some people claim
they can hear a difference between CDs and lps.  (Lps
sounding the better of the two.  Forget about pops
and clicks for a second.  Just fidelity.)  So the
difference between MDs and lps would be even more
apparent.

CD-R or CD-RW would also be a good choice.


__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Will MZ-G750 remote work on the MZ-R700?

2001-09-14 Thread las


Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor wrote:

 I don't know the answer to this, but am forwarding your question to
 the MD mailing list. If anyone there knows, I will add the information
 to the MZ-R700 and MZ-G750 entry (and also reply to you).

While it may work for a few specific models, the power that illuminates the
remote usually comes from the recorder.  So if the recorder was not
originally designed to have a back lit remote, even if the remote itself
worked, it would not  light up.

The best advice I could suggest would be to contact Sony.

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Advice on Inexpensive MDR for Field?

2001-09-14 Thread las



  A good choice for me would be the Sharp SR-70 except the only feature
 missing is MDLP.

 Colin.

I would suggest the Sony MZ-R700.  If you plan on doing a lot of voice
recording, as opposed to music, you should be able to take advantage of the MDLP
4 mode.  If you shop around you may be able to find the unit for about $200.00.

My personal opinion is that anyone shopping for a recorder but who can wait a
few months, old off to see what happens with Net MD.  If you can't wait, again
this is just my personal opinion, you should not consider any unit not capable
of MDLP recording.

I like Sharp's units and own several of various types, but I'm not sure if you
can get an MDLP recorder from Sharp for $200.00

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Advice on Inexpensive MDR for Field?

2001-09-14 Thread Luis Dodero


Hm, the 200 or below sort of narrows it down a lot, but I'd try the Sony
MZR-700. I got it 4 months ago, it's a brilliant piece of machinery. Rugged,
compact, records MDLP and a really really long battery life. Also, it takes
AA batteries, without an extra adapter, which is nice for traveling. I got
mine for $230, which I think is pretty fair. If not you can go for the
stepped down MZR-500, but I don't think that would be very worth your while,
it's VERY stripped down, and feels a lot cheaper to me.
-Luis


Hi,
I'm a new member of the list. My name is Alex Enkerli and I'm a Ph.D.
student in ethnomusicology at Indiana University.
I'm planning for an extensive field trip to Mali, West Africa, and would
like advice on buying a low-cost MD recorder to record both interviews and
live music.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Pentagon/World Trade Center attacks, audio

2001-09-14 Thread Len Moskowitz


jk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey listers -- I'm collecting audio relating to the
 recent attacks here in the US.  Does anyone know where
 I can find any archives of news broadcasts,
 police/fire/rescue dispatch channels, etc. from
 September 11th?  I'm trying to create an audio
 scrapbook of sorts.

Try http://www.npr.org in the archives for Morning Edition and All
Things Considered.


Len Moskowitz Binaural and StealthMics (tm), Cables, Interfaces
Core Soundhttp://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey   http://www.core-sound.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Advice on Inexpensive MDR for Field?

2001-09-14 Thread Stilson Snow


I just got my first MD - a 'basic' model - Sharp MD MT90 and use it mainly
for recording band rehearsals.  Mostly I use the 'mono' record mode that
doubles the length of recording time (not as long as MDLP, of course) and
the sound quality is excellent.  No time stamp, but that could be part of
your manually entered titling.

What I most like about it is the ease of recording - a single button to
start, so that you don't have to burrow down through layers of menu items to
start.

I believe Minidisco.com has it on sale for about $135 or so.

Good luck on your trip!
Stilson

 like advice on buying a low-cost MD recorder to record both interviews and
 live music.
 At this point in time, ruggedness, battery life, overall durability and
 price (under US$200) are more important for me than additional features
 and sound quality (provided it's at least decent).
 The only additional features I'd consider interesting right now would be 2
 mic input, long ESP, timestamps, and MDLP, in descending
 order of interest. If you have suggestions for other important features,
 please feel free to tell me so.
 Thanks in advance for your help.
 Alex Enkerli


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Advice on Inexpensive MDR for Field?

2001-09-14 Thread David W. Tamkin


Stilson Snow wrote,

| Mostly I use the 'mono' record mode that
| doubles the length of recording time (not as long as MDLP, of course) ...

There are two MDLP modes: LP4 and LP2.  The capacity of SP mono is less than
that in LP4 but exactly the same as LP2.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: about NetMD, can it do SP? -- And: NetMD upload path

2001-09-14 Thread Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor


Brian Youn writes:

 Having owned the new Sony Clie, I can say with all certainty that the 
 current versions of OpenMG Jukebox don't allow for anything above the 132 
 kbps ATRAC3 format, and that was with version 2.1... so is version 2.2 
 (which is what was announced with the MZ-N1) going to add the codec/encoder 
 for the standard 292 kbps ATRAC?  I really doubt that personally...

Matt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The only thing i can see of that maybe say's otherwise is i believe that in
 one of the press releases that it said compatible with all older units, so
 sp should be ok.  now if i am wrong then you are correct that sp wont be in
 there, but i hope i read the release correctly.

I agree with Matt. From the original press release:

Because Net MD will accept current MiniDiscs and will be
compatible with both ATRAC and ATRAC3 audio codecs, Net MD
recordings can also be played on existing MD products.
and:
2) Compatibility with the existing MD hardware: 
   To ensure backward compatibility with existing MD products,
   Net MD will support both ATRAC and ATRAC3 audio compression
   technologies. Music recorded in ATRAC3 must be played in
   ATRAC3 compliant devices.

This clearly indicates that SP mode will be supported.

What I'm still thinking about is the report from the folks at
My-Minidisc.de of their experience at IFA with download *and upload*
of data. I talked to them on the phone about this, and they were quite
clear that upload was being carried out. They tried it themselves on a
Sony VAIO hitched to a NetMD unit (I think it was a deck).

This is a major improvement over the current state of affairs for
those wishing to move audio from MD to PC. My question is, what are
the properties of audio upload? Is the track deleted from the MD after
you upload it? Are you allowed a limited number of uploads?

And given that OpenMG Jukebox 2.1 already supports .WAV, .WMA and .MP3
download (via an internal transcoding to ATRAC3 step) I think NetMD
will be very interesting after all.

Does anyone know what the download speed of MP3 audio to a Memorystick
Walkman is? Is it limited by the transcoding step, or the Memorystick
interface bandwidth?

Is there a good newsgroup for Sony OpenMG and Memorystick Walkmans?

Rick
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Re[2]: Hookup to PC with the Sony MZR-700DPC

2001-09-14 Thread 5703171


JC You have to bring up the volume control from the Start menu, not the
JC task bar.   START/Accessories/ Volume Control

JC You will see the large version of the volume control.

Oh really?
Some many Volume Controls

How'd you say Same balls - side-view? :-)

/D-Off

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]