Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread PrinceGaz


From: "J. van de Griek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jeanmougin schrieb:
  I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more read
  errors.

 Well, that would be a problem with the CD burner, not with the player.

 If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all that,
 chances of burn errors or poorly readable result discs are higher.

 And that is probably what the originator of this thread meant. So, in that
 case, just try it out a couple of times, and if there's no problem, there's
 no problem!

Indeed, that is exactly what I meant, does burning faster sort of produce
less well defined discs, perhaps less discrimination between reflectivity
of 1's and 0's, less sharp edges because the laser is having to turn on and
off from a higher power and the higher heat on the disc sort of blurs the
bits slightly, or something...

The related topics which have come up have also been very interesting
however.  Many thanks.

Yours,
PrinceGaz.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread las


"J. van de Griek" wrote:

 See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can be
 anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a combination of
 any of them...


Hopefully, more and more drives will start coming out with "burnproof"
technology, like the Plextor.  That will end this debate.  The real problem is
the software/hardware combination.  Like burnproof technology, a drive should be
able to know when to write and when to wait.  Kind of like printer spooling.
You store enough the information so that where will be no buffer problems.

The drive should have control over whether it writes or not if they information
isn't streaming fast enough.  Remember the old Star Trek where "Nomad" the
"changeling" feeds the information to the ships computer faster then the
computer can take it and the computer starts to smoke?

The next time that it was going to transfer information, Spock (e.g. the
"burnproof" technology) politely asked Nomad not to "send the data faster than
the computer could handle it".

Of course there is the occasional disc problem-some brands just seem to have
problems with some drives.  My daughter once had an HP drive that she had to
return because it would only write to HP discs.

But that's no assurance that an HP disc is good.  I have had trouble with HP
discs in my external HP drive from time to time.

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread J. van de Griek


las wrote:

 "J. van de Griek" wrote:

  See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can
be
  anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a
combination of
  any of them...

 Hopefully, more and more drives will start coming out with "burnproof"
 technology, like the Plextor.  That will end this debate.  The real
problem is
 the software/hardware combination.  Like burnproof technology, a drive
should be
 able to know when to write and when to wait.  Kind of like printer
spooling.
 You store enough the information so that where will be no buffer problems.

Actually, it doesn't seem as if Mike has a buffer underrun problem; he *can*
burn disks at 2x or 4x speeds, and they *can* be read by some of his CD
equipment, but not by his living room stereo CD player.

So the problem in this case is one of either media that do not come out
clear enough when burned at speeds 1x, a player that cannot correctly read
CDs that are burned too "loosely", or a burner that does not imprint the
digital info onto the media enough when burning at higher speeds.

Or a combination of these factors.

Since he has already tried using different media, I think a combination of a
weak burner and a shabby CD player is the most likely; either the burner
doesn't leave enough imprint on the media at high speeds, or the player is
bad at reading low-differential CD-Rs, or both.

,xtG
.tsooJ
--
Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread las


JT wrote:

 Neither of those are accurate.  The *.cda files are a virtual
 filesystem Windows 9x imposes on CDs.  There are no files on am
 audio CD, just 44.1KHz PCM audio data.  The CD burning program
 converts the waves to that data when it burns the CD.


No, I stated just what you mentioned above as a possible explanation:

"(if they can't then the wave files are  somehow automatically
converted.."

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread J. van de Griek


PrinceGaz a ecri:

 From: "J. van de Griek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all
that,
  chances of burn errors or poorly readable result discs are higher.
 
  And that is probably what the originator of this thread meant. So, in
that
  case, just try it out a couple of times, and if there's no problem,
there's
  no problem!

 Indeed, that is exactly what I meant, does burning faster sort of produce
 less well defined discs, perhaps less discrimination between reflectivity
 of 1's and 0's, less sharp edges because the laser is having to turn on
and
 off from a higher power and the higher heat on the disc sort of blurs the
 bits slightly, or something...

Yes. Sort of.

See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can be
anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a combination of
any of them...

When the disc is burned at a higher speed, the burner needs a more powerful
laser to make sure the burn is sufficient, ensuring a good readable "one" or
"zero". Also, the media needs to be susceptible enough to be burnt that
fast, and finally the player needs to be sensitive enough to distinguish the
ones and zeros on the disc.

,xtG
.tsooJ
--
Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: Speeding

2000-11-07 Thread Nathan White


Are you sure you are using the correct burning method? It sounds to me like
you are just copying mp3, wav, whatever to your cd? What is the file format
of the tracks you are dragging over to your burner? You need to convert your
audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to be able
to read it. That's probably why you can only play it in your cd-rom.

Nathan White
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mike Burger
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding


The burner is a Ricoh 6200S, running on an Adaptec 2940U2W.  The only
issue I've ever seen, really, is what I've described, when it comes to
this type of burn.  Other than the obvious overrun/underrun which
occasionally happens, no matter what software/burner/interface, etc you
use, this is it.

The procedure for copying my audio CDs is no different the than the
procedure for burning my data CDs...copy the tracks from the source CD to
the target CD, click the burn button, click the finalize button, and
voila...she is done.

Like I said, I can play them in my other systems' CD-ROMs, but not on my
CD Player...shrug

Whatever...it's not like the issue is going to be solved, anyway.  I've
stopped burning audio CDs, anyhow, since I got my MD recorder.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned
 a couple of audio
  CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R
 in my burner) at 2x
  (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc
 changer in the next
  room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house
 could (and I have a
  number of systems to choose from in that regard), but
 no CD player.

 Well that's strange.  No offense, but either your CD
 burner sucks, your CD players suck, or you didn't close
 the disc.  I have burned audio CDs at 12x and had no
 problem playing them =)
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread las


"J. van de Griek" wrote:


 You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.

 Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
 them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.

 That's right.  I wonder where Mike got that one from?  I think that he has
 either MP3 files or something mixed up with standard audio wave files.

All CD players can read standard CDs (which are "virtual" files-if you ever
check a standard audio file is registers on Windows Explorer as being 1 KB) and
wave files.  But either way the information is digital.

It doesn't matter how fast you get the ones and zeros there.

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread las


Jeanmougin wrote:

 I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more read
 errors.

Not if your equipment can handle the speed.

Larry




-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread I Can Not Tell You


That is more like due to a problem in the media or the player not the
burner...


Btw, I am new to the list...just saying "Sup!?!" :)

- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding


 Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x burner, and when I burned my
 audio CDs at 2x, my Pioneer CD player wouldn't play them.  My other
 CD-ROMS would read them just fine, but my regular audio equipment would
 not.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Dan Frakes


Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned a couple of 
audio CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R in my 
burner) at 2x (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc 
changer in the next room could not play the CD. Any CD-ROM in the 
house could (and I have a number of systems to choose from in that 
regard), but no CD player.

When I burned new copies of the same CDs at 1x, they worked fine in 
any CD *player* I own, as well as the various CD-ROM drives.

That's simply because data drives have a higher tolerance for errors than 
audio drives. The speed you burn at is irrelevant -- if it were possible, 
you could burn at 100x and as long as the errors were minimal it would 
play on an audio CD player just fine. The above scenario means that your 
burner had too many errors at 2x but far fewer at 1x.

CD's pressed by the standard CD manufacturing process are just that -- 
pressed. They have physical pits on the surface of the disk that create 
lighter or darker segments that reflect the laser pickup differently. On 
"burned" CDs, there are none of these surface variations. The burner 
simply... uh... "burns" the media so that it appears to be darker or 
lighter. This provides similar reflective properties, but it isn't as 
effective as pressed media.

One reason audio players are so bad at error-correction is that they were 
all designed for production-grade audio CDs. Audio players' error 
tolerance is designed with the "normal" error rate of "pressed" CD 
assumed. When you put in a burned CD, which has far more errors, the 
audio player often has trouble. This is also a good way to test the 
error-correction of your various audio players ;) I suspect that this 
will be less of a problem in future audio players -- now that CD burners 
are more common, my guess is that audio player manufacturers are going to 
be improving the level of error correction on their players.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread J. Coon


I use Easy CD Creator, and I have to decide if it will be a data CD or
an audio CD that will play on any Cd player before I start the
recording.  

Mike Burger wrote:

 The procedure for copying my audio CDs is no different the than the
 procedure for burning my data CDs...copy the tracks from the source CD to
 the target CD, click the burn button, click the finalize button, and
 voila...she is done.

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread jtasker


 Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned 
a couple of audio 
 CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R 
in my burner) at 2x 
 (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc 
changer in the next 
 room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house 
could (and I have a 
 number of systems to choose from in that regard), but 
no CD player.

Well that's strange.  No offense, but either your CD 
burner sucks, your CD players suck, or you didn't close 
the disc.  I have burned audio CDs at 12x and had no 
problem playing them =)

JT
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread J. Coon


It's digital. As long as there are ones and zeros to be read correctly,
it will work.  If it keeps getting coasters at 6x, you have a problem. 
If not, you are ok.

PrinceGaz wrote:
 
 I've finally replaced my Creative Labs CD burner with a drive which
 actually works, the Ricoh MP9060A which can burn CD-R at up to 6x.
 My question is, assuming the PC can get the data to the drive quick
 enough to avoid under-runs (which it can) is there any disadvantage to
 burning at 6x (the discs I have are rated for up to 8x burning) rather
 than 4x?

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Stainless Steel Rat


* "J. Coon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on Mon, 06 Nov 2000
| I think you are wrong on that.

He is wrong on that.  I burn at 4x-8x and play on several different CD
players, no problems.
-- 
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ accelerate to dangerous speeds.
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Mike Burger



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x burner, and when I burned my 
audio CDs at 2x, my Pioneer CD player wouldn't play them.  My other 
CD-ROMS would read them just fine, but my regular audio equipment would 
not.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, J. van de Griek wrote:

 
 Mike Burger wrote:
 
  The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs
  for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can
  run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read
  them.
 
 You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
 
 Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
 them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Mike Burger


On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, las wrote:

 
 "J. van de Griek" wrote:
 
 
  You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
 
  Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
  them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.
 
  That's right.  I wonder where Mike got that one from?  I think that he has
  either MP3 files or something mixed up with standard audio wave files.

I don't burn MP3s to CD...waste of resources, IMO, since I don't have a 
CD player capable of playing MP3s...only standard CDs.

Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned a couple of audio 
CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R in my burner) at 2x 
(maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc changer in the next 
room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house could (and I have a 
number of systems to choose from in that regard), but no CD player.

When I burned new copies of the same CDs at 1x, they worked fine in any 
CD *player* I own, as well as the various CD-ROM drives.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Mike Burger



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs 
for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can 
run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read 
them.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, J. Coon wrote:

 
 It's digital. As long as there are ones and zeros to be read correctly,
 it will work.  If it keeps getting coasters at 6x, you have a problem. 
 If not, you are ok.
 
 PrinceGaz wrote:
  
  I've finally replaced my Creative Labs CD burner with a drive which
  actually works, the Ricoh MP9060A which can burn CD-R at up to 6x.
  My question is, assuming the PC can get the data to the drive quick
  enough to avoid under-runs (which it can) is there any disadvantage to
  burning at 6x (the discs I have are rated for up to 8x burning) rather
  than 4x?
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Mike Burger



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

I don't think it's necessarily a problem with either, to tell the 
truth...IU've had hte same thing happen with Verbatim, Memorex, Imation, 
and no-name CDs.

Doesn't matter.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, I Can Not Tell You wrote:

 
 That is more like due to a problem in the media or the player not the
 burner...
 
 
 Btw, I am new to the list...just saying "Sup!?!" :)
 
 - Original Message -
 From: "Mike Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:10 AM
 Subject: Re: MD: Speeding
 
 
  Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x burner, and when I burned my
  audio CDs at 2x, my Pioneer CD player wouldn't play them.  My other
  CD-ROMS would read them just fine, but my regular audio equipment would
  not.
 
 
 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread J. van de Griek


Mike Burger wrote:

 The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs
 for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can
 run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read
 them.

You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.

Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.

,xtG
.tsooJ
--
Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Jeanmougin



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more read
errors.

"J. van de Griek" a *crit :

 Mike Burger wrote:

  The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs
  for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can
  run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read
  them.

 You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.

 Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
 them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.

 ,xtG
 .tsooJ
 --
 Joost van de Griek
 Applications Developer
 Yacht ICT
 http://www.yachtgroup.com/

 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread J. van de Griek


Jeanmougin schrieb:

 I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more
read
 errors.

Well, that would be a problem with the CD burner, not with the player.

If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all that,
chances of burn errors or poorly readable result discs are higher.

And that is probably what the originator of this thread meant. So, in that
case, just try it out a couple of times, and if there's no problem, there's
no problem!

,xtG
.tsooJ
--
Joost van de Griek
Applications Developer
Yacht ICT
http://www.yachtgroup.com/

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Taky Cheung



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

EZ CD Creator 4.0 can actually support drag and drop MP3. It will be
converted to wave file on the fly to burn to audio cd.

- Original Message -
From: "Nathan White" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: RE: MD: Speeding



 Larry wrote:

 Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate.  I believe that a CD player can
 also
 read wave files (if they can't then the wave files are somehow
 automatically
 converted because I copy wave files to CDRs all of the time and play them
 on
 regular CD players (you have to close the disc)


 Are you sure? That's news to me. Thanks for clearing that up. Maybe he is
 transferring his mp3 directly to the disc then. A long shot, but its
 possible. I assumed the wav files were automatically converted to *.cda,
but
 I could be wrong.

 Later,

 Nathan White
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
 las
 Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: MD: Speeding


 Nathan White wrote:

   You need to convert your
  audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to be
able
  to read it. That's probably why you can only play it in your cd-rom.
 

 Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate.  I believe that a CD player can
also
 read wave files (if they can't then the wave files are somehow
automatically
 converted because I copy wave files to CDRs all of the time and play them
on
 regular CD players (you have to close the disc)

 Larry

 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
 "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread Mike Burger


The burner is a Ricoh 6200S, running on an Adaptec 2940U2W.  The only 
issue I've ever seen, really, is what I've described, when it comes to 
this type of burn.  Other than the obvious overrun/underrun which 
occasionally happens, no matter what software/burner/interface, etc you 
use, this is it.

The procedure for copying my audio CDs is no different the than the 
procedure for burning my data CDs...copy the tracks from the source CD to 
the target CD, click the burn button, click the finalize button, and 
voila...she is done.

Like I said, I can play them in my other systems' CD-ROMs, but not on my 
CD Player...shrug

Whatever...it's not like the issue is going to be solved, anyway.  I've 
stopped burning audio CDs, anyhow, since I got my MD recorder.

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned 
 a couple of audio 
  CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R 
 in my burner) at 2x 
  (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc 
 changer in the next 
  room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house 
 could (and I have a 
  number of systems to choose from in that regard), but 
 no CD player.
 
 Well that's strange.  No offense, but either your CD 
 burner sucks, your CD players suck, or you didn't close 
 the disc.  I have burned audio CDs at 12x and had no 
 problem playing them =)
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 === The original message was multipart MIME===
 === All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===

Hi

I have been into recording for a long time, and in a perfect setting =
with no burps of the software and with no quirks with the burner; speed =
should not matter much.  In reality though you will get a more accurate =
copy with most drives at a slower speed.  I routinely burn at 4X with no =
troubles.

The most important factor to consider is the blank you use.  Unlike MD, =
CDR media has a wide range of quality and not all will even be =
recognized in a picky cd player.  Look for blanks that are rated for 1X =
recording; a 1X-12X blank usually is an excellent choice.  Watch out for =
2X-8X or 4X-12X as a lot of these will have problems playing in some =
boom box's or automotive deck's.  High quality gear will usually play =
and correct any flaws in the process but there are still many cheaper =
units out there giving problems with the lower quality blanks which are =
known to have error rates well above what the low end decks can correct.

For more information regarding quality blanks, visit my website at =
www.musicmixers.com/mall and click on the about CDR link.


- Original Message -=20
From: "Mike Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding


 On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, las wrote:
=20
 =20
  "J. van de Griek" wrote:
 =20
  
   You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
  
   Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will =
still play
   them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.
  
   That's right.  I wonder where Mike got that one from?  I think =
that he has
   either MP3 files or something mixed up with standard audio wave =
files.
=20
 I don't burn MP3s to CD...waste of resources, IMO, since I don't have =
a=20
 CD player capable of playing MP3s...only standard CDs.
=20
 Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned a couple of =
audio=20
 CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R in my burner) at =
2x=20
 (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc changer in the =
next=20
 room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house could (and I have =
a=20
 number of systems to choose from in that regard), but no CD player.
=20
 When I burned new copies of the same CDs at 1x, they worked fine in =
any=20
 CD *player* I own, as well as the various CD-ROM drives.
=20

 === MIME part removed : text/html; ===

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread las


Nathan White wrote:

  You need to convert your
 audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to be able
 to read it. That's probably why you can only play it in your cd-rom.


Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate.  I believe that a CD player can also
read wave files (if they can't then the wave files are somehow automatically
converted because I copy wave files to CDRs all of the time and play them on
regular CD players (you have to close the disc)

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread I Can Not Tell You


yea...like i said the media _OR_ the player...many consumer entertaintment
products...especially older ones dont have the laser that will recognize
cdr/cdrw but the newer ones do...tho one thing i noticed is that sometimes
blank audio cds are recognized but not at all times

 I don't think it's necessarily a problem with either, to tell the
 truth...IU've had hte same thing happen with Verbatim, Memorex, Imation,
 and no-name CDs.

 Doesn't matter.



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread JT


On 6 Nov 2000, at 9:39, Les@musicmixers wrote:

 The most important factor to consider is the blank you use.  Unlike
 MD, CDR media has a wide range of quality and not all will even be
 recognized in a picky cd player.

This cannot be stressed enough.  Especially with CDRW's.  And 
just because the maker is a large company does not mean they 
are good blanks.  In my experience, TDK makes the best CDRW's 
(4x rated), but some of the worst CDRs (the aluminum layer tends 
to flake/peel off).  A Sony 4x-rated CDRW I had got corrupted, and 
this has been reported by several other people too (check 
http://resource.simplenet.com )

-- 
JT
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread JT


   You need to convert your
  audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to
  be able to read it.
 
 Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate.  I believe that a CD player
 can also read wave files (if they can't then the wave files are
 somehow automatically converted because I copy wave files to CDRs all
 of the time and play them on regular CD players (you have to close the
 disc)

Neither of those are accurate.  The *.cda files are a virtual 
filesystem Windows 9x imposes on CDs.  There are no files on am 
audio CD, just 44.1KHz PCM audio data.  The CD burning program 
converts the waves to that data when it burns the CD.

Check out http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq for more info.

-- 
JT
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-06 Thread J. Coon



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Mike Burger wrote:
 

..I burned a couple of audio
 CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R in my burner) at 2x
 (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc changer in the next
 room could not play the CD.  Any CD-ROM in the house could (and I have a
 number of systems to choose from in that regard), but no CD player.
 
 When I burned new copies of the same CDs at 1x, they worked fine in any
 CD *player* I own, as well as the various CD-ROM drives.


sounds like an equipment problem to me.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: Speeding

2000-11-05 Thread las


PrinceGaz wrote:

 is there any disadvantage to
 burning at 6x (the discs I have are rated for up to 8x burning) rather
 than 4x?
 I'd rather not go back to 2x burning but would a slightly slower than
 max speed; 4x rather than 6x give better more readable discs and be
 worth the extra six or so minutes needed.


Not if you have a super fast system.  But trying to keep the flow going at
that rate can be difficult for most systems.  I'd make sure that I closed
down every other program when I was using it if I were you.

I really like the Plextor 12X drive.  They have their "burn proof"
technology that will go back and "wait" if necessary so that you don't get
any under runs.  That may slow things down a little, but at 12 times, on a
fast computer, it "spits" out the CDs.

Larry

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]