Re: Issue 375 in memcached: Accept4 on FreeBSD 10 - sockets stuck in CLOSE
Comment #22 on issue 375 by mlav...@gmail.com: Accept4 on FreeBSD 10 - sockets stuck in CLOSE https://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=375 Same problem :( When it stuck - in kernel log kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xf80328c68930: Listen queue overflow: 1 already in queue awaiting acceptance (14114 occurrences) and this line disappears from netstat -Lan tcp4 0/0/1024 192.168.0.32.11211 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Added timestamp to log file
Hello all, just want to inform you that there is a PR I've just added (https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/83) which prepends every line in the log with a high resolution timestamp. It needs the binary ts which is provided in the debian/ubuntu package "moreutils" (see https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/moreutils). If it's not installed, nothing will change. You need to restart memcached, obviously, in order to reopen the log files. Looking forward to getting some feedback! Cheers, ppp0 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Is memcached server response guaranteed to be in order?
with the ascii protocol, yes. It would not work otherwise. with the binary protocol, the answer is also currently yes, but the ordering isn't strict and could be up to the individual commands. On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Yaowen Tu wrote: > > If I have a client that creates a TCP connection, and send multiple commands > to the memcached server, will server guaranteed to respond to these > commands in the same order? > > > Thanks, > > Yaowen > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Is memcached server response guaranteed to be in order?
Thanks for your response. Could you please give me more information about individual commands? In which case it would be out of order? I am using xmemcached client and seeing some weird behavior with binary command, but text command works. I know there are some bugs in xmemcached client binary command code, I am trying to dig deeper to see if it is because of ordering of memcached responses. Based on your answer it is highly possible, so I would be really appreciated if you could share with me more detailed information. Thanks, Yaowen Yaowen On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:19 PM, dormando wrote: > with the ascii protocol, yes. It would not work otherwise. > > with the binary protocol, the answer is also currently yes, but the > ordering isn't strict and could be up to the individual commands. > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Yaowen Tu wrote: > > > > > If I have a client that creates a TCP connection, and send multiple > commands to the memcached server, will server guaranteed to respond to these > > commands in the same order? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yaowen > > > > > > -- > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "memcached" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Is memcached server response guaranteed to be in order?
I don't believe any binprot commands are out of order presently. However the protocol *allows* them to be out of order. it's probably a bug you're seeing in the client. also make sure your memcached daemon is up to date. On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Yaowen Tu wrote: > Thanks for your response. > Could you please give me more information about individual commands? In which > case it would be out of order? > > I am using xmemcached client and seeing some weird behavior with binary > command, but text command works. > > I know there are some bugs in xmemcached client binary command code, I am > trying to dig deeper to see if it is because of ordering of memcached > responses. > > Based on your answer it is highly possible, so I would be really appreciated > if you could share with me more detailed information. > > Thanks, > Yaowen > > Yaowen > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:19 PM, dormando wrote: > with the ascii protocol, yes. It would not work otherwise. > > with the binary protocol, the answer is also currently yes, but the > ordering isn't strict and could be up to the individual commands. > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Yaowen Tu wrote: > > > > > If I have a client that creates a TCP connection, and send multiple > commands to the memcached server, will server guaranteed to > respond to these > > commands in the same order? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yaowen > > > > > > -- > > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "memcached" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
