Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aliminum wheels; tightening torque; meaning of words

2007-08-19 Thread Robert Bigham
The difference between the word that is correct and the word that 
is almost correct is the difference between lightning and lightning 
bugs. - attributed to Winston Churchill.

Maybe he merely meant the spherical collar screws were tighter 
than he had ever seen or imagined.  I can buy that. They must have 
been extremely tight.  I suspect something would break before 
250 ft lb tightening torque, but do not know.  

Perhaps someone does know the breaking torque for 
M12 x 1.5 spherical collar screws holding on steel or alumininum 
wheels. If so, you know who you are. Speak up, please.  

I promise to not ask how you know.

When discussing technical things and using numbers to 
communicate, one should be careful to say as near to exactly 
what one means as one can, to avoid confusion.  

If one is not sure of a technical fact, it does not mean one is 
a bad person or even seriously disabled, but one should 
say so.  Words do have meanings. 

That is the engineering position.  Do recovering engineers see 
it a whole lot differently?  If so, why?  Please elaborate.   

Tom Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:52:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Mercedes Discussion List'
mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
I don't think he was serious about the 250 ft lb, just stressing the fact
that they were way over-torqued.
 
That's OK, I was an Engineer once but now I'm a Recovering Engineer.
 
Thanks,
Tom Hargrave
www.kegkits.com
256-656-1924
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Bigham
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 10:09 PM
To: E M; mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
 
250 ft lb is way too much torque on spherical collar screws holding on steel
 
or alloy road wheels.
 
My Daimler Benz Passenger Car Technical Data book says tighten them 
to 110 NM, equal roughly to 81 ft lb if I didn't botch the conversion. 
 
No wonder they are hard to get off when torqued to 250 ft lb. The wonder is 
that they survive being so overtightened without damage to screw, wheel, or
hub.
 
Engineered like no other car 
 
- Original Message - 
From: E M 
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/19/2007 5:08:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
 
 
Oh, the wheel didn't have a problem sitting flush with the hub, but when you
torque the bolts to about 250 or more f/lbs, it's amazing how two things can
kind of stick themselves together! :-) ( Note to me: never never leave the
car unattended at the garage!! I should know this by now!) All fixed now
and it allowed me to give the inside of the wheel a good detailing too.
Just have to do the other three now.
 
Ed
300E






___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aliminum wheels; tightening torque; meaning of words

2007-08-19 Thread Tom Hargrave
I agree 100% about your Words do have meaning statement and I agree that
in the Engineering world, communication is very literal indeed. But I have
learned that non-engineers communicate in more abstract, often making
statements that have implied meaning. By Recovering Engineer I mean I've
learned to be less literal with my conversations in certain circles.

Thanks,
Tom Hargrave
www.kegkits.com
256-656-1924
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Bigham
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:10 AM
To: mercedes@okiebenz.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aliminum wheels; tightening torque;meaning
of words

The difference between the word that is correct and the word that 
is almost correct is the difference between lightning and lightning 
bugs. - attributed to Winston Churchill.

Maybe he merely meant the spherical collar screws were tighter 
than he had ever seen or imagined.  I can buy that. They must have 
been extremely tight.  I suspect something would break before 
250 ft lb tightening torque, but do not know.  

Perhaps someone does know the breaking torque for 
M12 x 1.5 spherical collar screws holding on steel or alumininum 
wheels. If so, you know who you are. Speak up, please.  

I promise to not ask how you know.

When discussing technical things and using numbers to 
communicate, one should be careful to say as near to exactly 
what one means as one can, to avoid confusion.  

If one is not sure of a technical fact, it does not mean one is 
a bad person or even seriously disabled, but one should 
say so.  Words do have meanings. 

That is the engineering position.  Do recovering engineers see 
it a whole lot differently?  If so, why?  Please elaborate.   

Tom Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:52:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Mercedes Discussion List'
mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
I don't think he was serious about the 250 ft lb, just stressing the fact
that they were way over-torqued.
 
That's OK, I was an Engineer once but now I'm a Recovering Engineer.
 
Thanks,
Tom Hargrave
www.kegkits.com
256-656-1924
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Bigham
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 10:09 PM
To: E M; mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
 
250 ft lb is way too much torque on spherical collar screws holding on steel
 
or alloy road wheels.
 
My Daimler Benz Passenger Car Technical Data book says tighten them 
to 110 NM, equal roughly to 81 ft lb if I didn't botch the conversion. 
 
No wonder they are hard to get off when torqued to 250 ft lb. The wonder is 
that they survive being so overtightened without damage to screw, wheel, or
hub.
 
Engineered like no other car 
 
- Original Message - 
From: E M 
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/19/2007 5:08:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
 
 
Oh, the wheel didn't have a problem sitting flush with the hub, but when you
torque the bolts to about 250 or more f/lbs, it's amazing how two things can
kind of stick themselves together! :-) ( Note to me: never never leave the
car unattended at the garage!! I should know this by now!) All fixed now
and it allowed me to give the inside of the wheel a good detailing too.
Just have to do the other three now.
 
Ed
300E






___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aliminum wheels; tightening torque; meaning of words

2007-08-19 Thread E M
No, I agree with your point Robert.  Torque figures are very accurate for a
reason, and I do my best to follow them and get as close to them as possible
at all times.  However, in my original post, I don't have a problem throwing
out a number like 250, as I've felt 200 before and this felt like more.
Reason I don't have a problem throwing out a nubmer like 250 is, I don't
really expect anyone to read it and think, oh, it can't take that, and to
prove it, I'll go out now and torque my wheels to 250.  Now, if asked how
tight to torque a lugnut, I would never say, oh, about 100 f/lbs., give or
take.  However, in the original context of my post, I think the use of 250
was ok. :-)

Ed
300E

On 20/08/07, Robert Bigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The difference between the word that is correct and the word that
 is almost correct is the difference between lightning and lightning
 bugs. - attributed to Winston Churchill.

 Maybe he merely meant the spherical collar screws were tighter
 than he had ever seen or imagined.  I can buy that. They must have
 been extremely tight.  I suspect something would break before
 250 ft lb tightening torque, but do not know.

 Perhaps someone does know the breaking torque for
 M12 x 1.5 spherical collar screws holding on steel or alumininum
 wheels. If so, you know who you are. Speak up, please.

 I promise to not ask how you know.

 When discussing technical things and using numbers to
 communicate, one should be careful to say as near to exactly
 what one means as one can, to avoid confusion.

 If one is not sure of a technical fact, it does not mean one is
 a bad person or even seriously disabled, but one should
 say so.  Words do have meanings.

 That is the engineering position.  Do recovering engineers see
 it a whole lot differently?  If so, why?  Please elaborate.

 Tom Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:52:06 -0500
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Mercedes Discussion List'
 mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 I don't think he was serious about the 250 ft lb, just stressing the fact
 that they were way over-torqued.

 That's OK, I was an Engineer once but now I'm a Recovering Engineer.

 Thanks,
 Tom Hargrave
 www.kegkits.com
 256-656-1924

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Robert Bigham
 Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 10:09 PM
 To: E M; mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels

 250 ft lb is way too much torque on spherical collar screws holding on
 steel

 or alloy road wheels.

 My Daimler Benz Passenger Car Technical Data book says tighten them
 to 110 NM, equal roughly to 81 ft lb if I didn't botch the conversion.

 No wonder they are hard to get off when torqued to 250 ft lb. The wonder
 is
 that they survive being so overtightened without damage to screw, wheel,
 or
 hub.

 Engineered like no other car

 - Original Message -
 From: E M
 To: Mercedes Discussion List
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 8/19/2007 5:08:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Anti sieze on aluminum wheels


 Oh, the wheel didn't have a problem sitting flush with the hub, but when
 you
 torque the bolts to about 250 or more f/lbs, it's amazing how two things
 can
 kind of stick themselves together! :-) ( Note to me: never never leave the
 car unattended at the garage!! I should know this by now!) All fixed now
 and it allowed me to give the inside of the wheel a good detailing too.
 Just have to do the other three now.

 Ed
 300E






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com