Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-31 Thread Mitch Haley
Allan Streib wrote:
 president in January 2009.  There are benefits to a two party system,
 ...Utopias don't exist.  Would you rather have Hillary or [Romney
 | McCain | Huckabee].  Because it WILL be one of them in January.

I really couldn't care less which of those socialists is POTUS next.
And that is why, if the two arms of the current one party system
give me choices from that list, I won't be voting for that system. 
If I wanted to choose from that list I'd vote Billary back in office,
because they would enjoy far less Congressional support than most. 

I've only voted for one republicrat party presidential candidate
in my life, and I chose the greatest of all evils. It really didn't
matter, my state's vote went to AlGoreJr, but I still hate myself
now for having cast a vote for a president who has done more than
any single man since FDR to expand our goverment outside of its
Constitutional restraints, and for the man who has done more than
any man in our nation's history to destroy the Bill of Rights.  
If National Socialism is what we can expect from the so-called
Republican Party, I fail to see how Hillary's brand of Marxism
could be any worse. 

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Mitch Haley
LarryT wrote:
 
 
 The others running are either Dems or RINOs (republican in name only) who we
 cannot count on to stand up for the constitution our forefathers fought and
 died for. 

You left Fred Thompson out of that group and left Ron Paul in it???
People like Fred and Huckster only look conservative when standing
next to people like Ghouliani, McLame, and Mitt Rotten. 

There's only been one person in Congress who wants to enforce the
Constitution, and everybody (expecially Faux News) seems to go out
of their way to ignore the fact that he's running for President. 
I think yesterday in Florida was the first time that Ghouli beat
Paul, but everybody was treating Rudy like the pre-ordained winner
while ignoring Ron as unelectable. (they said Reagan was unelectable
in January 1980 too)

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Curt Raymond

Ron Paul is the only candidate I'd even consider...

-Curt

Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:05:33 -0500
From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

LarryT wrote:
 
 
 The others running are either Dems or RINOs (republican in name only)
 who we
 cannot count on to stand up for the constitution our forefathers
 fought and
 died for. 

You left Fred Thompson out of that group and left Ron Paul in it???
People like Fred and Huckster only look conservative when standing
next to people like Ghouliani, McLame, and Mitt Rotten. 

There's only been one person in Congress who wants to enforce the
Constitution, and everybody (expecially Faux News) seems to go out
of their way to ignore the fact that he's running for President. 
I think yesterday in Florida was the first time that Ghouli beat
Paul, but everybody was treating Rudy like the pre-ordained winner
while ignoring Ron as unelectable. (they said Reagan was unelectable
in January 1980 too)

   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread LarryT
You;re right, I should not have left R Paul out. Given the alternatives I;ll 
probably vote for him - now that Thompson has dropped out.

Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
.

- Original Message - 
From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics


 LarryT wrote:


 The others running are either Dems or RINOs (republican in name only) who 
 we
 cannot count on to stand up for the constitution our forefathers fought 
 and
 died for.

 You left Fred Thompson out of that group and left Ron Paul in it???
 People like Fred and Huckster only look conservative when standing
 next to people like Ghouliani, McLame, and Mitt Rotten.

 There's only been one person in Congress who wants to enforce the
 Constitution, and everybody (expecially Faux News) seems to go out
 of their way to ignore the fact that he's running for President.
 I think yesterday in Florida was the first time that Ghouli beat
 Paul, but everybody was treating Rudy like the pre-ordained winner
 while ignoring Ron as unelectable. (they said Reagan was unelectable
 in January 1980 too)

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Allan Streib
I liked Thompson too, and of course the time to vote your conscience  
is in the primary.  In the general election it will be important to  
vote for the candidate who best reflects your views AND has a chance  
to win.  The reality is we have a two party system and there will be  
two candidates who have a realistic chance to win.  They will each be  
a compromise for most people.  But voting for your ideal third  
party candidate would just be handing the election to the person you  
LEAST want.  Remember Ross Perot is the reason Bill Clinton got his  
first term.

Allan


On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:06 PM, LarryT wrote:

 You;re right, I should not have left R Paul out. Given the  
 alternatives I;ll
 probably vote for him - now that Thompson has dropped out.

 Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
 .

 - Original Message -
 From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics


 LarryT wrote:


 The others running are either Dems or RINOs (republican in name  
 only) who
 we
 cannot count on to stand up for the constitution our forefathers  
 fought
 and
 died for.

 You left Fred Thompson out of that group and left Ron Paul in it???
 People like Fred and Huckster only look conservative when standing
 next to people like Ghouliani, McLame, and Mitt Rotten.

 There's only been one person in Congress who wants to enforce the
 Constitution, and everybody (expecially Faux News) seems to go out
 of their way to ignore the fact that he's running for President.
 I think yesterday in Florida was the first time that Ghouli beat
 Paul, but everybody was treating Rudy like the pre-ordained winner
 while ignoring Ron as unelectable. (they said Reagan was unelectable
 in January 1980 too)

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Wonko the Sane
I would have loved to see Thompson as the Republican nominee.

But then of course, I am a member of the Democratic Party establishment.

On Jan 30, 2008 8:28 PM, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I liked Thompson too, and of course the time to vote your conscience
 is in the primary.  In the general election it will be important to
 vote for the candidate who best reflects your views AND has a chance
 to win.




-- 
LT Don
http://don.homelinux.net/~don/

apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
The following packages will be replaced
 Prez
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Mitch Haley


Allan Streib wrote:
 a compromise for most people.  But voting for your ideal third
 party candidate would just be handing the election to the person you
 LEAST want.  Remember Ross Perot is the reason Bill Clinton got his
 first term.

Voting for the lesser of two evils is a vote for evil. I did that
once in my life (in 2000), and I'm ashamed of it. You seem proud of it. 
If you don't like the current one party system, why do you continue
to vote for it, and insist that others follow suit? The only way
to break the monopoly is to vote for something other than the status
quo. 
Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Donald Snook
Larry T. wrote: You;re right, I should not have left R Paul out. Given the 
alternatives I;ll probably vote for him - now that Thompson has dropped out.

Fred Thompson was my candidate, too.  But, switching from Fred to Ron doesn't 
make sense to me.  The two of them could not be more different and still be in 
the same party.


Donald H. Snook

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Allan Streib
On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:

 Voting for the lesser of two evils is a vote for evil. I did that  
 once in my life (in 2000), and I'm ashamed of it. You seem proud of  
 it.  If you don't like the current one party system, why do you  
 continue to vote for it, and insist that others follow suit? The  
 only way to break the monopoly is to vote for something other than  
 the status quo.

Pride is not the word I'd use, but I don't live in fantasy land.   
Either the Republican or Democratic nominee is going to be the  
president in January 2009.  There are benefits to a two party system,  
and there are drawbacks.  The benefits are that the majority party  
can probably get some things done.  It forces people to say I want A  
more than B  A drawback is that more often than not, the candidate  
is a compromise in some areas compared to what you might ideally  
want.  Utopias don't exist.  Would you rather have Hillary or [Romney  
| McCain | Huckabee].  Because it WILL be one of them in January.

Allan

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Wonko the Sane
Hopefully (but somewhat doubtful) I will interject only *one* comment on
this thread.

I am an Obama delegate to the county convention here in Iowa.

That being said -- I think McCain has the credentials, the experience (much
of it really bad experiences in the 60s/70s), and the downright common sense
to draw voters from both parties. Maybe even me. He doesn't say what he
thinks is popular or what the RNC wants him to say. He says what he thinks,
and that normally upsets everyone with a vested interest as an insider in
the election process.

If you 'publicans want to stay in the White House, then you'd better start
supporting McCain. He has a legitimate shot at pulling it off. He'd be
neck-to-neck with Obama in a campaign. He'd squash Hillary once the nation
sees her claws come out.

I pray on bended knee for Romney to be the nominee. Dukakis will send him
sympathy cards. A Romney candidate is 100% guaranteed to put my party into
the White House, with a landslide big enough to activate FEMA.

I've been politically active for a very long time -- way back to the Vietnam
era. This is one of the more exciting Presidential races I've observed, and
I was around for Kennedy/Nixon.

D.


On Jan 30, 2008 9:18 PM, Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Larry T. wrote: You;re right, I should not have left R Paul out. Given
 the alternatives I;ll probably vote for him - now that Thompson has dropped
 out.

 Fred Thompson was my candidate, too.  But, switching from Fred to Ron
 doesn't make sense to me.  The two of them could not be more different and
 still be in the same party.


 Donald H. Snook

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com




-- 
LT Don
http://don.homelinux.net/~don/

apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
The following packages will be replaced
 Prez
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Allan Streib

On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Wonko the Sane wrote:

 I pray on bended knee for Romney to be the nominee. Dukakis will  
 send him sympathy cards. A Romney candidate is 100% guaranteed to  
 put my party into the White House, with a landslide big enough to  
 activate FEMA.

That's pretty confident.  History shows that strong conservative  
candidates win national elections.  I'm not sure Romney is that.   
McCain definitely is NOT.  If Shrillary wins in November, it will be  
because the republicans did not find anyone who was convincingly a  
strong conservative, Reagan being the best recent example of that.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Wonko the Sane
Yep. And I will stand by my statement.

You guys don't *have* a strong conservative candidate -- unless God himself
comes down and anoints/endorses Ron Paul. You have a rich businessman who,
based on my observation of the debate this evening, doesn't even have the
self-control to not show by facial expression that he wants to put out a hit
contract (fulfilled by Mormon missionaries, no doubt) on McCain ... running
against an old man with military experience during A TIme Of War.

I am against 99% of what McCain stands for -- but he is a guy I can trust in
the Oval Office.

I shook Romney's hand (as an infiltrator) in Jefferson, Iowa, and looked
into his eyes. I saw pure evil and ego and opportunism. McCain wants to be
President because he loves his country. Romney wants to be President because
it is the ultimate CEO position.

Obama/X ticket will change the world, but McCain/Paul would perhaps get my
vote.

On Jan 30, 2008 9:52 PM, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Wonko the Sane wrote:

  I pray on bended knee for Romney to be the nominee. Dukakis will
  send him sympathy cards. A Romney candidate is 100% guaranteed to
  put my party into the White House, with a landslide big enough to
  activate FEMA.

 That's pretty confident.  History shows that strong conservative
 candidates win national elections.  I'm not sure Romney is that.
 McCain definitely is NOT.  If Shrillary wins in November, it will be
 because the republicans did not find anyone who was convincingly a
 strong conservative, Reagan being the best recent example of that.



-- 
LT Don
http://don.homelinux.net/~don/

apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
The following packages will be replaced
 Prez
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Donald Snook
Allen wrote:

If Shrillary wins in November, it will be because the republicans did not find 
anyone who was convincingly a strong conservative, Reagan being the best recent 
example of that.

Be careful labeling Reagan as conservative if you apply that to current 
conservatives. Reagan was a true conservative. That means the focus is on 
smaller government, judicial restraint, lower taxes, and less government 
intervention in our lives.  Think Barry Goldwater.  Reagan was not a 
conservative (as has been recently defined) on Social issues.  Genuine 
conservatives believe in personal freedom and personal responsibility.  Reagan 
was not a hard core champion of far right religious conservatives.

If you are interested (and most of you are probably not), the best resource on 
Reagan is a book called Role of A lifetime By Lou Cannon

Donald H. Snook

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Allan Streib

On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:48 PM, Donald Snook wrote:

 Reagan was a true conservative. That means the focus is on smaller  
 government, judicial restraint, lower taxes, and less government  
 intervention in our lives.

That was what I meant by strong conservative.  What you said, as  
well as a unflagging belief in the goodness of the country and  
optimism about what individuals living in freedom can accomplish.

None of the current crop of likely republican nominees are all this.   
They each have some bits of it.  Nobody has all of it in one package.

Allan

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Hargrave
That's why the party is so fractured.

Thanks,
Tom Hargrave
www.kegkits.com
256-656-1924
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Allan Streib
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 11:30 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: all inclusive politics


On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:48 PM, Donald Snook wrote:

 Reagan was a true conservative. That means the focus is on smaller  
 government, judicial restraint, lower taxes, and less government  
 intervention in our lives.

That was what I meant by strong conservative.  What you said, as  
well as a unflagging belief in the goodness of the country and  
optimism about what individuals living in freedom can accomplish.

None of the current crop of likely republican nominees are all this.   
They each have some bits of it.  Nobody has all of it in one package.

Allan

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1250 - Release Date: 1/29/2008
10:20 PM



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com