Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Jim Cathey
Several people I know are now just putting their stuff on github 
pages[1].


Looks like it requires system resources that I do not have,
and do not intend to procure.  I am _very_ much against the
widespread attitude that machines older than a couple of years
should not be supported.  My feeble little pages work(ed) on
any browser ever made, and were maintained with emacs and ftp,
tools that pre-date the web itself.  (As do I!)  Not flashy,
but functional.

-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Peter Frederick
Amusingly, the actual machines are unchanged from 5 years ago, and  
possibly as much as ten as far a processors and speed go.  Might have  
more memory, but not that much.


Processor speed stalled in about 2008, it's impossible to air-cool  
silicon over about 3GHz, and the memory access bottleneck hasn't  
changed a bit, either.


So the difference between a 5 year old machine and a brand new of of  
the same specifications (and they are just about identical) is lower  
price today and a different box.  Most desktops have a tiny MOBO now  
that the same circuitry is in use and has been put on fewer VLSI  
chips, but as far as operation goes, no change.


Software has changed quite a bit, but not for the better.  Windows 7  
is a resource hog (like very version of Windows ever sold) and Windows  
8 stinks -- there is a reason so many operations have stuck with XP.   
It sucks, and is so transparent to virus and hacking you might as well  
post what you are doing on the outside of your building, but it works,  
and NONE of the high value proprietary business software moves over.   
I have to retire a piece of equipment very soon because the  
manufacturer will not write software that runs under W7, although the  
equipment works as well as ever (which is to say, manages).  The  
original software appears to have been written by a high school kid,  
really terrible stuff.  I've not seen a divide by zero error that  
locks up the computer anywhere else for a long, long time!


We may be reaching the end of the digital craze -- I've seen way too  
many later model MBs in the junkyard, undamaged.  $5000 for a pair of  
computers because the brake lights won't work, and no promise that  
replacing the do everything computers will fix it.


On top of that, internet aware cars subject to virus infestation and  
drive by wire is just plain stupid.  Once cars start going out of  
control and killing people we may remember that mechanical steering is  
not only cheaper, but it's impossible to hack into a hydraulic pump  
and mechanical valves.


Peter

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Jim Cathey
Processor speed stalled in about 2008, it's impossible to air-cool 
silicon over about 3GHz, and the memory access bottleneck hasn't 
changed a bit, either.


What's more, when your system demands 10x the electrical power
to get 2x the speed, and as prices of electricity continue to
escalate, people will start to notice!

I have.  I'm trying to put together a free G4 tower mac as a backup
server, even though we have a spare G5 that would do it much easier,
because it draws about 40W versus the 250W or so of the G5.

The rampant inefficiency of current software is truly disgusting,
especially to a guy that knows what the raw hardware is capable of.
My now-ancient Pismo laptop is capable of running several full-screen
movies at once, horsepower-wise, yet it cannot surf basic web sites
anymore.

-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Peter Frederick
Adobe Flash, the original CPU killer.  There is  a reason that Jobs  
refused to allow it on his newer stuff.


CPU usage goes to 100% when you start Flash, even though it is doing  
nothing.



Peter

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread arche...@embarqmail.com
I took everything related to Adobe Flash I could find off my computer 
when I read that it had several unfixed holes in its security, but its 
invitations to be downloaded still keep popping up on various websites.
Are the websites the source or is there still some Adobe Flash program 
on my computer that's doing it?  I'm using Mozilla Firefox and 
Thunderbird which someone mentioned in relation to Adobe Flash.  I'm 
also using Adobe Reader.

Thanks,
Gerry

On 6/10/2014 10:24 AM, Peter Frederick wrote:
Adobe Flash, the original CPU killer.  There is  a reason that Jobs 
refused to allow it on his newer stuff.


CPU usage goes to 100% when you start Flash, even though it is doing 
nothing.



Peter

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list 
owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
It's probably the website 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 10, 2014, at 10:15 AM, arche...@embarqmail.com 
 arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 I took everything related to Adobe Flash I could find off my computer when I 
 read that it had several unfixed holes in its security, but its invitations 
 to be downloaded still keep popping up on various websites.
 Are the websites the source or is there still some Adobe Flash program on my 
 computer that's doing it?  I'm using Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird which 
 someone mentioned in relation to Adobe Flash.  I'm also using Adobe Reader.
 Thanks,
 Gerry
 
 On 6/10/2014 10:24 AM, Peter Frederick wrote:
 Adobe Flash, the original CPU killer.  There is  a reason that Jobs refused 
 to allow it on his newer stuff.
 
 CPU usage goes to 100% when you start Flash, even though it is doing 
 nothing.
 
 
 Peter
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Dan Penoff
You would be proud of me...

I run a Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) that has an EFI firmware update to a 2,1 using a 
boot loader to run OSX 10.9 if I wish.  Working on ways to run OSX 10 on it 
should be successful soon.

I have a 120GB SSD as a boot drive, 14GB RAM (nearly all scrounged) and just 
recently bought a couple of 5355 SLAEG CPUs for $50 to bump it from four 
processors at 2.0GHz to eight running at 2.6GHz.  Last night I installed an ATI 
5850 graphics card flashed with the proper EFI so I get boot screens.

It's an antique, but there is a large contingent of Mac enthusiasts with these 
and some willing code writers who keep finding ways around the 32 bit EFI they 
are crippled with. I love it and can't imagine using anything else.

MacDan

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net wrote:

 Several people I know are now just putting their stuff on github pages[1].
 
 Looks like it requires system resources that I do not have,
 and do not intend to procure.  I am _very_ much against the
 widespread attitude that machines older than a couple of years
 should not be supported.  My feeble little pages work(ed) on
 any browser ever made, and were maintained with emacs and ftp,
 tools that pre-date the web itself.  (As do I!)  Not flashy,
 but functional.
 
 -- Jim
 
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Allan Streib
Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net writes:

 Several people I know are now just putting their stuff on github 
 pages[1].

 Looks like it requires system resources that I do not have,
 and do not intend to procure.  I am _very_ much against the
 widespread attitude that machines older than a couple of years
 should not be supported.  My feeble little pages work(ed) on
 any browser ever made, and were maintained with emacs and ftp,
 tools that pre-date the web itself.  (As do I!)  Not flashy,
 but functional.

I'm right there with you. My newest computer is from 2007, a salvage
item, running OpenBSD. Other one is a G4 MacBook still chugging along.

Perhaps I'm missing something on the requirements. You mean the
requirements to use git (very minimal, install the command-line utility;
you don't need the fancy GUI tools) or the requirements to actually view
the github pages (may require JavaScript and a current browser, as many
blog type sites now do, but I don't think this is the case. I haven't
verified that though).

Alternatively you can provision a small virtual server on something like
DigitalOcean for $5/month, install Apache or NGINX and serve static HTML
from there.

Allan

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Craig
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:16:12 -0700 Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net
wrote:

  Processor speed stalled in about 2008, it's impossible to air-cool 
  silicon over about 3GHz, and the memory access bottleneck hasn't 
  changed a bit, either.
 
 What's more, when your system demands 10x the electrical power
 to get 2x the speed, and as prices of electricity continue to
 escalate, people will start to notice!

I have gone the low-power route with our computers. We have:

ASUS M4A785TD-M EVO AM3 AMD 785G micro ATX motherboardAMD AD605EHDGIBOX
Athlon II X4 605e 2.3GHz 2MB Cache AM3 45W Quad-Core Processor
along with 4 GB DDR3 RAM (which takes less power than DDR2)

It takes 43 W with one disk running and the second unmounted and at
standby.

More than enough horsepower for our uses, even running COMSOL.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Curt Raymond
I disagree with this, although clock speeds aren't increasing anymore we're 
seeing more and more cores so 6 core processors aren't uncommon anymore. 64bit 
operating systems allow much more RAM in the computer which has been a huge 
boon to high demand applications like our video and audio editing applications 
where desktop systems with 16 or 32GB of RAM are not uncommon.

Win7 is bigger than WinXP but considerably less bloated than WinVista. I make 
images of the machines in my classroom, Clonezilla will make a WinXP image in 
about 6GB, WinVista is more like 28GB while Win7 is only maybe 7 or 8GB. Its 
easy to say the OS is bloated but it has to be everything to everybody, provide 
support for many different hardware manufacturers and run all sorts of software 
while still costing less to make than it can be sold for. Sure theres lazy code 
but its kind of the nature of the beast...


-Curt

Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:29:23 -0500
From: Peter Frederick psf...@earthlink.net
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: file server
Message-ID: 3ae2ff27-13f0-4866-a982-a72c6435b...@earthlink.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Amusingly, the actual machines are unchanged from 5 years ago, and  
possibly as much as ten as far a processors and speed go.  Might have  
more memory, but not that much.

Processor speed stalled in about 2008, it's impossible to air-cool  
silicon over about 3GHz, and the memory access bottleneck hasn't  
changed a bit, either.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Curt Raymond
Have you looked at the Raspberry Pi? I'm thinking about finally building one, I 
want to put it in a 9inch Mac chassis. I've got a 512K I'd gutted for a fish 
tank but never finished building. Now I want to make it a retro gaming station. 
I bought a USB to Atari joystick adapter that works a treat. I want to setup 
port duplicators so everything looks right. The whole computer will run off 5v 
2a plus whatever I'll need for a very small LCD monitor. Not the highest 
horsepower computer around but plenty to run an Atari emulator.

-Curt

Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:16:12 -0700
From: Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: file server
Message-ID: c6a96144-f0a9-11e3-bdfc-000502d9a...@windwireless.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

 Processor speed stalled in about 2008, it's impossible to air-cool 
 silicon over about 3GHz, and the memory access bottleneck hasn't 
 changed a bit, either.

What's more, when your system demands 10x the electrical power
to get 2x the speed, and as prices of electricity continue to
escalate, people will start to notice!

I have.  I'm trying to put together a free G4 tower mac as a backup
server, even though we have a spare G5 that would do it much easier,
because it draws about 40W versus the 250W or so of the G5.

The rampant inefficiency of current software is truly disgusting,
especially to a guy that knows what the raw hardware is capable of.
My now-ancient Pismo laptop is capable of running several full-screen
movies at once, horsepower-wise, yet it cannot surf basic web sites
anymore.

-- Jim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Jim Cathey

Perhaps I'm missing something on the requirements.


Right on the front it says it requires the 10.9 OS.  Or was
it 10.7?  Either way, game over.  I also don't relish the
thought of being on vandal patrol forever.  Our machines run
10.2 through 10.6.  Most are on 10.5 right now.  Only one
_can_ run 10.6, the G5's are all very happy with 10.5,
the G4's and G3's are running 10.4, except for the nascent
400 MHz G4 file-server that has 10.5 wedged onto it, with
difficulty, one HD-limited Pismo that's on 10.3, and the
lowly Beige G3 (our first OSX machine, and upon which I
write) is trailing at 10.2.8.

Alternatively you can provision a small virtual server on something 
like
DigitalOcean for $5/month, install Apache or NGINX and serve static 
HTML

from there.


Least expensive fraction of a _real_ server I can get is,
so far, estimated at about $10/year.

A friend suggests that I host it myself, at home.  Need some
sort of DNS trickery in order to handle the non-static IP
address of our router.  But the bandwidth needs are low,
and I could put my own bandwidth limits on it, etc.
There's about 100MB of static content, and we have about
a 4Mbps pipe that's up 24x7 now.  And we never UP-load,
that side of the pipe is pretty much going to waste.

I'm not sure whether you can get the search engines to
index your site if you do that, though.

-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Allan Streib
Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net writes:

 Perhaps I'm missing something on the requirements.

 Right on the front it says it requires the 10.9 OS.  Or was
 it 10.7?  Either way, game over.

That's for the github GUI tool. You can do everything from the command
line assuming you can find a way to install the git utilities, which at
this point may prove to be tedious on an older Mac OS X but I don't
think impossible. However, sounds like this is just not really the
solution you're looking for.

 A friend suggests that I host it myself, at home.  Need some
 sort of DNS trickery in order to handle the non-static IP
 address of our router.  But the bandwidth needs are low,
 and I could put my own bandwidth limits on it, etc.

Yes, you can do this. Dynamic DNS. There are many providers. ISPs don't
like it, and it bay technically violate their terms of service, but from
what I've heard most won't bother you about a low-volume site.

 I'm not sure whether you can get the search engines to
 index your site if you do that, though.

No idea. At best it will not enhance your site's ranking. It may hurt
it.

Allan


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Craig
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:52:04 -0700 Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net
wrote:

 A friend suggests that I host it myself, at home.  Need some
 sort of DNS trickery in order to handle the non-static IP
 address of our router.

Lt. Don (Wonko the Sane) had some web pages hosted, IIRC, dyndns.com or
some such so he could host pages from home.


 But the bandwidth needs are low, and I could put my own bandwidth
 limits on it, etc. There's about 100MB of static content, and we have
 about a 4Mbps pipe that's up 24x7 now.  And we never UP-load,
 that side of the pipe is pretty much going to waste.

I think that side is pretty much going to waste for all of us.


 I'm not sure whether you can get the search engines to
 index your site if you do that, though.

Good question.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread arche...@embarqmail.com
Thanks, Kaleb.  Not much can be done about it then, I suppose.  Seems to 
be more and more in your face popups and advertising on various 
websites.  I wonder if such popups  are a problem on other OSs; Linux, 
BSD, etc.; or on email clients other than Mozilla Thunderbird?

Gerry

On 6/10/2014 12:45 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

It's probably the website

Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 10, 2014, at 10:15 AM,arche...@embarqmail.com  
arche...@embarqmail.com  wrote:

I took everything related to Adobe Flash I could find off my computer when I 
read that it had several unfixed holes in its security, but its invitations to 
be downloaded still keep popping up on various websites.
Are the websites the source or is there still some Adobe Flash program on my 
computer that's doing it?  I'm using Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird which 
someone mentioned in relation to Adobe Flash.  I'm also using Adobe Reader.
Thanks,
Gerry


On 6/10/2014 10:24 AM, Peter Frederick wrote:
Adobe Flash, the original CPU killer.  There is  a reason that Jobs refused to 
allow it on his newer stuff.

CPU usage goes to 100% when you start Flash, even though it is doing 
nothing.


Peter

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archiveshttp://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archiveshttp://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archiveshttp://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Craig
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:52:49 -0400 arche...@embarqmail.com
arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Thanks, Kaleb.  Not much can be done about it then, I suppose.  Seems
 to be more and more in your face popups and advertising on various 
 websites.  I wonder if such popups  are a problem on other OSs; Linux, 
 BSD, etc.; or on email clients other than Mozilla Thunderbird?
 Gerry

If you are using a Mozilla product (Firefox or SeaMonkey) get the Add-on
NoScript. It does wonders for pop-ups and other things.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-10 Thread Rick Knoble
. Original Message From:CraigSent:Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:04 PMTo:Mercedes Discussion ListReply To:Mercedes Discussion List‎Subject:Re: [MBZ] OT: file serverOn Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:52:49 -0400 "arche...@embarqmail.com"arche...@embarqmail.com wrote: Thanks, Kaleb. Not much can be done about it then, I suppose. Seems to be more and more "in your face" popups and advertising on various websites. I wonder if such popups are a problem on other OSs; Linux, BSD, etc.; or on email clients other than Mozilla Thunderbird? GerryIf you are using a Mozilla product (Firefox or SeaMonkey) get the Add-onNoScript. It does wonders for pop-ups and other things.I also use Ad block plus. No pop ups, no side bar ads. It make Web browsing so much more pleasant.   Rick Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone‎




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: file server

2014-06-09 Thread Allan Streib
Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net writes:

 I would have just put this on my web site, but I believe I
 may have lost it.  I am considering free/low-cost options.
 Anybody have any good suggestions for a static-content site?
 It looks like maybe $20/year is a reasonable aspiration for
 something that might work.  Half of that is a domain name.

Several people I know are now just putting their stuff on github pages[1].

The nice thing is everything is version controlled in github so you can
always recover if you screw something up.

You can write in straight HTML, or if you want to get fancy, use
jekyll[2].


[1] https://pages.github.com/
[2] https://help.github.com/articles/using-jekyll-with-pages

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.