Re: backcolor by html?

2000-05-09 Thread Richard Gaskin

On 5/8/00 10:42 PM, Christoph Wollek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Halo all,
 is there a possibility for setting the backcolor of a word by
 html-shortcut, like setting the style "bold" of a word in a htmltext by
 B//B
 
 e.g.:  replace "word" with "Bword/B" in text
 
 Thanks in advance

The only way I know how is to do it in a var and replace it:


   put the htmlText of fld 1 into tData
   replace "word" with "Bword/B" in tData
   set the htmlText of fld 1 to tData


-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World
 Multimedia Design and Development for Mac, Windows, UNIX, and the Web
 _
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   ICQ#60248349Fax: 323-225-0716


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: backcolor by html?

2000-05-09 Thread Dave Cragg

At 6:42 AM +0100 5/9/00, Christoph Wollek wrote:
Halo all,
is there a possibility for setting the backcolor of a word by
html-shortcut, like setting the style "bold" of a word in a htmltext by
B//B

e.g.:  replace "word" with "Bword/B" in text

Thanks in advance

Christoph

Hi

You can set the color of text using htmlText like this:

FONT color=blue your text /FONT

Is this what you're looking for?

Check the htmlText in the the reference for more information.

Cheers
Dave Cragg

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Windows CE?

2000-05-09 Thread Jarno Järvenpää

Hi,

does MetaCard run on WinCE?

-Jarno Järvenpää


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Windows CE?

2000-05-09 Thread Kevin Miller

On 9/5/00 9:41 am, Jarno Järvenpää [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 does MetaCard run on WinCE?

No.

Kevin

 -Jarno Järvenpää

Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xworlds.com/
Cross Worlds Computing, MetaCard Distributors, Custom Development.
Tel: +44 (0)131 672 2909.  Fax: +44 (0)1639 830 707.


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Digest metacard.v003.n360

2000-05-09 Thread Raymond E. Griffith

on 5/09/2000 1:02 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:

 I disagree -- the latter behavior would be fine.  If I really needed to, I
 could lock and unlock the screen to update the outer card regions.
 
 For example: I have a series of cards in a stack that use the same header
 imagery at the top of each card (in a shared group).  I'd like to use a
 localized visual effect on the lower portion of the cards, to update the
 content that appears in that region, without affecting the header images.
 Currently there's no way to do this except by placing all the images/data on
 a single card and hiding/showing the desired content.  Why limit this effect
 to a single card?  Why not allow the use of MC's card structure to organize
 content for transitions (visual effects)?
 
OK, this is untested, untried, etc.
Make your header another stack (say a substack). Show it as a palette with
decorations set to empty so it can't move and set its loc on the stack where
you want it.

You should be able to use the visual effects on the card without affecting
the image.

At least try it and let me know!

Raymond

 Regards,
 
 Scott
 
 _
 Scott Rossi   Tactile Media - Multimedia  Design
 Creative Director Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web: www.tactilemedia.com


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Odd Title Behavior?

2000-05-09 Thread Scott Rossi

I'm seeing what I think is odd behavior when saving a stack as a 2.3
standalone on Windows.  The titlebar of the standalone shows up with the
stack name, not the stack title.

Under the MC editor, the stack title displays correctly.  I've saved the
stack three times now to confirm that I do have a title applied to the
stack.  I used the answer dialog in the standalone to confirm the stack
title is present.  And if I use brute force and set the title of the stack
to itself in a preOpenStack handler, the stack's title shows up as garbage
characters. 

The style of this stack is a standard topLevel window.  Am I missing
something with regard to how stack titles are supposed to work?

Scott

_
Scott Rossi   Tactile Media - Multimedia  Design
Creative Director Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web: www.tactilemedia.com


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Exporting a GIF file from a card

2000-05-09 Thread Larry_R_Huisingh

Is it possible to export a card image object to a GIF file?  The only thing
on exporting I found in the help files was a reference to a PBM format file.
Ultimately I want to make the white areas of a card image transparent and I
believe I can only do that via a GIF file with transparency turned on.  I
want to create a series of GIF files from my cards and then I will go
through and set the transparency colors on each file.  After that I will
import these modified GIF files back into their stack, replacing the
previous images.

Larry Huisingh


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Odd Title Behavior?

2000-05-09 Thread Scott Rossi

Recently, I wrote:

 I'm seeing what I think is odd behavior when saving a stack as a 2.3
 standalone on Windows.  The titlebar of the standalone shows up with the
 stack name, not the stack title.

I figured out the problem -- I'm using Tuviah's external collection in the
standalone and the DLL wasn't present in the same directory.  Strange that
it should effect the stack title though.

Still diggin' on those useful externals -- thanks Tuviah.

Regards,

Scott

_
Scott Rossi   Tactile Media - Multimedia  Design
Creative Director Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web: www.tactilemedia.com


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Limit Visual Effect?

2000-05-09 Thread Geoff Canyon

On 5/8/00 9:47 PM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A good point -- the problem effects are those that involve movement.  I used
dissolve in an example to illustrate the syntax, but the fact remains it
would be useful to limit the results of an effect between card transitions,
not just on a single card.

A transition limited to a particular rectangle would be nice; another 
option would be a transition limited to objects not common to the two 
cards. I.E., assuming the cards share all the same backgrounds, the 
transition would affect only card objects. This again would only affect 
the "moving" transitions, but it would be different from limiting the 
transition to a rectangle, because, for a push, for example, some objects 
that made the transition might move over/under objects that didn't move 
because they were common to the two cards.

I don't think what I just said was very clear...

gc


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: field height and group height

2000-05-09 Thread andu



This one is slowly driving me insane.

Say I have a group with two fields in it - one is a heading, and the other
is a column below that.  And I want the column field to be really, really
tall... as in a height of 1635.  And to top it all off, I want to make a
group out of the two fields, and make the group scrollable (because my stack
is only 400 tall.)  I have not been able to do this.  Every time I quit out
of my stack and then come back, the field gets resized smaller.  If I try to
set the height of the column field on openCard, it doesn't work... it
extends the field both higher and lower, and covers the heading field.
Arrgh.

Why does MetaCard by default shrink fields that are over a certain height?
And is there a way to defeat this?

Set lockLocation to true for both.

r


Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.

 

Regards, Andu

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.