Re: Compiling for Windows

2002-09-27 Thread Shari

>MetaCard has its creator and type codes set up to only display Mac 
>files in its open file dialogs. You can still compile for other 
>platforms, but you'll have to type in the engine path manually. 
>Ignore the button that lets you choose an engine.

You know, I almost tried that... LOL!

By the way, if any of you have any tidbits to share regarding 
compiling into a standalone, issues you've encountered and the fix, 
etc., let me know and I will include them in the article.

Shari C
-- 
--Shareware Games for the Mac--
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Re: Frontscripts and backscripts

2002-09-27 Thread Shari

>It'd be a lot more convenient if the engine had a way of making sure it only
>used the IDE's error dialog when available.   I've lost a lot of
>productivity first due to erroneous error reporting, then with needing to
>remember to delete and re-add my error dialog between standalone builds. :(

I actually created a template stack, complete with not only 
Metacard's embedded stacks, but my own that are included with each 
program.  So it comes built in to everything I create, from the 
get-go.  Much easier than trying to remember which stacks to embed 
and which to ignore :-)
-- 
--Shareware Games for the Mac--
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Re: Compiling for Windows

2002-09-27 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 9/27/02 4:31 PM, Shari wrote:

> In the Standalone Builder dialog, when looking for the Windows engine, 
> it sees all the Mac engines, but the metacard.exe file, which I'm 
> assuming is the engine, does not show up for me to choose.

MetaCard has its creator and type codes set up to only display Mac files 
in its open file dialogs. You can still compile for other platforms, but 
you'll have to type in the engine path manually. Ignore the button that 
lets you choose an engine.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Re: Compiling for Windows

2002-09-27 Thread Rich Mooney

The windows MetaCard engine is named mc.exe.

Rich Mooney
Payne Sparkman Mfg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



> I have a Mac.
>
> Attempting to compile the stack for Windows.
>
> In the Standalone Builder dialog, when looking for the Windows
> engine, it sees all the Mac engines, but the metacard.exe file, which
> I'm assuming is the engine, does not show up for me to choose.
>
> I tried changing the stack's name to blackjack.exe instead of
blackjack.mc.
>
> No change.
>
> Anybody?
> --
> --Shareware Games for the Mac--
> http://www.gypsyware.com
> ___
> metacard mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Compiling for Windows

2002-09-27 Thread Shari

I have a Mac.

Attempting to compile the stack for Windows.

In the Standalone Builder dialog, when looking for the Windows 
engine, it sees all the Mac engines, but the metacard.exe file, which 
I'm assuming is the engine, does not show up for me to choose.

I tried changing the stack's name to blackjack.exe instead of blackjack.mc.

No change.

Anybody?
-- 
--Shareware Games for the Mac--
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Re: Frontscripts and backscripts

2002-09-27 Thread Richard Gaskin

Shari wrote:

>> Yeah, it seems to get confused when your own stack file contains an error
>> dialog.  If you delete yours while you're working then MC's should report
>> everything okay.  Just remember to put yours back before you build your
>> standalone.
> 
> Hmmm, that's a good piece of info... thanks :-)

It'd be a lot more convenient if the engine had a way of making sure it only
used the IDE's error dialog when available.   I've lost a lot of
productivity first due to erroneous error reporting, then with needing to
remember to delete and re-add my error dialog between standalone builds. :(

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Custom Software and Web Development for All Major Platforms
 Developer of WebMerge 2.0: Publish any database on any site
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



unsubscribe

2002-09-27 Thread Rachael . Bourke/Dublin/IE/RoyalSun





Rachael Bourke
I.T. Dept
Ext: 3643
Ph: + 353 1 6363643
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 
  Shari
 
  cc: 
 
  Sent by: Subject: Re: Frontscripts and 
backscripts
  metacard-admin@lists 
 
  .runrev.com  
 
   
 
   
 
  27/09/02 15:27   
 
  Please respond to
 
  metacard 
 
   
 
   
 




THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the detailed
disclaimer below.
---


>Yeah, it seems to get confused when your own stack file contains an error
>dialog.  If you delete yours while you're working then MC's should report
>everything okay.  Just remember to put yours back before you build your
>standalone.

Hmmm, that's a good piece of info... thanks :-)
--
--Shareware Games for the Mac--
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



---
The following message has been automatically added by the mail gateway to
comply with a Royal & SunAlliance IT Security requirement.

As this email arrived via the Internet you should be cautious about its
origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information or
legal/contractual obligations are particularly vulnerable. In these cases
you should not reply unless you are authorised to do so, and adequate
encryption is employed.

If you have any questions, please speak to your local desktop support team
or IT security contact.
---




___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Re: Frontscripts and backscripts

2002-09-27 Thread Shari

>Yeah, it seems to get confused when your own stack file contains an error
>dialog.  If you delete yours while you're working then MC's should report
>everything okay.  Just remember to put yours back before you build your
>standalone.

Hmmm, that's a good piece of info... thanks :-)
-- 
--Shareware Games for the Mac--
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



re: saving styled text?

2002-09-27 Thread miscdas

eric engle wrote: 

2) I would prefer to save the file not as an .html but
as a .doc or at least .rtf 

I know that the html file can be read by current
versiosn of word - but have you ever looked at what
word does when it generates html files? Simple 15 k
files have turned into 50-90 monstrosities (I am not
joking) when exporting a doc from HTML to word. I am
_hoping that the reverse is not true... but I could
easily imagine M.$. bloating imported files (so they
can later sell a proprietary debloating program). 

So this is why I would prefer to save as a .doc or
.rtf rather than html. 


Eric, 

MicroShaft Word also creates highly bloated RTF files, so this may not be 
much better thatn the HTML solution. Try creating an RTF in another program, 
open it in Word, then save it. Then check the file size. This is a result of 
the RTF "standard" being so loosely defined that MS RTF is actually a 
superset of most other RTF definitions. However, MS includes some features 
that many other RTF generators lack, such as full paragraph justification. 
Therefore, beware of lost formatting when opening in another program an RTF 
file created in Word. 

Also, save the RTF file as an HTML file and compare the files sizes. 

miscdas
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard