[meteorite-list] Meteorite Crashes Through Roof of New Zealand House

2004-06-12 Thread Ron Baalke


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200406/s1130666.htm

Meteorite touches down in NZ home
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
June 12, 2004

A meteorite has crashed through the roof of a house in Auckland, New 
Zealand, much to the surprise of the home's owners.

Scientists were sceptical about the report but have now confirmed the 
1.3 kilogram rock has fallen from space.

It is only the ninth meteor to land in New Zealand.

Its rarity makes it valuable to collectors as well as scientists.

Joel Schiff, from Auckland University, says the circumstances of the 
meteor's discovery also add to its value.

"Falling through a roof is really an exceptional event that rarely happens, 
and this is a beautiful large specimen," he said.

Scientists plan to analyse the chemical composition of the meteorite to find 
out more about where it came from.


--

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3572212
&thesection=news&thesubsection=general

Meteorite crashes through roof of Auckland house 
New Zealand Herald
June 13, 2004

A black lump that crashed into an Auckland family's living room yesterday 
was identified as only the ninth meteorite to be found in this country, 
television's One News reported. 

The 1.3kg, four billion-year-old rock fell through the roof of the house in 
the suburb of Ellerslie about 9am. 

"There was just a huge explosion and we looked around and there was just dust 
everywhere," householder Brenda Archer told the station. 

"I don't know what to make of it, it's unbelievable. I'm just glad no one was 
sitting on the couch because they just would have got absolutely crowned." 

Specialists were convinced the rock was a meteorite, but would not know where 
it had come from until it was fully examined, One News said. 

Overseas dealers were expected to offer the Archers cash for the rock. 

"Falling through a roof is really an exceptional event that rarely happens, and this 
is a beautiful large specimen," Joel Schiff of Auckland University said. 

-

Meteorite crashes onto couch
The Australian
June 13, 2004

A 1.3kg meteorite crashed through an Auckland city home, hitting the couch 
and ending up under a computer, the Sunday Star Times reported today.

The book-sized rock hit Phil and Brenda Archer's suburban Ellerslie home on 
Saturday morning, leaving a large hole in their roof.

"I was in the kitchen doing breakfast and there was this almighty explosion," 
Brenda said. "It was like a bomb had gone off. I couldn't see anything, there 
was just dust."

She thought something had exploded in the ceiling, but her husband saw a stone 
under the computer and it was hot to touch.

The rock hit a leather couch and bounced back up to the ceiling before rolling 
under the computer. 

The Archer's one-year-old grandson Luca was playing nearby but was unhurt.

"He must have a guardian angel," Brenda said.

Auckland University meteorite expert Joel Schiff said the rock was "a national 
treasure", but international collectors would offer big money for it.

He said the chondrite type meteor - meaning it was chipped off an asteroid - 
had probably hit the atmosphere the size of a basketball at 15 kilometres per 
second before slowing to around 100-200 metres a second at impact. 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cassini's Flyby of Phoebe Shows a Moon With a Battered Past

2004-06-12 Thread Ron Baalke


Carolina Martinez (818) 354-9382
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

Heidi Finn  (720) 974-5859
Cassini Imaging Central Laboratory for Operations
Space Science Institute, Boulder, Colo.

News Release:  2004-147 June 12, 2004

Cassini's Flyby of Phoebe Shows a Moon With a Battered Past

First images from the Cassini flyby of Phoebe reveal it to be a
scarred, cratered outpost with a very old surface and a
mysterious past, and a great deal of variation in surface
brightness across its surface.

"What spectacular images," said Dr. Carolyn Porco, Cassini
Imaging Team leader at the Space Science Institute in Boulder,
Colo.  "So sharp and clear and showing a great many geological
features, large and small.  It's obvious a lot of new insights
into the origin of this strange body will come as a result of all
this."

"What we are seeing is very neat.  Phoebe is a heavily cratered
body.  We might be seeing one of the chunks from the formation of
the solar system, 4.5 billion years ago.  It's too soon to say,"
said Dr. Torrence Johnson, Cassini imaging team member at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "It's important to
see the big picture from all of the other instruments to get the
global view on this tiny moon."

Dr. Gerhard Neukum, an imaging team member from Freie University
in Berlin, said, "It is very interesting and quite clear that a
lot of craters smaller than a kilometer are visible. This means,
besides the big-ones, lots of projectiles smaller than 100 meters
(328 feet) have hit Phoebe."  Whether these projectiles came from
outside or within the Saturn system is debatable.

There is a suspicion that Phoebe, the largest of Saturn's outer
moons, might be parent to the other, much smaller retrograde
outer moons that orbit Saturn.

Dr. Joseph Burns, an imaging team member and professor at Cornell
University, Ithaca, N.Y. said, "Looking at those big 50
kilometers (31 mile) craters, one has to wonder whether their
impact ejecta might be the other tiny moons that orbit Saturn on
paths much like Phoebe's."

All planned 11 instruments operated as expected and all data was
acquired.  Scientists plan to use the data to create global maps of
the cratered moon, and to determine Phoebe's composition, mass and
density. It will take scientists several days to pour over the data
to make more concrete conclusions.

Cassini came within approximately 2,068 kilometers (about 1,285
miles) of the dark moon on Friday, June 11.  The spacecraft was
pointing its instruments at the moon during the flyby.  Several
hours later it turned to point its antenna to Earth.  The signal
was received through the Deep Space Network antennas in Madrid,
Spain and Goldstone, in California's Mojave Desert, at 7:52 a.m.
PDT today.  Cassini was traveling at a relative speed of 20,900
kilometers per hour (13,000 miles per hour) relative to Saturn.
It's been 23 years since a spacecraft last visited Phoebe.  The
Voyager 2 flyby in 1981 was at a distance from 2.2 million
kilometers, (about 1.4 million miles), 1,000 times farther away.

With the Phoebe accomplished, Cassini is on course for Saturn.  A
trajectory correction maneuver is scheduled for June 16.  Cassini
will conduct a critical 96-minute burn before going into orbit
around Saturn on June 30 (July 1 Universal Time).  During Cassini's
planned four-year tour it will conduct 76 orbits around the Saturn
system and execute 52 close encounters with seven of Saturn's 31
known moons.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the
European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of
Technology in Pasadena, manages the Cassini-Huygens mission for
NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, D.C. The Cassini
orbiter and its two onboard cameras were designed, developed and
assembled at JPL.  The imaging team is based at the Space Science
Institute, Boulder, Colo.

For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission, visit

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/index.cfm

and the Cassini imaging team home page,

http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/ .

  -end-


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Video re New Zealand event

2004-06-12 Thread Charlie Devine
Ken wrote:

 >Charlie
 >Thanks very much for the link.

Your welcome, Ken.  And thank you for the description which gave me some
idea of what I'm missing:-)  Guess we'll all be following the saga of
this new fall as it unfolds.
Best wishes,
Charlie

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Video re New Zealand event

2004-06-12 Thread E. L. Jones
I hope Joel told them to not throw away any of the items which were 
struck, gouged, or otherwise penetrated.

Hummm...What is the exchange rate for NZ currency now adays?  What is 
the fair value rate in New Orleans terms...? (ok  just a little satire 
folks)

Actually the report was very well done and seemed to be technically 
acurate for a change.

Elton
ken newton wrote:
snip...
Good interview with  Joel Schiff (wearing a dark blue FBI cap).
While praising the stone he said to the homeowner
"Dealers will be on the next plane, and they will be here on
your doorstep with wads of cash."   The meteorite went through
 what appears to be a ceramic tile roof ( large tile/s knocked out)
 fiberglass insulation and drywall, landing on the Archers' cream
 leather couch.  It didn't look as if it hit any solid wood. The  stone's
weight was approximately 1.3 kilos  Nice close-ups - a beautiful stone,
 oriented, flow lines, lip. Wow!
best,
kn
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Video re New Zealand event

2004-06-12 Thread ken newton




Charlie,
Thanks very much for the link.
Good interview with  Joel Schiff (wearing a dark blue FBI cap).
While praising the stone he said to the homeowner
"Dealers will be on the next plane, and they will be here on 
your doorstep with wads of cash."   The
meteorite went through
 what appears to be a ceramic tile roof ( large tile/s knocked out)
 fiberglass insulation and drywall, landing on the Archers' cream
 leather couch.  It didn't look as if it hit any solid wood. The 
stone's 
weight was approximately 1.3 kilos  Nice close-ups - a beautiful stone,
 oriented, flow lines, lip. Wow!
best,
kn

Charlie Devine wrote:

  Dear list,

I can't download this 2 minute clip, but most listmembers probably can,
and it may be worth seeing.  Scroll down the page at the link until you
see a video entitled "Space rock falls into living room"

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/tvnz_index_skin/tvnz_index_group

Regards,
Charlie

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

  



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Apology for "academic egghead PhDs"

2004-06-12 Thread minador
Dear List,

Someone just graciously pointed out my poor choice of words privately rather
than chastising me publicly.

I apologize if I offended any academics.  I didn't mean to lump all
academics together.  Those I intended to criticize are those who are
condescending toward amateurs or professionals only because they don't have
the correct credentials or are for profit.  The "boot leather" types they
criticize can play an essential role in new discovery.

I don't consider most academic as eggheads - just the purists who seem to
have no judgment or balance (common sense).  I meant the ivory tower types
who can be so problematic and irritating to those who try to come up with
new ideas or "trail blaze" into new geographic areas.   I didn't foresee
that "egghead" can mean more than highbrow, especially for those who are
academics and are flippantly tagged with the word so often.

I have many professors whom I keep contact with to this day.  They have been
great mentors and friends.  It seems to me that more and more these days,
good leaders are slowly being replaced with politically correct people who
are savvy at surviving (because they don't take a stand for something).
While those who stand up for what they believe in fall by the way side - or
retire with (seemingly) no new, good cadre replacing them.

I have the utmost respect for most academics, including some who I may
disagree with in some areas.  I guess it's important to point out that the
person who I was responding to isn't an academic and doesn't represent the
academic community.  I think that he is engaged in a responsible, honorable
profession, but that I just disagree with him on the subject at hand.

Respectfully,

Mark Bowling
Vail, AZ USA


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Video re New Zealand event

2004-06-12 Thread Charlie Devine
Dear list,

I can't download this 2 minute clip, but most listmembers probably can,
and it may be worth seeing.  Scroll down the page at the link until you
see a video entitled "Space rock falls into living room"

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/tvnz_index_skin/tvnz_index_group

Regards,
Charlie

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread bernd . pauli
"mhutson" wrote:

> Enstatite chondrites contain a significant amount of metal and are 
> undifferentiated (roughly solar in composition).  Enstatite chondrites
> cannot be surface material from any large (planetary) object.

.. that is why Burbine et al. propose this:

"If Mercury formed out of highly reduced material, our closest meteoritic
analog to Mercury's surface composition would be the aubrites (enstatite
achondrites)."

Bernd

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite--Hot Rock debate is back

2004-06-12 Thread Michael Farmer
Elton, the New Orleans fall fell several hours before the homeowner returned
home, so that one had no chance of being felt.
I bought a 1 kilo individual of Park Forest which fell through a home and
smashed a printer, the homeowner was sitting at her computer 2 feet away!
She picked up the stone about 1 minute later and said it was slightly warm.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: "E. L. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "meteorite list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite--Hot Rock debate is back


> A New Zealand newspaper reports:
>
> <>"There was just a huge explosion and we looked around and there was
> just dust everywhere," says Brenda Archer. What they didn't expect to
> find was a very hot rock.--note a "very hot rock".
>
> Would anyone who is in touch with the Archer's pursue this asspect in
> more detail?  Such as how hot-- relatively speaking...a baked potato,
> too hot to hold, uncomfortable to hold...etc  And to find out if it
> cooled rapidly, slowly,  got frosty,etc.
>
> I lament that in the New Orleans and Park Forrest falls that there was
> no report of anyone asking these questions to the targets...er witnesses.
>
> Elton
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread mhutson

I'm not sure where the idea came from that enstatite chondrites might be 
samples of Mercury.  We know that Mercury has a large metallic core and an 
intrinsic magnetic field.  Therefore, it must be differentiated.  Surface 
material would be the silicate fraction of whatever chondritic precursor 
material went in to the accretion of the planet.  All of the metal would be in 
the core.  Enstatite chondrites contain a significant amount of metal and are 
undifferentiated (roughly solar in composition).  Enstatite chondrites cannot 
be surface material from any large (planetary) object.  A recent spectral study 
of the surface of Mercury (Sprague et. al -- LPSC 2004) shows no evidence for 
metal on the surface of Mercury.  Mercury's surface does not reflect sunlight 
in the same manner as an enstatite chondrite.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorites from Mercury

2004-06-12 Thread bernd . pauli
"Peanut" wrote:

> What about Mercury ... ?

Gregory responded:

> There was widespread belief that the Enstatite Chondrites
> originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't actually
> Mercurian themselves ...

Martin A. contributed:

> The Enstatite Chondrite Neuschwanstein had its aphelion
> in the asteroid main belt, thus it's not related to Mercury.

Mark B. wrote:

> Not saying Enstatites are from Mercury, it seems
> to me that they formed much further from the sun ...


Hello All,

One major problem with a Mercurian origin of enstatite meteorites
is Mercury's mean density of about 5.4 g/cm^3. Enstatite chondrites,
on the other hand, have a density of about 3.4-3.7 g/cm^3.

Palme (2002) proposes that NWA 011 may be a fragment of Mercury!
Problem: The high FeO content of this meteorite would point toward a
parent body with a small metallic iron core and this is irreconcilable with
the large iron core believed to exist in Mercury.

References:

BURBINE T.H. et al. (2002) Spectra of extremely reduced assemblages:
Implications for Mercury (MAPS 37-9, 2002, pp. 1233-1244).

PALME H. (2002) A new solar system basalt (Science 296, 271-273).

CONSOLMAGNO G.J. et al. (1998) The density and porosity of
Meteorites from the Vatican collection (MAPS 33, 1231-1241).


Best regards,

Bernd

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

2004-06-12 Thread MexicoDoug
>> So, you really think I'm "intrepid"?

>> ;-))
>> Bob V.

Listen here pardoner,

A brutal California Sun,  desert hot lips, calamari eyeballs from the systematic wandering about cemented mud curdled lakebeds at the lowest elevations (=hottest), more than ocassional furnace-like winds, brilliant white glare, the encouragement of the participation of others may not be as exotic or isolated as Johnny Quest and Hodgi getting stuck in a Land Rover in the Sahara crawling with contrasting African cultures, but only the sponsored Antarctic hunters might have better bragging rights.

Typical Mohave desert humidity this time of year is in the 10% to 20% range; temperatures to around 110°F (43.3°C) in the lower areas; and gusts common in the 30 mph (50 kph) range, according to the almanac.  The highest month-long temperature ever measured on Earth was there (and probably during that month it also beat the Libyan single measurement world record one degree more that the corresponding California record).  And I believe that by many measures in the summertime the Mohave (Death Valley) area frequently has the record hottest month on earth.

And then there's always all the pieces of Mars - which you know for a fact were US Martians:) - and all the new material successfully recovered.  Sure we have similar conditions here in Northern Mexico... But that Mars and long list of lakebed finds is part of being intrepid which is hard to ignore and silences those of us who try to realize or meteorite hunting dreams ... of course along with the other hardy pardners in your extremely challenging sandbox (or groutflats), where Kit Carson blazed trails, native Americans once survived and thrived, curious ghost towns remind us of Zane Grey romance and hardships of the American frontier, bones of goldseekers and cattle alike are concealed or ocassionally windblown exposed to catch a passing dried tumbleweed, and for archaelogists even the challenge to reveal the site that most probably the great Aztec Empire and Culture was born in an earlier time.

Yup, reconsidered, you're intrepid.  No need to be bashful about it ... 

Saludos
Doug
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite--Hot Rock debate is back

2004-06-12 Thread E. L. Jones
A New Zealand newspaper reports:
<>"There was just a huge explosion and we looked around and there was 
just dust everywhere," says Brenda Archer. What they didn't expect to 
find was a very hot rock.--note a "very hot rock". 

Would anyone who is in touch with the Archer's pursue this asspect in 
more detail?  Such as how hot-- relatively speaking...a baked potato, 
too hot to hold, uncomfortable to hold...etc  And to find out if it 
cooled rapidly, slowly,  got frosty,etc.

I lament that in the New Orleans and Park Forrest falls that there was 
no report of anyone asking these questions to the targets...er witnesses.

Elton
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] List: Attention on virus W32/Zafi-B!

2004-06-12 Thread bernd . pauli
> Fortunately it was wiped out before I could have opened it!

Hello José and List,

I also got this message but did not open the attachment
though "she" clearly and unambiguously wrote she still
"loved me" :-)

Bernd

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread fcressy
Hello Michael and all,
The link is hidden in the text below the picture. A better link for the
photo of the meteorite follows:
http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_national_story_skin/430438%3fformat=html

It looks like a real beauty...enjoy.

Regards,
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Michael L Blood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marco Langbroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Meteorite List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite


> Hi Marco & All,
> Marco - I went to the URL site below and got the story, but no
> photo. I have two different browsers (Safari & Explorer) and tried
> both to no avail.
> From Mike Farmer's reaction, my curiosity is peeked. know
> how I can see a photo of this stone? (Perhaps other list members
> are having the same problem?)
> Thanks, Michael
>
>
>
>
> on 6/12/04 2:10 AM, Marco Langbroek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With regard to Joel Schiffs announcement of a meteorite fall today in
New
> > Zealand: there's a link to a press report with a picture of the stone at
the
> > Asteroid/Comet Connection website:
> >
> > http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0406/11.htm
> >
> > (look in the text box below the cover illustration for the link).
> >
> > And it looks like it is a gorgious nose cone oriented meteorite.
> >
> > - Marco
> >
> > --
> > Marco Langbroek
> > Leiden, the Netherlands
> > 52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)
> >
> > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
> > weblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html
> > --
> >
> > __
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> --
> "It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
> democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
> dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
> bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
> are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
> exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."
> - Hermann Goering
> --
> When Jesus said "Love your enemies" I think he probably
> meant don't kill them.
>Anonymous
> --
> For perspective, try THIS:
>
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html
> --
> cool message fro Ben & Jerry:
> www.TrueMajority.org/oreo
> --
> AMAZING photos of Aurora Borealis, etc.
> http://faculty.rmwc.edu/tmichalik/atmosphere.htm
> --
> Hubble space telescope - AMAZING photos!:
> http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm
> --
> http://www.costofwar.com/
> --
> SUPPORT OUR TROUPS:
> http://www.takebackthemedia.com/onearmy.html
> --
> Worth Seeing:  Earth at night from satellite:
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
> --
> - Interactive Lady Liberty:
> http://doody36.home.attbi.com/liberty.htm
> --
> Earth - variety of choices:
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html
> --
> Michael Blood Meteorites:
> http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/
>
>
>
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] List: Attention on virus W32/Zafi-B!

2004-06-12 Thread Jose Campos
Attention List: VIRUS!
I have been warned by my server that the e-mail sent to meteorite list by a
GEMFRANCE under the subject "Don't worry, be happy" - is in fact infected
with the virus "W32/Zafi-B".
So please, do NOT open it's attached file: www.ecard.com.funny
picture.index.nude.php356.pif
Fortunately it was wiped out before I could have opened it!
José


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread ken newton




Try this:
http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_national_story_skin/430438%3fformat=html
http://home.earthlink.net/~magellon/img/meteorite.jpg
best, 
kn

Michael L Blood wrote:

  Hi Marco & All,
Marco - I went to the URL site below and got the story, but no
photo. I have two different browsers (Safari & Explorer) and tried
both to no avail.
From Mike Farmer's reaction, my curiosity is peeked. know
how I can see a photo of this stone? (Perhaps other list members
are having the same problem?)
Thanks, Michael




on 6/12/04 2:10 AM, Marco Langbroek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
Hi all,

With regard to Joel Schiffs announcement of a meteorite fall today in New
Zealand: there's a link to a press report with a picture of the stone at the
Asteroid/Comet Connection website:

http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0406/11.htm

(look in the text box below the cover illustration for the link).

And it looks like it is a gorgious nose cone oriented meteorite.

- Marco

--
Marco Langbroek
Leiden, the Netherlands
52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
weblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html
--

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

  
  


--
"It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."
- Hermann Goering 
--
When Jesus said "Love your enemies" I think he probably
meant don't kill them.
   Anonymous
--
For perspective, try THIS:
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html
--
cool message fro Ben & Jerry:
www.TrueMajority.org/oreo
--
AMAZING photos of Aurora Borealis, etc.
http://faculty.rmwc.edu/tmichalik/atmosphere.htm
--
Hubble space telescope - AMAZING photos!:
http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm
--
http://www.costofwar.com/
--
SUPPORT OUR TROUPS:
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/onearmy.html
--
Worth Seeing:  Earth at night from satellite:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
--
- Interactive Lady Liberty:
http://doody36.home.attbi.com/liberty.htm
  



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread Meteoryt.net
> Hi Marco & All,
> Marco - I went to the URL site below and got the story, but no
> photo. I have two different browsers (Safari & Explorer) and tried
> both to no avail.
> From Mike Farmer's reaction, my curiosity is peeked. know
> how I can see a photo of this stone? (Perhaps other list members
> are having the same problem?)
> Thanks, Michael

Here You go
http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_national_story_skin/430438%3fformat=html

-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Legality of Libyan Desert GlassArtifactsDiscussion

2004-06-12 Thread Frank Prochaska
" in all fairness a muesum is a bit diffrent than a private collector. sure 
both my preserve a relic, however a muesume allows for it to be enjoyed by 
the public as a whole. afterall, what good is a relic if it's left burried 
in the ground so as to never allow us to learn from it, or apreciate it."



Alright, I have been trying to stay out of this, as this thread has
been a distraction from the true point of the list, and is clearly a no-win
argument from any point of view.  However, trying to make blanket
generalizations between museums (apparently public or private) and private
collectors, and in particular their value to society or the public "good" is
a sore subject for me.
There are the good and the bad in both categories, and I certainly
do not mean to paint everyone in each category with the same brush, but let
me give a few examples, from my experience in meteorites over the last 16
years.
There are a number of museums within the US that have either do not
have the interest or the resources to properly protect and care for their
specimens.  A number of list members could relate their personal
observations of some collections of meteorites simply rusting away in some
museums.  I doubt this is limited to the US.  In reviewing the literature,
it is not uncommon to find that specimens and even entire meteorites to have
been "lost" in museums.  This isn't limited to falls or finds from several
hundred years ago, but also has occurred with many samples recovered since
1900, well into the heyday of modern science's collecting and cataloging
phase (such as in archaeology).  These samples and whole meteorites,
entrusted to the museums from a public point of view, are now lost to
everyone.  While many museums have a public display of some of their
samples, only the smallest museum collections are on display in their
entirety.  Only a small fraction of the large collections will ever be seen
by the public.  Further, research money is limited and only a small fraction
of the meteorites in collections will ever receive any analysis or study
beyond initial classification.  In truth, only a small fraction of samples
in museums have ever been used to allow the public to either "learn from it,
or appreciate it."  This is also true of some collections in private
collections, but certainly not all.
There are people on this list who have reached more of the public
with their meteorites, through presentations at local astronomy club
meetings, giving talks at public libraries or in public schools, and so
forth, than many museums reach.  There are many school kids in my area
(Washington State) who will probably never travel to one of the major
meteorite displays in places like Chicago and Washington DC, but have held
and examined some truly rare and inspiring meteorites from my collection.
They would have to travel to one of the larger museums in the country to
even see these meteorites behind glass.  There are many private collectors
on this list that have done far more of this sort of outreach than I have.
Let us also not forget that most, if not all, museums owe the fact
that they have a great many of their samples to the effort and the presence
in the market of the private collector.  (I am not as familiar with other
disciplines, but I suspect that this is also the case in fields such as
archaeology.)
My point is simply that I do not believe that having a collection in
a "museum" in general is any "better" from a moral, altruistic,
'good-of-society' point of view than the same collection in the hands of a
"private collector."  There are good and bad actors in both categories and
both categories have their benefits to our field and to society in general.

I apologize for the rant, but in my opinion there are a number of
folks on this list whose work and efforts over the years, in public
outreach, hunting and preserving, and sponsoring scientific research, should
not be relegated to second place behind any museum.



Frank Prochaska



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stan .
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 12:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Legality of Libyan Desert
GlassArtifactsDiscussion



>I sense a little(?) hypocrisy here.   It would seem
>to me that archeologists have been the greatest
>looters of all time concerning artifacts.I haven't
>seen any reports of any of the major museums around
>the world scrambling to return the treasures taken out
>of other countries. Whether it was looted before or
>after 1970,,,it was still looted.

in all fairness a muesum is a bit diffrent than a private collector. sure 
both my preserve a relic, however a muesume allows for it to be enjoyed by 
the public as a whole. afterall, what good is a relic if it's left burried 
in the ground so as to never allow us to learn from it, or apreciate it.

___

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite eBay Bidding Comment

2004-06-12 Thread Meteoryt.net
> Hi Mike,
>
> Just bid your highest bid the first time and forget it.  If you win, you
> win.  If you don't, via sniping or otherwise, well you weren't going to
bid
> any higher anyway so what difference does it make whether the other
person's
> bid was entered 10 hours, 10 minutes, or 10 milliseconds before the
auction
> ends?

You are WRONG.
Its verry importand when You place bid.

exam1
If item is placed f.e. for 1$ , and in a first few days will go up to 20$
then You put f.e. 100$ your max bid 3 days before auction ends. So then many
other bidders will try to outbid You and final price will grown up more or
less slowly, and finally price will be f.e. 90$. You are lucky winner ? No,
You are lucky looser. And many times You will return from work, log to ebay
and what You see ? You are outbited and someone win Your item. Nothing more
irritated.
exam2
Without your early bid price is still 20$ and in the next days will not grow
up in the same speed as with your bid. So finally in last 5 minutes of
auction,  item price will be 50$. Someone who is high bidder in last 60
seconds think that noone will place higher price, and then You come. A lone
sniper, who will place his 101$ in last 20 seconds of auction. Not 100$,
becouse people usualy enter prices as 50, 60, 100, 110, so to be sure you
must put 51, 61, 101$. If You do this in the last 20 seconds Your bid will
be entered in around 5-10seconds before auction end and THEN You will win
the same item for less than 90$, becouse noone can place another bid in last
5 seconds. Your system is working, buy snipers can win the same items for
smaller money.

You can say, that this is not right, this is sniping etc. But this is real
life like on old westerns :))) Only faster gunmen survive.


-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cassini Makes Close Observations of Phoebe

2004-06-12 Thread Ron Baalke


Carolina Martinez (818) 354-9382
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

News Release:  2004-146   June 12, 2004

Cassini Makes Close Observations of Phoebe

With its flyby of Phoebe, the Cassini spacecraft has completed the
first satellite flyby in its four-year tour of the Saturn system.
NASA's Deep Space Network received confirmation at 7:52 a.m. PDT
today.  The spacecraft is operating normally and is in excellent
health.

"One down, 52 to go," said Jeremy Jones, chief navigator for the
Cassini-Huygens mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Pasadena, Calif.  During Cassini's planned four-year tour it will
orbit Saturn 76 times and execute 52 close encounters with seven of
Saturn's 31 known moons.

"Although this is the first flyby in the Saturn tour, it is the
only opportunity to see Phoebe," said Dr. Dennis Matson, project
scientist for the Cassini-Huygens mission.  "This flyby is key to
knowing more about the mysterious odd-ball, which has been the
object of interest of many scientists."

Cassini came within approximately 2,068 kilometers (about 1,285
miles) of the dark moon on Friday, June 11.  The spacecraft was
pointing its instruments at the moon during the flyby.  Several
hours later it turned to point its antenna to Earth.  The signal
was received through the Deep Space Network antennas in Madrid,
Spain and Goldstone, in California's Mojave Desert.  It was
traveling at a relative speed of 20,900 kilometers per hour
(13,000 miles per hour) relative to Saturn.  It's been 23 years
since we last visited Phoebe.  The Voyager 2 flyby in 1981 was
from 2.2 million kilometers, (about 1.4 million miles), 1,000
times further away.

When it was discovered in 1898, Phoebe was Saturn's outermost
known moon.  That changed with the discovery of several smaller
moons in 2000. Phoebe is almost four times farther from Saturn
than its nearest major neighbor, Iapetus, and substantially
larger than any of the other moons orbiting at comparable
distances. With a diameter of 220 kilometers (about 140 miles),
it rotates on its axis every nine hours and 16 minutes and it
completes a full orbit around Saturn in about 18 months. All of
Saturn's moons except for Phoebe and Iapetus orbit very nearly in
the plane of Saturn's equator. Phoebe's orbit is highly eccentric
and retrograde; it orbits backwards with respect to the direction
of the other moons.

Based on data from the Voyager flyby, Phoebe resembles a sort of
dark asteroid.  It may be very primitive.  "All previous
indications suggest that it may be a captured Kuiper Belt object,
one of the millions of asteroid-like bodies from outside the
orbit of Pluto," said Dr. Bonnie Buratti, scientist on the
Cassini-Huygens mission at JPL.  "With the flyby behind us, we
may soon know whether Phoebe's composition is unmodified since
the time it was formed in the outer solar system.  If it turns
out to be a Kuiper Belt object, we could be looking at the most
detailed close-ups of any such object ever taken."

First pictures after the flyby are expected later today.  After the
Phoebe flyby, Cassini is on course for Saturn.  A last trajectory
correction maneuver is scheduled for June 16.  Cassini will fire
its engine for 96-minutes before going into orbit around Saturn on
June 30 in U.S. time zones (July 1 Universal Time).

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the
European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of
Technology in Pasadena, manages the Cassini-Huygens mission for
NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, D.C. JPL designed,
developed and assembled the Cassini orbiter.

For the latest images and more information about the Cassini-
Huygens mission, visit 

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov .

  -end-


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread Michael L Blood
Hi Marco & All,
Marco - I went to the URL site below and got the story, but no
photo. I have two different browsers (Safari & Explorer) and tried
both to no avail.
From Mike Farmer's reaction, my curiosity is peeked. know
how I can see a photo of this stone? (Perhaps other list members
are having the same problem?)
Thanks, Michael




on 6/12/04 2:10 AM, Marco Langbroek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> With regard to Joel Schiffs announcement of a meteorite fall today in New
> Zealand: there's a link to a press report with a picture of the stone at the
> Asteroid/Comet Connection website:
> 
> http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0406/11.htm
> 
> (look in the text box below the cover illustration for the link).
> 
> And it looks like it is a gorgious nose cone oriented meteorite.
> 
> - Marco
> 
> --
> Marco Langbroek
> Leiden, the Netherlands
> 52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)
> 
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
> weblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html
> --
> 
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
"It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."
- Hermann Goering 
--
When Jesus said "Love your enemies" I think he probably
meant don't kill them.
   Anonymous
--
For perspective, try THIS:
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html
--
cool message fro Ben & Jerry:
www.TrueMajority.org/oreo
--
AMAZING photos of Aurora Borealis, etc.
http://faculty.rmwc.edu/tmichalik/atmosphere.htm
--
Hubble space telescope - AMAZING photos!:
http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm
--
http://www.costofwar.com/
--
SUPPORT OUR TROUPS:
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/onearmy.html
--
Worth Seeing:  Earth at night from satellite:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
--
- Interactive Lady Liberty:
http://doody36.home.attbi.com/liberty.htm
-- 
Earth - variety of choices:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html
--
Michael Blood Meteorites:
http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Thank You - Was A fun Libyan Desert Glass Debate

2004-06-12 Thread Michael L Blood
Dean & Keith,
Perhaps the problem is the interpretation
of the word, "flake," as in "picking up a flake of
LDG..." 
This can be interpreted as:
1) picking up any little bit
2) picking up a piece of flaked tool or piece of debutage
made of LDG
Best wishes, Michael


on 6/12/04 5:37 AM, dean bessey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> WOW KEITH. YOU REALLY CANT GET YOUR THOUGHTS STRAIT.
> FIRST YOU MISQUOTE AND PUT WORDS INTO AN ARCHAELOGISTS
> MOUTH THAT HE NEVER SAID. AND NOW YOU ARE EVEN
> MISQUOTING YOURSELF. NOW YOU SAY:
>> In this case, you are the person very confused about
>> my arguments. I perfectly agree with you that there
> is 
>> ***nothing** illegal about picking up or collecting
>> natural, unmodified pieces of LDG. My discussion had
>> nothing to do with the collection of natural pieces
>> of LDG
> BUT TWO DAYS AGO YOU SAID:
> Despite what you have stated, he and other
> professional archaeologists have made it very clear,
> contrary to you have claimed, me that even picking
> an LDG flake up off the shifting sandy desert floor
> and transporting it / exporting it without permission
> from either Egypt or Libya is unethical and illegal
> behavior. It doesn't matter if this Egyptian or Libyan
> 
> artifact is in a museum of not. It is still looting
> and 
> it is still unethical and immoral according to the
> archaeologists, whom I have talked to.
> SO NOW YOU 100% CONLICT WITH WHAT YOU SAID TWO DAYS
> AGO. 
> MAYBE YOU HAVE JUST NOW CHANGED YOUR MIND?
> CHEERS
> DEAN
> PS: THE CAPS IS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN EASILY TELL MY
> WRITING FROM YOUR MISQUOTES.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
"It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."
- Hermann Goering 
--
When Jesus said "Love your enemies" I think he probably
meant don't kill them.
   Anonymous
--
For perspective, try THIS:
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html
--
cool message fro Ben & Jerry:
www.TrueMajority.org/oreo
--
AMAZING photos of Aurora Borealis, etc.
http://faculty.rmwc.edu/tmichalik/atmosphere.htm
--
Hubble space telescope - AMAZING photos!:
http://wires.news.com.au/special/mm/030811-hubble.htm
--
http://www.costofwar.com/
--
SUPPORT OUR TROUPS:
http://www.takebackthemedia.com/onearmy.html
--
Worth Seeing:  Earth at night from satellite:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
--
- Interactive Lady Liberty:
http://doody36.home.attbi.com/liberty.htm
-- 
Earth - variety of choices:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html
--
Michael Blood Meteorites:
http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Thank You - Was A fun Libyan Desert Glass Debate

2004-06-12 Thread David Freeman
Dear Keith, LIST,
So, archaeology ~smarkeology, lets get back to meteorite  topics and 
stave this trouble making duck of what's seemingly become a personal 
agenda.

Let the  archaeology duck seek somewhere else to squawk and discharge 
waste product.

Sincerely,
Dave F.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dean bessey wrote:
FIRST YOU MISQUOTE AND PUT WORDS INTO 
AN ARCHAELOGISTS MOUTH THAT HE NEVER 
SAID. AND NOW YOU ARE EVEN
MISQUOTING YOURSELF. NOW YOU SAY:

I am not misquoting the archaeologist, as far as
the potential illegal and unethical nature of
trading and owning artifacts composed of Libyan, 
which is what was being discussed. What the 
archaeologist stated in a post made by a 
professional archaeologist to the "Archaeology 
List". The full post can found at:

http://listserv.tamu.edu/cgi/wa?A2=ind0406&L=arch-l&F=&S=&P=4205
If anyone is putting completely false words into s
person's mouth, it is Mr. Dean. When I talked about
flakes below, I ***wasn't** talking about natural pieces 
of Libyan Desert Glass when I wrote:

Despite what you have stated, he and 
other professional archaeologists have 
made it very clear, contrary to you 
have claimed, me that even picking 
an LDG flake up off the shifting sandy 
desert floor and transporting it / 
exporting it without permission 

from either Egypt or Libya is unethical 

and illegal behavior. It doesn't matter 
if this Egyptian or Libyan"

When I was using the term "flake" I was using the term 
in its archaeological definition. In this definition, 
a flake is a man-made artifact.  In that case, I was 
talking about artifacts, not natural pieces of LDG. I 
apologize if that terminology wasn't clear. However, if
had bothered to look at the context of the discussion,
instead of flying off the handle, you would have seen 
that I consistently referred to **artifacts** composed of 
Libyan Desert Glass in the discussion as being potential 
illegal to trade in.

Dean wrote:
SO NOW YOU 100% CONLICT WITH WHAT YOU 
SAID TWO DAYSAGO. MAYBE YOU HAVE JUST 
NOW CHANGED YOUR MIND?

I didn't change my mind, it is just that their
some confusion of the definition of "flake"/
If Dean would bother to read the various posts
it is quite clear that only artifacts composed
of Libyan Desert Glass is being discussed.
Only time will tell whether people need to be
careful about trading in artifacts composed
of Libyan Desert Glass.
Yours,
Keith
Louisiana
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Fw: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread Jose Campos



Hi List,
The probability of a meteorite originated from 
Mercury, being able to reach Earth (or Venus or Mars, for that matter), must 
be exceedingly small, as it would be strongly attracted towards the 
Sun, unless its initial orbit would be disturbed in such a way as to be 
"kicked out" by a close encounter in the Sun's vicinity,  with a 
passing asteroid or a comet?
 
José
 
- Original Message - 
From: MARK 
BOSTICK 
To: Martin Altmann ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Meteorite List 
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

Hello Martin and list,
 
Not saying Enstatites are from Mercury, it seems to me that they formed 
much further from the sun.but doesn't everything get kind of pushed into the 
asteroid belt?  That was my understanding why there are still asteroids in 
the belts.they get replaced.
 
 
 
Mark Bostick
www.meteoritearticles.com
 
 
 

  - Original Message -
  From: 
  Martin Altmann
  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:28 
  AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
  Origins
   
  
  

  The Enstatite Chondrite Neuschwanstein had its 
  aphelion in the asteroid main belt, thus it's not related to 
  Mercury.
  Here a picture of the orbit
  http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/14785/1.html
   
  Martin 
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:28 
AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
Origins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter...Etc? Is it just because 
  we have to point of reference or maybe distance...Just 
Curious!There was widespread belief that the Enstatite 
Chondrites originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't actually 
Mercurian themselves, but I haven't read any particularly recent scientific 
assessment on that positionany updates out there?   The 
"giants" (Jupiter and Saturn) are considered to be essentially gaseous with 
prohibitive escape velocities as well, so I don't think there's much 
speculation about them being reasonable candidates for parent 
bodies.Gregory 



__Meteorite-list 
mailing 
list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sixpairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Meteorite-list 
  mailing 
  list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__Meteorite-list mailing 
list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG Anti-Virus 
(http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 7.0.245 / Virus Database: 263.1.2 - 
Release Date: 07-06-2004
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.245 / Virus Database: 263.1.2 - Release Date: 07-06-2004
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread Martin Altmann



Jo Mark,
 
In my little world I have no idea whether at all 
or from which reservoir the asteroid belt could be filled up nowadays, only 
the comet cores, which were captured by Jupiter on short periodic tracks, 
come into my mind.
 
We have to ask the celestial mechanics on that 
list.
Also the ratio of the probability to catapult a body 
from the inner solar system out on a stable orbit, let's say with an aphelion in 
the main belt and a perihelioin somewhere around Mercury's orbit
versus the same orbit but thrown from a collision in 
the main belt into the inner solar system would be interesting,
or not so?
 
Martin

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MARK 
  BOSTICK 
  To: Martin Altmann ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 
  Meteorite List 
  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 3:20 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
  Origins
  
  Hello Martin and list,
   
  Not saying Enstatites are from Mercury, it seems to me that they formed 
  much further from the sun.but doesn't everything get kind of pushed into 
  the asteroid belt?  That was my understanding why there are still 
  asteroids in the belts.they get replaced.
   
   
   
  Mark Bostick
  www.meteoritearticles.com
   
   
   
  
- Original Message -
From: 
Martin Altmann
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:28 
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
Origins
 



The Enstatite Chondrite Neuschwanstein had its 
aphelion in the asteroid main belt, thus it's not related to 
Mercury.
Here a picture of the orbit
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/14785/1.html
 
Martin 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:28 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
  Origins
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  What about Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter...Etc? Is it just 
because we have to point of reference or maybe distance...Just 
  Curious!There was widespread belief that the 
  Enstatite Chondrites originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't 
  actually Mercurian themselves, but I haven't read any particularly recent 
  scientific assessment on that positionany updates out 
  there?   The "giants" (Jupiter and Saturn) are considered to be 
  essentially gaseous with prohibitive escape velocities as well, so I don't 
  think there's much speculation about them being reasonable candidates for 
  parent bodies.Gregory 
  
  

  __Meteorite-list 
  mailing 
  list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sixpairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Meteorite-list 
mailing 
list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Thank You - Was A fun Libyan Desert Glass Debate

2004-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dean bessey wrote:

>FIRST YOU MISQUOTE AND PUT WORDS INTO 
>AN ARCHAELOGISTS MOUTH THAT HE NEVER 
>SAID. AND NOW YOU ARE EVEN
>MISQUOTING YOURSELF. NOW YOU SAY:

I am not misquoting the archaeologist, as far as
the potential illegal and unethical nature of
trading and owning artifacts composed of Libyan, 
which is what was being discussed. What the 
archaeologist stated in a post made by a 
professional archaeologist to the "Archaeology 
List". The full post can found at:

http://listserv.tamu.edu/cgi/wa?A2=ind0406&L=arch-l&F=&S=&P=4205

If anyone is putting completely false words into s
person's mouth, it is Mr. Dean. When I talked about
flakes below, I ***wasn't** talking about natural pieces 
of Libyan Desert Glass when I wrote:

>Despite what you have stated, he and 
>other professional archaeologists have 
>made it very clear, contrary to you 
>have claimed, me that even picking 
>an LDG flake up off the shifting sandy 
>desert floor and transporting it / 
>exporting it without permission 
>from either Egypt or Libya is unethical 
>and illegal behavior. It doesn't matter 
>if this Egyptian or Libyan"

When I was using the term "flake" I was using the term 
in its archaeological definition. In this definition, 
a flake is a man-made artifact.  In that case, I was 
talking about artifacts, not natural pieces of LDG. I 
apologize if that terminology wasn't clear. However, if
had bothered to look at the context of the discussion,
instead of flying off the handle, you would have seen 
that I consistently referred to **artifacts** composed of 
Libyan Desert Glass in the discussion as being potential 
illegal to trade in.

Dean wrote:

>SO NOW YOU 100% CONLICT WITH WHAT YOU 
>SAID TWO DAYSAGO. MAYBE YOU HAVE JUST 
>NOW CHANGED YOUR MIND?

I didn't change my mind, it is just that their
some confusion of the definition of "flake"/
If Dean would bother to read the various posts
it is quite clear that only artifacts composed
of Libyan Desert Glass is being discussed.

Only time will tell whether people need to be
careful about trading in artifacts composed
of Libyan Desert Glass.

Yours,

Keith
Louisiana


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Legality of Libyan Desert Glass ArtifactsDiscussion Continu

2004-06-12 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello Keith and list,   Keith also wrote, "my bread and butter geologic work involving finding sand, gravel, and road fill for companies; generating oil and gas prospects, which I can sell"    I find it funny that you have an occupation, that a history of destroying both culture and environment and still have a self righteous attitude towards others.  Perhaps this is related to your need to tell us what church you go to.  List members might remember it was Keith that thought the Estonia impactite would be better off on the shores getting destroyed then collected.   Mark Bostick www.meteoritearticles.com  
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Sharklike Acrimonious Humo(u)r 101

2004-06-12 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello Dave and list,   I guess it was about time for a little argument on the list.  Since I am bored this saturday morning I will reply.   Dave wrote: "but I think the reply Doug gave him was quite uncalled for.  "F_rting" and "a__hole" and the such."   I remember Doug (now) from Tucson  When I was sick Doug showed general concern and tried to be helpful to me.  So Doug's e-mail did kind of surprise me.  However, we did see Gregory send an uncalled for e-mail first. So I think it is more honest to condemn them both.  It is unusual to just condemn the person who tossed the second punch.   "Maybe Gregory's sarcastic point was, that some of us don't really like to feel belittled by a bunch of "Techno-babble"..."   Perhaps Gregory's sarcastic remark, (I didn't see no point in the Hippos comment), was as you suggested.  A lack of desire for "Techno-babble".  Gregory you know is a lawyer, so one would think he would be accustomed to "techno-babble".  I would have rather have seen Gregory argue against one of the points Doug made.  This is to some degree a scientific forum, one would think a techno e-mail would be acceptable.  Personally I found it interesting and somewhat courageousif only a little passive aggressive.  He did present a different point of view then that of Michael Blood, something most would likely shy away from because of the position he has in our community.   Having said all of that I am impressed with Doug's ability to speak and type in English.  My ability in his language is limited to words I had no choice but to learn during the times I have been in Mexico.  Like "Alto", it is on all the stop signs.  I also see no comparison with Doug and the old J. Warren (who has been a pretty decent person the last six months).     And I have also met Gregory a couple times.  In person he seems intelligent and rational.  I think in the past I have agreed with 80% or more of his postings.     I don't think Gregory or Doug was meaning to feed the ducks.   It may be of interest to note, that I did agree with Michael.  That the Los Angeles offers should have waited, as that is more standard business practice in this hobby.  We are not completely cut throat people...yet.  But I must also agree with Doug.  A set price sale and a silent auction, is unlikely to affect each other.  It is also hard to see that Vernish lost anything in such action, since he controls all the material and any piece sold or traded, came from his hands. Mark    
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello Martin and list,   Not saying Enstatites are from Mercury, it seems to me that they formed much further from the sun.but doesn't everything get kind of pushed into the asteroid belt?  That was my understanding why there are still asteroids in the belts.they get replaced.       Mark Bostick www.meteoritearticles.com        - Original Message - From: Martin Altmann Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origins  The Enstatite Chondrite Neuschwanstein had its aphelion in the asteroid main belt, thus it's not related to Mercury. Here a picture of the orbit http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/14785/1.html   Martin   - Original Message -  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Origins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter...Etc? Is it just because we have to point of reference or maybe distance...Just Curious!There was widespread belief that the Enstatite Chondrites originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't actually Mercurian themselves, but I haven't read any particularly recent scientific assessment on that positionany updates out there?   The "giants" (Jupiter and Saturn) are considered to be essentially gaseous with prohibitive escape velocities as well, so I don't think there's much speculation about them being reasonable candidates for parent bodies.Gregory __Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://sixpairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Add-ons to Pre-Meteorite sale, PTS.1,2 AND 3

2004-06-12 Thread Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!
Good morning list.I am adding a few specimens to the PRE-SUMMER meteorite
sale I am having.I am sorry for not adding them before.So here goes:
__
1.FORREST 002   7.4 GRAMS  $40.00
2.GOMES 2.2 GRAMS  $15.00
3.LONG ISLAND   3 GRAMS$15.00
4.NANTAN130 GRAMS  $25.00
5.SANDY CREEK   1.134 GRAMS$15.00
6.SETH WARD11.2 GRAMS $60.00
7.NWA 787  110.8 GRAM STONE INDIVIDUAL
   $60.00
___
Well there you have people.  42 different specimens forsale cheap to
go.Also as of today,ALL rikers will come with specimens.Here is a list of
the specimens that are gone: NWA 980,NWA 002,WAKA,HAVILAND(D),TELL,and
SEMINOLE(D).Let me know what you want.also I pay for shipping world wide.

steve arnold, chicago 
   

=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 
Illinois Meteorites 
website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
 
 










__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Thank You - Was A fun Libyan Desert Glass Debate

2004-06-12 Thread dean bessey
WOW KEITH. YOU REALLY CANT GET YOUR THOUGHTS STRAIT.
FIRST YOU MISQUOTE AND PUT WORDS INTO AN ARCHAELOGISTS
MOUTH THAT HE NEVER SAID. AND NOW YOU ARE EVEN
MISQUOTING YOURSELF. NOW YOU SAY:
> In this case, you are the person very confused about
> my arguments. I perfectly agree with you that there
is 
> ***nothing** illegal about picking up or collecting
> natural, unmodified pieces of LDG. My discussion had
> nothing to do with the collection of natural pieces
> of LDG
BUT TWO DAYS AGO YOU SAID:
Despite what you have stated, he and other
professional archaeologists have made it very clear, 
contrary to you have claimed, me that even picking 
an LDG flake up off the shifting sandy desert floor 
and transporting it / exporting it without permission 
from either Egypt or Libya is unethical and illegal 
behavior. It doesn't matter if this Egyptian or Libyan

artifact is in a museum of not. It is still looting
and 
it is still unethical and immoral according to the 
archaeologists, whom I have talked to.
SO NOW YOU 100% CONLICT WITH WHAT YOU SAID TWO DAYS
AGO. 
MAYBE YOU HAVE JUST NOW CHANGED YOUR MIND?
CHEERS
DEAN
PS: THE CAPS IS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN EASILY TELL MY
WRITING FROM YOUR MISQUOTES.




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread Michael Farmer
Oh my god, what a gorgeous stone! Go get it Joel.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: "Marco Langbroek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "meteorite list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 2:10 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite


> Hi all,
>
> With regard to Joel Schiffs announcement of a meteorite fall today in New
> Zealand: there's a link to a press report with a picture of the stone at
the
> Asteroid/Comet Connection website:
>
> http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0406/11.htm
>
> (look in the text box below the cover illustration for the link).
>
> And it looks like it is a gorgious nose cone oriented meteorite.
>
> - Marco
>
> --
> Marco Langbroek
> Leiden, the Netherlands
> 52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
> weblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html
> --
>
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Thank You - Was A fun Libyan Desert Glass Debate

2004-06-12 Thread minador
Keith wrote:

> I perfectly agree with you that there is
> ***nothing** illegal about picking up or collecting
> natural, unmodified pieces of LDG. My discussion had
> nothing to do with the collection of natural pieces of
> LDG. The only mention of this was that collecting of
> any kind in the area containing LDG was prohibited
> because of looting of ***artifacts*** in the strewn
> field area. In that case, the people collecting only
> LDG, not artifacts, were victims of the pothunter
> / arrowhead collector types.
>
> I fully agree that people should be able to collect
> and take home natural and unmodified pieces of LDG.
>

Keith,

So why bring this up on a meteorite list?  We're not
hunting/trading/collecting/selling/studying archaeological artifacts...
That's another group isn't it?

> my bread and butter geologic work involving finding
> sand, gravel, and road fill for companies; generating
> oil and gas prospects, which I can sell

Some might consider those practices of yours as unethical or morally
bankrupt...

Though not me - just pointing out that it's easy to nitpick when it comes to
moral behaviour.  I tend to live and let live - if some poor Arab can sell
some pieces of LDG for some barley and oil, that's fine by me... especially
pieces that are here today and buried for thousands of years tomorrow.  The
same goes for mining oil, lead or what ever else people legally engage in to
put bread on their table.  There are more significant artifacts/sites worthy
of study, so many in fact that it would probably take a thousand years to
study them all (and by that time they'll be studying us).  I don't
see picking up flakes as immoral no matter how many academic eggheads say
so.  Scientists don't have moral leg to stand on if you look at their past
behavior.  Besides, I know numerous respected PhD's from research one
universities who don't agree with most of the current politically correct
rhetoric that infects many places of learning these days.  I bet many of the
"respected" archaeologists you speak of have looted artifacts in their
collections, both private and institutional.  Seems a bit hypocritical...

> prohibit the export of antiquities without permits. If a
> person doesn't have the paperwork, which documents
> that his Libyan desert glass artifact was exported legally,
> a case can be made that the artifact was exported in
> violation of either the laws of Egypt or Libya. Since
> legally exported artifact are suppose to be sold with
> documentation proving that they are legal, the lack of
> such, even if the result of negligence on the part of the
> person selling it to you failing to provide it, can be used
> to argue that the Libyan desert glass artifacts are illicit.
> It the owner that has to prove that an artifact was
> legally exported with a documented chain-of-custody
> going back to the person, who originally received the
> license to exported it. If a person doesn't have the
> paperwork and don't have this chain-of-custody, the
> person don't have the proof that artifact is legal and
> the country of origin, whether it be Egypt or Libya
> can reclaim it.

I think this is wrong.  The dealers who were successfully prosecuted in the
US & England (for looting in Egypt) weren't successfully prosecuted because
they didn't have paperwork - pieces from old collections do not necessarily
have documentation.  What nailed the case was the fact that they found the
detailed journal of the collector which revealed his activities.  Most
importantly they found some stone reliefs/carvings in his house that were
hacked out of a monument.  They were exact matches the reliefs that were
recently stolen from that monument.  In addition, I'm pretty sure that you
face prosecution if you are in possession of items of $5,000 or more in
value.

> Again, someone needs to do a detail study of the antiquity
> laws of Egypt, Morocco, and Libya in reference to LEG
> artifacts. It seems like people are being much too
> complacent about the legally of collecting, buying, and
> selling these artifacts. Regardless of whether a minority
> of LDG artifacts might be legal, the overall illict trade
> in these artifacts is contributing to the destruction of
> valuable archaeological sites.

Again, I think the laws regarding the possession of "LDG artifacts" has no
bearing on the meteorite list.  I'll just have to agree to disagree whether
the study of flake chippings "contribute to the destruction of valuable
archaeological sites".  I don't know if I'm engaging in "flaming" here, but
I get frustrated with these chicken little/holier that thou arguments.  And
I'm a bit fatigued after spending the night doing some stargazing and am
probably rambling.  :-)

Respectfully,

Mark Bowling


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite eBay Bidding Comment

2004-06-12 Thread minador
Boy,

I wonder if this thread is about me... :-)

I agree with Gregory on this.  Bid the max you're willing to pay.  Sometimes
when I'm at the edge of my budget I'll pass on a few auctions.  Only to find
later that no other bids were placed and that the item sold way under what I
would have been willing to pay.  But I am usually more successful when I
snipe than when I place my high bid early.  That tells me that people aren't
bidding at that max amount they're willing to pay.  So they only have
themselves to blame if they lose.

Basically I think the best practice is to identify the highest you're
willing to pay and snipe, if you're able, with that amount.  Sniping can
save you money (when people aren't placing their true max bids).

Whether it's good for the seller, it can be argued either way.  By sniping
you can increase the final bid of the auction if the other bidders aren't
bidding their max.; However, it can be demonstrated that by sniping you're
aren't pushing the other bidders to bid that max amount.  They may be
holding back because they don't fully realize what their max bid amount
really is until they're outbid.  If you bid your max early on, they may run
the auction up much higher to the sellers benefit (or just outbid you
outright).  I think that practicing "max bidding" using both strategies sort
of balances out with regard to fairness to the seller (since one can't
always be checking eBay).

DO YOU SELLERS have any opinions on this?

I used to think that sniping wasn't an ethical practice, but I think that if
you always bid at your max and participate the conventional (pre-bid) way
when you're unable to snipe, you're participating in good faith.

There are problems for the sniper, some of which others have mentioned.

1) If a sniper doesn't bid with his max amount, they are at risk of being
outbid.  They usually can't put in an extra bid (I sometimes use the low
snipe when money's tight - it rarely works, but it can stretch your money).
2) if the bid artificially high to edge out others, they can find themselves
beyond their means when that "(crazy) high max bid" is out there...
3) they can forget to watch a particular auction and miss out.

To those I may have offended/frustrated in the past:  If it's any comfort, I
use dial-up and have no auto bidding software.  I lose more than I win
(which is a good thing because another cool meteorite or creative offering
always comes by!).  And I've been sniped and counter sniped many times.
I've always been comforted by the fact that the item was worth more that I
was willing to pay (or could afford).  I gave it my best.

So bid your max, and let the best ebayer win!  (Sorry for the long post - I
was bored this evening...)

Mark (Vail, AZ)

P.S. === Don't forget the "buy it now" option...


Gregory:

 << I think bidders who complain about being outbid at the last second are
virtually always guilty of one mistake:  they never placed a bid of the
MAXIMUM amount they would be freely willing to pay for the item. >>





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread Martin Altmann



The Enstatite Chondrite Neuschwanstein had its 
aphelion in the asteroid main belt, thus it's not related to 
Mercury.
Here a picture of the orbit
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/raum/14785/1.html
 
Martin 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:28 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 
  Origins
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  What about Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter...Etc? Is it just because we 
have to point of reference or maybe distance...Just 
  Curious!There was widespread belief that the Enstatite 
  Chondrites originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't actually 
  Mercurian themselves, but I haven't read any particularly recent scientific 
  assessment on that positionany updates out there?   The "giants" 
  (Jupiter and Saturn) are considered to be essentially gaseous with prohibitive 
  escape velocities as well, so I don't think there's much speculation about 
  them being reasonable candidates for parent bodies.Gregory 
  
  

  __Meteorite-list 
  mailing 
  list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Sharklike Acrimonious Humo(u)r 101

2004-06-12 Thread Dave Andrews
Wow!  I had always thought of Gregory (Mr. Sharkster) as one of the 
list's more benign creatures (unless provoked).  I'm not aware of what 
you two had said to each other in private about Normandy or whatever, 
but I think the reply Doug gave him was quite uncalled for.  "F_rting" 
and "a__hole" and the such.  Maybe Gregory's sarcastic point was, that 
some of us don't really like to feel belittled by a bunch of 
"Techno-babble"...especially when it's about 3 pages of text or more.  
If so, you best spell it correctly?  We all realize that Doug is a very 
intelligent and talented person with loads of insight (to say the 
least), but some of us probably don't want our face rubbed in our 
supposed ignorance.

Now, I don't know what you two had going in private, but I've never seen 
you (Bernd) go off on anyone like that before.  I'm guessing I don't 
know the whole story and will leave it as such and offer my apologies 
now for even mentioning it.

Hope everyone can work it out between themselves and the list can go 
on.  I meant no offense to anyone and hope none was taken.

Probably said too much already,
Dave

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the window on the soul
   

.. said the undisputed master of hypocritical ceremonies who notoriously deigns
to provoke even the most benevolent list members with unwarranted comments
that only reflect his mean intentions and motives. Comparing Doug to J. Warren
is as provocatively mean and sarcastic as trying to make someone believe that I
thought that the June 06 invasion of the Allied Forces in Normandy was a mistake.
OK, you self-appointed fomenter, I will NOW apologize for having sent part of  your
ignominious comments to the List. I did make a mistake because I had assumed it
had been sent via the list. I was too rash because it was deep sadness over thousands
of young lives lost, no more and no less, but it was a mistake. I DO NOT regret having
sent it to the List because it shows, once again, as so often before, that your prime 
goal
is stirring trouble (Kevin Kichinka would be able to contribute a lot here).
Good night to all the good people that aren't "barbaric flamers", to all those who 
want to
"maintain critical mass", and to all those who don't want this list to "decline in 
quality".
End of this thread (on my part) !
Bernd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] New Zealand meteorite

2004-06-12 Thread Marco Langbroek
Hi all,

With regard to Joel Schiffs announcement of a meteorite fall today in New
Zealand: there's a link to a press report with a picture of the stone at the
Asteroid/Comet Connection website:

http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/mn/0406/11.htm

(look in the text box below the cover illustration for the link).

And it looks like it is a gorgious nose cone oriented meteorite.

- Marco

--
Marco Langbroek
Leiden, the Netherlands
52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
weblog: http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/iss_log.html
--

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Origins

2004-06-12 Thread Sharkkb8
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

What about Mercury, Saturn, Jupiter...Etc? Is it just because we have to point of reference or maybe distance...Just Curious!

There was widespread belief that the Enstatite Chondrites originated within Mercury's orbit, if they weren't actually Mercurian themselves, but I haven't read any particularly recent scientific assessment on that positionany updates out there?   The "giants" (Jupiter and Saturn) are considered to be essentially gaseous with prohibitive escape velocities as well, so I don't think there's much speculation about them being reasonable candidates for parent bodies.

Gregory
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Legality of Libyan Desert Glass ArtifactsDiscussion

2004-06-12 Thread stan .

I sense a little(?) hypocrisy here.   It would seem
to me that archeologists have been the greatest
looters of all time concerning artifacts.I haven't
seen any reports of any of the major museums around
the world scrambling to return the treasures taken out
of other countries. Whether it was looted before or
after 1970,,,it was still looted.
in all fairness a muesum is a bit diffrent than a private collector. sure 
both my preserve a relic, however a muesume allows for it to be enjoyed by 
the public as a whole. afterall, what good is a relic if it's left burried 
in the ground so as to never allow us to learn from it, or apreciate it.

_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Libyan Desert Glass & Sikhote-alin

2004-06-12 Thread Solvænget
This discussion about moral..

Just wondering.

If anyone has a Sikhote-Alin meteorite in their collection, it too must have
been smugled out of Russia.

As far as I know they dont allow those meteorites to leave the country.

Correct me if I am wrong.

Best
Lars Pedersen




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] An announcement from Joel Schiff

2004-06-12 Thread Science Graphics




Joel Schiff, publisher of Meteorite Magazine, has 
asked me to forward the following.
 
Dorothy Norton
 
 
 
A meteorite weighing 1.3 kg crashed through the 
roof of a house in Auckland, New Zealand on Saturday morning 12 June. It looks 
to be an ordinary contrite with a gray matrix. Further details will be featured 
in the next issue of Meteorite magazine Joel Schiff
 
Thank you,
Joel
 
 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Legality of Libyan Desert Glass Artifacts Discussion

2004-06-12 Thread RAYDOBOS
In a message dated 6/12/2004 2:21:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< professional archaeologists have made it very clear, 
 contrary to you have claimed, me that even picking 
 an LDG flake up off the shifting sandy desert floor 
 and transporting it / exporting it without permission 
 from either Egypt or Libya is unethical and illegal  >>
I sense a little(?) hypocrisy here.   It would seem
to me that archeologists have been the greatest 
looters of all time concerning artifacts.I haven't 
seen any reports of any of the major museums around
the world scrambling to return the treasures taken out
of other countries. Whether it was looted before or 
after 1970,,,it was still looted.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Re: Humo(u)r 101

2004-06-12 Thread Sharkkb8


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Comparing Doug to J. Warren
is as provocatively mean and sarcastic[snip]

 It is?  Really?  Moments after he posts "If I wanted to hear an asshole I would have farted"?   You're aligning yourself with THAT, to oppose "meanness and sarcasm" on the list?   Wow.  I just want to go on record as being unapologetically opposed to that kind of inexcusably boorish post, no matter who offers it, and I am frankly more than a little surprised and saddened that Bernd feels compelled to defend its writer. 

.[snip].trying to make someone believe that I
thought that the June 06 invasion of the Allied Forces in Normandy was a mistake. 

I didn't "try to make anyone believe" anything, Bernd, I merely wrote to you and you alone, and asked you to clarify a list-comment you made.   * Sigh*   OK, since you have chosen to dredge all this up again, Bernd..on the D-Day anniversary you expressed what we all obviously feel, sorrow for the lives lost at Normandy, but you then curiously wrote "When will we ever learn?"   I didn't understand that, so I asked you off-list, one-on-one, very sincerely, very innocently and without the remotest inference or "sarcasm" (re-read it and re-post it if you like), for you to clarify that curious remark.  Unless I'm missing something (which is what I asked you to supply), there don't seem to be too many different interpretations of it, other than "Had we learned some (as-yet undefined) lesson by that day in 1944, Normandy could have been avoided."  I merely privately asked you to explain what you meant by that, but I PUBLICLY got an ON-list smear, with no subsequent apology until this highly-diluted and conditional one, a week later.   I'm still patiently waiting for the answer to my polite question, by the way.  But would you please keep it off-list, though, as I have tried to do since the beginning?  

My apologies to everyone else (if anyone else is still reading ;-) for having this little tiff rise from the dead.  Bernd, to follow is a sincere OFF-LIST request that you & I clear the air of whatever it is that has fouled it, so the list might be spared this sort of thing again any time soonbarring the return of Joel Warren (the First).    ;-)

Back to meteorites?!

 Gregory



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list