Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern........

2007-04-11 Thread Matthias Bärmann

Hello Ruben  Son,

I've read your e-mail with regret. Doug was faster to say what a pleasure it
always was to participate at your hunting expeditions - I remember at least
one splendid success, a real triumph - via text and photos.

But of course one has to accept the reasons for such a decision - which
might but must not necessarily be forever. Time will show. If one day an
extremely nice iron will fall down exactly in your garden, brandnew and
ultimately fresh, or in front of your home - may be you can't resist to go
out and hunt it. And there you'd be back again!

But well, as you mentioned it: there are far more activities for a good
father-son-team. Anyway, I wish you both all the best. I'll miss your posts.
But I have two souvenirs here: a wonderful Toluca half-stone and a big and
splendid Gibeon partslice which I bought from you via Ebay.

I wish you both all the best!

Matthias



P.S. Thanks to Mal Bishop for the Vergilius!


- Original Message - 
From: Ruben Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 6:51 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern


Hi all,

It is with sadness and regret that I am writing today.
I've been thinking about this for some time now, and
today I have made my final decision. Let me explain.

Due to certain personalities in this hobby I have
grown more and more disenchanted with meteorites,
meteorite collecting and meteorite hunting.

Also, in February I was told by my dermatologist to
stay out of the sun. This is because of non-cancerous
lesions that have appeared on my face and hands over
the last year. According to him my attempts at
covering up are not working. Since I am allergic to
sun block I am pretty much out of luck.

I've always said that when this hobby ceased being fun
I'd cease doing it. I'm done.

To make a long story short, I have already taken down
my website and will remove myself from this forum
a.s.a.p. I will no longer write about meteorites or
meteorite hunting. I am walking away from all the
trouble and trouble makers. It's just not worth it.
Unfortunately, I'll also leave behind the fun and
excitement that I used to have when finding meteorites
with my son, or teaching a newbie.

I will honor any deals or agreements regarding
meteorites that I've made in the past.

Don't feel sorry for me or my son though. I'm sure
that we'll start doing all the things normal Fathers
and Sons do. Diamondbacks and Suns games here we come!

Thanks to everyone that helped make the last 9 years
enjoyable.

Goodbye,

Ruben Garcia



Ruben Garcia
Phoenix, Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com




Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] FW: Re: Kalahari Lunar

2007-04-11 Thread ensoramanda


Hi,

This has all probably been on the list before...but I was not following 
it at the time...so have these lunar meteorites just disappeared without 
trace?  Has anyone ever seen photographs of the main masses and where 
are they now.?  Have any pieces come on to the market ever?


Graham Ensor, nr Barwell UK


Sterling K. Webb wrote:


Hi,

   I recall, but cannot find in the archives (too long
ago) of the List, a thread that batted back and forth
rumors about Kalahari 008 and 009 having been found
elsewhere and having been planted in the Kalahari.
It was vague, certainly speculative, and nobody claimed
to have come up with the inside scoop.

http://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/planetologie/pdf/bischoff/meteorites_from_botswana.pdf
 says In 1999, the first meteorites from Botswana
were recovered. Most samples (seven) were purchased
from natives in the small village of Kuke. We suggest
that these samples were found close to Kuke in the
Kalahari desert. As reported by the finder, the other
four samples were recovered during geological field
work in various areas of Botswana in April (Mabe),
September (Kalahari 008 and 009), and November
1999 (Matisama). Kalahari 008 and Kalahari 009
were found close to the small village of Kuke and
are chemically and petrographically different lunar
rocks. However, we suggest that both samples
represent distinct lithologies of one meteoroid and
that the lunar sample broke apart at the find site.
The other nine samples are H-group ordinary chondrites.
Based on different petrologic types, the degrees of shock
metamorphism and weathering pairing of most samples
can be ruled out. We conclude that only Kalahari 004
and Kalahari 005 are paired.

   So, there were many other meteorites (H) that came from
the Kuke area initially and were offered for sale. It would
seem that the finder then searched the area further and found
four more, including the lunar duo.


http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2005/pdf/5059.pdf
Two of these samples were found close to the small village of
Kuke (Kalahari 008 and Kalahari 009) and are chemically and
petrographically different lunar rocks. However, it is suggested
that both samples represent distinct lithologies of one meteoroid
that broke apart at the find site... During geological field work
Kalahari 008 and 009 were found roughly 50 m apart in front
of a small dune in September 1999.

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2005/pdf/5270.pdf   says:
   The combined 26Al and 36Cl 4pi exposure ages are
350±120 yr for Kalahari 008 and 220±40 yr for Kalahari 009
that is the shortest exposure age of any meteorite. If both
objects are lunar meteorites, the transition time from the Moon
to the earth was 230±90 yr and ejection depth was more than
 


1,100 g/cm2 on the Moon. Small amounts of cosmogenic
   


nuclides are also produced in-situ on the Earth's surface.
The 26Al and 36Cl concentrations in Kalahari 009 can be
explained by ~0.3 Myr exposure time in the Kalahari Desert
(1,000 m elevation and 21°S). Long terrestrial ages, 0.3-0.5 Myr,
were found for Dhofar lunar and Martian meteorites... For
the case of Kalahari 009, cosmogenic nuclides could have
been produced on the Earth's surface, without previous
exposure in space. Cosmogenic nuclide results do not exclude
that Kalahari 009 is a terrestrial object. However, the 36Cl
concentration in Kalahari 008 is ~15% higher than saturation
of 36Cl production on the Earth's surface, therefore
Kalahari 008 was exposed in space.

   So, if I wanted to plant a 30-pound chuck of the Moon
in Botswana or anywhere else, like my back yard, where
would I go to get one? Inquiring minds want to know...


Sterling K. Webb
---
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite list 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] FW: Re: Kalahari Lunar


I have heard that this area would be nearly impossible
to find meteorites. It is clear that they are not from
that area.
Michael Farmer
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 





[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Randy and List,  Last July Chauncey Walden and I
drove all the way around the
reported find location of these Kalahari Lunars.
This part of the Central Kalahari Nature
Reserve (national not private) is  not a sandy
desert like those far to the north or the Namib to
the west. In this location is the ground is almost
totally covered in knee high grass and scattered
trees. We did not see any igneous rocks in this area
in fact there are not many rocks of any type in this
area. If I remember correctly it is part of the
worlds largest body of sand. So any rock would look
odd and stand out. I know it was totally different
from what I had envisioned and hoped for. Tough area
to hunt meteorites. Much better for photographing
lions and cheetah.
Regards, Fred Olsen, Denver




[meteorite-list] AD:SIX HUGE SEYMCHAN SLICES !!!!! 1.8 FOOT LONG !

2007-04-11 Thread Michel FRANCO
Dear list,

I have just received the visit of a Russian friend that brought with him 6
top huge slices of Seymchan.

weight:

2164 g size 399 mm * 151 mm
1836 g size 478 mm * 163 mm
3566 g size 525 mm * 171 mm
4018 g size 537 mm * 181 mm
2984 g size 565 mm * 204 mm
3040 g size 563 mm * 199 mm

Thickness varies from 3.5 mm to 10 mm. Very fine polishing and etching.

These slices present uncommon chromite cristals, and extraordinary
Widmanstatten figures. they deserve a look, at least!

They will be the master center piece of any serious collection. Size average
is more than a foot and a half !

Please have a look at http://www.caillou-noir.com/HUGE%20Seymchan.htm

Serious offers will be considered. please email at:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

First pay first serve.

See my site for detailed infos about these rare slices.

Best regards.

Michel FRANCO
IMCA 3869
Met Soc member since 1998.
www. caillou-noir.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] back to meteorites

2007-04-11 Thread steve arnold
Good morning list.I am a real BIG fan of mike
farmer.He has done it right!He has gone out to find us
all great stones and irons to have in our
collections.And when he says the list has some serious
problems he is sssoo right.If it is not a
flame war going on between 2 or more list members,or
someone who is trying to push off on us
meteorwrongs,or people on the list talking about
CHURCH STUFF,OR JUST NON-METEORIIC junk.Art developed
this list to bring out the beauty of meteorites.Talk
about meteorites.Overall just bring out the beauty of
meteorites in general.I know there are someof you who
do like me or that I post to much,but in the 6 years
of being on this list,I usually talk about
meteorites.But mike is right lets get back to what
this list is about METEORITES.I guess you can only say
so much till it gets shoved into everyone's heads.I
enjoy sterlings posts,ron baalke's posts and so
on.They bring a real zest to the list.I like to
believe I bring a real passion for the hobby to the
list.I really believe in this list and art has done a
great job of keeping it going.I have over 300 email
address for this list and all or most are great
people.So lets please  get back to meteorites and lets
stop all the BS and lets do what art wanted us to
do.BRING OUT ONLY METEORITICS TO THE LIST.Not all this
rap that has made people unsuscribe and never come
back.I know we have not had a major fall lately,but
there is always something new to talk about concerning
meteorites.I hope I speak for alot of fine on this
list.Any comments are always welcome.


steve arnold,chicago,ill  usa!

Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
  Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999!!
  www.chicagometeorites.net.Specializing
  in Gao Meteorites!
  Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites



   

The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern.......

2007-04-11 Thread Michael Murray

Hold the door Ruben, I am right behind you

I too have decided to take my leave from this interest.

Thanks to all that have shared so much information.  I appreciate  
your communications.


Best regards,

Michael Murray
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Botanica, Radio Program + Odds Ends

2007-04-11 Thread MARK BOSTICK

Hello Everybody,

Hope everyone is doing well.  Been pretty busy around here as usual.  After 
a little cold spell the sun is now shining much to the delight of my baby 
Oak trees, and my banana tree that perhaps I put outside a little too early. 
(It really isn't looking good after the last week.)  Oh well, on to 
meteorite things


A couple weeks ago I helped Steve Arnold move the Brenham meteorite main 
mass from the Exploration Place. It was sad to see Steve pull away in his 
hummer, perhaps the last time the meteorite will be here.  I took a couple 
images and will try to find time to post them.


(Speaking of Steve and Brenham, that Cash for Treasures program with Steve 
and Geoff is getting a LOT of air play.)


Last week we presented a slide show at the local Botanica on the solar 
system and meteorites.  It was lunch program, so people had to pay to see 
the presentation, but we still had about 80 people in attendance. Photos 
coming when I can find time.


The Kansas Meteorite Society will be on the radio this weekend, on a local 
radio station, KNSS. This will be Saturday, April 14th from 10 a.m. to 11 
a.m., during the Countryman's Kansas program, hosted by Gene Countryman.  We 
will be promoting the upcoming meteorite themed rock show.


You can read more radio show here

http://www.knssradio.com/djs/countrymans_kansas.php

And after the weekend, not sure when really, you will be able to download 
the show to your ipod here...


http://www.knssradio.com/promo/podcast/index.php

Followed up all leads from the lawn show and no new meteorites.

Must more in the works, some things not finalized yet, some things I can't 
really talk public about.


Mark Bostick
Wichita, Kansas
www.meteoritearticles.com

PS: I will remind everyone about the dates and times of our upcoming rock 
show, as it seems like the thing to do.  Please try to make it if in the 
region, but avoid Friday, unless you want to be trampled by the ~1500 kids 
or so that attend that day.


http://www.meteoritearticles.com/2007GemShowInfo.html


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisional names and numbers

2007-04-11 Thread wahlperry

Dear List,

I am sending this email in response to an ongoing thread regarding 
provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope this puts an end to 
the thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding this issue and 
received the following response.





Dear Sonny,
Thanks for your phone message as well as this email.
You can look up the committee membership and the rules and guidelines 

on the Meteoritical Society website.
The Committee has no requirements regarding getting provisional 
numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no requirement to get a 
provisional number at all. If you want to just submit a meteorite at 
the time it is classified that is fine. Similarly, there is no time 
requirement for submitting a new find. When fragments are clearly 
paired it is fine to include them all in the same number.

I hope this clarifies things.



I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob Verish and Team 
Verish. As you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay of 
getting provisonal numbers and names for all of  my new finds. I have 
chosen to complete field study work before aquiring any provisional 
names or numbers.

Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails.


Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
his way, and I'm forced to abide by guidelines.


http://www.meteorite-times.com  ( Nevada Picture Of The Day) The last 2 
months have been focused negativley on my finds.


Thanks,

Sonny


AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread Moni Waiblinger

Sonny,

this is not harassment.
Like I wrote to you before its simply an opinion of a writer writing his 
article.

The last Nevada find was thought of a find from John Blennert.
If you see it as an harassment, I am sorry, which I also told you before.

I am not Bob V.s parrot, but as a Californian meteorite hunter I would like 
to have other hunters coming into this state help the hunters that are on 
these dry lakes for number of years, logging all the finds and numbering 
them as well to have the TKW for the areas and the different classifications 
for the different finds on the lakes.


I think you are right that one could get numbers or no numbers if this is 
the Nom rules, when you think it is the time, but getting numbers to keep 
things a bit in order doesn't tell anyone that you hunt there, it is only 
known by Rhian Jones, which is kept in strictest confidence.
It does help out the hunters here in California and there are more than just 
Bob.


And just like Bob, you wouldn't'f feel so harassed by him, if you wouldn't 
want things to be the way you are wanting them to be.

Your way.
Two opinions and that is the way it goes.

So no parrot on Bob's back, just my opinion coming from California where 
things are done a bit different than Arizona.


Happy hunting,
Moni





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: 
provisionalnames and numbers

Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 -0400

Dear List,

I am sending this email in response to an ongoing thread regarding 
provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope this puts an end to the 
thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding this issue and received 
the following response.





Dear Sonny,
Thanks for your phone message as well as this email.
You can look up the committee membership and the rules and guidelines

on the Meteoritical Society website.

The Committee has no requirements regarding getting provisional
numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no requirement to get a 
provisional number at all. If you want to just submit a meteorite at the 
time it is classified that is fine. Similarly, there is no time requirement 
for submitting a new find. When fragments are clearly paired it is fine to 
include them all in the same number.

I hope this clarifies things.



I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob Verish and Team Verish. As 
you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay of getting provisonal 
numbers and names for all of  my new finds. I have chosen to complete field 
study work before aquiring any provisional names or numbers.

Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails.


Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
his way, and I'm forced to abide by guidelines.


http://www.meteorite-times.com  ( Nevada Picture Of The Day) The last 2 
months have been focused negativley on my finds.


Thanks,

Sonny


AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


_
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. 
http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mars Exploration Rovers Update - April 10, 2007

2007-04-11 Thread Ron Baalke

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status.html

SPIRIT UPDATE: Spirit Studies Rocks En Route to Home Plate - 
sol 1152-1158, April 10, 2007:

Spirit is healthy and performing scientific studies of an outcrop of
light-toned clasts and cobbles nicknamed Elizabeth Mahon on the edge
of Home Plate as well as a pockmarked rock outcrop nicknamed Madeline
English.

To get around obstacles and make progress over rough terrain using only
five wheels, Spirit drove backward a few meters, pivoted around the
front wheel, drove backward another few meters, pivoted again to face
Madeline English, and finally pushed forward to reach the rock with
scientific instruments on the robotic arm.

After investigating Madeline English, the rover will head back north to
one of several possible on-ramps for driving onto Home Plate.

Sol-by-sol summary:

In addition to daily observations of atmospheric dust levels and surveys
of the sky and ground with the miniature thermal emission spectrometer,
Spirit conducted the following activities:

Sol 1152 (March 31, 2007): Spirit acquired panoramic camera images of a
rock exposure known as Clara Zaph in addition to miniature thermal
emission spectrometer data from Clara Zaph 1, Clara Zaph 2, and
Clara Zaph 3. The rover surveyed the sky and ground and targets known
as Rita Briggs and Twila Shively using the miniature thermal
emission spectrometer and completed a survey with the sun low in the sky
using the panoramic camera.

Sol 1153: Spirit turned southeast and drove backward 4 meters over the
target Elizabeth Mahon to place it within the work volume of the rover's
scientific instruments. Spirit acquired post-drive images using the
navigation camera and relayed data to the Odyssey orbiter overnight.

Sol 1154: Spirit acquired thumbnail images of the sky using the
panoramic camera and measured argon using the alpha-particle X-ray
spectrometer.

Sol 1155: Spirit unstowed the robotic arm, placed the Moessbauer
spectrometer on Elizabeth Mahon, and acquired data overnight. The rover
acquired a mosaic of panoramic camera images facing the drive direction
and relayed data to Odyssey overnight.

Sol 1156: Spirit continued to acquire overnight data from Elizabeth
Mahon using the Moessbauer spectrometer. Spirit acquired full-color
images using all 13 filters of the panoramic camera of a target known as
Madeline English 2. The rover acquired miniature thermal emission
spectrometer data from Madeline English 2 and targets known as Betty
Hill and Madeline English 3.

Sol 1157: Spirit changed tools from the Moessbauer spectrometer to the
microscopic imager and acquired a mosaic of microscopic images of
Elizabeth Mahon. The rover placed the alpha-particle X-ray spectrometer
on the target and collected data overnight while also relaying relayed
data to the Odyssey orbiter. Spirit scanned the sky for clouds using the
navigation camera and acquired full-color images of white soil using all
13 filters of the panoramic camera.

Sol 1158 (April 6, 2007): Plans called for Spirit to acquire overnight
data using the Moessbauer spectrometer, panoramic camera images of
Madeline English, and miniature thermal emission spectrometer data on
targets known as Noreen Arnold, Carol Habben, and Phyllis Wise.

Odometry:

As of sol 1153 (April 1, 2007), Spirit's total odometry was 7,077.10
meters (4.40 miles).



OPPORTUNITY UPDATE: Characterizing Wind Streaks - sol 1131-1138, 
April 10, 2007:

Opportunity is healthy and is attempting to characterize the dark wind
streak material which emanates from Victoria Crater as seen from orbital
images.

On Sol 1132 the team planned a four-hour alpha particle X-ray
spectrometer integration to measure atmospheric Argon. The purpose of
this measurement is to determine the atmospheric mixing processes and
track their changes with time.

Sol 1137 included a test of a fix for a steering bias bug in the
mobility flight software. This is the fix for the problem the team saw
on sol 1114, when the software selected an arc that was 13 degrees off
course from the goal.

Sol-by-sol summary:

In addition to Opportunity's usual observations of panoramic camera tau,
navigation camera cloud captures, miniature thermal emission sky and
ground stares, and panoramic camera sky spots, the rover did the following:

Sol 1131 (March 30, 2007): On this sol, Opportunity's panoramic camera
began to take the first half of a long baseline stereo image of Valley
Without Peril. The navigation camera was used to fill gaps in the
previous sol's panorama. The panoramic camera was then used again to
image target Almeria. The miniature thermal emission spectrometer also
observed Almeria.

Sol 1132: Opportunity bumped 5.6 meters (18.4 feet) to the second eye
location of the stereo panorama of Valley Without Peril. The miniature
thermal emission spectrometer observed target Barcelona. The alpha
particle X-ray spectromter completed a four-hour 

Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread Michael Farmer
At least we now know who drove Ruben away from
meteorites. What is with California and arrogance
about who owns the strewnfields? I recall that two
years ago, a group who went meteorite hunting was
turned in and harrassed for hunting someones
territory.
What a crock, if you don't own the land, you should
not say a thing about someone else who hunts there, or
how they turn in their finds. Sonny has been one of
the most successful meteorite hunters to appear in the
last few years, and he deserves nothing but credit,
not harrassment. I have avoided hunting anywhere NEAR
California due to the rotten attitudes and better
than thou sentiment that oozes from some of these
groups. Perhaps it is time for me to start hunting
some dry lake beds.
Michael Farmer


Moni, that statement
Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do
things his way, and I'm forced to abide by
guidelines, sure as heck sounds like harrassment to
me. Especially since the NOMCOM has cleared it up and
Sonny can do it any way he see's fit, so Verish is
wrong on that issue, and has just been proven wrong by
the nomcom themselves.


--- Moni Waiblinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sonny,
 
 this is not harassment.
 Like I wrote to you before its simply an opinion of
 a writer writing his 
 article.
 The last Nevada find was thought of a find from John
 Blennert.
 If you see it as an harassment, I am sorry, which I
 also told you before.
 
 I am not Bob V.s parrot, but as a Californian
 meteorite hunter I would like 
 to have other hunters coming into this state help
 the hunters that are on 
 these dry lakes for number of years, logging all the
 finds and numbering 
 them as well to have the TKW for the areas and the
 different classifications 
 for the different finds on the lakes.
 
 I think you are right that one could get numbers or
 no numbers if this is 
 the Nom rules, when you think it is the time, but
 getting numbers to keep 
 things a bit in order doesn't tell anyone that you
 hunt there, it is only 
 known by Rhian Jones, which is kept in strictest
 confidence.
 It does help out the hunters here in California and
 there are more than just 
 Bob.
 
 And just like Bob, you wouldn't'f feel so harassed
 by him, if you wouldn't 
 want things to be the way you are wanting them to
 be.
 Your way.
 Two opinions and that is the way it goes.
 
 So no parrot on Bob's back, just my opinion coming
 from California where 
 things are done a bit different than Arizona.
 
 Happy hunting,
 Moni
 
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [meteorite-list] New information from
 Nomenclature re: 
 provisionalnames and numbers
 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 -0400
 
 Dear List,
 
 I am sending this email in response to an ongoing
 thread regarding 
 provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope
 this puts an end to the 
 thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding
 this issue and received 
 the following response.
 
 
 
 Dear Sonny,
 Thanks for your phone message as well as this
 email.
 You can look up the committee membership and the
 rules and guidelines
 on the Meteoritical Society website.
 The Committee has no requirements regarding
 getting provisional
 numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no
 requirement to get a 
 provisional number at all. If you want to just
 submit a meteorite at the 
 time it is classified that is fine. Similarly,
 there is no time requirement 
 for submitting a new find. When fragments are
 clearly paired it is fine to 
 include them all in the same number.
 I hope this clarifies things.
 
 
 I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob
 Verish and Team Verish. As 
 you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay
 of getting provisonal 
 numbers and names for all of  my new finds. I have
 chosen to complete field 
 study work before aquiring any provisional names or
 numbers.
 Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails.
 
 Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do
 things
 his way, and I'm forced to abide by guidelines.
 
 http://www.meteorite-times.com  ( Nevada Picture Of
 The Day) The last 2 
 months have been focused negativley on my finds.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Sonny
 


 AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out
 more about what's free 
 from AOL at AOL.com.
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

_
 Need a break? Find your escape route with Live
 Search Maps. 
 http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list

Re: [meteorite-list] MORE ON KALAHARI 008 - 009

2007-04-11 Thread Norbert Classen
Hi Sterling, and All,

In the meantime, at least two other (rather experienced) teams have checked
the alleged find location of the Kalahari lunars, and all are reporting the
same: that's no place to hunt for meteorites, there are no sand dunes as
described in the MetBull entry for the Kalahari lunars, and so at least the
find location seems to be questionable.

Sterling wrote:

 However, please note that the Bischoff paper says that the other 
 four samples were recovered during geological field work in various 
 areas of Botswana. If the finder was doing geological field work, 
 this suggests that the finder is a geologist, which is not an 
 absolute disqualifier for a knowledge of meteorites. Presumably, he 
 is working near Kuke because he's already acquired meteorites from 
 there.

Presumed that the finder of Kalahari 008/009, and the finder of the other
four stones are one and the same person. I have my doubts about that.
According to what I've heard first hand, the finder of the Kalahari lunars
is a South African diamond prospector, and it's certainly not usual if not
illegal to prospect for diamonds in a natural reserve. Anyway, I still
believe that these finds have been planted into Botswana - the whole story
is odd, as are the missing photos of the masses.

 If it's an elaborate setup for the reasons Norbert suggested, it's
 a damned good one. Try to prove otherwise... On the other hand,
 if he's a geologist in the largest sandcovered area of the planet 
 and sees a large rock, ANY large rock, doesn't he check it?

The area is covered with more or less dense vegetation, and that's part of
the problem. It's as improbable to find a lunar there as it would be to find
it in the loess covered vineyards of the Kaiserstuhl area where I live...
And I know my lunars... Adam compared the Kalahari stones to the Dhofar
lunars, and I think that's a pretty good comparison from the first look at
Randy's photos. At least the small feldspathic sample reminds me a lot of
certain Omani finds. So I might have picked this rock up - BUT, I recall it
very well: when I returned with Dho 908 and 909 even some scientists had no
hope for these ugly ducklings, devoid of any fusion crust that would have
revealed their extraterrestrial origin.

Back to our geologist/diamond prospector in the Kalahari: I still think that
Jeff's words were wisely put: ... it sounds improbable that a person who's
not into meteorites at all recovers a large lunaite, AND - having no idea of
what he has there - combs the place for additional fragments. That's really
odd.

Something's wrong in the State of Botswana, but I have no idea what.

Take care,
Norbert


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisional names and numbers

2007-04-11 Thread Notkin

Bob V. posted:


Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
his way, and I'm forced to abide by guidelines.



Dear Bob:

Correct me if I'm wrong, please, but your posts seem to infer that 
Sonny is in some way acting in an improper manner regarding his finds.


I've had the pleasure of hunting for meteorites with Sonny in seven 
states in the Union. I've also stayed at his house, seen his impressive 
collection of finds, and been privileged to inspect his extensive field 
data. I've never seen anyone keep more meticulous records of his finds, 
or act in a more responsible and respectful way regarding private 
property, hunting regulations, etc.


Anyone who has made a significant meteorite discovery knows it's common 
sense to complete work in the new find zone before making data public. 
I think that's better for the community than hogging scores of 
provisional numbers for one's personal use later on. The view certain 
people hold that such-and-such a lake bed is my area is the kind of 
mentality that drives decent people like Ruben Garcia out of the field. 
When someone like Ruben gives up meteorites, the community as a whole 
is diminished by the loss.


I agree with you that some meteorite hunters fail to report their finds 
accurately, but Sonny is not one of those people.



Respectfully,

Geoff N.
www.aerolite.org

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread Adam Hupe
Dear List,

It kind of takes the fun out of it when somebody feels
the need to snitch on an out of state group to the
BLM. This only serves to weaken the hobby of hunting.

By the way, I was told that there was a BLM agent
hanging around the meteorite group this year in
Tucson.  He was recognized in one of the images posted
to the List.

I got nothing but grief over the Randsburg iron even
though its provenance goes back three decades.
Questions about whether it was really a transplanted
Campo or Chuckwalla forced me to liquidate it for
free. I donated the entire mass to a church in North
Carolina because I was so disgusted with the politics
surrounding this California meteorite.

Luckily my pairing to the Old Woman was found on
private property or I am sure there would be some more
grief in regards to this shale ball.

The best advice for anybody searching California lake
beds is to check out the laws regarding them. It is
difficult to know if you are searching on private
property or not so it is best to question the locals.
Do not be afraid to bang on a few doors and ask
questions. I would rather search on private property
with a solid agreement than risk getting in trouble.
Besides, you can get an exclusive if you do your
research which accounts for 90% of any true treasure
hunting effort.

I plan a long term stay in the Mojave next fall with
all of the proper equipment and permissions so it
should be an enjoyable effort.

Best Regards,

Adam

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern........

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald Flaherty
Ruben, I'm sorry to hear about your decision and for the reasons behind it. 
I have enjoyed reading about your exploits through the List over the years.

Good luck in any endeavor you choose to pursue.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: Ruben Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:51 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern


Hi all,

It is with sadness and regret that I am writing today.
I've been thinking about this for some time now, and
today I have made my final decision. Let me explain.

Due to certain personalities in this hobby I have
grown more and more disenchanted with meteorites,
meteorite collecting and meteorite hunting.

Also, in February I was told by my dermatologist to
stay out of the sun. This is because of non-cancerous
lesions that have appeared on my face and hands over
the last year. According to him my attempts at
covering up are not working. Since I am allergic to
sun block I am pretty much out of luck.

I've always said that when this hobby ceased being fun
I'd cease doing it. I'm done.

To make a long story short, I have already taken down
my website and will remove myself from this forum
a.s.a.p. I will no longer write about meteorites or
meteorite hunting. I am walking away from all the
trouble and trouble makers. It's just not worth it.
Unfortunately, I'll also leave behind the fun and
excitement that I used to have when finding meteorites
with my son, or teaching a newbie.

I will honor any deals or agreements regarding
meteorites that I've made in the past.

Don't feel sorry for me or my son though. I'm sure
that we'll start doing all the things normal Fathers
and Sons do. Diamondbacks and Suns games here we come!

Thanks to everyone that helped make the last 9 years
enjoyable.

Goodbye,

Ruben Garcia



Ruben Garcia
Phoenix, Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com




Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern........

2007-04-11 Thread JKGwilliam

Hello List,
I too am sorry to read about Ruben's recent decision.  He, Mike 
Miller, and Sonny have all made great contributions to the meteorite 
community.  It's too bad that some certain personalities played a 
role in Ruben deciding to give up meteorite hunting.


Over the past several years I too have noticed some members of our 
loosely knitted group try to exert influence on meteorite hunters to 
do things their way.  This whole issue of provisional names, in my 
opinion, is not necessary for everyone.  If someone, a few people, or 
a group of people want to follow this convension, good for 
them.  That doesn't mean, however, that every one must do it.  This 
also doesn't mean that the maverick hunters are any less diligent 
in recording their finds and keeping good and accurate records to be 
submitted to the Nom. Comm. at the proper time.


There are some California meteorite hunters who I consider good 
friends and, as best as I can tell, aren't involved in this 
controversy. Let's not lump every one from California, or those who 
hunt in California, together. Many of them go about their business 
quietly without any publicity stunts or chest pounding.  In fact, you 
have to search out the facts about these people to find out about 
their accomplishments because they  generally are pretty quiet about 
their work.


Keeping ones active find sights a secret is important to meteorite 
hunters. Anyone can tell you that as soon as a new meteorite is 
announced (particularly here in the Western USA) meteorite hunters 
start showing up in droves. Now before anyone points a finger at me, 
I'll admit I've done the same thing.  I've found meteorites in places 
where someone else found them first.  Once the location becomes a 
matter of public record, anyone can go right to the spot providing 
the correct location is recorded.  Lucerne Dry Lake is a good 
example, as is Franconia.


When  meteorite hunter has invested lots of time and money to locate 
meteorites in a new location, I believe he (she) has a right to 
protect their investment by keeping the location quiet until they can 
finish their work there.  I know there is a level of confidence that 
exists with many of the people on the academic and scientific side of 
the process, but I know that there have been instances where some 
persistent people have been able to acquire some locations that 
should have been kept confidential.


In closing, I want to let you all know that like Ruben,  I have lost 
much of my enthusiasm for meteorite hunting and meteorites in 
general. I didn't attend the Tucson Show this past February which was 
just the second time in twenty years I haven't gone.  It might just 
be me, or it might just be the way everything changes with time, but 
things have changed, in my opinion, and most of the changes haven't 
been for the better.  The ongoing debate about who can hunt where, 
government regulations that are almost impossible to find in print 
and the unanswered questions about who actually owns meteorites found 
on Public Land has complicated things to the point of frustration for 
many people.  It's no wonder that people are becoming disenchanted 
and finding something else to do with their spare time.


Sorry about the long post,

John

At 11:16 AM 4/11/2007, Gerald Flaherty wrote:
Ruben, I'm sorry to hear about your decision and for the reasons 
behind it. I have enjoyed reading about your exploits through the 
List over the years.

Good luck in any endeavor you choose to pursue.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - From: Ruben Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:51 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern


Hi all,

It is with sadness and regret that I am writing today.
I've been thinking about this for some time now, and
today I have made my final decision. Let me explain.

Due to certain personalities in this hobby I have
grown more and more disenchanted with meteorites,
meteorite collecting and meteorite hunting.

Also, in February I was told by my dermatologist to
stay out of the sun. This is because of non-cancerous
lesions that have appeared on my face and hands over
the last year. According to him my attempts at
covering up are not working. Since I am allergic to
sun block I am pretty much out of luck.

I've always said that when this hobby ceased being fun
I'd cease doing it. I'm done.

To make a long story short, I have already taken down
my website and will remove myself from this forum
a.s.a.p. I will no longer write about meteorites or
meteorite hunting. I am walking away from all the
trouble and trouble makers. It's just not worth it.
Unfortunately, I'll also leave behind the fun and
excitement that I used to have when finding meteorites
with my son, or teaching a newbie.

I will honor any deals or agreements regarding
meteorites that I've made in the past.

Don't feel sorry for me or my son though. I'm sure
that 

[meteorite-list] Repost: Re Nevada picture of the day / Reply to Sonny

2007-04-11 Thread Robert Verish
List,

The oft-quoted:
Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
his way, and I'm forced to abide by guidelines. 
has been taken out of context from it's original
thread and ignores my subsequent reply and
explanation.  

As you can see in that reply (below) I clearly stated
that that Sonny did nothing wrong in how he reported
his Starvation Flat meteorite to the NomComm.

And I never said that Sonny was wrong in not getting
any provisional numbers.

There are separate issues here:

Bob V.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Bob ,and List,
 
 With the new Nevada Meteorite, Starvation Flat . I
 found 4 meteorites . 
 With these meteorite, I also found many fragments,
 over 100 small pieces . 

+ 
 
 The meteorite in the picture is one of the many
 fragments that were found from Starvation #3
 

 
 The correct number [for the next find at Starvation 
 Flat] would be 005 ! 


Yes, Sonny,

You're right!  The next find at Starvation Flat
should be 005.

Over the weekend, people have pointed out to me that
they see very little difference in opinion between
Sonny and me.  They pointed out that Sonny is just as
inclined as I am to number our finds, it's just that I
prefer to use NomComm approved numbers.  And as long
as the NomComm continues to request this information
from all finders, I'll continue to supply this
information and use their numbers.

But I still have a question.  If I had supplied this 
same Starvation Flat information to the NomComm, they
would have told me that I have to get 4 numbers, and
that under Pieces for each of those 4 numbers I
would have to supply the total number of fragments. 

And I think I know why the NomComm handles requests
differently.  But it isn't because anybody did
anything wrong.  It's just that there appears to be a
misunderstanding of what the term Pieces means by
whoever submitted the name request to the NomComm.  

I know for a fact that the NomComm has no intention to
obfuscate recovery data by condensing into one
coordinate the find locations for 4 meteorites, or
their total number of fragments.
It has to be how the data is interpreted and entered
into their two standard forms.  Maybe the NomComm
interprets the data differently depending which of the
two forms are used?  I don't know for sure, but maybe
the NomComm should review this.

If I have misrepresented the NomComm, or mistated any
facts, I would appreciate a reply from any one of
their representatives.

With best regards,
Bob V.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think you should change your post from Nevada Pic 
 of the Day , To fishing for Nevada Meteorite 
 information of the Day!
 
 Thanks,
 
 Sonny
 
 http://www.meteorite-times.com/meteorite_frame.htm
 __





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-11 Thread Robert Verish
A wise man once said, Sonny has been one of
the most successful meteorite hunters to appear in the
last few years, and he deserves nothing but credit...
which no one can deny.  But that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing it
with provisional names and numbers.

Otherwise, some other person could make another find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of him
with getting that area named and 001 number approved,
and worse, get published before Sonny could get proper
credit.

That's only one of many good reasons,
Bob V. 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] 4-11-07 Update on Walter Branch

2007-04-11 Thread Walter Branch

Hello,
I spoke with Walter's nurse casemanager today.  She told me that Walter will 
be in rehab. for another 3-4 weeks then he can come home.  He will need 
total care for awhile but hopefully he will gain strength quickly once he is 
home.  We are so appreciative of all of the e-mails and the cards and the 
checks/money orders.  Walter told me that when he gets home and can sit at 
the computer for awhile, he will respond to all of you.

Thank you so much for your prayers and support,
Sabrina Branch
 



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] NEW Angrite Lithology - NWA 4590 Tamassint - AD

2007-04-11 Thread Greg Hupe

Dear List Members,

I would like to announce a NEW and Officially Approved Angrite which is of a 
different lithology than the other known agrites. It is NWA 4590 
Tamassint. The total known weight is just 212.8 grams. Due to the fragile 
nature of this material and the low TKW, I chose not to cut any slices and 
will offer it as the fragments were found. This is some of the most 
beautiful material I have seen in a while. Here are a couple links to see 
this beautiful new angrite:


Group image of NWA 4590 Tamassint:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590group.jpg



Microscopic image of matrix at 12x magnification::

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590micro.jpg



Close-up image of fusion crust at 10x magnification:

http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4590/nwa4590crust.jpg



Link to the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstract on NWA 4590:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1522.pdf




I loaded 28 of the largest available specimens on eBay under my seller name, 
NaturesVault. Click here to see all that I just loaded: 
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvaultQQhtZ-1QQfrppZ50QQfsopZ1QQfsooZ1QQrdZ0




For further classification information, click on one of the eBay auctions.



Best regards and Thank You for bidding!
Greg




Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
NaturesVault (eBay)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LunarRock.com
IMCA 3163




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Measuring Martian Meteorites at Houston's Lunar and Planetary Institute

2007-04-11 Thread Darren Garrison
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2007/4/emw517793.htm

Measuring Martian Meteorites at Houston's Lunar and Planetary Institute  
 
 
 
 

In the documentary just released on The Futures Channel's website, The Surface
of Mars, Dr. Molly McCanta, an experimental petrologist, takes students inside
the Lunar and Planetary Institute to show them how her scientific studies of
tiny Martian meteorites found on Earth could unlock some of that planet's
mysteries.

Burbank, Calif. (PRWEB) April 11, 2007 -- 37 Martian rocks that somehow reached
our planet over the eons may be key to telling us how Mars was formed, and may
also tell us the best place to land when we visit the Red Planet. 

In their latest online documentary, The Surface of Mars, The Futures Channel
takes students to the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas to meet
experimental petrologist Dr. Molly McCanta. She studies Martian rocks that
landed on Earth as meteorites. She knows they're from Mars, she explains, from
the gases trapped inside the rocks. Her challenge is not small. 

Working on Mars, working on any other planet, is always a big challenge because
I can't just pick up a rock and study it, she says. What we're attempting to
do is take 37 small bits of rock and recreate the whole geologic history of a
planet.

She explains in the movie, now showing on The Futures Channel's website, that
with the help of a spacecraft orbiting Mars measuring the topographical data, as
well as the Mars Rovers collecting rock samples, all of her scientific detective
work will help to reveal the geological formation of a planet similar to Earth.
It is also possible that her research could lead to discoveries of where other
life forms may have originated. As Dr. McCanta states, the general idea is that
where there's water, you have life forms. The polar regions and higher
latitudes may reveal the mystery one day, she says.

She is enthusiastic about her work and hopes others will find it exciting too.
Young people are encouraged to get involved at the early stages, Dr. McCanta
says in the movie, because they're the ones who are actually going to be the
scientists when spacecrafts get there and start producing data and sending it
back to earth. 

The Lunar and Planetary Institute is one of the foremost resources for
scientists focused on the exploration of the solar system with an expansive
collection of space photography, including the earliest explorations of the Moon
and the solar system. 

We provide a conduit for scientists from around the world, to come and get
access to those collections, says Dr. Steve Mackwell, the Institute's Director.
It is an institute that is designed to provide a scientific and support role
for NASA and its connection to the university community. They're all working on
various aspects of solar system research. 

Watch the movie:
http://www.thefutureschannel.com/dockets/realworld/surface_of_mars/ 

 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Ad Meteorite sale Ebay auctions ending soon

2007-04-11 Thread Mike Jensen

Hi all

Here is a two part post;

PART 1
I have a few miscellaneous meteorites for sale. Please take a look;

http://jensenmeteorites.com/April.htm

PART 2
I have several auctions ending tomorrow most still at 95 cents;

http://collectibles.search.ebay.com/_Meteorites-Tektites_W0QQcatrefZC12QQsacatZ3239QQsassZmeteorfinder

Two really cute Bensours still at 95 cents
http://cgi.ebay.com/Bensour-LL6-Morocco-Fall-1-61-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100406404

Really nice Brenham especially when you compare it to the rusted
fragments usually offered on Ebay, still at 95 cents
http://cgi.ebay.com/Brenham-Pallasite-3-86-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100406484

Drake Creek fragment still at 95 cents
http://cgi.ebay.com/Drake-Creek-L6-Fall-0-053-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100406618

Hughes 004 Howardite, Juvinas, Kenna, Moss all still at 95 cents

Killer whole Thuathe no bid
http://cgi.ebay.com/Thuathe-H4-5-Fall-7-43-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100407136

Awesome 9.45 g Thuathe slice only at $1.25
http://cgi.ebay.com/Thuathe-H4-5-Fall-9-45-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100407169

Zhovtnevyi 6.8 g slice still at 95 cents
http://cgi.ebay.com/Zhovtnevyi-H5-Fall-6-8-g-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ190100407264
--
Mike
--
Mike Jensen
Jensen Meteorites
16730 E Ada PL
Aurora, CO 80017-3137
303-337-4361
IMCA 4264
website: www.jensenmeteorites.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] buying pallasites

2007-04-11 Thread harlan trammell
i have bought several russian pallasites that were mostly epoxy polished surfaces. can anyone recomment a reputable seller that sell seymchan or others that does NOT use fillers to make fake olivines?
i will be gradually switching over to yahoo mail (it has 100 FREE megs of storage). please cc to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re:provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread Moni Waiblinger

Hi Adam and All,

I just wonder now,
if you make a find in California, what is the rule after that?
Who gets what, BLM or Smithsonian and where would you have it classified?
What have you found out about that?
What kind of permits?
And if you obtain a permit, do you have to tell them exactly what you found?
And are there written laws now one could get from the BLM offices?
Or does each BLM office in California have different rules?

I never even wondered about going out to hunt,
never stepped foot in a BLM office.
I knew the basics that the meteorites really don't belong to me and the 
Smithsonian could get them any time they wanted.

But that was never the question, ever.
I wonder why things started changing?
Why all the sudden is the BLM getting so involved?

Thanks, Moni



From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature 
re:provisionalnames and

Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:36:55 -0700 (PDT)

Dear List,

It kind of takes the fun out of it when somebody feels
the need to snitch on an out of state group to the
BLM. This only serves to weaken the hobby of hunting.

By the way, I was told that there was a BLM agent
hanging around the meteorite group this year in
Tucson.  He was recognized in one of the images posted
to the List.

I got nothing but grief over the Randsburg iron even
though its provenance goes back three decades.
Questions about whether it was really a transplanted
Campo or Chuckwalla forced me to liquidate it for
free. I donated the entire mass to a church in North
Carolina because I was so disgusted with the politics
surrounding this California meteorite.

Luckily my pairing to the Old Woman was found on
private property or I am sure there would be some more
grief in regards to this shale ball.

The best advice for anybody searching California lake
beds is to check out the laws regarding them. It is
difficult to know if you are searching on private
property or not so it is best to question the locals.
Do not be afraid to bang on a few doors and ask
questions. I would rather search on private property
with a solid agreement than risk getting in trouble.
Besides, you can get an exclusive if you do your
research which accounts for 90% of any true treasure
hunting effort.

I plan a long term stay in the Mojave next fall with
all of the proper equipment and permissions so it
should be an enjoyable effort.

Best Regards,

Adam


_
Interest Rates Fall Again! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,399/mo - Calculate new 
payment 
http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18679moid=7581


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re:provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Moni and List,

As I said before, you can talk to ten different BLM
offices and get ten different answers. The only
consistent thing I have heard is that 250 pounds a
year can be taken for non-commercial purposes (can't
be sold).  In other words, they are incorporating
meteorites under general laws that apply to federal
land, things like minerals and petrified wood to name
a few.

The Smithsonian can't take away any meteorite that
weighs less than 250 pounds from what I was led to
believe unless it was found in an area deemed to be
off-limits to any kind of searching.

The only reason the Old Woman meteorite was taken was
because of it's weight from what I was told. 

It is far better to search private property with
permission than to hassle with unclear laws that don't
specifically mention meteorites.  Then, you are free
to do whatever you like with the meteorites.

Some areas in California require a use permit before
stepping foot in them and the restrictions are
different for every area so it is best to do your own
research before searching.  The BLM is very helpful in
letting you know what areas can be searched so a call
ahead of time is recommended.

I am tired of this subject.  It reminds me of all the
restrictions put on Treasure Hunters because of a few
bad apples who rocked the boat. I see meteorite
hunting going the same way.  If everybody respected
everyone else's property, followed the laws and minded
their own business, there would be far fewer problems.
 If things continue the way they are now, there are no
guarantees that the next generation will be able to
search for anything.  Picking up a piece of dog poop
could be off limits if somebody deemed it to be of
scientific value.

Wishing everybody the best,

Adam




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-11 Thread wahlperry
In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:34:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing it
with provisional names and numbers.



Otherwise, some other person could make another find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of him
with getting that area named and 001 number approved,
and worse, get published before Sonny could get proper
credit.



That's only one of many good reasons,
Bob V.


Hi Bob,

I appreciate your concern. But lets try this one more time! The reason 
I do not wish to get a provisional number or name until all of the of 
the field work is complete is for this reason. Because of the loop hole 
you figured out many years ago! Not to say you that would do this. 
Example; Lets say a meteorite hunter has been working an area for a few 
years with many finds and received provisional numbers on all of his 
finds.  Another is curious about this location. All he would have to do 
is say he found a couple meteorites from that location and request 
provisional numbers. The Nomenclature may reply  Ok Bob,your 
provisional numbers will be 35 and 36! Bob never hunted this location, 
has just found out that  34 meteorites were recovered from this 
location. What a better resource for gaining information regarding a 
new location.


This is a problem we have to address as a meteorite hunting community. 
I do not know the answer. We should come up with an idea on how to 
solve this problem. What the current system in place does is give 
confirmation of first meteorite found and credit to the finder. 
Unfortunately it can also be a source of information to someone digging 
for data. It is not the fault of the Nomenclature but a system that is 
in place. This is the reason I choose to wait on submitting 
information.


Sonny





-
---
See what's free at AOL.com.

AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-11 Thread Gerald Flaherty

Sonny,
I've never had the opportunity to hunt meteorites in a reasonably productive 
area.

Having read your latest post though makes sense to me.
Maintaining secrecy would make sense and if Provisional Numbers are 
postponed what's the difference.
In the long run everything would iron out. The site would be made known as 
well as the total weight and the classification.

So why the rush?
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Giving credit where (official) credit is due


In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:34:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing it
with provisional names and numbers.



Otherwise, some other person could make another find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of him
with getting that area named and 001 number approved,
and worse, get published before Sonny could get proper
credit.



That's only one of many good reasons,
Bob V.


Hi Bob,

I appreciate your concern. But lets try this one more time! The reason I 
do not wish to get a provisional number or name until all of the of the 
field work is complete is for this reason. Because of the loop hole you 
figured out many years ago! Not to say you that would do this. Example; 
Lets say a meteorite hunter has been working an area for a few years with 
many finds and received provisional numbers on all of his finds.  Another 
is curious about this location. All he would have to do is say he found a 
couple meteorites from that location and request provisional numbers. The 
Nomenclature may reply  Ok Bob,your provisional numbers will be 35 and 
36! Bob never hunted this location, has just found out that  34 
meteorites were recovered from this location. What a better resource for 
gaining information regarding a new location.


This is a problem we have to address as a meteorite hunting community. I 
do not know the answer. We should come up with an idea on how to solve 
this problem. What the current system in place does is give confirmation 
of first meteorite found and credit to the finder. Unfortunately it can 
also be a source of information to someone digging for data. It is not the 
fault of the Nomenclature but a system that is in place. This is the 
reason I choose to wait on submitting information.


Sonny





-
---
See what's free at AOL.com.

AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free 
from AOL at AOL.com.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mark Bostick`s meteorite chatroom anyone?

2007-04-11 Thread drtanuki
Dear List,
  Mark`s chatroom is open for anyone that wants to
discuss recent topics including provisional numbers,
hunting on BLM land, etc.
  Anyone wishing to join please come and discuss. 
Thanks, Dirk Ross...Tokyo

http://meteoritearticles.com/chatroom.html
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] This list needs serious help.

2007-04-11 Thread Dave Harris
You mean like the response I got when I tried to discuss the Hambleton
pallasite?

not a word (or barely) or perhaps it's because we care more about uninformed
people being ripped off, than making money out of collectors by other
collectors.



Talk about pot calling kettle black.


dave

 
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Michael Farmer
Date: 04/11/07 04:41:33
To: Dave Harris; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: This list needs serious help.
 
Do you all know what I have noticed over the last few
year? That the majority of people on this list seem to
care much less about real meteorites than they do
about fakes! This thread is a perfect example which
makes me sick. Many of us (Robert Haag is not on this
like for this very reason) have been discussing the
simple fact that now days, when a new meteorite falls,
or is found, there tends to be crickets chirping after
it is announced.
For example, last Friday I announced and showed the
first photos of a new pallasite, one of ~55 known, a
pretty interesting and in the world of meteorites, a
big thing. There were few comments about it. Even
though I asked a question hoping to start some good
discourse and get some information from this list, all
I got was Matteo's usual tirade of complaints.
Virtually no-one cared about a beautiful new
meteorite.
Now, today we have another nut job out there, who does
not want to hear the truth, and half the people on the
list see fit to discuss his fake meteorites. My point,
many people on this list do not care about real
meteorites, they want to fight/argue/complain/debunk/
and otherwise mess with non-issues rather than comment
on actual meteorites.
Who cares if some guy refuses to accept the truth that
his rocks are just that, rocks? Yet this list goes
berserk over such a boring issue.
Why is this?
Michael Farmer
 
 
 
 
 
--- Dave Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Thank you for your offer of material.
 If you had any real involvement in true meteorites
 you would know that there
 are a variety of technical protocols they have to
 undergo for formal
 identification and cataloging - a process that takes
 a couple of years
 sometimes.

 We are quite happy in the knowledge that this
 material is not meteoritic,
 they have not been submitted to the correct
 institutions for analysis, nor
 have they been published in any of the recognised
 papers.

 The anecdotes you relay regarding recoveries are
 totally at odds with
 hundreds of years of falls and finds and I can
 assure you that mineral
 phases that you describe occur on Earth too. But you
 do not find silica!
 There is more to meteorites than isotopic analysis,
 what about presolar
 gases, nanodiamonds, kerogens, shock glasses, IMBs
 and so on.

 I am concerned that you have been mis-selling your
 material and I would like
 a complete list of all of the individuals you have
 been using for analysis
 and also the institutions to whom you have been
 selling it to.

 Your tests prove nothing - anyone can crib data and
 attribute it to their
 piece of rock. Have you sent any material to Dr Jeff
 Grossman, Dr, Monica
 Grady, Dr. Sara Russell?

 As much as I'd like to continue this discussion, I
 am afraid that I can see
 that, like everyone I have received meteorites
 from, and have had them
 resolved as terrestrial material, just do not like
 to believe their rocks
 are ordinary. I guess it's human nature.

 Electron microprobes, XRD and XRF will tell you
 nothing if you do not
 compare it with the real thing, Mag Sus is not an
 important aspect of
 meteorites as their flux density is often changed by
 terrestrial influences.

 Do as you wish, but being a registered dealer in
 Meteorites means
 absolutely nothing - but of course, if you have been
 selling material that
 latterly turns out to be fake, then you are
 responsible for making good.

 I wish you luck in your endeavours and thank you for
 your time to reply.

 Dave Harris




 ---Original Message---

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 04/10/07 19:48:30
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Your meteorite site

 I have to inform you that all of your meteorites
 are definitely fake. You
 show a page from 1728.pdf. I have this paper - your
 fancy chart is NOT in it
 - hence you are misrepresenting the material you are
 selling.

 Hi Dave, The 1728 pdf chart is used to show how
 exhibit 2 Mars meteorite
 plots on John Brandenburgs oxygen isotope chart for
 CI / Mars plots, and
 exhibit 2 Mars plots as a Mars meteorite, and all
 the test results offer
 this proof as well.

 I have to inform you that all of your meteorites
 are definitely fake

 The Oxygen Isotopes, Electron Microprobe, SM-30
 Magnetic Susceptibility, XRF
  and XRD prove our meteorites , you having
 experience in the meteoritic
 field should know this ?

 Far too many of the minerals you mention do NOT
 occur in meteorites (ie
 quartz).  There are so many aspects incorrect with
 your claims that I cannot
 begin to start to list them

 All 

[meteorite-list] No More Church Stuff?

2007-04-11 Thread LITIG8NSHARK
Good morning Folks,

Of course, Chicago Steve is right.partially.  There should be no further 
mention of CHURCH STUFF on this list.  And, henceforth, there should 
likewise be no mention of the Ensisheim meteorite because, as we all know, in 
1492 
shortly after the fall, the Mayor of Ensisheim ordered that the meteorite be 
placed in front of the village CHURCH!

In order to form a more perfect List, I think we all can agree that there 
should exist a Separation of Church and List.
 
Best regards to all,
 
Paul Martyn
Savannah, GA



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread greg stanley
Hi All:
   
  This whole thread is a real shame, I have only been hunting for about a year 
and have found nine meteorites to date; I also have purchased some off ebay 
(mostly achondrites). I find it a fascinating hobby where you can be outside 
having fun, read about asteroids and how rocks from other planets are formed, 
and the best thing is to hold rocks from outer space.  I have hunted fossils 
and minerals for many years, but I think meteorites are the most rewarding.
   
  I don’t understand all this tension between everyone.  We should all be in 
this together and share our experiences.  I always hope people find meteorites 
every time they hunt, in fact, I can’t wait until someone finds another ‘Mars’ 
or ‘Achondrite’.  I think we all benefit.  I watched the meteorite hunting 
‘Cash and Treasures’ show for about the 10th time recently and everyone was so 
unified and having a good time hunting; this was also the feeling I got in 
Tucson.
   
  Another thing, why this conflict between the states? I live in California so 
that’s where I hunt; I pretty much only do day trips.  I kinda resent having an 
“attitude” about anything.  When Adam sent his “links’ to his pics from his 
recent trip in California/Nevada, I congratulated him on his finds and I hope 
he has an achondrite, that would be fantastic.  Who cares if it was found in 
California or Nevada or Arizonia… so what.
   
  I truly agree – if someone discovers a meteorite, a strewn field, or 
something unusual, then they should be allowed to study the area until they 
feel their research is complete.  However, if someone is performing continuing 
scientific studies over a certain region that many people are hunting and is 
open knowledge to the public, then I don’t see the problem with everyone 
getting provision numbers for finds in that particular area.  For example if 
someone found a strewn field in Arizona and was researching the area, and then 
others found out about it through the Bulletin and started collecting 
meteorites, what’s the problem in getting numbers for those meteorites.  The 
continuing studies might help others in future find more meteorites.  I think 
the scientific value of meteorites is important.
   
  It make me sad the Rubin is quitting (and I think his son is losing the most) 
as I feel father son activities are very important; anyway stamp collection is 
very boring,  I used to collect stamps when I was a kid.  Find another hobby.
   
  Let’s try and be more unified and work together… and as always… 
   
  Happy Hunting
   
  Greg Stanley  
  

Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dear List,

It kind of takes the fun out of it when somebody feels
the need to snitch on an out of state group to the
BLM. This only serves to weaken the hobby of hunting.

By the way, I was told that there was a BLM agent
hanging around the meteorite group this year in
Tucson. He was recognized in one of the images posted
to the List.

I got nothing but grief over the Randsburg iron even
though its provenance goes back three decades.
Questions about whether it was really a transplanted
Campo or Chuckwalla forced me to liquidate it for
free. I donated the entire mass to a church in North
Carolina because I was so disgusted with the politics
surrounding this California meteorite.

Luckily my pairing to the Old Woman was found on
private property or I am sure there would be some more
grief in regards to this shale ball.

The best advice for anybody searching California lake
beds is to check out the laws regarding them. It is
difficult to know if you are searching on private
property or not so it is best to question the locals.
Do not be afraid to bang on a few doors and ask
questions. I would rather search on private property
with a solid agreement than risk getting in trouble.
Besides, you can get an exclusive if you do your
research which accounts for 90% of any true treasure
hunting effort.

I plan a long term stay in the Mojave next fall with
all of the proper equipment and permissions so it
should be an enjoyable effort.

Best Regards,

Adam

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


   
-
8:00? 8:25? 8:40?  Find a flick in no time
 with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: new meteorites for sale, updated website

2007-04-11 Thread Joe
Hello list,
   I have just updated my website with many new photos and some new 
meteorites for sale. Here is a link to my home page: 
http://illinoismeteorites.com
  And as always you are all invited to come and join our meteorite hunting and 
collecting forum: http://illinoismeteorites.com/yabb/YaBB.pl
  Here is a link to my for sale meteorites, take a look.
http://illinoismeteorites.com/for_sale_page.htm
Happy Hunting,
Joe Kerchner




   

Now that's room service!  Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisionalnames and

2007-04-11 Thread WAHLPERRY
Hi Mike ,
 
Thanks, 
 
Sonny



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Giving credit where (official) credit is due

2007-04-11 Thread WAHLPERRY
 
In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:34:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But  that's all I'm asking of
Sonny; to get the credit he deserves by securing  it
with provisional names and numbers.

Otherwise, some other person  could make another find
from his study area unknowingly, and go ahead of  him
with getting that area named and 001 number approved,
and worse, get  published before Sonny could get proper
credit.

That's only one of  many good reasons,
Bob V. 



Hi Bob,
 
I appreciate your concern. But lets try this one more time! The reason  I do 
not wish to get a provisional number or name until all of the of the field  
work is complete is for this reason. Because of the loop hole you figured out  
many years ago! Not to say you that would do this. Example; Lets say a  
meteorite hunter has been working an area for a few years with many finds and  
received provisional numbers on all of his finds.  Another is curious about  
this 
location. All he would have to do is say he found a couple meteorites from  
that 
location and request provisional numbers. The Nomenclature may  reply  Ok 
Bob,your provisional numbers will be 35 and 36! Bob never  hunted this 
location, has just found out that  34 meteorites were recovered  from this 
location. 
What a better resource for gaining information  regarding a new location.
 
This is a problem we have to address as a meteorite hunting community. I do  
not know the answer. We should come up with an idea on how to solve this  
problem. What the current system in place does is give confirmation of first  
meteorite found and credit to the finder. Unfortunately it can also be a source 
 
of information to someone digging for data. It is not the fault of the  
Nomenclature but a system that is in place. This is the reason I choose to wait 
 on 
submitting information. 
 
Sonny



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD Rare Meteorites on Ebay

2007-04-11 Thread mineral
Dear List,

I have some Rare meteorites listed on Ebay.  Thanks, Derek.

http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmeteoritedudeQQhtZ-1
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern........

2007-04-11 Thread tracy latimer

What Doug said.  Ruben, if your mind is already made up, then go well, but you 
will be missed.For the coverup, aside from sunblock, there is a line of beach 
and surf wear (I believe the brand is Alpha) that blocks 100% of the sun's 
rays, but is ultralightweight for swimmers and surfers; you might want to see 
if that would help.  It comes in both long and short sleeve/pants, like 
wetsuits.Tracy Latimer From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:32:26 -0500 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] To whom it may concern  Hello friends, 
I hope I'm not alone in feeling down after reading this. While I don't know 
anything about the forces at work and haven't kept up with any of the US 
Southwest issues, I feel lousy now, because here I've been all along in the 
background enjoying every single hunting post Ruben makes and his really nice 
web-page that he's work so hard with pride of his work together with his son, 
and after I post so much, now I finally scrape up a post to recognize when he 
is disgusted because of 'personalities' making some wholesome thing like 
meteorite hunting no longer fun to him.  Ruben I'm sorry for being such an 
idiot and for not sending you some encouraging words earlier for bringing some 
of the most adrenaline releasing tales I've ever read and most beautiful 
pictures into my living room. Truly they are some of the nicest and most 
exciting I've read.  Hope to see you in the field sometime again, this time 
not by accident, and congratulations on whatever you decide.  Surely we can 
find a hypoallergenic sunblock if that would be all it took (did you check 
Almay's (NC, USA) product line?)  Best wishes and Great Health, Doug PS I 
don't feel sorry for you: I feel sorry for all the tales you'd be writing that 
I'll be missing.   - Original Message -  From: Ruben Garcia 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Tuesday, 
April 10, 2007 11:51 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] To whom it may 
concern   Hi all,  It is with sadness and regret that I am writing 
today. I've been thinking about this for some time now, and today I have made 
my final decision. Let me explain.  Due to certain personalities in this 
hobby I have grown more and more disenchanted with meteorites, meteorite 
collecting and meteorite hunting.  Also, in February I was told by my 
dermatologist to stay out of the sun. This is because of non-cancerous 
lesions that have appeared on my face and hands over the last year. According 
to him my attempts at covering up are not working. Since I am allergic to sun 
block I am pretty much out of luck.  I've always said that when this hobby 
ceased being fun I'd cease doing it. I'm done.  To make a long story short, 
I have already taken down my website and will remove myself from this forum 
a.s.a.p. I will no longer write about meteorites or meteorite hunting. I am 
walking away from all the trouble and trouble makers. It's just not worth it. 
Unfortunately, I'll also leave behind the fun and excitement that I used to 
have when finding meteorites with my son, or teaching a newbie.  I will 
honor any deals or agreements regarding meteorites that I've made in the 
past.  Don't feel sorry for me or my son though. I'm sure that we'll start 
doing all the things normal Fathers and Sons do. Diamondbacks and Suns games 
here we come!  Thanks to everyone that helped make the last 9 years 
enjoyable.  Goodbye,  Ruben GarciaRuben Garcia Phoenix, Arizona 
http://www.mr-meteorite.com
 
 Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for 
free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front 
__ Meteorite-list mailing list 
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list  
__ Meteorite-list mailing list 
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
_
Live Search Maps – find all the local information you need, right when you need 
it.
http://maps.live.com/?icid=wlmtag2FORM=MGAC01__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread GREG LINDH

   To all,

I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I have purchased 13 
meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by bidding on EBAY.  I've 
noticed that many times someone will bid for an item and continually bid the 
item up even though nobody is bidding against them.  They may start out by 
bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person raises the price to $30.00, 
then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They artificially and unnecessarily 
raise the price so that the item finally sells for a *much* higher price 
than it would have gone for if this hadn't been done.
Either the bidder is a moron or he is working with the seller to up the 
price.
Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?

Greg Lindh 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread GREG LINDH
   Hi Dave,

I don't think my analysis of the EBAY situation is silly at all.  There 
is no reason to artificially up the price of an item.  What I do is wait 
until the last 30 seconds or so and then pop in and place a bid.  I have 
always won, but unfortunately I pay a higher price than necessary because 
someone has bid over and over again *for no apparent reason*.  They're not 
scaring anyone away by doing this.  They just make the item cost a ton more.
Again, I ask why?

Greg Lindh




- Original Message - 
From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 Don't be so silly, the person is raising their bid so that if you bid, you 
 won't out bid them. If you want to win the auction, you have to bid higher 
 than their bid.
 For fun, start out and bid very low, bid again, bid four or five times to 
 what is your maximum bid. It will let other bidders THINK you are serious 
 about winning...ORTHAT  other bidders may think 
 you are fixing your bid
 Dave F.

 GREG LINDH wrote:

To all,

 I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I have purchased 13
 meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by bidding on EBAY.  I've
 noticed that many times someone will bid for an item and continually bid 
 the
 item up even though nobody is bidding against them.  They may start out by
 bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person raises the price to 
 $30.00,
 then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They artificially and unnecessarily
 raise the price so that the item finally sells for a *much* higher price
 than it would have gone for if this hadn't been done.
 Either the bidder is a moron or he is working with the seller to up 
 the
 price.
 Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?

 Greg Lindh

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread Michael Farmer
It is not bid fixing, it is proxy bidding. 
Let's say you have an item, a bidder puts in a bid of
$100.00 max bid. The item is currently at $45.00 and
they are high bidder, then you come along at the last
minute and put in a bid of $80.00., then the ebay
proxy bid automatically bids up to the $80.00. You
must then bid over their $100.00 bid to win. 
It does not auctomatically place little bids, it goes
by the max bid.
Mike Farmer
I hav been buying and selling on ebay since 1995.


--- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Dave,
 
 I don't think my analysis of the EBAY situation
 is silly at all.  There 
 is no reason to artificially up the price of an
 item.  What I do is wait 
 until the last 30 seconds or so and then pop in and
 place a bid.  I have 
 always won, but unfortunately I pay a higher price
 than necessary because 
 someone has bid over and over again *for no apparent
 reason*.  They're not 
 scaring anyone away by doing this.  They just make
 the item cost a ton more.
 Again, I ask why?
 
 Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
  Don't be so silly, the person is raising their bid
 so that if you bid, you 
  won't out bid them. If you want to win the
 auction, you have to bid higher 
  than their bid.
  For fun, start out and bid very low, bid again,
 bid four or five times to 
  what is your maximum bid. It will let other
 bidders THINK you are serious 
  about winning...ORTHAT 
 other bidders may think 
  you are fixing your bid
  Dave F.
 
  GREG LINDH wrote:
 
 To all,
 
  I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting. 
 I have purchased 13
  meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by
 bidding on EBAY.  I've
  noticed that many times someone will bid for an
 item and continually bid 
  the
  item up even though nobody is bidding against
 them.  They may start out by
  bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person
 raises the price to 
  $30.00,
  then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They
 artificially and unnecessarily
  raise the price so that the item finally sells for
 a *much* higher price
  than it would have gone for if this hadn't been
 done.
  Either the bidder is a moron or he is working
 with the seller to up 
  the
  price.
  Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?
 
  Greg Lindh
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
  
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread drtanuki
Dear Greg and others,
  Your suspect bidder may have a different bidding
strategy than you.  Not everyone can be available to
bid a the last seconds of an auction and not everyone
uses bidding software.  Some people bid up their own
bids several times to increase the number of bids to
reduce the number of potential bidders.  Each strategy
has its advantage and its dis-advantage; if you are
really wanting something you have to outbid other
bidders otherwise you don`t win the auction.
  Best at eBay, Dirk Ross...Tokyo

--- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
To all,
 
 I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I
 have purchased 13 
 meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by
 bidding on EBAY.  I've 
 noticed that many times someone will bid for an item
 and continually bid the 
 item up even though nobody is bidding against them. 
 They may start out by 
 bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person
 raises the price to $30.00, 
 then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They
 artificially and unnecessarily 
 raise the price so that the item finally sells for a
 *much* higher price 
 than it would have gone for if this hadn't been
 done.
 Either the bidder is a moron or he is working
 with the seller to up the 
 price.
 Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?
 
 Greg Lindh 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Thank you all!!!!

2007-04-11 Thread Ruben Garcia

Hi all,
My son and I just got home from a Diamondbacks
game(they lost).  I noticed that I've received 50
emails over the last 24 hours from list members
wishing me well. Many asking me to think about coming
back.

I'm very moved! Thank you all!

I will definitely take 6-12 months off and who knows
if I can cure my skin problems maybe I will come back
again. With people like Paul Harris, Geoff Notkin,
Cindy Sue, Mike Farmer, John Birdsell, John Gwilliam,
Maria and the other 43 friends that emailed it can't
be all badright?

For now Ken has asked to post some of my recent
adventures on the IMCA website. 

Thanks again,

Ruben Garcia
Phoenix, Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com


   

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread GREG LINDH

   Dave,

First you called me silly and said that, the person is raising their 
bid so that if you bid, you won't out bid them.  Then when I pointed out 
the fallacious reasoning behind your post, you came out and admitted that 
you are a seller (which is no crime in my eyes) and that I shouldn't be such 
a tight ass.
Nice talk, Dave.  Really nice!
I admit that I don't know the pressures of being a seller, but just 
because you're a seller doesn't give you the right to do an uncharitable, 
heavy handed, ad hominem attack on me.  I raised a legitimate question and 
instead of providing a cogent answer, you just called me names and threw 
insults my way.
In all the answers that I've read so far, I still haven't found one that 
explains why someone would bid numerous times in a row with *no one else 
bidding.  What I've noticed is the person who does the bidding up over and 
over again *never wins the item*.  They always drop out.
Again: Why?

Greg Lindh




- Original Message - 
From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 As a seller, those that wait until the last minute to bid should be shot, 
 and those that up their bids a numberof times keep us in business..you 
 like to buy meteorites, don't be such a tight ass with your bidding.  When 
 we go out of business from tight asses, you will not have the selection 
 now enjoyed.  The no apparent reason is not of your concern, just the 
 highest bid..bid high or stay home.
 Learn business then whine about upping bids.  Like you said, your new. 
 Practice selling for a while and your opinion will change!
 Dave F.

 GREG LINDH wrote:

Hi Dave,

 I don't think my analysis of the EBAY situation is silly at all. 
 There
 is no reason to artificially up the price of an item.  What I do is wait
 until the last 30 seconds or so and then pop in and place a bid.  I have
 always won, but unfortunately I pay a higher price than necessary because
 someone has bid over and over again *for no apparent reason*.  They're not
 scaring anyone away by doing this.  They just make the item cost a ton 
 more.
 Again, I ask why?

 Greg Lindh




 - Original Message - 
 From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


   Don't be so silly, the person is raising their bid so that if you bid, 
 you
 won't out bid them. If you want to win the auction, you have to bid higher
 than their bid.
 For fun, start out and bid very low, bid again, bid four or five times to
 what is your maximum bid. It will let other bidders THINK you are serious
 about winning...ORTHAT  other bidders may think
 you are fixing your bid
 Dave F.

 GREG LINDH wrote:

To all,

 I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.  I have purchased 13
 meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by bidding on EBAY.  I've
 noticed that many times someone will bid for an item and continually bid
 the
 item up even though nobody is bidding against them.  They may start out by
 bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person raises the price to
 $30.00,
 then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They artificially and unnecessarily
 raise the price so that the item finally sells for a *much* higher price
 than it would have gone for if this hadn't been done.
 Either the bidder is a moron or he is working with the seller to up
 the
 price.
 Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?

 Greg Lindh

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list





 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread GREG LINDH

   Hi Mike,

I'd like to start by saying I met you at the Tucson show and I know of 
your meteorite hunting exploits and I have a lot of respect for you.
My question still has not seemed to be answered.  My concern is about 
someone who bids over and over with no apparent competition.  They single 
handedly raise the price from $10.00 to $30.00 to $60.00 to $80.00, etc.
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, despite Dave's overly sensitive and 
rude comments to me .  I'm simply describing a phenomenon on EBAY (which I'm 
new to) that makes absolutely *no sense* to me.
If I get a good answer to my question from people on this forum, great. 
If I don't, I won't melt.

Regards,
 Greg Lindh



- Original Message - 
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Freeman mjwy 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?


 It is not bid fixing, it is proxy bidding.
 Let's say you have an item, a bidder puts in a bid of
 $100.00 max bid. The item is currently at $45.00 and
 they are high bidder, then you come along at the last
 minute and put in a bid of $80.00., then the ebay
 proxy bid automatically bids up to the $80.00. You
 must then bid over their $100.00 bid to win.
 It does not auctomatically place little bids, it goes
 by the max bid.
 Mike Farmer
 I hav been buying and selling on ebay since 1995.


 --- GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Dave,
 
  I don't think my analysis of the EBAY situation
  is silly at all.  There
  is no reason to artificially up the price of an
  item.  What I do is wait
  until the last 30 seconds or so and then pop in and
  place a bid.  I have
  always won, but unfortunately I pay a higher price
  than necessary because
  someone has bid over and over again *for no apparent
  reason*.  They're not
  scaring anyone away by doing this.  They just make
  the item cost a ton more.
  Again, I ask why?
 
  Greg Lindh
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dave Freeman mjwy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: GREG LINDH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?
 
 
   Don't be so silly, the person is raising their bid
  so that if you bid, you
   won't out bid them. If you want to win the
  auction, you have to bid higher
   than their bid.
   For fun, start out and bid very low, bid again,
  bid four or five times to
   what is your maximum bid. It will let other
  bidders THINK you are serious
   about winning...ORTHAT
  other bidders may think
   you are fixing your bid
   Dave F.
  
   GREG LINDH wrote:
  
  To all,
  
   I am new to EBAY and to meteorite collecting.
  I have purchased 13
   meteorites total.  I've gotten most of them by
  bidding on EBAY.  I've
   noticed that many times someone will bid for an
  item and continually bid
   the
   item up even though nobody is bidding against
  them.  They may start out by
   bidding $10.00 for an item, then the same person
  raises the price to
   $30.00,
   then $50.00, then $80.00, etc., etc.  They
  artificially and unnecessarily
   raise the price so that the item finally sells for
  a *much* higher price
   than it would have gone for if this hadn't been
  done.
   Either the bidder is a moron or he is working
  with the seller to up
   the
   price.
   Can anyone explain this phenomenon to me?
  
   Greg Lindh
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
  
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Is EBAY bidding fixed?

2007-04-11 Thread Darren Garrison
Read this:
http://pages.ebay.com/help/buy/proxy-bidding.html
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list