PDF Reader 2010: view, create, edit, print, share pdf documents
Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://pro.mailmarketer.in/display.php?M=7875985C=16e98183402c86cead609378ba 0243d7S=1156L=911N=653 PDF READERB. 2010 - PRODUCT LAUNCH - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 26th 2010 --- Dear customers, We are pleased to update the following features of our PDF ReaderB. 2010: Gather, prepare, and share information in *.pdf files using PDF ReaderB. 2010 software Streamline document development and review Simplify form creation and data transfer. Combine multiple file types in polished *pdf portfolios that communicate clearly and help make your work shine. You would have various options which best fit your business requirements. Following are steps which show you how to update your current version: 1. Go to PDF Reader 2010 or copy and paste http://pro.mailmarketer.in/link.php?M=7875985N=1156L=653F=T to your browser 2. Download it and let PDF ReaderB. 2010 boost your business productivity. Thanks and best regards, PDF ReaderB. 2010 63 Clover Rd | Adams Center | NY 13606 | USA To stop receiving these emails:http://pro.mailmarketer.in/unsubscribe.php?M=7875985C=16e98183402c86c ead609378ba0243d7L=911N=1156
routing question: 2 mail servers sending from their own IPs
Hi folks, I'm running into a bit of a routing gotcha getting two mail servers to send mail out using their own respective IP addresses. (While this involves postfix, this is not a postfix support question, it's a routing question) What I'm trying to accomplish is this: - two autonomous domains, each with their own mail server instance (postfix in this case) so that one domain never 'mentions' the other domain. Using one instance of postfix to relay for the 2nd domain is not an option, as domain1.com will be shown in the headers when mail is from domain2.com. The reason is that 2nd domain is a business entity and should not be associated in any way with the first. The setup (which works fine): - the two domains have their own external IPs, dns-wise. - two instances of postfix listen on their respective external IPs taking mail for their domains (set in master.cf) - postfix acts as a mail gateway on the firewall, which shuffles mail to either of two instances of postfix on an internal mail server - 5 (non-contiguous) IPs are assigned to me by ADSL, so I have one physical connection, with 1 'main' IP and 4 aliases. That works fine and dandy: two independent domains. I should mention that (some) internal traffic, depending on its origin, is NAT'd out with pf on those aliases, appearing to come from independent networks. The problem: - mail sent out via either instance of postfix, regardless of the master.cf setting, go out on the 'main' IP, such that mail headers appear like such: Received: from mail.domain2.com (erratic.ca [75.119.251.119]) The goal: I'd prefer it to read .. from mail.domain2.com (domain2.com [a.b.c.d]) The untouched firewall routing table looks like this: Internet: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface default206.248.154.122UGS322803 56410450 - 8 tun0 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 00 33200 8 lo0 (snipping a bunch of lo0 stuff) 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 10 - 4 nfe0 192.168.0.200:0d:60:91:5d:a4 UHLc 143271 - 4 nfe0 192.168.1/24 link#5 UC 20 - 4 sk0 192.168.1.200:19:5b:68:91:20 UHLc 1 7177 - 4 sk0 192.168.1.300:10:c6:b5:c1:72 UHLc 4 136762 - 4 sk0 192.168.2/24 link#5 UC 10 - 4 sk0 192.168.2.1127.0.0.1 UGHS 00 33200 8 lo0 192.168.3/24 link#5 UC 00 - 4 sk0 192.168.3.1127.0.0.1 UGHS 00 33200 8 lo0 206.248.154.12275.119.251.119 UH 10 1492 4 tun0 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS00 33200 8 lo0 I've tried this: # route add 206.248.154.122 a.b.c.d but my routing-fu is not strong. That command gives all of the above, plus this: 206.248.154.122a.b.c.dUGHS 00 - 8 tun0 Of course, sending mails from domain2.com still appears from erratic.ca. Any suggestions? Clear as mud? The firewall does not have an /etc/mygate set, and is OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #7: Sat Jan 23 16:34:02 EST 2010, but I don't think a dmesg is of much use here. Unrelated question: can smtpd handle this kind of funkiness? I'd like to switch to smtpd eventually if it can, but that's another project for another day. Thanks! -- - RSM www.erratic.ca
Re: routing question: 2 mail servers sending from their own IPs
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Scott McEachern sc...@erratic.ca wrote: Hi folks, I'm running into a bit of a routing gotcha getting two mail servers to send mail out using their own respective IP addresses. (While this involves postfix, this is not a postfix support question, it's a routing question) I don't see anything about routing in your question. What I see is an issue involving the binding of the client-side of TCP connections. ... The setup (which works fine): - the two domains have their own external IPs, dns-wise. - two instances of postfix listen on their respective external IPs taking mail for their domains (set in master.cf) - postfix acts as a mail gateway on the firewall, which shuffles mail to either of two instances of postfix on an internal mail server - 5 (non-contiguous) IPs are assigned to me by ADSL, so I have one physical connection, with 1 'main' IP and 4 aliases. ... The problem: - mail sent out via either instance of postfix, regardless of the master.cf setting, go out on the 'main' IP, such that mail headers appear like such: Received: from mail.domain2.com (erratic.ca [75.119.251.119]) The goal: I'd prefer it to read .. from mail.domain2.com (domain2.com [a.b.c.d]) You need to configure the postfix for domain2.com to explicitly bind() to the IP address of a.b.c.d and not use the default for the host. (You might think but I've configured this postfix instance to only listen on IP A.B.C.D, why isn't it sending from that IP?. The answer is because, in general, such a restriction is *not* correct behavior for MTAs, and therefore is not the default for postfix.) Philip Guenther
Re: routing question: 2 mail servers sending from their own IPs
Check into smtp_bind_address in Postfix. If you're still having issues, binat rather than rdr to internal IPs so connections will originate properly. Without seeing your pf.conf or master.cf, this is a guess, but I think these tips should lead you in the right direction. ...master.cf: smtp ... smtp -o smtp_bind_address=11.22.33.44 On 3/27/10 3:02 AM, Scott McEachern wrote: Hi folks, I'm running into a bit of a routing gotcha getting two mail servers to send mail out using their own respective IP addresses. (While this involves postfix, this is not a postfix support question, it's a routing question) What I'm trying to accomplish is this: - two autonomous domains, each with their own mail server instance (postfix in this case) so that one domain never 'mentions' the other domain. Using one instance of postfix to relay for the 2nd domain is not an option, as domain1.com will be shown in the headers when mail is from domain2.com. The reason is that 2nd domain is a business entity and should not be associated in any way with the first. The setup (which works fine): - the two domains have their own external IPs, dns-wise. - two instances of postfix listen on their respective external IPs taking mail for their domains (set in master.cf) - postfix acts as a mail gateway on the firewall, which shuffles mail to either of two instances of postfix on an internal mail server - 5 (non-contiguous) IPs are assigned to me by ADSL, so I have one physical connection, with 1 'main' IP and 4 aliases. That works fine and dandy: two independent domains. I should mention that (some) internal traffic, depending on its origin, is NAT'd out with pf on those aliases, appearing to come from independent networks. The problem: - mail sent out via either instance of postfix, regardless of the master.cf setting, go out on the 'main' IP, such that mail headers appear like such: Received: from mail.domain2.com (erratic.ca [75.119.251.119]) The goal: I'd prefer it to read .. from mail.domain2.com (domain2.com [a.b.c.d]) The untouched firewall routing table looks like this: Internet: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface default206.248.154.122UGS322803 56410450 - 8 tun0 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 00 33200 8 lo0 (snipping a bunch of lo0 stuff) 192.168.0/24 link#1 UC 10 - 4 nfe0 192.168.0.200:0d:60:91:5d:a4 UHLc 143271 - 4 nfe0 192.168.1/24 link#5 UC 20 - 4 sk0 192.168.1.200:19:5b:68:91:20 UHLc 1 7177 - 4 sk0 192.168.1.300:10:c6:b5:c1:72 UHLc 4 136762 - 4 sk0 192.168.2/24 link#5 UC 10 - 4 sk0 192.168.2.1127.0.0.1 UGHS 00 33200 8 lo0 192.168.3/24 link#5 UC 00 - 4 sk0 192.168.3.1127.0.0.1 UGHS 00 33200 8 lo0 206.248.154.12275.119.251.119 UH 10 1492 4 tun0 224/4 127.0.0.1 URS00 33200 8 lo0 I've tried this: # route add 206.248.154.122 a.b.c.d but my routing-fu is not strong. That command gives all of the above, plus this: 206.248.154.122a.b.c.dUGHS 00 - 8 tun0 Of course, sending mails from domain2.com still appears from erratic.ca. Any suggestions? Clear as mud? The firewall does not have an /etc/mygate set, and is OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #7: Sat Jan 23 16:34:02 EST 2010, but I don't think a dmesg is of much use here. Unrelated question: can smtpd handle this kind of funkiness? I'd like to switch to smtpd eventually if it can, but that's another project for another day. Thanks! -- James M. Shupe shu...@gridexec.com RHCE Certified Plain text preferred 1.903.522.3425 This Email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The information contained in this Email is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone 1.903.522.3425 and destroy the original message. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
unidentified system load
I'm using supermicro boxes (dmesg below) as vpn routers. IPsec+gre+bgp. After a few days uptime the boxes start reporting 8% system cpu, and at the same time they become unresponsive on the network approx every 10 seconds. Any idea on how to find the reason for this is appreciated. I have around 20 of these boxes running open and freebsd, so far all of the openbsd boxes display this behaviour using amd64, i386, sp and mp, 4.6 and various 4.7 snapshots. I only see this on these specific supermicros. This happens on the devices that don't move any traffic as well. Regards Tony bmr0.mlt# ping -i 0.1 172.30.251.230 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=42 ttl=255 time=0.278 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=43 ttl=255 time=0.328 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=44 ttl=255 time=0.250 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=45 ttl=255 time=402.911 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=46 ttl=255 time=292.374 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=47 ttl=255 time=181.836 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=48 ttl=255 time=71.300 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=49 ttl=255 time=0.255 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=50 ttl=255 time=0.305 ms bmr1.mlt# dmesg OpenBSD 4.7-beta (GENERIC.MP) #427: Sun Feb 28 12:37:40 MST 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 3.01 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR real mem = 3487580160 (3326MB) avail mem = 3391463424 (3234MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/24/09, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdb70, SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xcfedf000 (39 entries) bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies LTD version 1.30 date 07/24/2009 bios0: Supermicro X7SBi acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP _MAR MCFG APIC BOOT SPCR ERST HEST BERT EINJ SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices PXHA(S5) PEX_(S5) LAN_(S5) USB4(S5) USB5(S5) USB7(S5) ESB2(S5) EXP1(S5) EXP5(S5) EXP6(S5) USB1(S5) USB2(S5) USB3(S5) USB6(S5) ESB1(S5) PCIB(S5) KBC0(S1) MSE0(S1) COM1(S5) COM2(S5) PWRB(S3) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 333MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 3.01 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 3 pa 0xfecc, version 20, 24 pins acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (PXHA) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEX_) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 5 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 13 (EXP5) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 15 (EXP6) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 17 (PCIB) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3, PSS acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB acpivideo0 at acpi0: IGD0 bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9000 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 3001 MHz: speeds: 3000, 2667, 2333, 2000 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 3200/3210 Host rev 0x01 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 3200/3210 PCIE rev 0x01: apic 2 int 16 (irq 5) pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 Intel IOxAPIC rev 0x09 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 (irq 5) uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 17 (irq 10) uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 (irq 11) ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 (irq 11) usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 (irq 5) pci3 at ppb2 bus 5 ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 (irq 5) pci4 at ppb3 bus 13 em0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E) rev 0x03: apic 2 int 16 (irq 5)PHY ID 0x1410CC0 detected (17) , address 00:30:48:bd:45:3a ppb4 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: apic 2 int 17 (irq 10) pci5 at ppb4 bus 15 em1 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L) rev 0x00: apic 2 int 17 (irq 10)PHY ID 0x1410CC0 detected (17) , address 00:30:48:bd:45:3b uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 23 (irq 10) uhci4 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 22 (irq 11) uhci5 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 (irq 11) ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 23 (irq 10)
Re: heads up - softraid metadata change
Don't thank me, I had nothing to do with it - just reporting the good news :) All the thanks and kudos go to Joel, Marco and everybody who's ever worked on softraid(4). Mitja -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of J.C. Roberts Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:11 PM To: Mitja MuEeniD Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: heads up - softraid metadata change On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:31:59 +0100 Mitja MuEeniD mi...@muzenic.net wrote: Joel Sing (jsing@) has just commited to -current a softraid update that bumps the softraid metadata version - see the commit mail and the brief article on Undeadly. The new kernel will not assemble the existing softraid volumes, so special caution is required BEFORE upgrading your -current kernel or moving to next snapshot. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20100326 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=126960262412653w=2 http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20100326172808 Mitja (looking forward to more softraid goodies! :) Excellent! --It seems we're moving closer to bootable softraid. Thanks Mitja, Joel, and Marco. jcr
Re: aucat: default: can't open device
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:05:49 + Jacob Meuser
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:03:47PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
One of the (supposedly) working ISA devices I have here is an old
Creative SoundBlaster card, but I can't seem to get it working.
# AUCAT_DEBUG=4 SIO_DEBUG=4 aucat -l
man sb. look for duplex.
The sb(4) man pages mentions a (potentially optional) configuration
file but gives no further details about it? --I think this needs to
get documented.
does `aucat -l -m play` work?
no joy.
# aucat -l -m play
aucat: default: can't open device
BIOS PNP detects and configures the card properly (no jumpers).
The label on the card reads:
FCC ID: IBACT-SB32PNP49
Model#: CT3620
The output of audioctl shows:
config=SB_16
Should the above show up as SB_32 ?
For fun, I grabbed second, slightly different (older), Creative
SoundBlaster ISA card and gave it a try. The results were the same. The
card comes up properly (IRQ DRQ) but aucat and midicat have issues.
The label on the second card reads:
FCC ID: IBACT-SB16MCD
Model#: CT750
If you need me to test them, I've also got a SB-AWE64, SB-ViBRA, ESS,
and a few other ISA based audio cards around.
It's not like I actually *use* these cards at all (for anything but
testing), and I wonder how many (if any) people are still using ISA
audio cards?
jcr
# AUCAT_DEBUG=4 SIO_DEBUG=4 aucat -l -m play
sio_open_aucat: trying 0 - 0.default
sio_open_aucat: connect: No such file or directory
sun_setpar: 0: trying pars = 48000/16/6
sun_setpar: couldn't set linear encoding
aucat: default: can't open device
# audioctl
name=SoundBlaster
version=4.12
config=SB_16
encodings=ulinear:8,mulaw:8*,alaw:8*,slinear:8,slinear_le:16,ulinear_le:16,slinear_be:16*,ulinear_be:16*
properties=mmap,independent
full_duplex=0
fullduplex=0
blocksize=200
hiwat=163
lowat=1
output_muted=0
monitor_gain=0
mode=
play.rate=8000
play.sample_rate=8000
play.channels=1
play.precision=8
play.encoding=mulaw
play.gain=128
play.balance=32
play.port=0x0
play.avail_ports=0x0
play.seek=0
play.samples=0
play.eof=0
play.pause=0
play.error=0
play.waiting=0
play.open=0
play.active=0
play.buffer_size=32768
play.block_size=200
play.errors=0
record.rate=8000
record.sample_rate=8000
record.channels=1
record.precision=8
record.encoding=mulaw
record.gain=0
record.balance=32
record.port=0x1
record.avail_ports=0x7
record.seek=0
record.samples=0
record.eof=0
record.pause=0
record.error=0
record.waiting=0
record.open=0
record.active=0
record.buffer_size=65536
record.block_size=400
record.errors=0
# mixerctl -v
outputs.master=128,128 volume
inputs.fmsynth=128,128 volume
inputs.fmsynth.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.fmsynth.swap=off [ off on ]
inputs.cd=128,128 volume
inputs.cd.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.cd.swap=off [ off on ]
outputs.cd.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.dac=128,128 volume
inputs.mic=0 volume
inputs.mic.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.mic.swap=off [ off on ]
outputs.mic.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.line=0,0 volume
inputs.line.mute=off [ off on ]
inputs.line.swap=off [ off on ]
outputs.line.mute=off [ off on ]
record.source=mic { mic cd line fmsynth }
equalization.treble=128,128 treble
equalization.bass=128,128 bass
inputs.pc_speaker=128 volume
inputs.input=128,128 volume
outputs.output=128,128 volume
inputs.agc=off [ off on ]
dmesg
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC) #561: Wed Mar 24 20:41:50 MDT 2010
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) (GenuineIntel 586-class) 133 MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8
real mem = 133791744 (127MB)
avail mem = 120848384 (115MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/08/96, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfbcf0
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x638
pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 4 Interrupt Routing table entries
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 (Intel 82371FB ISA rev
0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x2800
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: F00F bug workaround installed
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82437FX rev 0x02
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 82371FB ISA rev 0x02
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 Intel 82371FB IDE rev 0x02: DMA,
channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives) pciide0: channel 1 disabled (no
drives) vga1 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 S3 86C968-0 rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ahc0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 Adaptec
Re: aucat: default: can't open device
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:24:58AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:05:49 + Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:03:47PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: One of the (supposedly) working ISA devices I have here is an old Creative SoundBlaster card, but I can't seem to get it working. # AUCAT_DEBUG=4 SIO_DEBUG=4 aucat -l man sb. look for duplex. The sb(4) man pages mentions a (potentially optional) configuration file but gives no further details about it? --I think this needs to get documented. it refers to the kernel configuration file, i'd imagine. SYNOPSIS shows the bits you can tweak. jmc
Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com wrote: I read `man mk.conf' found there's no CFLAGS or CXXFLAG entries , even though i tried to put `CFLAG += -O3 -march=i686' into that file , but ports doesn't recognize it. No such variable is used by the ports infrastructure. Note the name, CFLAG is not the same as CFLAGS. Just want to optimize ports software , during compilation of kernel , i'd comment them out. Yes, you can set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in /etc/mk.conf or the environment and most ports will pick it up. (Some don't for sound technical reasons, a few don't and it's an error that needs to be fixed.) Generally speaking, I advise against playing with gcc's optimization flags. You will not see an improvement, and some of these optimization steps may actually generate incorrect code. The time you spend fiddling with these settings will be more than you can ever gain from them. I do occasionally set CFLAGS to build a port *without* optimization when I need to debug a problem with gdb(1). Single-stepping through code that has been run through -O2 can be a surreal experience. -- Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Re: unidentified system load
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote: I'm using supermicro boxes (dmesg below) as vpn routers. IPsec+gre+bgp. After a few days uptime the boxes start reporting 8% system cpu, and at the same time they become unresponsive on the network approx every 10 seconds. Any idea on how to find the reason for this is appreciated. I have around 20 of these boxes running open and freebsd, so far all of the openbsd boxes display this behaviour using amd64, i386, sp and mp, 4.6 and various 4.7 snapshots. I only see this on these specific supermicros. This happens on the devices that don't move any traffic as well. Regards Tony bmr0.mlt# ping -i 0.1 172.30.251.230 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=42 ttl=255 time=0.278 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=43 ttl=255 time=0.328 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=44 ttl=255 time=0.250 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=45 ttl=255 time=402.911 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=46 ttl=255 time=292.374 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=47 ttl=255 time=181.836 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=48 ttl=255 time=71.300 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=49 ttl=255 time=0.255 ms 64 bytes from 172.30.251.230: icmp_seq=50 ttl=255 time=0.305 ms bmr1.mlt# dmesg [snip] I'd be looking at the state of your mbufs as well. man netstat -- Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse
Re: unidentified system load
I'd be looking at the state of your mbufs as well. man netstat Thanks Aaron, these systems are currently running with load very low. From one of the boxes with the problem: bmr1.mlt# uptime 11:33AM up 13 days, 1:04, 1 user, load averages: 0.15, 0.17, 0.11 bmr1.mlt# netstat -m 102 mbufs in use: 81 mbufs allocated to data 4 mbufs allocated to packet headers 17 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 69/310/6144 mbuf 2048 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 4096 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 8192 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 9216 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 12288 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 16384 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 0/8/6144 mbuf 65536 byte clusters in use (current/peak/max) 900 Kbytes allocated to network (18% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines bmr1.mlt# bmr1.mlt# vmstat -m ... Memory Totals: In UseFreeRequests 3756K210K 3844873 ... In use 6468K, total allocated 32928K; utilization 19.6% bmr1.mlt# They are basically standard setups with ipsec,bgpd,gre,carp and vlans, small and simple configs, low number of interfaces. Not even any packages added.
Re: routing question: 2 mail servers sending from their own IPs
James Shupe wrote: Check into smtp_bind_address in Postfix. If you're still having issues, binat rather than rdr to internal IPs so connections will originate properly. Without seeing your pf.conf or master.cf, this is a guess, but I think these tips should lead you in the right direction. ...master.cf: smtp ... smtp -o smtp_bind_address=11.22.33.44 Thank-you James and Philip, problem solved! Between using inet_interfaces in main.cf and a.b.c.d:smtp... in master.cf, I figured it was covered, but I was wrong. The smtp_bind_address works like a charm, which I didn't see when searching for multiple instances of postfix. I did find it rather odd that I'd have to use routing. I thought it was like using a sledgehammer to solve a thumbtack problem, when it was just a leaky screwdriver. -- - RSM www.erratic.ca
Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
Aaron, I built 3.7 base + OpenVPN for VPN gateway with custom CFLAGS/LDFLAGS and it worked well for years, even with such aggressive flags as CFLAGS=-O3 -march=c3 -mmmx -m3dnow -fomit-frame-pointer and LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-O2 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags. But build was broken and I must to fix many things in OpenBSD makefiles, to get binaries done. Such LDFLAGS significantly speedups application loading, cause it's doing the same things as prelink utility, but it link time. CFLAGS helps me speedup C3 500MHz router device as about 20-30%, but it was synthetic measurement on nbench built with and without CLFAGS. Kernel build was also forced for such CFLAGS and no stability issue and subjectively more speedy. It was few years ago, when I've had mood to compile everything with all CPU features on. ;-) Looking at this concrete OpenBSD build my summary is that it took me more than 20h to build it and speedups was not such significant, comparing that it should took an about 1h to do the same functionality with release binaries only bit slow. And two other things to keep on mind: nowadays x86 CPUs has very heuristic instruction handling/prefetching so it will not speedup as much with custom CFLAGS; OpenBSD still use gcc 3.3.5 which can't do as good optimization for new CPUs as to loose time with custom flags build. And many makefiles in OpenBSD base don't handle CFLAGS/LDFLAGS correctly. The last time I tried it (about 1/2y. ago), I made only kernel with custom flags (for kernel it is COPTS variable if I remember right). Rest of system didn't build and I didn't had a time to bother with broken makefiles. So if you don't want to do HPC, don't loose time with custom flags. I if you want to do HPC, choose other operating system, cause OpenBSD strengths are other. I. On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 10:05 +0800, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi, Is that possible to modify CFLAG for port installed software ? I read `man mk.conf' found there's no CFLAGS or CXXFLAG entries , even though i tried to put `CFLAG += -O3 -march=i686' into that file , but ports doesn't recognize it. Just want to optimize ports software , during compilation of kernel , i'd comment them out. Does anyone has any ideas ? Thanks in advance !
Re: Anomali on /var available space
Hi Vadim, Thx for your reply Problem solve after I restart pflogd New problem is Why the pflogd process almost use 100% capacity of my /var ? My pf manage queue bandwidth for just 100 users. Thx Kabayan --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Anomali on /var available space To: misc@openbsd.org Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 1:33 AM On 26 March 2010 c. 10:17:30 Kabayan wrote: Dear misc, I got anomaly available space of my system. I have different output between df and du $ df -h /var/ Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 29.5G 29.5G -1.5G 105%/var $ df -kP /var Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 30964722 30964034-1547548 105% /var $ sudo du -sh /var 30.3M /var On message: Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:09:02 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full I used: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Mon Mar 15 02:57:08 WIT 2010 Some program(s) removed but not closed its files. Dive in in the fstat output. -- Best wishes, Vadim Zhukov A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Re: Anomali on /var available space
On 27 March 2010 G. 13:51:26 Kabayan wrote: Hi Vadim, Thx for your reply Problem solve after I restart pflogd New problem is Why the pflogd process almost use 100% capacity of my /var ? My pf manage queue bandwidth for just 100 users. Probably it doesn't receive SIGHUP upon log rotation? How do you rotate /var/log/pflog? --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Anomali on /var available space To: misc@openbsd.org Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 1:33 AM On 26 March 2010 c. 10:17:30 Kabayan wrote: Dear misc, I got anomaly available space of my system. I have different output between df and du $ df -h /var/ Filesystem Size UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 29.5G29.5G-1.5G105% /var $ df -kP /var Filesystem 1024-blocks UsedAvailable Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 3096472230964034 -1547548105%/var $ sudo du -sh /var 30.3M/var On message: Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:09:02 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full I used: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Mon Mar 15 02:57:08 WIT 2010 Some program(s) removed but not closed its files. Dive in in the fstat output. -- Best wishes, Vadim Zhukov A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Re: Anomali on /var available space
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:51:26PM +0800, Kabayan wrote: Hi Vadim, Thx for your reply Problem solve after I restart pflogd New problem is Why the pflogd process almost use 100% capacity of my /var ? You wrote pf.conf, so you are telling pflogd what's needs to be logged. You cannot blame pflogd for that. -Otto My pf manage queue bandwidth for just 100 users. Thx Kabayan --- On Fri, 3/26/10, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Anomali on /var available space To: misc@openbsd.org Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 1:33 AM On 26 March 2010 c. 10:17:30 Kabayan wrote: Dear misc, I got anomaly available space of my system. I have different output between df and du $ df -h /var/ Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 29.5G 29.5G -1.5G 105%/var $ df -kP /var Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0d 30964722 30964034-1547548 105% /var $ sudo du -sh /var 30.3M /var On message: Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:07:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full Mar 26 08:08:01 GreenBridgeVPN pflogd[10433]: Logging suspended: fwrite: No space left on device Mar 26 08:09:02 GreenBridgeVPN /bsd: uid 0 on /var: file system full I used: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Mon Mar 15 02:57:08 WIT 2010 Some program(s) removed but not closed its files. Dive in in the fstat output. -- Best wishes, Vadim Zhukov A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Re: Anomali on /var available space
Kabayan kab4...@yahoo.com writes: Problem solve after I restart pflogd New problem is Why the pflogd process almost use 100% capacity of my /var ? My guess would be that your pf.conf logs traffic with log (all) on at least one rule that matches a lot of traffic, and possibly your newsyslog.conf does not implement a very aggressive log rotation schedule. Logging all packets is not all that useful unless you're deep in debugging something. If you want to do traffic accounting, it's easier to either use labels and extract the values at intervals, or set up with pflow (set state-defaults pflow) and collect the netflow data somewhere with enough disk space to slice and dice the data separately. - Peter -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: aucat: default: can't open device
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:24:58AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: sun_setpar: 0: trying pars = 48000/16/6 sun_setpar: couldn't set linear encoding aucat: default: can't open device blargh. sb(4) can't handle 48kHz rates, and this old driver is stupid. we don't match exactly on sample rate, so completely ignore all other parameters! how the f is someone supposed to figure out what parameter is the problem then? if it set all the paramters it could (which is everything but the sample rate) and returned a sample rate that the device supported, a program could see that the sample rate requested != sample rate returned and deal with it, easily. instead, by denying all parameters, it's now a guessing game. did sample rate not match, or did channels not match, or was it encoding, or precision ... and you have to get them *all* right to know the answer. see how totally ridiculous that is? unfortunately, fixing this is not exactly trivial. I have an idea, but I really would need a machine (I have the cards, just nothing that can use them) to work it out. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Re: Anomali on /var available space
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:09 +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net wrote: Kabayan kab4...@yahoo.com writes: Problem solve after I restart pflogd New problem is Why the pflogd process almost use 100% capacity of my /var ? My guess would be that your pf.conf logs traffic with log (all) on at least one rule that matches a lot of traffic, and possibly your newsyslog.conf does not implement a very aggressive log rotation schedule. Logging all packets is not all that useful unless you're deep in debugging something. I occasionally log packets that pf blocks (just to see who is poking around). Normally, that's about 100K per hour and only 4 old logs are kept so a small /var is OK most of the time. Then one day, some new network gear was installed that messed-up the layer 2 bridging and introduced a loop and STP stopped working. From that came a huge broadcast storm. pf logs filled up a 4GB /var in 3 minutes. I've never seen that many packets in that short amount of time. I still log pf blocks and 99% of the time, it's OK. Brad
week end di Pasqua
Questa e' la nostra proposta per Pasqua! Sara' un soggiorno di 3 notti con l'ingresso al centro benessere. Andremo con il Pullman al Parco Oltremare di Riccione. Vedremo lo spettacolo dei delfini e i grandi acquari marini. Faremo la cena della Vigilia con musica dal vivo e tanto altro. Camera doppia euro 498,00 totali per l'intero soggiorno tutto incluso Il programma completo e' su www.missirini.it Auguriamo una Serena Pasqua ricca di affetti e gioie Hotel Missirini - Terme della Fratta - Romagna - T 0543 460770 Chiediamo scusa se abbiamo infastidito e invitiamo a cancellarsi. -- Puoi cancellarti: http://newsletter.2mlab.it/?p=unsubscribeuid=b28cdb1222c89a3bc2b91c3f879f174c Puoi mandare questa offerta a chi vuoi tu! http://newsletter.2mlab.it/?p=forwarduid=b28cdb1222c89a3bc2b91c3f879f174cmid=44 Puoi leggere la promozione direttamente dal sito: http://www.missirini.it/missirini/promozione.asp?id=56promo=P_9
Re: Anomali on /var available space
Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com writes: network gear was installed that messed-up the layer 2 bridging and introduced a loop and STP stopped working. From that came a huge broadcast storm. pf logs filled up a 4GB /var in 3 minutes. I've never seen that many packets in that short amount of time. I still log pf blocks and 99% of the time, it's OK. Heh. Loops can be fun (fsvo) for sure. I also tend to put a block log at the top of rule sets, if only to peek at occasionally to see how much crazy stuff gets aimed at you. But then the OP's problem of /var filling up quickly fit my hazy memories of one time I put in way to much log (all) in a config. The difference in space consumption between log and log (all) is rather significant. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
2010/3/26 Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com: Hi, Is that possible to modify CFLAG for port installed software ? I read `man mk.conf' found there's no CFLAGS or CXXFLAG entries , even though i tried to put `CFLAG += -O3 -march=i686' into that file , but ports doesn't recognize it. Just want to optimize ports software , during compilation of kernel , i'd comment them out. Does anyone has any ideas ? Have in mind that gcc can produce wrong code with anything higher than -O2. Honestly, don't worry with that, just compile stuff and be happy.
Re: aucat: default: can't open device
Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:24:58AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: sun_setpar: 0: trying pars = 48000/16/6 sun_setpar: couldn't set linear encoding aucat: default: can't open device blargh. sb(4) can't handle 48kHz rates, and this old driver is stupid. we don't match exactly on sample rate, so completely ignore all other parameters! how the f is someone supposed to figure out what parameter is the problem then? if it set all the paramters it could (which is everything but the sample rate) and returned a sample rate that the device supported, a program could see that the sample rate requested != sample rate returned and deal with it, easily. instead, by denying all parameters, it's now a guessing game. did sample rate not match, or did channels not match, or was it encoding, or precision ... and you have to get them *all* right to know the answer. see how totally ridiculous that is? unfortunately, fixing this is not exactly trivial. I have an idea, but I really would need a machine (I have the cards, just nothing that can use them) to work it out. Now that you mention this, I remember that not accepting 48kHz was a common complaint for earlier soundblaster cards. People who cared were really pissed off. -- A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. -- Robert Heinlein
Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
Thanks Jacob , I just want to make some graphic software faster. Cause i have a core2 cpu , supports mmx code and some other features , i'm trying to see if it really helps with those compiler flags. Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:05:02AM +0800, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hi, Is that possible to modify CFLAG for port installed software ? I read `man mk.conf' found there's no CFLAGS or CXXFLAG entries , even though i tried to put `CFLAG += -O3 -march=i686' into that file , but ports doesn't recognize it. Just want to optimize ports software , during compilation of kernel , i'd comment them out. Does anyone has any ideas ? I've built things with '-O3 -march' on OpenBSD throughout the years. *never* has it improved *anything*. at best, the difference is not noticible, at worst things are slower and less stable. and I'm talking like I did this a month ago with multimedia software that uses such flags by default. -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode
Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
Christian Weisgerber wrote: Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com wrote: I read `man mk.conf' found there's no CFLAGS or CXXFLAG entries , even though i tried to put `CFLAG += -O3 -march=i686' into that file , but ports doesn't recognize it. No such variable is used by the ports infrastructure. Note the name, CFLAG is not the same as CFLAGS. Yeah , its a typo , should be CFLAGS. Just want to optimize ports software , during compilation of kernel , i'd comment them out. Yes, you can set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in /etc/mk.conf or the environment and most ports will pick it up. (Some don't for sound technical reasons, a few don't and it's an error that needs to be fixed.) Generally speaking, I advise against playing with gcc's optimization flags. You will not see an improvement, and some of these optimization steps may actually generate incorrect code. The time you spend fiddling with these settings will be more than you can ever gain from them. You're right Christian. AFAIK , sqlite can't work with intel mmx instructions , gcc generate wrong asm codes I do occasionally set CFLAGS to build a port *without* optimization when I need to debug a problem with gdb(1). Single-stepping through code that has been run through -O2 can be a surreal experience. Use CFLAGS to build software with debug information is a good hack , i'll take your suggestion. -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode
sxwerg
dear -Why Did Allah Create Humans?
[SOLVED] Re: customize CFLAG with /etc/mk.conf
First of all , thanks for all your experiences ;-) Forgive me , i didn't response to all your mail. So let me do a summary , after collection all you mails: I) generating CPU featured assemble takes longer time , also risks in creating wrong code II) customize compiler flag on OpenBSD doesn't values so much as what we costs to achieve it. Thanks again ! Ivan Nudzik wrote: Aaron, I built 3.7 base + OpenVPN for VPN gateway with custom CFLAGS/LDFLAGS and it worked well for years, even with such aggressive flags as CFLAGS=-O3 -march=c3 -mmmx -m3dnow -fomit-frame-pointer and LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-O2 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags. But build was broken and I must to fix many things in OpenBSD makefiles, to get binaries done. Such LDFLAGS significantly speedups application loading, cause it's doing the same things as prelink utility, but it link time. CFLAGS helps me speedup C3 500MHz router device as about 20-30%, but it was synthetic measurement on nbench built with and without CLFAGS. Kernel build was also forced for such CFLAGS and no stability issue and subjectively more speedy. I've read about that , e.g kernel avoid intel MMX instructions , cause it may cause interrupts (handle lots of register together to combine a bigger register) It was few years ago, when I've had mood to compile everything with all CPU features on. ;-) Yeah , i'm so interesting with CPU features on my Linux right now , like what you did a few years ago ;-) Looking at this concrete OpenBSD build my summary is that it took me more than 20h to build it and speedups was not such significant, comparing that it should took an about 1h to do the same functionality with release binaries only bit slow. And two other things to keep on mind: nowadays x86 CPUs has very heuristic instruction handling/prefetching so it will not speedup as much with custom CFLAGS; OpenBSD still use gcc 3.3.5 which can't do as good optimization for new CPUs as to loose time with custom flags build. And many makefiles in OpenBSD base don't handle CFLAGS/LDFLAGS correctly. The last time I tried it (about 1/2y. ago), I made only kernel with custom flags (for kernel it is COPTS variable if I remember right). Rest of system didn't build and I didn't had a time to bother with broken makefiles. So if you don't want to do HPC, don't loose time with custom flags. I if you want to do HPC, choose other operating system, cause OpenBSD strengths are other. I take your suggestion , ain't gonna waste time playing gcc's flags. -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode
Re: aucat: default: can't open device
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:02:44PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
unfortunately, fixing this is not exactly trivial. I have an idea,
but I really would need a machine (I have the cards, just nothing that
can use them) to work it out.
not exactly elegant (I don't think there is an elegant way to handle it
without bigger changes) but it should work (only compile tested).
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Index: sbdsp.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/isa/sbdsp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -p sbdsp.c
--- sbdsp.c 31 Jul 2009 22:53:04 - 1.29
+++ sbdsp.c 27 Mar 2010 15:03:58 -
@@ -562,6 +562,57 @@ sbdsp_set_params(addr, setmode, usemode, play, rec)
continue;
p = mode == AUMODE_PLAY ? play : rec;
+
+ switch (model) {
+ case SB_1:
+ case SB_20:
+ if (mode == AUMODE_PLAY) {
+ if (p-sample_rate 4000)
+ p-sample_rate = 4000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 22727)
+ p-sample_rate = 22727; /* 22050 ? */
+ } else {
+ if (p-sample_rate 4000)
+ p-sample_rate = 4000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 12987)
+ p-sample_rate = 12987; /* 12000 ? */
+ }
+ break;
+ case SB_2x:
+ if (mode == AUMODE_PLAY) {
+ if (p-sample_rate 4000)
+ p-sample_rate = 4000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 45454)
+ p-sample_rate = 45454; /* 44100 ? */
+ } else {
+ if (p-sample_rate 4000)
+ p-sample_rate = 4000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 14925)
+ p-sample_rate = 14925; /* ??? */
+ }
+ break;
+ case SB_PRO:
+ case SB_JAZZ:
+ if (p-channels == 2) {
+ if (p-sample_rate 11025)
+ p-sample_rate = 11025;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 22727)
+ p-sample_rate = 22727; /* 22050 ? */
+ } else {
+ if (p-sample_rate 4000)
+ p-sample_rate = 4000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 45454)
+ p-sample_rate = 45454; /* 44100 ? */
+ }
+ break;
+ case SB_16:
+ if (p-sample_rate 5000)
+ p-sample_rate = 5000;
+ else if (p-sample_rate 45000)
+ p-sample_rate = 45000; /* 44100 ? */
+ break;
+ }
+
/* Locate proper commands */
for(m = mode == AUMODE_PLAY ? sbpmodes : sbrmodes;
m-model != -1; m++) {
Re: Abnormally slow and unstable cvs process
Thanks a lot for the suggestions. The NIC was trying to auto negotiate, and it was ending up in half duplex. And that was the reason why the cvs checkout took 12 hours! I've fixed the problem by doing; ifconfig bge0 media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex and then i added that to /etc/hostname.bge0 Regards. -- Ozgur Kazancci - Ozgur Kazancci ozgur.kazan...@info.uvt.ro wrote: Hello. I have a new computer that i'll control remotely, (a Dell PowerEdge 860) it has a newly installed OpenBSD 4.6. When i try to get the src source via cvs, the progress goes extremely slow, it always stops for ~30 seconds, sometimes even few minutes pass almost at every file during the fetching. The same slowness happened also when i pkg_add'ed a package. (I use the nearest cvs mirror - i tried different mirrors as well) for example, U src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/NEWS (waiting too long, then) U src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/README (again wait few minutes) U src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/TODO again.. The current cvs process is running since ~12 hours. I guess it's not because of my computer's internet speed, at least it's not that slow, of course. Not a DNS problem. I suspect the NIC. Broadcom BCM5721. Its driver maybe? Here is the dmesg output: http://openbsd.pastebin.ca/CDtZiOel Would gratefully appreciate any suggestions. Many thanks in advance for your time! - Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote: try disabling ACPI in the first place. - Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: I would suspect some fragmentation issue here. Check you firewall settings.
Re: macbook pro 5,5
Hello, I installed a recent snapshot (i386) on the mac 5,5 and the nv driver seems to not be able to work. I have to resort to vesa to get X working. I thought somebody had mentioned s/he had got it working. Re. azalia: If more testing is needed, I can help. I am now on the way of downloading and installing the most recent amd64 snapshot on the laptop. Thanks in any case for the input. Cheers, Pau 2010/3/26 Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com: On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet jean-phili...@ouellet.biz wrote: On 3/25/10 12:44 PM, Ted Roby wrote: On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Lars Noodenlars.cura...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/24/10 21:02 , Pau wrote: I was also wondering whether it is possible to have openbsd on the laptop as the only OS. I am guessing that the EFI could give trouble. I've done that with the older macbook pros. I'm sure the openfirmware could be set to boot straight into OpenBSD, but would need a good OF reference first. If you leave it as-is, the firmware takes a long time to find the system. Leaving a minimal OS X partition and using rEFIt to boot 'legacy first', it quickly goes into openbsd as the default.If you leave off all the language variants and excess printer drivers, then OS X is about 20 GB. /Lars Actually, a default install of OSX without localizations and printer support is only 4.5 GB. You can reduce the partition it is installed on to that, plus the size of your memory. So, OSX allowed me to shrink my HFS+ partition (with 4 GB ram) down to 9.5 GB. I used diskutil resize to do this after install. Actually, if you're not going to use OSX, you shouldn't need to have it on your disk at all because you can put rEFIt on a small EFI partition at the beginning of your disk and use bless(8) from an OSX dvd or whatever to set it to boot. Such an EFI partition was silently created if you used Disk Utility to set up your disk (and exists by default on macs when you buy them). I had it set up like this on my old MacBook1,1 but have not tried it on my MacBookPro5,3 although I see no reason why it wouldn't work. Actually, I use it.
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SURVEILLANCE/FUND RECOVERY $7.5M.
$B?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9$r$*CN$i$;$7$^$9?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9!'(B intercontinental_ngplc00...@yahoo.co.jp Investigations into your payment file and the reason for the delay on your payment is concluded/approved.Are you still alive?Did you ask TOM BROWN to receive your funds?CONTACT;Mrs.F.Waziri+2347041440841(surveillance_efcc...@yahoo.com.hk)with your Names,Address,Age,Tel,to claim your $7.5m. - ECONOMIC FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION.
softraid
Is softraid(4) now concidered suitable for use in production environments? I know that many people have used it for a long time with no problems, but that is not my question. I see that the bioctl man page lists the RAID 4 5 disciplines as 'experimental' - I'm specificly interested in RAID0. I've been looking forward to switching from RAIDFrame for some time, here's hoping that 4.7 will be that time. I appreciate the fine work all the devs have done, and am extremely gratefull to you all that I'm able to use such a fine OS. Thank You. paulm
