Re: 4.8-current snap, possible OSX NFS issue?

2010-12-07 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Just a quick update with the Dec.6 amd64 snapshot, and the problem still
exists. I had hoped with some recent attention to nfs re: the systat -m
freeze that there might have been some movement on this one.

I had written a couple other replies previously that never made it to
list. Hope this one fares better.

Cheers,
-- 
Jason



4.8-current snap, possible OSX NFS issue?

2010-11-28 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Hello all,

Recently, my lazy ass went from 4.6-current snap to the most recent
4.8-current snap (#647: Fri Nov 26, amd64). Machine in question is
mostly a local file server, NFS to a few Macs. I say mostly, 'cause it
does some other stuff, and sits in a DMZ.

Since the upgrade to 4.8, I'm unable to read /some/ files from the nfs
server to the macs. I say some, because in testing I've been able to
ascertain the following:

1. I can write any size file from the mac to the nfs server. No issue.
2. I can write a small file (like 5 KiB), and read it back to the Mac.
3. I can write a large file (like 700 MiB), and cannot read it back to
the Mac.
4. I am unable to read any previously existing files on the NFS share to
the Mac, whether they be large, or small.

Because the machine is in a DMZ, I made sure to disable the
DMZ-Internal filtering rules and stuff to rule out any stupidity.
Traffic dumps show no blocked packets.

While grasping at straws, I set vfs.nfs.iothreads=4. The
Mac is mounting the share as -o resvport,hard,intr,nolock.

The troubleshooting results thus far are just erratic enough to have me
believe it's nothing I've done; nothing is making sense. I'm basically
looking for corroboration here. Can anyone else replicate this?
-- 
Jason 



Re: 4.8-current snap, possible OSX NFS issue?

2010-11-28 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Jan Stary wrote:
 
 I am experiencing something similar on 4.8-current (server) and MacOSX
 10.5.8 (client). I suspect the MacOSX to be the quilty one, as no other
 NFS client shows any of these symptoms.
 
 From the mac, I can write a file to the (auto)mounted share (/media)
 and read it back, but I cannot read any of the files that existed there
 before I mounted. A simple 'cat /media/.../file.txt' results in nothing
 (the command is still running); after a while, a window pops up saying
 'Server connection interrupted: media [Disconnect]'. I can _list_ the
 content of the mounted share though.
 
 I am (auto)mounting it with -resvport,noauto,nodev,noexec,noatime.
 No filtering is done in between the boxes; they are on the same LAN,
 pf is not running. I need to look at what exactly the mac firewall is
 doing I guess.
 
   Jan

Thanks Jan, that sounds a lot like what I'm seeing on several 10.6.5 OSX
clients. To be sure, it's the Mac clients with the issue; I've been able
to mount the share on another OpenBSD machine on the network and it
functions normally.

Whatever the issue, it was unexposed using any previous snapshots, and in
my case, there is no OSX firewall involved. I'm gonna start dumping
traffic at the OSX clients and see if I can find something there.

In the meantime, anyone have any recall of recent-ish changes to the NFS
code? I'm gonna start combing through src-changes now...

-- 
Jason



Spamd china and korea lists

2009-11-24 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Hello all,

Willing to suffer scorn if I've missed a commit message or previous post on
the matter, but I've been getting a 404 for these two lists since
approximately the `unplanned maintenance' www event of a few weeks ago. Shall
I comment them out of spamd.conf, or will they make their return?

Regards,
Jason.



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Jason LaRiviere
I'm currently trying to get my hands on a Nexcom Nise 2000. Should come
in under your power specs. Our goals are slightly different - I want a
smaller, quieter home server, don't care to do anything desktop related
with it. I'm sure it would work fine for either.

Timothy Hume wrote:
 Hi,
 
 My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low
 power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a
 Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will
 be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital
 photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet
 and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time.  I
 obviously want to build something which works perfectly with
 OpenBSD.
 
 Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30
 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Tim.



Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0

2008-07-16 Thread Jason LaRiviere

On 16-Jul-08, at 3:23 PM, Daniel W Barowy wrote:


On the other hand, web developers think this thing is hot shit.


I'd just be a little more comfortable if you qualified that a little.  
Perhaps with something like `wrong-thinking web developers think...'


The current breed of standards-based web developers - which in my  
estimation form the bulk of all web developers currently doing  
anything anyone is seeing, and of which I am fairly representative,  
would think nothing of the sort.


Truly well-versed web developers find cross-browser issues bothersome,  
but far from insurmountable; certainly not worthy of abandoning xhtml,  
css and javascript for something with funny names and registered  
trademarks.


Flash has a place on the web, just like any other rich media format.  
It should be used responsibly, as semantically as possible, and  
degrade nicely for those who care not to use it. I make every effort  
to use it within these guidelines, and present them as gospel to my  
clients. Many (most?) modern web developers do too, except for the  
ones at a Flex conference who still think drawing entire websites in  
Flash is a good idea. Shame on them, but they are a dying breed.


At a bank? Yeesh...



Re: no 4.2-stable package updates??

2007-12-11 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Marcos Laufer wrote:
 My opinion is that more money should be raised in order to
 keep -stable up to date.
 I think it's important to mantain a stable distribution, it's one
 of the things that give openbsd it's fame of being solid rock
 
 Marcos

Seriously? More money? Like enough to woo someone from their job
and keep stable packages up to date for you?

I'm not sure you understand how this whole thing works. Also, may your
payment be the first of the windfall, and your -stable package patches
the catalyst for la revolucion.
-- 
Jason



Re: No Blob without Puffy

2007-03-18 Thread Jason LaRiviere
SW wrote:
 Hi,
 this is the conversation I had with Theo:
snip

Your `No Blob!' poster, complete with logos of BSD systems that ship with
blobs, will feel right at home beside my `Trustworthy Computing
Initiative' and `Mission Accomplished' banners.

A true laughing-stock in the making. Trust me, this isn't just Theo and
the big, bad openbsd ogres being hardasses about blobs. This is just a
stupid and misleading campaign.



Re: [offtopic] Fiery X2-W Raster Image Processor

2007-02-08 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Nickolay A. Burkov wrote:
 My question is:  Anyway, what is it? :)

Fiery is a brand of RIP, as you mentioned. The one you describe probably
drove a Xerox colour printer/copier in the mid to late nineties. For a
time, they were built by sgi, so the mips makes sense. Some had cool
little lcd screens built in and stuff that would be fun hacking on. 

 Why I was unable to find specs and finally, can I install some kind of
 my favorite BSD on it and bring it to life as a complex computer system?

You should attempt to load openbsd on this machine immediately, and
report any failure to make a complex computer system.



Re: error in if_em.c building -stable kernel on sparc64

2006-11-07 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Shane J Pearson wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I am getting an error in if_em.c when trying to build a -stable kernel
 on sparc64.  It stops with this error:
 
 /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c: In function `em_rxeof':
 /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c:2446: error: structure has no member named
 `align_buf_len'

The correct header file seems to have been committed. You should cvs up
and try again.
-- 
jason



Re: Looking for HowTo instructions ...

2006-10-01 Thread Jason LaRiviere
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 The point of using periodic, at least under FreeBSD, is that there is a 
 'report' that is issued at the end of the monthly periodic run letting the 
 admin know the status of various things on their servers ...
 
 So, for instance, it would give them a monthly reminder that the script 
 *is* running on their machine ...

$ ls -l /var/log/*.out
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  1693 Oct  1 01:31 /var/log/daily.out
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel15 Oct  1 05:30 /var/log/monthly.out
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel59 Sep 30 03:32 /var/log/weekly.out

-- 
jason