spamd - good job!
I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This week I did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to 4.1 soon after disks arrive.
Re: spamd - good job!
Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind
spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0
-Bob
* Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 08:29]:
I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic
and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to
spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This week I
did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd
accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some
practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to
4.1 soon after disks arrive.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 not 1) != (! 0 ! 1)) {
print Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n;
}
Re: spamd - good job!
Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that (it's in man spamd). What's noticing out of order MX use - just a log entry? Are there any changes to existing functionality to be forewarned about; or just new features? I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a difference; this is considered living on the edge for me. At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote: Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0 -Bob * Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 08:29]: I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This week I did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to 4.1 soon after disks arrive.
Re: spamd - good job!
This will set you in the right direction: http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20070301144846 On 4/20/07, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that (it's in man spamd). What's noticing out of order MX use - just a log entry? Are there any changes to existing functionality to be forewarned about; or just new features? I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a difference; this is considered living on the edge for me. At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote: Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0 -Bob * Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 08:29]: I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This week I did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to 4.1 soon after disks arrive. -- Who?
Re: spamd - good job!
Yes, the upgrading to 4.1 page mentions this.
-Bob
* Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 12:43]:
Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or
am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm
mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time
use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that
(it's in man spamd). What's noticing out of order MX use - just a log
entry? Are there any changes to existing functionality to be forewarned
about; or just new features?
I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a
difference; this is considered living on the edge for me.
At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote:
Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind
spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0
-Bob
* Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 08:29]:
I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from
puremagic
and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to
spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This
week I
did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd
accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some
practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to
4.1 soon after disks arrive.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 not 1) != (! 0 ! 1)) {
print Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n;
}
