Re: tmux vs wake
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:44:35 -0400 STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote: On Friday 05 June 2009 11:29:00 Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hide attic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers! Gotta love it, fan clubs for commands! The proper solution there is to put it back into /usr/src/usr.sbin, link it up, and you'll have it once again. This IS open source, isn't it--if you want to make/keep different commands, you can. You are on your own, but wake(1) is hardly a monster. So while I'd like to see it in the official distribution, the option is there to keep it in *your* distribution. --STeve Andre' Thanks for Your answer. Well said, I'm doing that with few ports (ex. wireshark) and I'm maintaining my own xenocara source tree (because lack of support for my graphic card). While asking that question I was only curios why there wasn't place for wake and now there is for tmux. Simple answer was that tmux replaced window and I didn't noticed that. Yes that was my fault... Cheers!
tmux vs wake
Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hideattic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers!
Re: tmux vs wake
window was removed and tmux was added. -Mensagem original- De: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Em nome de Pawlowski Marcin Piotr Enviada: sexta-feira, 5 de Junho de 2009 16:29 Para: misc@openbsd.org Assunto: tmux vs wake Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hidea ttic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers!
Re: tmux vs wake
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? life isn't fair... tmux replaced window. one removed, one added. -moj Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hideattic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers!
Re: tmux vs wake
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:53:11 +0200 (MEST) Mats O Jansson m...@cntw.com wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? life isn't fair... tmux replaced window. one removed, one added. Thanks, I didn't noticed that. No more questions. Cheers.
Re: tmux vs wake
hi, they're not related to each other, so please stop whining. but i'm happy to have tmux(1) in base because most of the openbsd users/hackers i know used to install the screen port on their systems which is not needed anymore. tmux is nice, it is actively maintained and developed in the tree, and it is more than a replacement for screen. so a possible explanation is that tmux(1) is more important than wake(8). reyk On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:29:00PM +0200, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hideattic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers!
Re: tmux vs wake
On Friday 05 June 2009 11:29:00 Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Information about why wake(8) was removed: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/wake/Attic/Makefile?hide attic=0;only_with_tag=HEAD Cheers! Gotta love it, fan clubs for commands! The proper solution there is to put it back into /usr/src/usr.sbin, link it up, and you'll have it once again. This IS open source, isn't it--if you want to make/keep different commands, you can. You are on your own, but wake(1) is hardly a monster. So while I'd like to see it in the official distribution, the option is there to keep it in *your* distribution. --STeve Andre'
Re: tmux vs wake
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr pawlowski...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1) and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit unfair. Could someone explain it? Sure, I'll try to explain. Ready? Brace yourself for the blinding flash of clarity that will shine on this highly mystical perceived inconsistency in the fairness of the decisions made by the developers. Here it comes: Because we wanted to. //art
