Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1(1.6.1.90) (Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-26 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Steven,

On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 18:00, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>   It'll probably take 24 hours for SF to catch up but perhaps Ronald
>   will be creating a new release candidate tarball in a couple days
>   or so.

I'll wait for Martin to commit some of his proposed fixes for other
issues in jpeg2yuv. After that, I'll do a new RC (.91), let it float
around for a week and finally release 1.6.2 or so.

Ronald

-- 
Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users


Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)(Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-26 Thread Steven M. Schultz

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Steven M. Schultz wrote:

>   Typo.   The default limit for both formats (DVD and DVD-like)
>   is 7500.   For now rely on the usage summary (mpeg2enc -h) until
>   the manpage is repaired.

I've fixed the manpage for mpeg2enc and the -f 8 and -f 9
description reversal has been taken care of (as has the
mention of the default bitrate for -f 9 which is 7500, the
same as for -f 8).

It'll probably take 24 hours for SF to catch up but perhaps Ronald
will be creating a new release candidate tarball in a couple days
or so.

Cheers,
Steven Schultz



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users


Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)(Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-26 Thread Steven M. Schultz

On 25 Aug 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:

Not sure if/when this'll make it out - SF's mail system apparently
has its knickers twisted.  Sigh.

> So, when looking at the man pages for the release candidate, i noticed
> that "-f 9" is the new thing.

Ai.   If you're making DVDs then '-f 9' is absolutely the
wrong thing to use because it leaves out the NAV packets that
are needed.

> In the mpeg2enc man page, there's a mention about -f 9 being more
> appropriate for dvdauthor.

The man page is wrong ;(

Looks like the mpeg2enc manpage hasn't been updated sufficiently.

> So, which way is recommended? Use -f 9 on both mpeg2enc and mplex when
> authoring with dvdauthor? Or use -f 8?
> Does it depend on the dvdauthor version?

Use -f 8.   

There was a (thankfully brief) period when the new format (what is
now -f 9) was added but the roles were reversed (which broke
everyone's scripts of course).  That was fixed (by leaving -f 8
as it had been and using 9 for the new format) but the manpage
was apparently not reverted.

At least we know folks are reading the manpages ;)

> Also, why the bitrate for -f 9 is set to 10200 kbps? Isn't that too
> high? (i thought there's a limit imposed by the DVD standard that's
> quite close to 10 Mbit)

Typo.   The default limit for both formats (DVD and DVD-like)
is 7500.   For now rely on the usage summary (mpeg2enc -h) until
the manpage is repaired.

Steven Schultz



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users


Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1(1.6.1.90) (Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-26 Thread Florin Andrei
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 09:58, Steven M. Schultz wrote:

> There were issues with mplex and mpeg2enc that caused problems
> (2GB limit, timestamps, etc) with some DVD players.   Also some
> fixes were made to interoperate with dvdauthor - dvdauthor had
> some misassumptions about the MPEG2 header format and mplex
> knows (now) how to work around those.

So, when looking at the man pages for the release candidate, i noticed
that "-f 9" is the new thing.
In the mpeg2enc man page, there's a mention about -f 9 being more
appropriate for dvdauthor.
But in the mplex man page there's no such mention, and the explanations
are not quite clear (at least to me).

I made quite a few DVDs with -f 8 using the release candidate and then
authored them with dvdauthor-0.5.3 and so far i had no issues with that.

So, which way is recommended? Use -f 9 on both mpeg2enc and mplex when
authoring with dvdauthor? Or use -f 8?
Does it depend on the dvdauthor version?

Also, why the bitrate for -f 9 is set to 10200 kbps? Isn't that too
high? (i thought there's a limit imposed by the DVD standard that's
quite close to 10 Mbit)

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users


Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)(Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-26 Thread Steven M. Schultz

>   I've found that doing as much as possible in 4:1:1 and converting
>   to 4:2:0 at the last moment produces better looking output at
> 
>   If you have a recent ffmpeg on the system (do a 'make' but skip
>   the 'make clean') then build the smilutils with something like:
> 
>   ./configure --with-avcodec \
>--with-avcodec-include=/usr/local/src/ffmpeg/libavcodec

A bit of followup (and hopefully clarification ;)).   In 
addition to the benefits of processing keeping the data in 
DV (4:1:1) format as long as possible using ffmpeg's DV decoder
produces (from what I have seen) better "YUV4MPEG2 411" output
than libdv does.   You can see the effect by converting a frame
using both methods to PPM and viewing the PPM files with the
GIMP or other utility.

The exact "why" libavcodec's output is apparently better than
libdv's is unknown so far (if some one figures it out it'd be
nice to hear about it ;)).   

Cheers,
Steven Schultz



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users


Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Mjpegtools 1.6.2 release candidate 1 (1.6.1.90)(Ronald Bultje)

2003-08-25 Thread Steven M. Schultz

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, William R Sherman wrote:

> Well then three cheers to Steven:
>   Hip hip hooray


You can say that after the gaffe I made with the Red/White/Yellow
connectors? ;)

Gee thanks!

> One question though, the past couple days people have mentioned that one
> should use the DV capabilities of the ffmpeg library rather than some
> other library, and it isn't clear to me if I'm using dvgrab and/or kino
> to capture video, am I using the wrong thing?  I have a very recent version
> of ffmpeg (to get the Sorenson-3 decoding), but I don't recall which
> application uses which library.

For capturing 'dvgrab' is my tool of choice also.

Capturing and decoding to 4:2:0 for mpeg2enc are two different
things though.   dvgrab/kino store the data as 4:1:1 (for NTSC)
but at some point in time that needs to be converted to 4:2:0
for encoding to MPEG-2

I've found that doing as much as possible in 4:1:1 and converting
to 4:2:0 at the last moment produces better looking output at
a lower bitrate.   At least 2 of the filters (yuvdenoise and
yuvmedianfilter) support the 4:1:1 colorspace - thus they can work
on the data prior to 4:2:0 conversion.

If you have a recent ffmpeg on the system (do a 'make' but skip
the 'make clean') then build the smilutils with something like:

./configure --with-avcodec \
   --with-avcodec-include=/usr/local/src/ffmpeg/libavcodec

Then use "smil2yuv -i 2 ... | yuvdenoise | yuvmedianfilter ... "

Immediately prior to going into the encoder (mpeg2enc) use
y4mscaler to convert from 411 to 420:

y4mscaler -O chromass=420_mpeg2

> > to 1.6.1. Most importantly, this release allows full-fledged DVD
> > creation. 
> 
> And like one other reader, I'm curious as to what exactly this means.
> Haven't we already been making full-fledged DVD's, and in my case,

There were issues with mplex and mpeg2enc that caused problems
(2GB limit, timestamps, etc) with some DVD players.   Also some
fixes were made to interoperate with dvdauthor - dvdauthor had
some misassumptions about the MPEG2 header format and mplex
knows (now) how to work around those.

Cheers,
Steven Schultz



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
___
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users