Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fake warnings in log

2010-01-21 Thread Carlos Dávila
Carlos Dávila escribió:
 Since yesterday
Sorry, it was day before yesterday when it started to happen, so mp
merge may be related.
  the number of similar arcs warnings has increased very
 much, but when you look at the supposed wrong data, they are correct and
 there are no recent changes. May be recent commits have introduced some
 bug in this regard. You can have a look at this one for example:
 2010/01/21 09:14:35 ADVERTENCIA (RouteNode): Similar arcs ((N-630
 Carretera de Gijón a Sevilla,
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325) and (N-630 Carretera
 de Gijón a Sevilla, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325))
 from http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=38.32804mlon=-6.32094zoom=17
 Regards,
 Carlos

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fake warnings in log

2010-01-21 Thread WanMil

 Carlos Dávila escribió:
 Since yesterday
 Sorry, it was day before yesterday when it started to happen, so mp
 merge may be related.
   the number of similar arcs warnings has increased very
 much, but when you look at the supposed wrong data, they are correct and
 there are no recent changes. May be recent commits have introduced some
 bug in this regard. You can have a look at this one for example:
 2010/01/21 09:14:35 ADVERTENCIA (RouteNode): Similar arcs ((N-630
 Carretera de Gijón a Sevilla,
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325) and (N-630 Carretera
 de Gijón a Sevilla, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325))
 from http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=38.32804mlon=-6.32094zoom=17
 Regards,
 Carlos

I don't know what an arc warning is. But I can say something about the 
mp code.

The mp code should not modify any original way from OSM. The posted 
warnings link to original OSM ways so mp should not be the reason.

WanMil

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fake warnings in log

2010-01-21 Thread Mark Burton

Hello Carlos,

 Since yesterday the number of similar arcs warnings has increased very
 much, but when you look at the supposed wrong data, they are correct and
 there are no recent changes. May be recent commits have introduced some
 bug in this regard. You can have a look at this one for example:
 2010/01/21 09:14:35 ADVERTENCIA (RouteNode): Similar arcs ((N-630
 Carretera de Gijón a Sevilla,
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325) and (N-630 Carretera
 de Gijón a Sevilla, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325))
 from http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=38.32804mlon=-6.32094zoom=17

That warning occurs when you have multiple arcs that have the same
start and end points and the same length. It could occur when there
are duplicate ways in the map data but also it could occur if the style
rules you are using generate multiple routable lines from the same way.

I notice that in the above message the OSM ids are the same. That
implies that you are generating two roads from one way. It's either a
bug in mkgmap or in your style rules.

Mark
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fake warnings in log

2010-01-21 Thread Carlos Dávila
Mark Burton escribió:
 Hello Carlos,

   
 Since yesterday the number of similar arcs warnings has increased very
 much, but when you look at the supposed wrong data, they are correct and
 there are no recent changes. May be recent commits have introduced some
 bug in this regard. You can have a look at this one for example:
 2010/01/21 09:14:35 ADVERTENCIA (RouteNode): Similar arcs ((N-630
 Carretera de Gijón a Sevilla,
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325) and (N-630 Carretera
 de Gijón a Sevilla, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34954325))
 from http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=38.32804mlon=-6.32094zoom=17
 

 That warning occurs when you have multiple arcs that have the same
 start and end points and the same length. It could occur when there
 are duplicate ways in the map data but also it could occur if the style
 rules you are using generate multiple routable lines from the same way.

 I notice that in the above message the OSM ids are the same. That
 implies that you are generating two roads from one way. It's either a
 bug in mkgmap or in your style rules.

OK, I see. It's due to bridges I have introduced recently in my maps. In
some of my attempts to get bridges working I had to add road_class and
road_speed to the bridges lines. I suppose removing them will solve the
problem, won't it?
Thanks for you clarification

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fake warnings in log

2010-01-21 Thread Mark Burton

Hi Carlos,

 OK, I see. It's due to bridges I have introduced recently in my maps. In
 some of my attempts to get bridges working I had to add road_class and
 road_speed to the bridges lines. I suppose removing them will solve the
 problem, won't it?

Yes, adding class or speed makes a way into a road as far as mkgmap is
concerned.

What I have done for bridges/tunnels is this:

highway=*  bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue 
resolution 24]
railway=*  bridge=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010107 continue 
resolution 24]
highway=*  tunnel=yes { delete 'ref'; delete 'name'; } [0x010108 continue 
resolution 24]

those types are lines that look like this:

-

-

and the end result looks like this:

 --
**
 --

The Baltic map has bridges/tunnels like that.

 Thanks for you clarification

You're welcome.

Mark


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev