Re: [tdf-moderators] Re: re. Invitation: Dear God,s Select,

2013-05-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

 1.  don't mind duplicating each others work a lot of the time or

 Regardless if we know a message has been moderated or not, if it has
already been moderated if anyone else does the same thing and the message
has already been moderated nothing happens.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-moderators] Re: re. Invitation: Dear God,s Select,

2013-05-16 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Anne, *,

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:17 PM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
I do that for a very simple reason;
so all of this group is aware of what's happening.

As the explanation that follows is rather longish, here the short-form:
the decision whether a mail is spam or legitimate is fast, moderators
know immediately whether to let it pass or ignore it. Replying to
moderate it is fast as well. Much faster than reading an additional
mail, so any notices about what actions one moderator did take are not
needed.

But here's the long version about why letting the group know what's
happening doesn't make sense. There are a total of 3 cases, and in
neither a forwarded mail makes sense.

1) you let the mail pass to the list
   → moderators will see the mail on the list → that is their
notification that they don't need to take action (even if they do,
nothing happens, the mail won't be delivered twice to the list)

2) you don't let the mail pass because it is obvious spam
→ other moderators will also know this is spam and not let them
pass. Sending a note this is spam is telling the other moderators:
I don't think you're smart enough to tell that this is a spam
message. So no benefit here.

3) you explicitly reject the message because it is not-so-obvious-spam
or because it contains flames/hatred/whatever
→ no matter what moderators think of it, you already made the
decision. Whether moderators ignore it or reply to it to let it pass,
it doesn't have any effect. A note won't really help.

People get moderation requests immediately, and any note you sent will
be only with a delay. So the chances that moderators already have read
 parsed  made their decision whether to let it pass or ignore before
reading any of your notes.

The only case when it makes sense to send notification to other
moderators is when you reject a mail with the intend to contact the
author of the rejected mail on why it was rejected (I'll let the
poster know that his mail contained private data, and the poster might
not be aware that this info will be public in various archives). I.e.
when you reject (and then it must be a reject, and not just ignore to
let it expire) a legitimate mail (no spam or similar).

Remember:
Moderator's job as in technical mailinglist administrator is to let
mails through to the list from people that are not subscribed.

It happens that also spam is sent to the list-address, that obviously
should not be passed. moderator's job is not to replace a spam-filter
(there already are spam filters before it even gets handed over to the
mailing list system) - but rather to let valid postings through.
Ignoring the spam is just a side-effect.

Of course it depends on the type of list whether on what the ratio of
spam to legitimate messges is (announce lists have more spam, as
real people using it is low, etc)

And there are of course other meanings of moderator, but those are
unrelated to a technical mailing-list moderator as is the topic
here. If you have spare cycles, you can moderate the list itself in
the sense of acting as a mediator, take care that the tone on the
lists stays friendly, and similar - but this then happens on the list
itself or by private mails to the people involved in the discussion on
the list and does not affect the other technical mailinglist
moderators :-)

ciao
Christian

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-moderators] Re: Please moderate mirr...@documentfoundation.org: Re: [MIRROR] [tdf-mirrors] downloading issues

2013-05-16 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
This email ended up on the list first then moderated. did someone else
moderate this email and release before i got the email of it being
moderated?


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:38 AM, mirrors+ow...@documentfoundation.orgwrote:

 Hi, this is the Mlmmj program managing the mirr...@documentfoundation.org
 
 mailing list.

 A message from e.cava...@cineca.it with subject Re: [MIRROR]
 [tdf-mirrors] downloading issues has been submitted for posting. You are
 being asked to moderate because the requester is not a subscriber. The
 message is below.

 To release it to the list, please send a message to
 mirrors+release-5275a1c966fcd...@documentfoundation.org which can
 usually
 be done simply by replying to this message.

 If you do not want to do any of this, either send a message to
 mirrors+reject-5275a1c966fcd...@documentfoundation.org or simply ignore
 this message.

 The following moderators have received this mail:
 - varunmitta...@gmail.com
 - flo...@documentfoundation.org
 - kaplanl...@gmail.com
 - eagles051...@gmail.com
 - dnorw...@portalias.net

 Hello we are not aware of particular issues at the moment.

 I suppose it should be a local issue. Have you tried other downloads from
 our mirrors?

 http://mirror1.mirror.garr.it/mirrors
 http://mirror2.mirror.garr.it/mirrors
 http://mirror3.mirror.garr.it/mirrors

 Do they have the same issues? Test in particular with mirror3 (mirror1 and
 mirror2 are in the same POP which is having issues with you)

 Regards,
 Enrico.


 --
 Dr. Enrico Cavalli
 System  Technology Department
 e-mail: e.cava...@cineca.it
 ph. +39 02 26995383 - mob. +39 348 7090221 - fax +39 02 2135520
 CINECA - Consorzio Interuniversitario
 skype: enricocavalli








 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: mirrors+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-moderators] Re: Please moderate mirr...@documentfoundation.org: Re: [MIRROR] [tdf-mirrors] downloading issues

2013-05-16 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-05-16 11:51:

Let me know if there is anythign i can do to help test this issue out any
further.


thanks - I'll monitor the issue. I have the gut feeling that there are 
some bugs in the new mlmmj release, but so far, I didn't see any pattern.


Florian

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-moderators] Re: re. Invitation: Dear God,s Select,

2013-05-16 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Thanks, that does make sense.  


We just have to spot the message on the appropriate list. 

Regards from 
Tom :)  






 From: Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com
To: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com 
Cc: Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@gmail.com; moderators 
moderators@documentfoundation.org 
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013, 10:15
Subject: Re: [tdf-moderators] Re: re. Invitation: Dear God,s Select,
 

Hi Anne, *,

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:17 PM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
        I do that for a very simple reason;
            so all of this group is aware of what's happening.

As the explanation that follows is rather longish, here the short-form:
the decision whether a mail is spam or legitimate is fast, moderators
know immediately whether to let it pass or ignore it. Replying to
moderate it is fast as well. Much faster than reading an additional
mail, so any notices about what actions one moderator did take are not
needed.

But here's the long version about why letting the group know what's
happening doesn't make sense. There are a total of 3 cases, and in
neither a forwarded mail makes sense.

1) you let the mail pass to the list
   → moderators will see the mail on the list → that is their
notification that they don't need to take action (even if they do,
nothing happens, the mail won't be delivered twice to the list)

2) you don't let the mail pass because it is obvious spam
    → other moderators will also know this is spam and not let them
pass. Sending a note this is spam is telling the other moderators:
I don't think you're smart enough to tell that this is a spam
message. So no benefit here.

3) you explicitly reject the message because it is not-so-obvious-spam
or because it contains flames/hatred/whatever
    → no matter what moderators think of it, you already made the
decision. Whether moderators ignore it or reply to it to let it pass,
it doesn't have any effect. A note won't really help.

People get moderation requests immediately, and any note you sent will
be only with a delay. So the chances that moderators already have read
 parsed  made their decision whether to let it pass or ignore before
reading any of your notes.

The only case when it makes sense to send notification to other
moderators is when you reject a mail with the intend to contact the
author of the rejected mail on why it was rejected (I'll let the
poster know that his mail contained private data, and the poster might
not be aware that this info will be public in various archives). I.e.
when you reject (and then it must be a reject, and not just ignore to
let it expire) a legitimate mail (no spam or similar).

Remember:
Moderator's job as in technical mailinglist administrator is to let
mails through to the list from people that are not subscribed.

It happens that also spam is sent to the list-address, that obviously
should not be passed. moderator's job is not to replace a spam-filter
(there already are spam filters before it even gets handed over to the
mailing list system) - but rather to let valid postings through.
Ignoring the spam is just a side-effect.

Of course it depends on the type of list whether on what the ratio of
spam to legitimate messges is (announce lists have more spam, as
real people using it is low, etc)

And there are of course other meanings of moderator, but those are
unrelated to a technical mailing-list moderator as is the topic
here. If you have spare cycles, you can moderate the list itself in
the sense of acting as a mediator, take care that the tone on the
lists stays friendly, and similar - but this then happens on the list
itself or by private mails to the people involved in the discussion on
the list and does not affect the other technical mailinglist
moderators :-)

ciao
Christian

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-moderators] Mailing list behavior

2013-05-16 Thread anne-ology
   Oops, I forgot - I'm sorry, friend.



On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho
luz.roge...@gmail.comwrote:

Thanks ... but we do not speak Spanish ... we do speak Portuguese tho , so
 it would be

 Bom Dia Senhor ;)

 R.


 2013/5/15 anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com

Brasil has always impressed me as filled with common-sense folks
 :-)

   [
 http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/travel/countries/brazil-guide/ ]

Buenos Dias, senor!



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-moderators] Please stay ontopic

2013-05-16 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

during the last days, we have seen a huge amount of discussions, mostly 
offtopic. I'd like to remind everyone about the purpose of this mailing 
list - discussion amongst list moderators for topics specifically 
concerning list moderation, nothing else.


I have seen several people unsubscribing from this list and writing to 
me in private that they left because of the sheer amount of offtopic 
discussions. Moderators unsubscribing from this list renders its purpose 
useless.


As much as I love that the community also discusses other topics, even 
non-LibreOffice ones, I really have to ask to stay ontopic on the lists.


In the future, I see no other choice than putting those on forced 
moderation who will continously write offtopic e-mails. I really dislike 
doing so, but in the light of the recent events, this seems to be my 
only option. Losing people who are distracted and upset because of 
offtopic discussions is poison for the community.


Note that I am not specifically targetting any person or e-mail, it's 
the overall events of the last days that lead to this e-mail.


Please do *NOT* comment this e-mail, simply think about what I am asking.

Thank you for your understanding,
Florian

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-moderators] Mailing list behavior

2013-05-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi guys,

First of all, thanks Florian for your mail about staying on-topic - it
was completely right. Personally, I receive enough garbage in my
mailbox not to welcome more sent via a mailing list that I
specifically allow as useful/desired content.

Secondly, I'd certainly warn the moderators about engaging in
conversations with people who are actually the source of spam and
off-topic content that we are supposed to be filtering out.

It's surprising what can actually be learned about you/us and used
against your intentions by interacting with these people...

Just a little 2 cents. I'll return to the background now.

David Nelson

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, I forgot - I'm sorry, friend.



 On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho
 luz.roge...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks ... but we do not speak Spanish ... we do speak Portuguese tho , so
 it would be

 Bom Dia Senhor ;)

 R.


 2013/5/15 anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com

Brasil has always impressed me as filled with common-sense folks
 :-)

   [
 http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/travel/countries/brazil-guide/ ]

Buenos Dias, senor!



 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted