Re: [MMouse]: Basic rights - liberatarians

1999-06-14 Thread Anonymous

But what about the stuff you left out? the right to property is a 
killer, and that is in one of those documents if I remember correctly, 
and is the one that has made the rest nothing but a bunch of pretty 
words and lovely ideals.
Maybe I'm just cynical as a non-american...
L.

 Good morning!
 
 Any debate on freedoms/basic rights (at least in the US) should keep these 
 two source documents in mind:
 
 THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE:
 
 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created  
 equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain  
 unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the  
 pursuit of Happiness.
 (paragraph 2)
 
 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
 
 We the people of the United States, in order to form a more  
 perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility,  
 provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and  
 secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity,  
 do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States  
 of America.
 (Preamble)
 
 That's all I plan to say on this list...  I'll take on any of you jokers,
 give you the civics lesson you deserve! 
 
 Off-list of course!
 
 (BTW, :-) :-)
 
 Oh - how about this: 
 
 As a tie in to a controversial MM issue, the Declaration of Independence
 was written by a man who raped slaves.  (There can't be consent when you
 own your partner - Sally Hemings wasn't allowed the "right" to decline.)
 
 Does this fact make that document any less valid?
 
 Do the words have meanings beyond those which the author intended, are there
 emotions or meanings that the writing can evoke, even when coming from an 
 "impure" source?
 
 ta-
 DAVE!!! (Robson) AKA Rob Daveson, Davebob, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 http://www.xnet.com/~davebob or Staudacher Fish, whichever works for you.
 
 Tellabs Operations, Inc. / 4951 Indiana Ave. /  Lisle, IL 60532
 
 You know, I really like cheese.
 
Plagarism is necessary. Progress implies it. - Guy Debord, 
plagarising Issadore DuCasse. 



Re: [MMouse]: Basic rights - liberatarians

1999-06-10 Thread Fishisfast

 As a tie in to a controversial MM issue, the Declaration of Independence
  was written by a man who raped slaves.  (There can't be consent when you
  own your partner - Sally Hemings wasn't allowed the "right" to decline.)

Well I wouldn't call this a fact. You see, it has never been conclusively 
proven that it was actually Jefferson who was involved. The real facts were 
largely exaggerated or just plain lied about by socialists in a transparent 
attempt to make it seem like Clinton isn't a bad guy. However, I wouldn't be 
surprised to find that Jefferson was actually involved. 
Also, If he was, what makes you say it was "rape" and not a consensual sexual 
relationship? Documented evidence or a desire to make Jefferson look bad?

  Does this fact make that document any less valid?

No.

Ernie Fata



[MMouse]: Basic rights - liberatarians

1999-06-09 Thread dwr


Good morning!

Any debate on freedoms/basic rights (at least in the US) should keep these 
two source documents in mind:

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created  
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain  
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the  
pursuit of Happiness.
(paragraph 2)

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more  
perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility,  
provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and  
secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity,  
do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States  
of America.
(Preamble)

That's all I plan to say on this list...  I'll take on any of you jokers,
give you the civics lesson you deserve! 

Off-list of course!

(BTW, :-) :-)

Oh - how about this: 

As a tie in to a controversial MM issue, the Declaration of Independence
was written by a man who raped slaves.  (There can't be consent when you
own your partner - Sally Hemings wasn't allowed the "right" to decline.)

Does this fact make that document any less valid?

Do the words have meanings beyond those which the author intended, are there
emotions or meanings that the writing can evoke, even when coming from an 
"impure" source?

ta-
DAVE!!! (Robson) AKA Rob Daveson, Davebob, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
http://www.xnet.com/~davebob or Staudacher Fish, whichever works for you.

Tellabs Operations, Inc. / 4951 Indiana Ave. /  Lisle, IL 60532

You know, I really like cheese.