Re: mod_perl make failed: cannot find -lapr
Randy Kobes wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Steve Davis wrote: Your help will be very much appreciated to resolve the following issue. When attempting to make mod_perl.so, the make script 'almost' makes a touchdown but fails before getting to the finishing line. Now it is time get some help from a coach. Hopefully, with a little help, a touchdown will soon follow. Below, I present was appears to be the problem, but someone else will have to direct me to the next set of steps. [ .. ] This problem 'may' have to do with an issue of a change of naming conventions which were adapted by the apr apache group. Confer with Stas Bekman's post on Nov 26, 2002 with a title of "Problems compiling mod_perl 1.99_07 in RH 8.0". He provides a cvs patch; but, unfortunately, I'm not familiar with using that-as least-as of yet. (Look's like I might have learn this package real soon.) Are they any intentions to update the mod_perl-1.99_07.tar.gz? If my conclusion is correct, then currently, and according to the on-line instructions, the present tar.gz edition is not compatible to the latest edition of apache. (2.0.43). So, 'maybe' the cause of my make failure. It appears as if, only the cvs repository maybe a valid for compiling. If my analysis is correct, and a new edition of the respective non-cvs files be acquired somehow. It might be easier to obtain the whole mod_perl 2.0 sources via cvs, rather than patching - this is described at http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution You likely have a cvs client already, so it's a matter of changing to an appropriate directory and doing % cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic login % cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co modperl-2.0 Or you can use the cvs snapshots tarballs, linked from the same URL Randy provided. 1.99_08 should be released RSN. I will make sure that it will state in the README file which Apache version it will work with. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: mod_perl make failed: cannot find -lapr
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Steve Davis wrote: > Your help will be very much appreciated to resolve the > following issue. When attempting to make mod_perl.so, the make > script 'almost' makes a touchdown but fails before getting to > the finishing line. Now it is time get some help from a coach. > Hopefully, with a little help, a touchdown will soon follow. > Below, I present was appears to be the problem, but someone > else will have to direct me to the next set of steps. [ .. ] > This problem 'may' have to do with an issue of a change of > naming conventions which were adapted by the apr apache group. > Confer with Stas Bekman's post on Nov 26, 2002 with a title of > "Problems compiling mod_perl 1.99_07 in RH 8.0". He provides a > cvs patch; but, unfortunately, I'm not familiar with using > that-as least-as of yet. (Look's like I might have learn this > package real soon.) Are they any intentions to update the > mod_perl-1.99_07.tar.gz? If my conclusion is correct, then > currently, and according to the on-line instructions, the > present tar.gz edition is not compatible to the latest edition > of apache. (2.0.43). So, 'maybe' the cause of my make failure. > It appears as if, only the cvs repository maybe a valid for > compiling. If my analysis is correct, and a new edition of the > respective non-cvs files be acquired somehow. It might be easier to obtain the whole mod_perl 2.0 sources via cvs, rather than patching - this is described at http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution You likely have a cvs client already, so it's a matter of changing to an appropriate directory and doing % cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic login % cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co modperl-2.0 -- best regards, randy kobes
RE: mod_perl make failed: cannot find -lapr
I want to raise my hand on this one too. I went and downloaded, compiled and built and received the exact same problem on RedHat 8.0 with the same versin of perl and mod_perl (no surprise). But I just don't have the time or expertise to track down the exact reason by libapr.so isn't around or being built. But I did want to add to the issue that its more than just you :-) dale -Original Message- From: Steve Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_perl make failed: cannot find -lapr Your help will be very much appreciated to resolve the following issue. When attempting to make mod_perl.so, the make script 'almost' makes a touchdown but fails before getting to the finishing line. Now it is time get some help from a coach. Hopefully, with a little help, a touchdown will soon follow. Below, I present was appears to be the problem, but someone else will have to direct me to the next set of steps. I've spend an extensive amount of time trying to resolve this myself and it needs another set of eyes. The news groups were reviewed (repeatedly) for assistance, on-line docs, and what available books I could find. The environment is RH 8.0, Apache 2.0.43, Perl 5.8.0, mod_perl 1.99_07. As best as I can tell, Apache, Perl, and mod_perl have been compiled using the recommended configuration options listed in either Redhat's instructions or mod_perl's on-line docs. Get care has been taken to try to dot every one and cross every 't' to my ability. This problem 'may' have to do with an issue of a change of naming conventions which were adapted by the apr apache group. Confer with Stas Bekman's post on Nov 26, 2002 with a title of "Problems compiling mod_perl 1.99_07 in RH 8.0". He provides a cvs patch; but, unfortunately, I'm not familiar with using that-as least-as of yet. (Look's like I might have learn this package real soon.) Are they any intentions to update the mod_perl-1.99_07.tar.gz? If my conclusion is correct, then currently, and according to the on-line instructions, the present tar.gz edition is not compatible to the latest edition of apache. (2.0.43). So, 'maybe' the cause of my make failure. It appears as if, only the cvs repository maybe a valid for compiling. If my analysis is correct, and a new edition of the respective non-cvs files be acquired somehow. I confuse my ignorance and lack of familiarity with these packages so I could be off. Thank you. Steve The environment is described below. Apache has been configured with "--prefix=/etc/httpd --with-mpm=prefork". Perl has been configured with "-des -Dusethreads -Doptimize='-g' -Dusedevel". The perl Makefile.PL was flagged with "MP_AP_PREFIX=/etc/httpd MP_INST_APACHE2=1 MP_APXS=/etc/httpd/bin". (I also, attempted to configure the mod_perl makefile with the MP_APXS which generated the same error message.) The details follow below. Here is excerpt from the screen dump from the make output. make[1] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/WrapXS' make[1] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/docs/api/mod_perl-2.0' make[1] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/docs/api/mod_perl-2.0' make[1] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs' make[2] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR' make[3] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR/APR' rm -f ../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o ../../../blib/arch/Apache2-lapr -laprutil /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lapr collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3] : *** [../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so] Error 1 make[3] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR/APR' make[2] : *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[2] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR' make[1] : *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs' m Here is a list of the files within /etc/httpd/lib. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6996 Dec 30 21:04 apr.exp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3481 Dec 30 21:04 aprutil.exp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21354 Dec 30 21:01 apxs -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2685082 Dec 30 21:03 libapr-0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 628 Dec 30 21:03 libapr-0.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so -> libapr-0.so.0.9.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so.0 -> libapr-0.so.0.9.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1282063 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so.0.9.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1425080 Dec 30 21:04 libaprutil-0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 640 Dec 30 21:04 libaprutil-0.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 30 01:42 libaprutil-0.so -> libaprutil-0.so.0.9.2 lrwxrwxrw
mod_perl make failed: cannot find -lapr
Your help will be very much appreciated to resolve the following issue. When attempting to make mod_perl.so, the make script 'almost' makes a touchdown but fails before getting to the finishing line. Now it is time get some help from a coach. Hopefully, with a little help, a touchdown will soon follow. Below, I present was appears to be the problem, but someone else will have to direct me to the next set of steps. I've spend an extensive amount of time trying to resolve this myself and it needs another set of eyes. The news groups were reviewed (repeatedly) for assistance, on-line docs, and what available books I could find. The environment is RH 8.0, Apache 2.0.43, Perl 5.8.0, mod_perl 1.99_07. As best as I can tell, Apache, Perl, and mod_perl have been compiled using the recommended configuration options listed in either Redhat's instructions or mod_perl's on-line docs. Get care has been taken to try to dot every one and cross every 't' to my ability. This problem 'may' have to do with an issue of a change of naming conventions which were adapted by the apr apache group. Confer with Stas Bekman's post on Nov 26, 2002 with a title of "Problems compiling mod_perl 1.99_07 in RH 8.0". He provides a cvs patch; but, unfortunately, I'm not familiar with using that-as least-as of yet. (Look's like I might have learn this package real soon.) Are they any intentions to update the mod_perl-1.99_07.tar.gz? If my conclusion is correct, then currently, and according to the on-line instructions, the present tar.gz edition is not compatible to the latest edition of apache. (2.0.43). So, 'maybe' the cause of my make failure. It appears as if, only the cvs repository maybe a valid for compiling. If my analysis is correct, and a new edition of the respective non-cvs files be acquired somehow. I confuse my ignorance and lack of familiarity with these packages so I could be off. Thank you. Steve The environment is described below. Apache has been configured with "--prefix=/etc/httpd --with-mpm=prefork". Perl has been configured with "-des -Dusethreads -Doptimize='-g' -Dusedevel". The perl Makefile.PL was flagged with "MP_AP_PREFIX=/etc/httpd MP_INST_APACHE2=1 MP_APXS=/etc/httpd/bin". (I also, attempted to configure the mod_perl makefile with the MP_APXS which generated the same error message.) The details follow below. Here is excerpt from the screen dump from the make output. make[1] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/WrapXS' make[1] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/docs/api/mod_perl-2.0' make[1] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/docs/api/mod_perl-2.0' make[1] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs' make[2] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR' make[3] : Entering directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR/APR' rm -f ../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o ../../../blib/arch/Apache2-lapr -laprutil /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lapr collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3] : *** [../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so] Error 1 make[3] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR/APR' make[2] : *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[2] : Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs/APR' make[1] : *** [subdirs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/xs' m Here is a list of the files within /etc/httpd/lib. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6996 Dec 30 21:04 apr.exp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3481 Dec 30 21:04 aprutil.exp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21354 Dec 30 21:01 apxs -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2685082 Dec 30 21:03 libapr-0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 628 Dec 30 21:03 libapr-0.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so -> libapr-0.so.0.9.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so.0 -> libapr-0.so.0.9.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1282063 Dec 30 01:42 libapr-0.so.0.9.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1425080 Dec 30 21:04 libaprutil-0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 640 Dec 30 21:04 libaprutil-0.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 30 01:42 libaprutil-0.so -> libaprutil-0.so.0.9.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Dec 30 01:42 libaprutil-0.so.0 -> libaprutil-0.so.0.9.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 765330 Dec 30 01:42 libaprutil-0.so.0.9.2 In case the following can be of any value, here is further info. from the perl REPORT program. (In this case that would be, /usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/t.) . Problem Description: [DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM HERE] 2. Used Components and their Configuration: *** using /usr/src/mod_perl/mod_perl-1.99_07/t/../lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm *** Makefile.PL options: MP_APXS
Re: Modules Executed Twice
* Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-30 19:07]: > > Explanations and other suggested approaches to handling this problem > > will be most welcome. > > My suggestion in the past has been to PerlRequire a startup.pl that > does a use on your modules, instead of pulling them in with > PerlModule. I believe that if you have custom directives, you need to PerlModule your module -- a simple 'use Foo;' line within a PerlRequire'd script is not sufficient. (darren) -- Do you realize how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
