Re: Bundy vs. Jay Garcia
DeMoN LaG wrote: Bamm Gabriana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:a6jf24$4cb3 @ripley.netscape.com, on 11 Mar 2002: Bundy sincerely believes he is right and wants Mozilla to succeed, but he believes the developers are taking Mozilla in the wrong direction. Then Bundy is just a delusional troll. IMHO Good! A new concept. But let's not make it a sub concept of troll. Go for a fresh one. Bundy is a bundy. That's it! Bamm Gabriana again: A troll knows he is wrong and it gives him pleasure seeing others correct him. A bundy thinks he is right and it gives other headache constantly having to correct him. You wouldn't mind, Kyle? :) -- /P.M.
Re: ftp.mozilla.org really lagging bad , are there mirror sites fortonights nightlies?
Netscape Basher wrote: Are there mirror sites besides ftp.mozilla.org? http://www.mozilla.org/mirrors.html . But not all of them have picked up 0.9.9 yet. Gerv
[Mozilla 0.9.9] display incorrectly in this website
Hello, Please visit the website http://www.dcview.com.tw and see if it display correctly ? Nestcape 4.78 IE5.5 display correctly, but Mozilla 0.9.9 0.9.8+ (build 2002031008) don't. Before these release, Mozilla displayed correctly. Thanks a lot.
Language help
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French? I'd appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to french. /.lancer
Language help
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French? I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to french. /.lancer
why is PSM not installed by default?
I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it installed by default? At the very least, more needs to be done to make the if you dont install PSM, you cant access secure sites fact spelled out in plain language in the installer.
Wanted: Home based entrepreneurs; as seen on TV ... 31420
Income in the Information Age Give Yourself an Instant Pay RaiseHow would you like to double your income instantly and permanently?With twice the income, you could: Retire EarlyHave 4 day weekends for the rest of your lifeRaise your own childrenGet out of debtTake vacations anywhere in the worldBuy a new homePut your kids through collegeVolunteer for humanitarian causesIncome in the Information AgeCorporate America has conditioned us to believe that security comes from employment. Yet we hope to never become the victims of downsizing, career burn out, illness or injury. The frightening reality for most people is that the plastic in their wallets determines the quality of their lives. The hard facts show that our economy has moved from the industrial age into the INFORMATION AGE. No longer can you depend on the corporation to provide your family with the security you seek and deserve. Every day more and more people are looking outside the traditional workplace for the fulfillment of their goals and dreams. If you are a person of VISION, a TRUE ENTREPRENEUR, a person with FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE who recognizes a sound opportunity when you see one... Please read further:Our team of professionals is looking for a few quality individuals with a strong work ethic and the DESIRE to generate $10,000 PER MONTH OR MORE from the comfort of their home.With multiple income streams available, we teach people how to achieve a 6 figure cash flow within the first 6 to 12 months and how to retire for good within 2 to 5 years.This business is for those who are serious about creating multiple 6 and 7 figure wealth. If this describes you then take note:We seek individuals who recognize that the information boom is upon us, and who are determined to TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE of the opportunities presented in these NEW AND EXCITING TIMES. For the serious entrepreneur we invite you to fill out the contact form below. One of our associates will promptly respond to your request.Name*Phone*Email*City*State*Best time to call*Why do you seek greater financial gain?** To submit information, you must be viewing from within a mail client such as MS Outlook, Eudora, etc. Web based email may be unable to submit. Incomplete queries will be discarded.Planning a major purchase? Be sure to know your credit rating:3 bureau online credit report: $34.95Single instant online credit report: $9.95Free instant online credit report: Sign upRemove As seen on: USA TODAY48 HOURSNEW YORK TIMES
Language help
¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French? I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to french. /.lancer
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 03/11/2002 3:30 PM, Erik Corry wrote: Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP, then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's usenet isn't it? Probably your ISP doesn't carry the netscape.* groups. I'm sure they would if someone complained about it. This is the question of the netscape.* Usenet name space, and who gets to control it. If your ISP accepts netscape.* groups and accepts newgroup commands from Netscape then it works like any other part of 'Usenet'. If you are talking about netscape.public.mozilla.* when you say the very same groups, I can confirm that my newsserver (news.cis.dfn.de) does have them. My ISP's newsserver (news.chello.at) does also have them, I just noticed. Yup, and your message passed through the following machines on the way to me (reverse order): news.net.uni-c.dk!howland.erols.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.186.200 .128!not-for-mail Note that netscape.com is not there, so I would have got it even if netscape.com had been off then net. Works with the same technology as the rest of Usenet, even if it's not part of Usenet according to some big7-plus-alt definition of Usenet. Yes, thanks for the confirmation. There was no confirmation that I was aware of. I don't think you understood what I wrote. Just as I thought, the secnews server that hosts netscape.public.*.* does a usenet FEED !!! What do you mean by a feed? It feeds those who use it. Others can use their own Usenet server. Like I wrote, the secnews server doesn't appear to have a critical role in the netscape.public.* groups. Not that it matters. -- Erik Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Interviewer: Real programmers use cat as their editor. Bill Joy: That's right! There you go! It is too much trouble to say ed, because cat's smaller and only needs two pages of memory.
is bugzilla.mozilla.org down?
I just tried accessing bugzilla to file a new 0.9.9 bug and the server appears to be down. Can anyone else reach the webserver? Geraint -- Vizimarks - the Internet Scrapbook! Visual Bookmarks, Online Favorites, and an Online Scrapbook. Visit http://www.vizimarks.com today.
[Mozilla0.9.9] Forward as Inline not perfect as the one of Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008)
Hello, Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News. I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese) after clicking Forward as inline. The 0.9.8+(2002031008) is ok to do this. Now I go back to 0.9.8+...:-( This milestone is not perfect as I think. Any way, thanks for all of your effort.
How to specify regxpcom build flags?
Hello. I would very much like to add the -fomit-frame-pointer compiler switch to my Mozilla build (GNU compiler, Linux client) but cannot because it breaks the regxpcom program. The program segfaults when run if it was built with this compiler switch. So how can I specify the compiler switches used to build this program only? I've looked in ~/xpcom/tools/registry/ and see a couple makefiles. As none of them actually specify the regxpcom build, I assume that the build params are implicit in another makefile. So how can I specific compiler switches for recxpcom that differ from the overall build of Mozilla? Thanks.
Re: is bugzilla.mozilla.org down?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geraint Edwards wrote: I just tried accessing bugzilla to file a new 0.9.9 bug and the server appears to be down. Can anyone else reach the webserver? it does appear to be down, yes. i'm getting connection refused. haven't managed to get 0.9.9 yet either - the main site is going really slowly and the mirrors i've just tried don't have 0.9.9 yet (in fact, one of the UK mirrors seems to be stuck back at 0.9.3) think i'll leave it for now and try again later when things have calmed down... -- michael
Re: [Mozilla0.9.9] Forward as Inline not perfect as the one ofMozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008)
No problem here! Yeh You-Ying wrote: Hello, Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News. I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese) after clicking Forward as inline. The 0.9.8+(2002031008) is ok to do this. Now I go back to 0.9.8+...:-( This milestone is not perfect as I think. Any way, thanks for all of your effort.
Re: [Mozilla0.9.9] Forward as Inline not perfect as the one ofMozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008)
No problem for me! Yeh You-Ying wrote: Hello, Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News. I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese) after clicking Forward as inline. The 0.9.8+(2002031008) is ok to do this. Now I go back to 0.9.8+...:-( This milestone is not perfect as I think. Any way, thanks for all of your effort.
Re: Flash Plugin - Download which or direct copy from NS6.2.1?
Stosh wrote in message a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up it's mind for me. Help appreciated Download the NS one, it will give you an error when you run it, but will extract the required plugin to a folder on your c drive. Just copy the NPSWF32.dll to your Mozilla plugins folder and restart Moz :~) Cheers Till
Production Mini-plants in mobile containers. Co-investment Program
The Financial News, March 2002 Production Mini-plants in mobile containers. Co-investment Program "...Science Network will supply to countries and developing regions the technology and the necessary support for the production in series of Mini-plants in mobile containers (40-foot). The Mini-plant system is designed in such a way that all the production machinery is fixed on the platform of the container, with all wiring, piping, and installation parts; that is to say, they are fully equipped... and the mini-plant is ready for production." More than 700 portable production systems: Bakeries, Steel Nails, Welding Electrodes, Tire Retreading, Reinforcement Bar Bending for Construction Framework, Sheeting for Roofing, Ceilings and Faades, Plated Drums, Aluminum Buckets, Injected Polypropylene Housewares, Pressed Melamine Items (Glasses, Cups, Plates, Mugs, etc.), Mufflers, Construction Electrically Welded Mesh, Plastic Bags and Packaging, Mobile units of medical assistance, Sanitary Material, Hypodermic Syringes, Hemostatic Clamps, etc. Science Network has started a process of Co-investment for the installation of small Assembly plants to manufacture in series the Mini-plants of portable production on the site, region or country where they may be required. One of the most relevant features is the fact that these plants will be connected to the World Trade System (WTS) with access to more than 50 million raw materials, products and services and automatic transactions for world trade. Because of financial reasons, involving cost and social impact, the right thing to do is to set up assembly plants in the same countries and regions, using local resources (labor, some equipment, etc.) For more information: Mini-plants in mobile containers By Steven P. Leibacher, The Financial News, Editor Mini-plantas de produccion en contenedores moviles. Programa de Co-inversion "...Science Network suministrara a paises y regiones en vias de desarrollo la tecnologia y el apoyo necesario para la fabricacion en serie de Mini-plantas de produccion en contenedores moviles (40-foot). El sistema de mini-plantas esta diseado de forma que todas las maquinas de produccion van instaladas fijas sobre la propia plataforma del contenedor, con el cableado, tuberias e instalaciones; es decir, completamente equipadas... y a partir de ese momento estn listas para producir." Mas de 700 sistemas de produccion portatil: Panaderias, Produccin de clavos de acero, Electrodos para soldadura, Recauchutado de neumaticos, Curvado de hierro para armaduras de construccion, Lamina perfilada para cubiertas, techos y cerramientos de fachada, Bidones de chapa, Cubos de aluminio, Menaje de polipropileno inyectado, Piezas de melamina prensada (vasos, platos, tazas, cafeteras, etc.) Silenciadores para vehiculos, Malla electrosoldada para la construccion, Bolsas y envases de plastico, Unidades moviles de asistencia medica, Material sanitario (jeringas hipodermicas, Pinzas hemostaticas, etc.) Science Network ha puesto en marcha un proceso de Co-inversion para la instalacion de pequeas Plantas ensambladoras para fabricar en serie las Mini-plantas de produccion portatil, en el lugar, region o pais que lo necesite. Una de las caractersticas relevantes es el hecho de que dichas plantas quedaran conectadas al Sistema del Comercio Mundial (WTS) con acceso a mas de 50 millones de mercancias, materia primas, productos, servicios y las operaciones automaticas de comercio internacional. Resulta obvio que por razones economicas, de costes y de impacto social, lo apropiado es instalar plantas ensambladoras en los mismos paises y regiones asi como utilizar los recursos locales (mano de obra, ciertos equipamientos, etc.) Para recibir mas infromacion: Mini-plantas de produccion en contenedores moviles Steven P. Leibacher, The Financial News, Editor - If you received this in error or would like to be removed from our list, please return us indicating: remove or un-subscribe in 'subject' field, Thanks. Editor 2001 The Financial News. All rights reserved.
Re: Check spelling in Moz 0.9.8 ?
Lassie wrote: Hi all, Is there a spelling checker module in Moz 0.9.8 ? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 joel [:)
Re: why is PSM not installed by default?
Jonathan Wilson wrote: I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it installed by default? At the very least, more needs to be done to make the if you dont install PSM, you cant access secure sites fact spelled out in plain language in the installer. it's installed by default but people who do custom installs see Personal Security Manager think it's some useless feature and uncheck it.
Re: why is PSM not installed by default?
Kryptolus wrote: Jonathan Wilson wrote: I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it installed by default? At the very least, more needs to be done to make the if you dont install PSM, you cant access secure sites fact spelled out in plain language in the installer. it's installed by default but people who do custom installs see Personal Security Manager think it's some useless feature and uncheck it. Well why not make it greyed out like talkback and so on?
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
On 03/12/2002 5:23 AM, Erik Corry wrote: Yes, thanks for the confirmation. There was no confirmation that I was aware of. I don't think you understood what I wrote. I understood exactly what you wrote. You are reading this group from your ISP's news feed or other feed OTHER than logging into the physical server hosting this group. Just as I thought, the secnews server that hosts netscape.public.*.* does a usenet FEED !!! What do you mean by a feed? I am logged in to news.mozilla.org which is hosted on a PHYSICAL server housed at Netscape corporate headquarters located in Mountain View, Ca. When I post to this group, the server feeds it to usenet as well as mailing lists, etc. And this is how YOU read it. It feeds those who use it. Others can use their own Usenet server. Like I wrote, the secnews server doesn't appear to have a critical role in the netscape.public.* groups. Exactly, this is what you confirmed. I have since subscribed to this same group on my ISP's news feed at COX.NET I didn't realize that they carried it until recently as I've been using the server at Netscape for years. I'll reply to this reply using COX's feed and we'll see what's different in the header info. I'm curious as well. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: THANKS -Flash Plugin - Download which or direct copy from NS6.2.1?
Till wrote: Stosh wrote in message a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up it's mind for me. Help appreciated Download the NS one, it will give you an error when you run it, but will extract the required plugin to a folder on your c drive. Just copy the NPSWF32.dll to your Mozilla plugins folder and restart Moz :~) Cheers Till Thanks Till auser, copied fine Stan
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
On 03/12/2002 7:35 AM, Jay Garcia wrote: I'll reply to this reply using COX's feed and we'll see what's different in the header info. I'm curious as well. The reply I mentioned was done at approximately 7:37 CST on the COX group. Still waiting to see it here at 7:50 am CST which should prove something about usenet feed and the propagation time, etc . This reply should be seen immediately upon refreshing the group while logged in to THE server. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
On 03/12/2002 7:52 AM, Jay Garcia wrote: This reply should be seen immediately upon refreshing the group while logged in to THE server. It is, as witnessed by the posted time of this reply. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until nextrelease!!
On 03/12/2002 7:35 AM, Jay Garcia wrote: On 03/12/2002 5:23 AM, Erik Corry wrote: Yes, thanks for the confirmation. There was no confirmation that I was aware of. I don't think you understood what I wrote. I understood exactly what you wrote. You are reading this group from your ISP's news feed or other feed OTHER than logging into the physical server hosting this group. Just as I thought, the secnews server that hosts netscape.public.*.* does a usenet FEED !!! What do you mean by a feed? I am logged in to news.mozilla.org which is hosted on a PHYSICAL server housed at Netscape corporate headquarters located in Mountain View, Ca. When I post to this group, the server feeds it to usenet as well as mailing lists, etc. And this is how YOU read it. It feeds those who use it. Others can use their own Usenet server. Like I wrote, the secnews server doesn't appear to have a critical role in the netscape.public.* groups. Exactly, this is what you confirmed. I have since subscribed to this same group on my ISP's news feed at COX.NET I didn't realize that they carried it until recently as I've been using the server at Netscape for years. I'll reply to this reply using COX's feed and we'll see what's different in the header info. I'm curious as well. 7:35 posted, 7:55 received by COX ... Jay -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
0.9.9 I love it!
Hi All- JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new mail notification on the system tray, and fixes many of the buggy news and mail interface things I saw with 0.9.8. It even picked up shockwave! I love it so far Stan
[±¤°í] ºÎÀÚ µÇ¼¼¿ä^^
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä? ^^¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚŬ·´ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. µ·ÀÌ ¸ðÀ¸°í ºÎÀÚ°¡ µÇ´Â °Í¿¡´Â ÁöÇý¿Í ¹ýÄ¢ÀÌ ÀÖ´õ±º¿ä. ±× ÁöÇý¿Í ¹ýÄ¢À» ¿©·¯ºÐ°ú °°ÀÌÇÏ·Á°í ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³Â½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹ÀººÐµéÀÌ µ·À» ¹ú°ÔµÇ¼, ÇູÇØÁö¸é Àú¶ÇÇÑ ±â»Ú´Ï±î¿ä^-^ ´Ô°ú ¸¹ÀººÐµéÀÇ ÁöÇýµµ °°ÀÌ ÇßÀ¸¸é ÇÏ´Â ¹Ù·¥ÀÔ´Ï´Ù^-^ http://quest.starhana.com/ The Road to Millionaire!! ´ç½ÅÀº ¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚÀÇ ±æÀ» °ÉÀ¸½Ã°Ú½À´Ï±î? [Yes] [No] ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í °ø°³ °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ ÀÓÀÇ·Î ¾Ë°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. Ȥ½Ã³ª, Çã¶ôÄ¡ ¾Ê°í º¸³»µå·Á¼ ±âºÐ ³ª»Ú¼Ì´Ù¸é Á¤ÁßÈ÷ »ç°ú µå¸³´Ï´Ù. 2Â÷¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ- À§ ¹è³Ê°¡ ¾ÈµÉ½Ã Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä
Re: Mozilla .99
Jason Parker wrote: One step closer to 1.0! Eee! :) So will the next release be 1.0 because they are out of digits? Or will it be 0.9.10, 0.9.9.1 or 0.10.0?
Re: Mozilla .99
On 03/12/2002 10:58 AM, Sauron wrote: Jason Parker wrote: One step closer to 1.0! Eee! :) So will the next release be 1.0 because they are out of digits? Or will it be 0.9.10, 0.9.9.1 or 0.10.0? No if necessary there might be a 0.9.10. But drivers@mozilla don't think its necessary. Pratik.
Re: Mozilla .99
James Duberg wrote: It sounds like it creates an installation in one user's home directory, that everyone else uses. Is it better to wait until the rpm file is available from Linux-Mandrake (or whatever file from whatever distro), or does the tar.gz get you the same thing? I don't remember exactly what the multi-user release notes say, but here's how you do a multi-user installation from the tar.gz the right way. Since it's been a while since I did this (I used it back when debian's releases were months behind) things might have changed a bit since, but the majority of it should be fine. Become root. cd /usr/local tar zxvf mozilla-whatever.tar.gz cd mozilla export MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=. export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. touch chrome/user-skins.rdf chrome/user-locales.rdf ./regxpcom ./regchrome You might want to also ln -s /usr/local/mozilla/mozilla /usr/local/bin/mozilla so that the mozilla binary will be in the default path. I'd suggest logging out from root immediately after doing these steps because the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting is a theoretical security hole in any other commands you run until root's shell exits. These instructions assume GNU tools and the bash shell - in other shells (including bare sh) the syntax for setting and exporting variables is a bit different, and I've heard reports of versions of touch which will only take one argument at a time, so you have to touch each file separately. Most recent linux distributions standard install will work with the instructions as given above, though. I was partially involved in writing the multi-user installation instructions, but things didn't turn out quite the way I hoped they would. The idea of creating a script was that this script would come with mozilla so you wouldn't have to create it; if you have to do it by hand anyway you might as well just run the commands yourself. It's simpler that way anyway. And if you're doing it by hand all the dirname and $dist_bin stuff becomes redundant since you *know* what the directories are called. Stuart. -- Stuart Ballard, Programmer FASTNET - Internet Solutions 215.283.2300, ext. 126 www.fast.net
Sender is Sendee
For several releases of Mozilla Mail, the Sender column in the list view shows the recipient, not the sender. How do I fix this? (I'm using 0.9.9, btw). Thanks!
Re: AOL to Dump IE in favor of Mozilla
Blake Ross wrote: You're so naive to believe that any of the 30 million users will even notice the switch. Sounds like you're preparing your backup story should this story turn out to be true. Worried, are we? ;-) What bothers me is that a person with an netscape.com email address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat unlikely that anything is set in stone yet. Or maybe Blake does know, but just isn't allowed to *say* so yet... Stuart. -- Stuart Ballard, Programmer FASTNET - Internet Solutions 215.283.2300, ext. 126 www.fast.net
Re: Language help
Lancer wrote: ¿Is there someone near to mozilla, who speak or know French? I'll appreciate if can help me to translate few things from english to french. /.lancer Sur quelle fenetre tu veux une traduction ? En général, c'est assez clair, même en Anglais Lassie
Re: 0.9.9 I love it!....BUT
Stosh wrote in message news:a6l57n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Stosh wrote: Hi All- JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new mail notification on the system tray, and fixes many of the buggy news and mail interface things I saw with 0.9.8. It even picked up shockwave! I love it so far Stan Hey - I Don't want to take away from my initial infatuation, but Mozilla has taken over my icons! When I try to assign an icon to a shortcut, I have a bunch saved in a folder, and the attachment shows what it looks like Please LMK what I need to do, I'll report a 'feature' or bug if I have to Stan I believe that option is availalbe to DE select when installing. (do you want moz to be the default viewer for the following images (or something like that)) jy
Re: How to specify regxpcom build flags?
Steve Snyder wrote: I would very much like to add the -fomit-frame-pointer compiler switch to my Mozilla build No you wouldn't. Mozilla won't work. It's not just regxpcom that would segfaults when you use that switch. -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: AOL to Dump IE in favor of Mozilla
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an @netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat unlikely that anything is set in stone yet. Anything this huge (that can completely swing who has dominance in the web browser category) would be kept under wraps. I doubt if anyone with an @netscape.com email address would be told this info, and if they were, they would be made to sign a few hundred pages of NDA -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: why is PSM not installed by default?
Jonathan Wilson wrote: I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it installed by default? It is. The only way to avoid installing it is to use RPMs and not install the PSM RPM. Also, in recent builds, there is a sensible error message when you try and access a secure site. How old are the builds you are talking about? Gerv
9.9 don't work for me on RH6.2
I downloaded mozilla-0.9.9.src.rpm and rebuilt it on one RH6.2 (with upgraded ximian) box. I installed it on another RH6.2 box with upgraded redhat gnome rpm's. When I run mozilla from the command line, it returns an exit value of 127 without opening the browser. When I run mozilla url I get: /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/mozilla/components/libxpconnect.so: undefined symbol: NS_NewGenericFactory__FPP17nsIGenericFactoryPC21nsModuleComponentInfo When I run strace /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin, I get an empty dialog boxthat does nothing. Help!
Re: 0.9.9 I love it!....BUT
I don't think he is complaining about the association, but rather that usually in windows the icon for an image file is a thumbnail of the image... Johnny Yen wrote: Stosh wrote in message news:a6l57n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Stosh wrote: Hi All- JUst got 0.9.9, man, it rendersfast, has a new mail notification on the system tray, and fixes many of the buggy news and mail interface things I saw with 0.9.8. It even picked up shockwave! I love it so far Stan Hey - I Don't want to take away from my initial infatuation, but Mozilla has taken over my icons! When I try to assign an icon to a shortcut, I have a bunch saved in a folder, and the attachment shows what it looks like Please LMK what I need to do, I'll report a 'feature' or bug if I have to Stan I believe that option is availalbe to DE select when installing. (do you want moz to be the default viewer for the following images (or something like that)) jy
Re: 0.9.9 I love it!....BUT
Stosh wrote: Stosh wrote: Mozilla has taken over my icons! When I try to assign an icon to a shortcut, I have a bunch saved in a folder, and the attachment shows what it looks like Please LMK what I need to do, I'll report a 'feature' or bug if I have to Stan Since you've already installed with mozilla set to handle your images, you can fix it in preferences: 1) In Preferences/Advanced/System, uncheck the file formats for icons (ico, gif, bmp). Then close Mozilla, including the Quick Launcher if it's running. 2) (Assuming your using Windows; I know nothing about other platforms.) Open Internet Explorer and let it set itself as your internet default. Then close IE again quickly and quietly so no one ever even has to know that you had it running. This seems like the quickest way to reassociate the IE viewer for those file formats. 3) Launch Mozilla again and reset it as your internet default. 4) Check in Win Explorer to make sure your icons are displaying correctly.
Re: 0.9.9 I love it!....BUT
Travis Crump wrote: I don't think he is complaining about the association, but rather that usually in windows the icon for an image file is a thumbnail of the image... But in the thumbnails apparently won't display unless IE is associated with those image files. (See my previous post in this thread.)
0.9.9 Cookies
Preferences - Privacy Security - Cookies - Enable cookies based on privacy levels [View] Where is it? Anyhow, I want it back! :(
Unable to D/L
I can't get any response out of the ftp server to download 0.9.9, either directly to the ftp or through http. Does that mean it's busy, or is there a problem?
#1 Rated Home Based Business!
Title: Break the FREE!
Re: Unable to D/L
Joseph N. wrote: I can't get any response out of the ftp server to download 0.9.9, either directly to the ftp or through http. Does that mean it's busy, or is there a problem? It's just busy. Try one of the mirrors: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://mozilla.org/mirrors.html /Jonas
Re: AOL to Dump IE in favor of Mozilla
On 03/12/2002 11:04 AM, DeMoN LaG wrote: Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an @netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat unlikely that anything is set in stone yet. Anything this huge (that can completely swing who has dominance in the web browser category) would be kept under wraps. I doubt if anyone with an @netscape.com email address would be told this info, and if they were, they would be made to sign a few hundred pages of NDA I understand from a client that ZDNET has now picked up on the story but I don't have the time to hunt down the URL ... Later ... -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: AOL to Dump IE in favor of Mozilla
Jay Garcia wrote: On 03/12/2002 11:04 AM, DeMoN LaG wrote: Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email address is saying should this turn out to be true. If an @netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat unlikely that anything is set in stone yet. Anything this huge (that can completely swing who has dominance in the web browser category) would be kept under wraps. I doubt if anyone with an @netscape.com email address would be told this info, and if they were, they would be made to sign a few hundred pages of NDA I understand from a client that ZDNET has now picked up on the story but I don't have the time to hunt down the URL ... http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-857681.html Source is Reuters Later ... -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
Re: AOL to Dump IE in favor of Mozilla
Parish wrote: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-857681.html Source is Reuters ...although it only talks about the switch to Linux, not Mozilla -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
Sidebar search problem what did I turn off?
Up until 0.9.8 the sidebar search facility worked well for me. The results came back split into 2 panes, the top half with a list of hits, the bottom half with the actual list of hits as it would be shown by the target search engine, Google for example. Since 0.98 what happens is the bottom pane is missing, ie it looks like you shrank it to the bottom of the window, and you cant expand it by clicking on the sidebar. If I repeat the search without change by hitting the search button again I get a popup window asking me what to do with the file internetresults.xul ie save to disk or name an app to handle it I dont think I actually reconfigured anything between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 and the problem is still there in 0.9.9 I'm running on Windows 98 Any clues?
Re: .snm files
Besides the are called .msf files now for Moz and N6 instead of .snm which they had been calle since Communicator 4.0.0 days. Christian Biesinger wrote: Joyce Severt wrote: Can someone tell me if there is a way to recapture a message folder if that folder is gone but I still have the folders .snm file? No - the snm file does not contain the contents of emails. -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -- --- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --- If it's fixed, don't break it! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm
Front and back buttons not working
Hi everyone: I installed Mozilla .9.9 yesterday and lost the use of the front and back buttons .. I then removed and re-installed Netscape 6.2.1 but the buttons still did not work. Is there any way of regaining the use of these buttons. Thanks for all of your help. Marc Paré
Re: Mozilla 1.0: Ready for the corporate desktop?
Neil M. wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that Communicator plugins can be used? As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well. Live connect can't be used with plugins because it required a non-standard extension to the Java runtime engine. Now that you can plug any JRE in, they no longer have control over the code, thus they can't use that method anymore. (I'm pretty sure about this but it's possible I'm wrong) This a question now: I thought Live connect was a form of Javascript code and had nothing to do with Java. Is that correct? -- --- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --- If it's fixed, don't break it! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
Bamm Gabriana wrote: Having to register it? That is a big issue You don't have to register it. He's right on this one. I tried to install Netscape 6.2.1 on my friend's new computer. Netscape will not open the first time until you sign up with a Netcenter account. But my friend could not sign up because she has no internet connection yet. Result: the activation page won't go away. So I uninstalled Netscape and installed Mozilla and all was fine. Bamm :) I installed Netscape 6.2 (perhaps 6.2.1 is different?) on someone's computer and did not register with netcenter. They do _not_ get a registration window each time NS6.2 is started. If I remeber correctly this is what happened: The prompt for registration has three choices 'yes', 'no', and 'cancel' I chose 'cancel' The registration window closed, and hasn't come back since. However, I believe if I had chosen 'no', the registration would keep coming back. Hope this helps, Dean
Test
Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note for fpour days now. Howie
Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until next release!!
Bamm Gabriana wrote: sorry, that was kinda harsh.. I meant to just say that you dont have to go around removing code like a Hack when you can just hit the cancel buttons to get out of activation.. Try installing Netscape 6 in a computer without an internet connection like I did in my friend's computer (in anticipation of her signing up with an ISP). Every time I open Netscape 6 the activation screen pops up. I just cancel everytime. Worse was when the Quick Launch option was enabled. The activation screen pops up everytime Windows starts! How very annoying indeed. Regards, Bamm Oh yeah, I forgot about that. If you don't have an internet connection active, you can't press 'cancel' because the prompt won't display. Instead you get an error (something about not being able to connect). I guess one could temporarily use an alternate browser until signed up on an isp, but I guess you shouldn't have to do that. On my installation, the quick launch option was unchecked, and I would have had to intentionally check it. Again this was on NS6.2, and NS6.2.1 may be different. Dean
Can't download .9.9 due to server bogged down? - alternative fastidea via mirror
I suggest the mozilla-win32-installer-sea.exe download because if you download mozilla-win32-installer.exe, it will attempt to download the rest from ftp.mozilla.org which current is being pounded by request, probably by microsoft.com people trying to bog down the server. :) -- Kyle
Re: REPOST: Opening links in Mail with different browser
And it came to pass that David Grant wrote:
Is there any way to get Mozilla Mail to open URL links in a
different browser? This applies to Linux and Windows.
Thanks.
David Grant
No. Mail is a component of Mozilla, not a seperate program;
since Mozilla is all ready running, it will open the URL.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Moderation is for monks. (Robert Anson Heinlein)
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
Re: Bundy vs. Jay Garcia
Netscape Basher wrote: PeEmm typed: Red wrote: We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat about it. The two of them need to take this private and settle it. I personally am sick and tired of both of them. They need to take break and get their thoughts in check. About this I only have one objection. Please, don't call Kyle a troll. By doing this you'll risk to drain the concept of all its usefulness. Kyle is the most energetic and one of the most interesting critics of the Mozilla project. Sometimes (most often?) he is in the wrong, but he always replies, and he really keeps this news group going! I try to make issues on purpose. Yea, I could file bug reports (up to what 130,000 (most of them dups or fixed) or post problems/complaints here. Like the latest Mozilla .9.8 nighties have improved again after two weeks of full retreat. Today, I am playing with it on 98 instead of XP. (minus the Java, I just don't like 1.3.1). Tonight I'll probably run a some to load sites through the ringer on Mozilla, to see how it compares. A troll doesn't act this way. A troll is a kind of freak, posting a false statement, then sitting in front of the monitor, eagerly watching the incoming replies and the thread growing bigger. This is what gives him satisfaction. He never intended to contribute to a discussion in the first place. There was an excellent example of a troll posting a few days ago on the subject New Virus set to hit for Netscape 6.21 and Mozilla builds on Wednesday. A troll posting shall never be replied to, since this is what keeps the troll going. But you know something, when Moz has good builds, I also am quick to admit them. The latest few nightlies, much better after it seemed to be 2 weeks of retreat. It will be interesting to see how Moz acts under 98, I will do a memory leak test also. Bundy style.. Hopefully when Moz gets to 1.0 and it is stable, Netscape will use that build and call it 7.0 (not 6.5 for reasons I have already explained, Netscape needs to totally get away from calling it 6.x) and not bloat it down (which they are getting better at) and make sure the add-ons are always up to date (Real Player etc.) AOL/Netscape have proven they can beat MS in some areas (AIM vs Micros**t's Messenger). I really, really hope AOL puts full support in making this a competitive product. I seen a few crumbles that they actually might, but until the big boys start reporting it, I don't buy into it. :) -- Kyle Yeah, I think you should go on using scepticism and harsh criticism as the main intellectual tools to - in fact - make Mozilla the best browser available. Some of the folks in this news group don't seem to understand that it is only by severe scrutinizing that you can improve things. They think that uttering a negative word about Mozilla is like peeing at the Holy Bible. -- /P.M.
Re: why is PSM not installed by default?
And it came to pass that Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Kryptolus wrote:
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I notice a lot of people that post in various places
saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure
site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt
know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it
installed by default? At the very least, more needs to be
done to make the if you dont install PSM, you cant access
secure sites fact spelled out in plain language in the
installer.
it's installed by default but people who do custom installs
see Personal Security Manager think it's some useless
feature and uncheck it.
Well why not make it greyed out like talkback and so on?
Because it is optional under custom install. Why have a
custom install if you can't customize?
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Moderation is for monks. (Robert Anson Heinlein)
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
Mislabelled Print dialogue box?
Hi, It seems the the dialogue box under: Print... Properties... Gap from edge... is not labelled correctly. The fields read: Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] when apparently they should be: Top: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] Bottom: [ ] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gunnm: Broken Angel http://reimeika.ca/
0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?
Hi, just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of activity in form of sending request transferring... and so on). It's the same problem with the linux und and the windows version. Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem appears ? Or missed I something? Thanks! Max
Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?
Max Bentz wrote: Hi, just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of activity in form of sending request transferring... and so on). It's the same problem with the linux und and the windows version. Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem appears ? Or missed I something? Thanks! Max It works if you use http://www.sparkasse-aachen.de There's some kind of problem with the javascript because it seems to think it's never on the right sight and keeps redirecting to itself.
Re: Mozilla 1.0: Ready for the corporate desktop?
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: Neil M. wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that Communicator plugins can be used? As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well. Live connect can't be used with plugins because it required a non-standard extension to the Java runtime engine. Now that you can plug any JRE in, they no longer have control over the code, thus they can't use that method anymore. (I'm pretty sure about this but it's possible I'm wrong) This a question now: I thought Live connect was a form of Javascript code and had nothing to do with Java. Is that correct? LiveConnect is an API for letting Java, JavaScript, and plugins talk to each other.
Re: Test
Howard M. Stark typed: Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note for fpour days now. Howie I noticed you are using Netscape's secure server to read this group. I use the one from my provider and it works fine. The problem seems to be on Netscape's secure server not accepting messages from other sources on n.p.m.z -- Kyle
Re: Full screen - Multi Monitor
bico wrote: I tried the full screen option with 0.9.9 just now, it's nice but I have a problem on a Windows 98se box. I run 2 monitors, a 15 lcd on the left running at 1024x768 which is the main monitor running the task bar and a 19 monitor on the right running at 1280x1024. I always run Mozilla on the right monitor and mail on the left. When I press F11 Mozilla fills the left monitor and overflows in to the right monitor, it seems to take the resolution of the right monitor but starts at screen 0 at 0,0. Can anyone else verify this behavior. confirmed here, 1024x768 on left (main), 800x600 on right, hitting f11 on right monitor results in a 800x600 window at 0,0 on screen0. 0.9.9 release, 2002031104, windows 2000 grayrest
Re: Question about plugins
Parish wrote: According to the Release Notes for 0.9.9: You now have the option of installing plugins in your Mozilla user directory ($HOME/.mozilla/plugins on Unix). These plugins are loaded in addition to those in your Mozilla install directory. I take it that this means \Documents and Settings\marko\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\username\.slt\plugins on W2K, yes? no. take: \Documents and Settings\marko\Application Data\Mozilla\Plugins\ and it will work (so it does here) hth, Christian
Re: Question about plugins
Christian Emig wrote: Parish wrote: According to the Release Notes for 0.9.9: You now have the option of installing plugins in your Mozilla user directory ($HOME/.mozilla/plugins on Unix). These plugins are loaded in addition to those in your Mozilla install directory. I take it that this means \Documents and Settings\marko\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\username\.slt\plugins on W2K, yes? no. take: \Documents and Settings\marko\Application Data\Mozilla\Plugins\ and it will work (so it does here) Thanks! It works here also. Badly worded Release Notes I think; I wouldn't Application Data\Mozilla\Plugins\ *your* Mozilla user directory, rather *the* Mozilla user directory. Regards, Parish hth, Christian -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
Re: It's Mozilla's fault....
tis embarrassing to see suntrust talk about standards. Just run http://www.suntrust.com through http://validator.w3.org and it will tell you about who's keeping to standars and who isn't. Eric Christopher Jahn wrote: And it came to pass that Frank Sfalanga wrote: According to this message (see attachment) I cannot do my online banking because mozilla uses some weird communication method that it chose to use. Can this be true? Who do we talk to about that? No, Suntrust has chosen not to follow W3C standards, which Netscape6/Mozilla adheres to stringently. Take your business to First Union. No problems there. And at least they won't lie to you like SunTrust just did - you shuld drop them for that alone.
weird scrollbar behaviour
hello, i'm designing a page wich lay-out will completely been done in css... don't mention the lay-out, it's just for checking out things... the page in wich the problem occurs http://islink.nl/paf/ the in the center positioned div (with a text about cascading stylesheets in dutch) has the overflow: auto property, wich makes a scrollbar appear as information in the div wich contains the information is too much to fit in the div. when looking the lower arrow is greyed out (as if you can't scroll down), but looking at the scroll bar itself, you can scroll down, and you can... i'm using 0.9.9 on w2k, and didn't have the problem yet, well, i suppose so, in 0.9.8 ... g., maarten brouwers
Re: XML files
The XSLT is run but you output xml in the null namespace. So the result-document are not interpreted as html at all, but rather as plain XML. To fix this either change xsl:output method=xml to xsl:output method=html/ or xsl:output/ (autodetect will do the trick for you) to output html. Or add an xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; attribute in the top to the root element which will make you output xhtml. Oh, and you should probably do something about that encoding=ascii attribute. I'm not sure there is such an encoding, and IE doesn't seem to like it. (mozilla doesn't use the encoding attribute since we output a tree) / Jonas Sicking Heikki Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Since this involves XSLT you should have better success in the XSLT newsgroup. I don't know what is immediately wrong. The mime types at least seem to be correct for the XSLT file. Patrick Gallagher wrote: Are XML documents supposed to load in Moz? I know this page loads in IE, but I'm not sure if it's correct behaviour or not. Patrick http://www.deepwhite.com/a_solid_plan/deepwhite_nr.xml
Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?
Kryptolus wrote: Max Bentz wrote: Hi, just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of activity in form of sending request transferring... and so on). It's the same problem with the linux und and the windows version. Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem appears ? Or missed I something? Thanks! Max It works if you use http://www.sparkasse-aachen.de There's some kind of problem with the javascript because it seems to think it's never on the right sight and keeps redirecting to itself. I filed http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130409
.9.9 - Humble impressions from an end user
browser is very impressive, and I can't wait to see the progress that's been made in Mozilla reflect in Netscape 6.x. I've been looking at the new (that is, finally fixed) features in Mozilla, and I have a few brief (mainly cosmetic) comments: Regarding the mail notification... IT'S ABOUT TIME! One of the concepts I love is to have Moz humming away in the background, having all of my connections still running, checking my mail etc. on my nice cable modem and being able to tell at a glance at the screen in passing whether or not I have new mail! I'm so happy! But, the graphic for it has just a tad of a whang to it, if they make a kick-ass appealing graphic that would be great! Also when it gives the pop up menu saying so-in-so has new messages, it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user choose his or her name? Regarding the (again IT'S ABOUT TIME) icon for watched messages in newsgroup threads, I'm very glad it's there, but 1) being so mixed with the 'thread' icon, it's kind of vague to pick out a watched thread from a non-watched thread when you're scrolling down. I find that I still have a tendency to label a message a certain color when I'm looking for it for ease. Also, when I post I'd like to mark the thread to be watched even though no replies have been made to it yet. I have no idea if it marks the message as watched or not; there is no watched icon for a message unless there have been replies! And finally the little mail notification icon that is within the browser itself (the little green arrow on the envelope on the Modern theme), doesn't seem yet to be uniform throughout the browser. For instance, if I receive a message, the little green arrow goes up. If I open another browser window (instead of going to mail/news to read it) there is no little green icon! I'd like to see it in all windows until I read my mail. Hehe, this old mind forgets these things! Maybe I'm missing something, but there still appears to be no function for Mozilla to delete messages off of a server after xx amount of days. I'd like for it to stay on there so I can read it from more than one location, but not long enough for it to clog up my ISP's stingy limit. What else can I say? I know most people use these newsgroups to simply whine and complain that things aren't like they want them or feature number 1024768 isn't working correctly... and I feel awful because this is all and exactly what I've done. But one thing I do feel is that the users play a very important role in the development of Mozilla/Netscape, a feeling that I rarely get with products. I hope my suggestions and 'experience' as an end user don't upset anyone, I don't mean to start a flame war. Thanks so much for working on such an awesome browser. The features really do outweight IE/OE, can't wait until 1.0!!! Best regards, Kenneth
Re: .9.9 - Humble impressions from an end user
One other thing I forgot to mention (and also a way for me to mark my thread as watched and actually be able to see it ;-)), It would be incredibly useful if there were an option to make labeled messages bold (as though they were unread mail). Talk about make it easy to spot! Best regards, Kenneth
Saved Messages
Just downloaded Mozilla (Win32) 0.9.9. Has anyone had any problems trying to drag a message to the Saved Message folder. I've tried it several time but there is nothing in the Saved Message folder - no message is saved. I had no problems with this feature in Mozilla 0.9.8. Perhaps it's something that I am missing or overlooked. And yes, I removed the previous version of Mozilla before downloading this version. Any help or suggestions is highly appreciated. -- Wayne Alligood/Amelia Island, Florida Compaq Computer running Windows XP/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Words rightly spoken are like apples of gold in pictures of silver.
Re: [Mozilla0.9.9] Forward as Inline not perfect as the one of Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No problem here! Yeh You-Ying wrote: Hello, Today I installed Mozilla 0.9.9 and had some test about Mail/News. I found that attach as inline is not perfect as Mozilla 0.9.8+ (2002031008). The 0.9.9 just show strange codes, not words(Chinese) after clicking Forward as inline. The 0.9.8+(2002031008) is ok to do this. Now I go back to 0.9.8+...:-( This milestone is not perfect as I think. Any way, thanks for all of your effort. It may occure on Chinese system. :-(
Java Problem
Hi all. I am using moz 0.9.9 and I am having a problem with a java pluggin. I go here: http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=2 to run a speed test for my cable modem, it works fine with NS 4.79 but with moz it tells me to download a pluggin. Anyway I download the pluggin using the software install option in preferences and it downloads and tries to install but it stops and says I don't have enough free space on C: (I have 36 Gig free) but then I cancel and then it says the package was installed successfully?? Needles to say that Java pluggin is not working. Any ideas? Thanks! -- Trample the weak, hurdle the dead... RTH
Re: Saved Messages
WDA wrote: Just downloaded Mozilla (Win32) 0.9.9. Has anyone had any problems trying to drag a message to the Saved Message folder. I've tried it several time but there is nothing in the Saved Message folder - no message is saved. I had no problems with this feature in Mozilla 0.9.8. Perhaps it's something that I am missing or overlooked. And yes, I removed the previous version of Mozilla before downloading this version. Any help or suggestions is highly appreciated. I'm replying to my own message here. I discovered that when I deleted the Saved Message folder and recreated it again, that it worked properly. Sorry about not using the mail newsgroups, but in my excitement about the new version, I forgot where I was at the moment. The spell-check program works great also. -- Wayne Alligood/Amelia Island, Florida Compaq Computer running Windows XP/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Words rightly spoken are like apples of gold in pictures of silver.
No Java with 0.9.9 Windows NT 4.0
Visit page with java applet (say http://www.javasoft.com). Click to download plug-in. Download and install plug-in. Browser window reports success. Restart Mozilla. Visit page with Java applet. No applet. Plug-in download icon still there. What gives?
Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render fonts as elegantly as Konqueror. But, despite following the instructions carefully (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some True Type fonts are available in the Preferences: microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1 microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1 ... But they don't look anti-aliased :-( I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on SuSE Linux 7.3. Joao
Re: Mislabelled Print dialogue box?
On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote: Hi, It seems the the dialogue box under: Print... Properties... Gap from edge... is not labelled correctly. The fields read: Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] when apparently they should be: Top: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] Bottom: [ ] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gunnm: Broken Angel http://reimeika.ca/ Where do you see this, I can't find that particular dialog here in latest Mozilla build on Win98 .. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Moz .9.9 Lost tabbed browsing? Help?
Hello, I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now messed up If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I check the boxes, the single tab disappears altogether. Behaviour is same in modern or classic theme. Help? Richard
Re: Sender is Sendee
No one else sees this? It's fine in newsgroups, but in all my mail accounts, the To address is in the Sender column. It's quite annoying as I can't see who is sending me mail. troy hakala wrote: For several releases of Mozilla Mail, the Sender column in the list view shows the recipient, not the sender. How do I fix this? (I'm using 0.9.9, btw). Thanks!
Re: Moz .9.9 Lost tabbed browsing? Help?
Richard wrote: Hello, I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now messed up If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I check the boxes, the single tab disappears altogether. Behaviour is same in modern or classic theme. Help? Richard One tab appears if you unchecked Hide tab bar if only one tab. Use Ctrl-T to open new tabs ...
Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?
Joao Rodrigues wrote: I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render fonts as elegantly as Konqueror. But, despite following the instructions carefully (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some True Type fonts are available in the Preferences: microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1 microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1 ... But they don't look anti-aliased :-( I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on SuSE Linux 7.3. Joao Yes it works. Wait till blizzard's Xft patch is checked -- it kicks even more ass. You have to make sure the fonts you mentioned are actually selected. Just having them being listed is not enough.
Re: Test
Just a test to see if the system is working. I havn't seen a new note for fpour days now. Howie Same here. Which server are you connecting to? I'm on secnews.netscape.com. Maybe I should change servers?
Motif Look Feel
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape 4.75? I think it is called Motif Look Feel.
Weird Print Behavior
It's really great that Moz now has a neat print preview, but has anyone else noticed the following behavior? IMO these are really serious. Try viewing a site like my.yahoo.com and then preview it. Why is only one column shown at a time instead of the actual front page? Going out of print preview basically screws up the original window , leaving the user unable to do anything (open tabs, enter a new site to browse to in the loc bar, etc.) until they go to filenew nav window and close the old one (no, CTRL-N does not work). Go to about:mozilla and print preview it. The text is white but it shows up as grey, and the background also shows up for printing (and it does print the background). Why? The color is wrong and I don't want to print the background to begin with. Ok, that's all that I've noticed with printing thus far. Albert
Re: Java Problem
RTH wrote: Hi all. I am using moz 0.9.9 and I am having a problem with a java pluggin. I go here: http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=2 to run a speed test for my cable modem, it works fine with NS 4.79 but with moz it tells me to download a pluggin. Anyway I download the pluggin using the software install option in preferences and it downloads and tries to install but it stops and says I don't have enough free space on C: (I have 36 Gig free) but then I cancel and then it says the package was installed successfully?? Needles to say that Java pluggin is not working. Any ideas? Thanks! Get 1.4.0 from java.sun.com. It *should* install a plugin into the moz/plugins directory.
system tray mail alert in 0.9.9
Is there a special trick to getting the new Windows system tray mail alert in 0.9.9 working?
Want to give a short talk on Mozilla any ideas?
I have been getting a lot of questions about Mozilla lately from my computer user group. I use it on my machine with is the one usually hooked up to the projector for our meetings. They seem to think it's IE with a skin. I would like to do a full on 20 min talk about the cool features of the future Moz 1.0 (since it's just polishing now) Does anyone have any good suggestions on what the ordinary Windows user would like about Moz? I have used it since M6 so I'm not really sure what are new features. The one thing I like is the cookie manager. Although I use it to just dump cookies. Anyone have any good ideas? Thanks
Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Kryptolus wrote: Max Bentz wrote: Hi, just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of activity in form of sending request transferring... and so on). It's the same problem with the linux und and the windows version. Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem appears ? Or missed I something? Thanks! Max It works if you use http://www.sparkasse-aachen.de There's some kind of problem with the javascript because it seems to think it's never on the right sight and keeps redirecting to itself. I filed http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130409 It may be the same issue while visiting http://www.dcview.com.tw JavaScript issue ?
Re: Motif Look Feel
isu0 wrote: Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape 4.75? I think it is called Motif Look Feel. May be if you use Netscape 4.75 youll get the look and UI of Netscape 4.75.
Re: Motif Look Feel
And it came to pass that isu0 wrote:
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape
4.75? I think it is called Motif Look Feel.
The closest you'll get is to use the Classic theme.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
We don't morally censure you. We just want the money.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
Re: Want to give a short talk on Mozilla any ideas?
I DONT BELIEVE YOU
Celeb Cunts! Huge Melons! Slow Blow Vid!
MOST RECOMMENDED ADULT ENTERTAINMENT FUCK ME TONIGHTIf you are a man looking for sex with married women - not just photos but REAL SEX - then you have to visit Sex2go. Over 100,000 women are waiting for a real man to fuck them hard; and more than 32,000 married women want you to do what their husbands won't! FREE XXX SITE PASSWORDSGet 100% FREE access to over 25,000 HOT and NASTY XXX adult sites. You won't believe the amazing porn some people are willing to give away for free. Why pay when you can get into 25,000 sites for free? ENLARGE YOUR PENIS Get longer. Get stronger and last longer with doctor approved herbal penis enlargement tablets. You'll fill her up with inches more than you already have, shoot your wad farther than you ever thought possible, and fuck for hours non-stop. FREE DAILY PORN STAR PHOTO SHOOT PIC#1PIC#2PIC#3PIC#4PIC#5PIC#6PIC#7PIC#8PIC#9PIC#10 FUCK SOMEBODY'S WIFE TONIGHT The wildest site for finding more than 74,000 absolutely REAL women for sex! They're 100% real, no models! Email them, meet them, fuck them! LEGAL NUDE TEENSThe best from all the Great National and International hardcore porn film makers. OVER 1 MILLION HARDCORE PICS. Top quality and fast loading on our super access servers. REAL LIVE SHOWS - 24 HOURS. EXCLUSIVE TEEN ANAL SHOW. ENLARGE YOUR PENIS Did you know that 70% of all women prefer a man with a larger penis? The average man's penis is 5-6 inches... STOP BEING AVERAGE!!! Don't you wish you could fill her up with 7 or more inches? STOP WISHING and click here to get on your way to a bigger and harder penis! FREE DAILY VIDEO You won't believe your eyes! FREE DAILY AUDIO CLIP Hear your fantasies come alive FREE DAILY PUZZLE Want to get lucky??? Play with them!!! 48 Puzzle Pieces TODAY'S DAILY PORN HARDCOREDirect a Live ShowClick Here MARRIED WOMENGet Laid TonightClick Here TEENSPerky Tits to SqueezeClick Here LIVE SEXClick to CumClick Here LESBIANDykes Need a DickClick Here FETISHHardcore Kink GaloreClick Here ORGIESConstant Gang Bangs Click Here BOOBSReally Big TitsClick Here ASIANSushi Served Raw Click Here LIVE WOMENThey Want You NOW Click Here BLACKChocolate Love FestClick Here GAYBang My Dong Click Here CUM IN OUR PORTAL The most interactive adult entertainment you can get without getting arrested! Live sex shows you direct, phone sex, live chat with horny whores, Snoop Dogg's x-rated videos, strippers, porn stars, and more! LATIN ORGYThe hottest Latina pussy on the Net! Absolutely stunning Latina Girls take you by the balls and engulf you in to a mass of sexual bliss. Latin Orgy takes hardcore to the extreme... it's an all-out sexfest with the finest Latina babes available. JOKE OF THE DAY Little boy is in the drugstore with his dad. He sees all the condoms. "Daddy, ...why do they come in a two pack?" His dad said "Thats when you are in high school...One for Friday night and one for Sat night." Then the boy said "Daddy, ...why do they come in six packs?" His dad said "Thats when you are in college...one for Thursday night, two for Friday night, and three for Saturday night." Finally the boy said "Daddy, ...why do they come in twelve packs?" The dad looked sad, and said "that's for when you are married One for January, one for February. " CHOOSE YOUR FAVORITE Who said this isn't interactive entertainment? Click on the picture you want to enlarge and jack off in the privacy of your own bathroom! FEAST ON THE RAWEST SUSHI Lotus love with Asian beauties! These Asian delights will tease your cock and make you cum with sucky sucky live shows, exclusive high quality photos, streaming video, and daily upated content. THE DAILY BUZZ Sex In the Country! Click here to see the Backwoods Road Sign FIND A WOMAN, GET LAID More than 700,000 horny members are waiting for you to find someone perfect to fulfill your wildest fantasies! Our members want to make your wettest dreams come true. 69 LIVEThe best from all the Great National and International hardcore porn film makers. OVER 1 MILLION HARDCORE PICS. Top quality and fast loading on our super access servers. REAL LIVE SHOWS - 24 HOURS. EXCLUSIVE TEEN ANAL SHOW. 4PLAYMAIL DAILY ADVICE Mastering the Button Fly Whoever thought of putting a zipper on a pair of jeans rather than a button fly was probably not getting any booty. Aside from the potential pubic hair and nether region capture hazards, zippers on jeans and easy access are not synonymous. Luckily, button flies are popular on both men's and women's jeans, making your access to hidden treasure even easier. Unlike buttoning the fly, un-buttoning can be done in a flash with a quick rip action that opens one button after the next in rapid fire succession. In the amount
Re: Bundy vs. Jay Garcia
PeEmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: They think that uttering a negative word about Mozilla is like peeing at the Holy Bible. Negative words are ok, for example: Mozilla is slow at DHTML, is anything being done to fix this? Not: Mozilla frigging sucks. Every page I go to loads slow as donkey testicles and I hate the thing. Why the hell don't you guys fix it already? Be nice, and you get helpful, nice responses. Call the stuff these people are working on crap, and telling them they are worthless, or making them feel worthless will only be met with defensiveness and unwillingness to help you. Didn't mommy teach you anything when you were little? -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99 for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about. 1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation? 2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail account with it? (Important) 3) Is jumping from Netscape -- Mozilla (and back presumably) a good idea or am I asking for trouble? Thank you much.
Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?
Max Bentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem appears ? Or missed I something? The problem is: if (document.location.host != www.sparkasse-aachen.de) document.location.host = www.sparkasse-aachen.de I did a test by putting: javascript:alert(document.location.host) into the URl, and the value returned is www.sparkasse-ac.de, but the script is looking for www.sparkasse-aachen.de, so the condition is true, thus it does: document.location.host = www.sparkasse-aachen.de. That, apparently for some reason, redirects to www.sparkasse-ac.de, and reruns the script. I don't speak any language other than english, so I have no idea what the site says, but it appears as though the -ac.de site is supposed to be used from within the -aachen.de site. Have you tried navigating that site to get to your online banking site? -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Sender is Sendee
troy hakala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: No one else sees this? It's fine in newsgroups, but in all my mail accounts, the To address is in the Sender column. It's quite annoying as I can't see who is sending me mail. Try deleting your summary files for your email (don't touch the files with no extensions, those actually hold the mail) -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: why is PSM not installed by default?
Kryptolus wrote in message... Jonathan Wilson wrote: I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying https doesnt work, I cant get to xyz secure site etc etc and half the time its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. Why isnt it installed by default? At the very least, more needs to be done to make the if you dont install PSM, you cant access secure sites fact spelled out in plain language in the installer. it's installed by default but people who do custom installs see Personal Security Manager think it's some useless feature and uncheck it. Yes I did this myself, until I realised it disabled ssl. A bit confusing if you ask me :~( Cheers Till
