Re: WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI V2.0.2

2002-12-03 Thread Emile Kearns
Title: Message



Hi 
Michael,

WMQI = 
MQSI + NEON
WMQI 
BROKER = MQSI - NEON


Emile Kearns
Office telephone no: 
+27(0)114586670

SOFTWARE 
FUTURESthe business advantageProud member of MGXwww.softwarefutures.com

  
  -Original Message-From: Michael F 
  Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 
  December 2002 10:14To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  Re: WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI V2.0.2And to add to this, what is with the new name? Now I see both 
  WebSphere MQ Integrator and WebSphere MQ Integrator Broker. Does the 
  term "broker" make it different? I can see versions with and without 
  "broker" in the name, both version 2.1, but if you click on the link to either 
  download it takes you to the same site for WebSphere MQ Integrator Broker. 
  Are these different products? Mike MurphySr. Middleware 
  ConsultantMQ Solutions, 
  LLChttp://www.mqsolutions.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  


  
Date 
Recieved:
  
  12/02/2002 10:46:19 AM 

  
To:
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
cc:
  
  

  
Bcc
  
  

  
Subject:
  
  WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI 
V2.0.2I've searched the 
  IBM website for documents comparing these two version,but have found none 
  which directly address the differences. Have I missedsomething 
  ?Does anyone know of any document which summarizes the differences 
  ?Thanks !PhilThis communication is for 
  informational purposes only. It is not intended asan offer or 
  solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrumentor as an 
  official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, dataand other 
  information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy andare 
  subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made hereindo 
  not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase  Co., 
  itssubsidiaries and affiliates.Instructions for managing your 
  mailing list subscription are provided inthe Listserv General Users Guide 
  available at http://www.lsoft.comArchive: 
  http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Archive log block size

2002-12-03 Thread Jan van Kemenade
Hi,

For those who still believe in 'tuning'...

The default blocksize for Archive logs is 20480 (5*4096).
No doubt chosen by IBM because this represents halftrack blocking on a
3380 disk (with lrecl=4096). But since 3390's have a larger track size,
an optimum blocksize would be 24576(6*4096).
Saves about 1/6 of the allocated archive log

Cheers, Jan.


-/
/Jan van Kemenade
\www.cressida.info
-\

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI V2.0.2

2002-12-03 Thread Robert Broderick
Integrator Broker was released as a pricing marketing tool. It is the base
WMQI with out, at the least, the NNSY support.

 bobbee






From: Michael F Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI V2.0.2
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:13:34 -0700

And to add to this, what is with the new name?  Now I see both WebSphere
MQ Integrator and WebSphere MQ Integrator Broker.  Does the term broker
make it different?  I can see versions with and without broker in the
name, both version 2.1, but if you click on the link to either download it
takes you to the same site for WebSphere MQ Integrator Broker.  Are these
different products?

Mike Murphy
Sr. Middleware Consultant
MQ Solutions, LLC
http://www.mqsolutions.com



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date Recieved:

12/02/2002 10:46:19 AM
To:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


Bcc


Subject:

WMQI V2.1 vs. MQSI V2.0.2

I've searched the IBM website for documents comparing these two version,
but have found none which directly address the differences.  Have I missed
something ?

Does anyone know of any document which summarizes the differences ?

Thanks !

Phil


This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended
as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made
herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase  Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive




_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Archive log block size

2002-12-03 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
Back around Feb, 2001, IBM issued a series of informational APARs that
described a wide range of tuning recommendations.  APAR PQ31226 contained
the following:

 BLKSIZE
Specifies the block size of the archive log data set.
The block size you specify must be compatible with the
device type you specify in the UNIT parameter.

The parameter must be in the range 4 097 through 28 672.
The value you specify is rounded up to a multiple
of 4 096.

The default is 20 480.

This parameter is ignored for data sets that are managed
by the storage management subsystem (SMS).

If the archive log data set is written to DASD, you are
recommended to choose the maximum block size that will
allow 2 blocks per track.  For example, for a 3390
device, you should use a block size of 24 576.

It would have been nice if IBM (also) provided the info as a SupportPac.




  Jan van Kemenade
  jvkemenade@CRES To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  SIDA.INFO   cc:
  Sent by: Subject: Archive log block size
  MQSeries List
  MQSERIES@AKH-Wi
  en.AC.AT


  12/03/2002 04:43
  AM
  Please respond
  to MQSeries List





Hi,

For those who still believe in 'tuning'...

The default blocksize for Archive logs is 20480 (5*4096).
No doubt chosen by IBM because this represents halftrack blocking on a
3380 disk (with lrecl=4096). But since 3390's have a larger track size,
an optimum blocksize would be 24576(6*4096).
Saves about 1/6 of the allocated archive log

Cheers, Jan.


-/
/Jan van Kemenade
\www.cressida.info
-\

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Sec Channel Exit code

2002-12-03 Thread Yu, David
Chris,

Could you send me the article and code.

Thanks David

-Original Message-
From: Howarth, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sec Channel Exit code


I wrote the article mentioned below. It has an explanation of how
channel security exits work and has outline template code. You still
need to plug in the actual security you choose to implement, but the
article explains what each step is for, how it works and different
methods of security you can plug in.
If anyone wants the article and code, drop me a note. I think the link
below has the first part of the article.

Regards,
___
Chris Howarth
CommerceQuest UK Ltd


-Original Message-
From: Bullock, Rebecca (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 17:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OS/390: Channel Security Exit

Wasn't someone asking a question about this very topic just a week or so
ago? I just thought I'd point out that the latest issue of Mainframe
Week
(http://www.mainframeweek.com) has the start of a series of articles on
this. It may be too late for the person with the query, but perhaps
someone
else would be interested.

Regards, Rebecca

P.S. For those of you in the U.S. --Happy Thanksgiving!

Rebecca Bullock
Computer Sciences Corporation

Educational Testing Service Account
Princeton, NJ 08541

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Archive log block size

2002-12-03 Thread Jan van Kemenade

 It would have been nice if IBM (also) provided the info as a
SupportPac.

Well, the info is in the System Setup guide in 5.2. I checked the 5.3
manual too. It seems that the default goes from 20480 (optimal for
3380) to 28672, the maximum, optimal for logging to tape. And a
disaster for logging to 3390. Except from  a hardware vendors
viewpoint ;-).

Cheers, Jan.
-/
/Jan van Kemenade
\www.cressida.info
-\

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-03 Thread Mark Taylor
Let me make one thing very clear: there is NO SUCH THING as V5.3.1

For a brief time, the download images were labelled that way, but it was
quickly corrected to say V5.3.0.1. That extra zero makes all the
difference.

The first tranche of V5.3 platforms were shipped mid-year, and we often
refer to those as the GA1 release.

Testing then continued on the extra platforms (Linux, OS/400) and a number
of fixes were made in cross-platform code. So, when the second set was
released (GA2) it made sense to refresh the manufacturing images of the
original set of platforms at the same time, so they were all at exactly the
same level. New shipments of the original platforms will all, in effect,
have CSD01 pre-applied.

However you could also get the same set of code by applying CSD01 to a GA1
platform. You will see the CSD level included in inventory commands such as
lslpp on AIX, wherever that's possible.

Two minor complications: CSD01 isn't separately downloadable at the moment,
because of a hitch dealing with the fact that it contains crypto code. We
are trying to sort that out urgently. (I believe some people have been sent
it directly, but can't be sure of that.)
And if you want to install on Windows XP you must get the new level, as the
earlier install code (which of course cannot be updated by CSD) explicitly
refused to allow you to put it on XP.

But when CSD02 arrives, you will be able to install it on top of a GA1
package, a GA2 package or a GA1+CSD01 package.

Mark Taylor.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-03 Thread John Scott
The passport advantage software download site gave the following output when
I checked just now...

WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Documentation, HTML eImage 2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Documentation, HTML tar eImage - Brazilian Portuguese,
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Documentation, PDF and Info Center tar eImage - Brazili
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Documentation, PDF and Info Center zip eImage - Brazili
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for AIX Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French, G
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for AIX Client with SSL eImage - Brazilian Portuguese,
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for AIX eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French, German,
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for HP-UX Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French,
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for HP-UX Client with SSL eImage - Brazilian Portuguese
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for HP-UX eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French, German
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for iSeries Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, Frenc
2002-10-31
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for iSeries eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French, Germ
2002-10-31
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux for Intel eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, Fren
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux for zSeries eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, Fr
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux on Intel Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux on Intel Client with SSL eImage - Brazilian P
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux on zSeries Client eImage - Brazilian Portugue
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Linux on zSeries Client with SSL eImage - Brazilian
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Solaris Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, Frenc
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Solaris Client with SSL eImage - Brazilian Portugue
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Solaris eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, French, Germ
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Windows Client eImage - Brazilian Portuguese, Frenc
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 for Windows NT 2000  XP eImage - Brazilian Portuguese,
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Install Documentation, zip eImage - Brazilian Portugue
2002-10-25
WebSphere MQ V5.3.1 Install Documentation, tar eImage - Brazilian Portugues
2002-10-25

So it definitely says 5.3.1, not 5.3.0.1...

Regards
John


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 December 2002 15:55
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc


 Let me make one thing very clear: there is NO SUCH THING as V5.3.1

 For a brief time, the download images were labelled that way,
 but it was quickly corrected to say V5.3.0.1. That extra zero
 makes all the difference.

 The first tranche of V5.3 platforms were shipped mid-year,
 and we often refer to those as the GA1 release.

 Testing then continued on the extra platforms (Linux, OS/400)
 and a number of fixes were made in cross-platform code. So,
 when the second set was released (GA2) it made sense to
 refresh the manufacturing images of the original set of
 platforms at the same time, so they were all at exactly the
 same level. New shipments of the original platforms will all,
 in effect, have CSD01 pre-applied.

 However you could also get the same set of code by applying
 CSD01 to a GA1 platform. You will see the CSD level included
 in inventory commands such as lslpp on AIX, wherever that's possible.

 Two minor complications: CSD01 isn't separately downloadable
 at the moment, because of a hitch dealing with the fact that
 it contains crypto code. We are trying to sort that out
 urgently. (I believe some people have been sent it directly,
 but can't be sure of that.) And if you want to install on
 Windows XP you must get the new level, as the earlier install
 code (which of course cannot be updated by CSD) explicitly
 refused to allow you to put it on XP.

 But when CSD02 arrives, you will be able to install it on top
 of a GA1 package, a GA2 package or a GA1+CSD01 package.

 Mark Taylor.

 Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are
 provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at
http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


**

Click here to visit the Argos home page http://www.argos.co.uk

The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be privileged 
and confidential, and is intended exclusively for the addressee.
The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the 
originator.
If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution, 
dissemination or use of this communication is not authorised.
If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by using your 
reply facility in youe e-mail software.
All messages sent and received by Argos Ltd are monitored for virus, high risk file 
extensions, and inappropriate content. As a result users should be aware that mail 

Re: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-03 Thread David C. Partridge
Mark,

Thanks very much for the clarification

Dave

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Unsubscribe

2002-12-03 Thread Jon Shearer

Unsubscribe

Re: Unsubscribe

2002-12-03 Thread Ofeldt, Robert








Unsubscribe
















Clustering on iSeries

2002-12-03 Thread Pope, Ben



Apologies for such a simple question but the AS/400 is 
as alien to me
as walking on the moon. Does MQ 5.2 on the 
iSeries support clustering?
Looking at the documentation (5th addition) it states 
the docs apply to 5.3 
for iSeries but I haven't found anything that mentions 
the minimum version
needed for clustering support on 
iSeries.

Also, assuming 5.2 does support clustering can I plan 
on using MQExplorer
to manage its cluster?

Thanks, Ben




Re: Sec Channel Exit code

2002-12-03 Thread Sudheer Kumar
Chris,
I would like a copy of the article and the code.

Thanks,
Sudheer

-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howarth, Chris
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sec Channel Exit code


I wrote the article mentioned below. It has an explanation of how
channel security exits work and has outline template code. You still
need to plug in the actual security you choose to implement, but the
article explains what each step is for, how it works and different
methods of security you can plug in.
If anyone wants the article and code, drop me a note. I think the link
below has the first part of the article.

Regards,
___
Chris Howarth
CommerceQuest UK Ltd


-Original Message-
From: Bullock, Rebecca (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 17:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OS/390: Channel Security Exit

Wasn't someone asking a question about this very topic just a week or so
ago? I just thought I'd point out that the latest issue of Mainframe
Week
(http://www.mainframeweek.com) has the start of a series of articles on
this. It may be too late for the person with the query, but perhaps
someone
else would be interested.

Regards, Rebecca

P.S. For those of you in the U.S. --Happy Thanksgiving!

Rebecca Bullock
Computer Sciences Corporation

Educational Testing Service Account
Princeton, NJ 08541

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Removal of Messages

2002-12-03 Thread Wyatt, T. Rob
Michael,

It's a long road to travel but you can do it with Perl.  I say a long road
because you would need to...
a) Download and install Perl (preferably Active State)
b) Download the MQSeries Perl module from CPAN
c) Install Visual Studio or some other compiler
d) Compile and install the MQSeries Perl module
and then finally...
e) run the script.

Of course an NT shop might have some or all of this environment already set
up.

That being said, I previously posted a Perl script for a similar request at
http://www.t-rob.net/Downloads/MQAge.zip

The script accepts a queue name but defaults to the DeadQ.  You pass in a
number of days and it deletes messages older than the specified threshold.
It could easily be modified to use hours instead of days.  If you have
Active State's Perl Dev Kit, you could even compile the script and modules
into one executable.

Come to think of it, I have the Perl Dev kit and would be happy to post an
executable version if you want.  Let me know.

-- T.Rob

-Original Message-
From: Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removal of Messages


I have a message problem that I need to deal with.  I have messages that can
sit on my queue and get stuck there.  I need to write a script that will
clear messages that have been sitting on the queue over a period of time,
say 100 hours.  Unfortunatly my client will not set expiry on the message,
so this has to be a script that I write to handle this process.  I am a
straight Windows NT shop.  If anybody has a script that I can use to clear
messages meeting this criteria I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you.

Michael

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Perl module on NT

2002-12-03 Thread Wyatt, T. Rob



Thanks, Ian. I've been working with the current module author and
we have identified a few bugs in the code related to cluster commands.
Hopefully, some of these failed tests will pass once the new version comes
out.

Unfortunately, once the Perl bugs are out of the way, there are still the
mysteries of clusters to deal with. I've decoded the PCF commands by hand
with a hex dumper and calculator and see that the formats are right and the
responses back from the Command Server are good - but some of the commands
appear to have no effect. Even MQ Explorer reports conflicting information
aboutmy cluster, depending on where you look.
Sigh...

--
T.Rob

  -Original Message-From: Ian Steyn
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002
  4:20 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Perl
  module on NTRob,
  I get the following.
  Failed Test  Status Wstat Total
  Fail Failed List of Failed 
  t\20convert.t
  6  2 33.33%
  5-6 t\30basic.t  
 17  3
  17.65% 6-7, 15 Failed
  2/7 test scripts, 71.43% okay. 5/1949 subtests failed, 99.74% okay.
  If "NOSERVER=1" in the CONFIG file
  is commented out, the results is exactly the same as yours. I don't have a PCF script to test and see if that
  works. Ian
  
  


  
  "Wyatt, T. Rob"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/26/2002 12:34 PM Please respond to MQSeries List 
  To:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:   
   
 Subject:Perl module on
NTHas
  anyone out there gotten the Perl MQSeries module to compile *and* had
  asuccessful run of the test suite on NT? I've been using the module
  on NTservers for quite a while. It compiles and installs but never
  passes thetests. Still, it works great for most everyday functions.
  Recently I trieddoing some PCF cluster commands and I guess I'm
  exercising the parts of thecode that fail the tests. I've tried
  module versions 1.7 through 1.9 onActive State 5.6.1 builds 629 through
  633 with the same result.I'd feel a lot better if I knew whether
  anyone else has done thissuccessfully.Here's the run-time
  error:Unable to translate Command/Parameters into MQEncodePCF
  inputData conversion hook (PutConvert) failed
  atD:/Perl/site/lib/MQSeries/Command.pm line 772The compile shows
  the following warnings:Please specify prototyping behavior for
  DeadLetter.xs (see perlxs manual)Please specify prototyping behavior for
  PCF.xs (see perlxs manual)Please specify prototyping behavior for
  RulesFormat.xs (see perlxs manual)The test run looks like
  this:I:\MQSeries-1.19nmake test TEST_VERBOSE=1Microsoft (R)
  Program Maintenance Utility  Version 6.00.8168.0Copyright (C)
  Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.  
  D:\Perl\bin\perl.exe -Mblib -ID:\Perl\lib -ID:\Perl\lib -e
  "useTest::Harness qw(runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; runtests
  @ARGV;" t\10constants.tt\20convert.t t\30basic.t t\40oo-qmgr.t
  t\50oo-command.t t\60-logs.tt\70-config.tUsing
  I:/MQSeries-1.19/MQClient/../blibt\10constants...okt\20convert.FAILED
  tests 2-6   Failed 5/6 tests, 16.67%
  okayt\30basic...FAILED tests 2-17  
  Failed 16/17 tests, 5.88% okayt\40oo-qmgr.ok 1/9MQCONN
  failed (Reason = 2058) (Queue manager namenotvalid or not known.) at
  t\40oo-qmgr.t line 40t\40oo-qmgr.FAILED tests 2-9 
   Failed 8/9 tests, 11.11%
  okayt\50oo-command..okt\60-logs...okt\70-config.okFailed
  Test  Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of
  Failedt\20convert.t
  6  5
  83.33% 2-6t\30basic.t 
  17  16 94.12%
  2-17t\40oo-qmgr.t   
   9  8 88.89% 2-9Failed 3/7 test
  scripts, 57.14% okay. 29/1824 subtests failed, 98.41% okay.NMAKE : fatal
  error U1077: 'D:\Perl\bin\perl.exe' : return code '0xff'Stop.NMAKE :
  fatal error U1077: 'cd' : return code
  '0x2'Stop.I:\MQSeries-1.19Thanks --
  T.RobInstructions for managing your mailing list subscription are
  provided inthe Listserv General Users Guide available at
  http://www.lsoft.comArchive:
  http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Re: Sec Channel Exit code

2002-12-03 Thread Beinert, William
Chris, part 1 looks pretty useful at mainframe week.
If part 2 is going to be a while, I would also appreciate the full article via mail or 
post.

Thanks

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Yu, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sec Channel Exit code


Chris,

Could you send me the article and code.

Thanks David

-Original Message-
From: Howarth, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sec Channel Exit code


I wrote the article mentioned below. It has an explanation of how
channel security exits work and has outline template code. You still
need to plug in the actual security you choose to implement, but the
article explains what each step is for, how it works and different
methods of security you can plug in.
If anyone wants the article and code, drop me a note. I think the link
below has the first part of the article.

Regards,
___
Chris Howarth
CommerceQuest UK Ltd


-Original Message-
From: Bullock, Rebecca (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 17:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OS/390: Channel Security Exit

Wasn't someone asking a question about this very topic just a week or so
ago? I just thought I'd point out that the latest issue of Mainframe
Week
(http://www.mainframeweek.com) has the start of a series of articles on
this. It may be too late for the person with the query, but perhaps
someone
else would be interested.

Regards, Rebecca

P.S. For those of you in the U.S. --Happy Thanksgiving!

Rebecca Bullock
Computer Sciences Corporation

Educational Testing Service Account
Princeton, NJ 08541

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Sec Channel Exit code

2002-12-03 Thread Marc Young
Chris,
Can I have a copy, too.thanks.
marc.



  Sudheer Kumar
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: MQSeries List  cc:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Subject:   Re: Sec Channel 
Exit code



  Tuesday December 3, 2002 01:56 PM
  Please respond to MQSeries List






Chris,
I would like a copy of the article and the code.

Thanks,
Sudheer

-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howarth, Chris
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sec Channel Exit code


I wrote the article mentioned below. It has an explanation of how
channel security exits work and has outline template code. You still
need to plug in the actual security you choose to implement, but the
article explains what each step is for, how it works and different
methods of security you can plug in.
If anyone wants the article and code, drop me a note. I think the link
below has the first part of the article.

Regards,
___
Chris Howarth
CommerceQuest UK Ltd


-Original Message-
From: Bullock, Rebecca (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 17:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OS/390: Channel Security Exit

Wasn't someone asking a question about this very topic just a week or so
ago? I just thought I'd point out that the latest issue of Mainframe
Week
(http://www.mainframeweek.com) has the start of a series of articles on
this. It may be too late for the person with the query, but perhaps
someone
else would be interested.

Regards, Rebecca

P.S. For those of you in the U.S. --Happy Thanksgiving!

Rebecca Bullock
Computer Sciences Corporation

Educational Testing Service Account
Princeton, NJ 08541

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
 Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-03 Thread Michael F Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions
Great explanation, this helps a great deal. I am still concerned about mqver. Here is the output I get on both my Windows 2000 and Linux machines. Note that my Windows 2000 memo.ptf says it has CSD 1 but Linux says no CSD applied:
Name:WebSphere MQ Version:   530 CMVC level: p000-L021011 BuildType:  IKAP - (Production)
How can I tell the CSD applied with this? To me it is gibberish.
Mike Murphy
MQ Solutions, LLC
Mark Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 




Date Recieved:

12/03/2002 08:54:42 AM


To:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


cc:




Bcc




Subject:

V5.3/V5.3.1 etcLet me make one thing very clear: there is NO SUCH THING as V5.3.1

For a brief time, the download images were labelled that way, but it was
quickly corrected to say V5.3.0.1. That extra zero makes all the
difference.

The first tranche of V5.3 platforms were shipped mid-year, and we often
refer to those as the GA1 release.

Testing then continued on the extra platforms (Linux, OS/400) and a number
of fixes were made in cross-platform code. So, when the second set was
released ("GA2") it made sense to refresh the manufacturing images of the
original set of platforms at the same time, so they were all at exactly the
same level. New shipments of the original platforms will all, in effect,
have CSD01 pre-applied.

However you could also get the same set of code by applying CSD01 to a GA1
platform. You will see the CSD level included in inventory commands such as
lslpp on AIX, wherever that's possible.

Two minor complications: CSD01 isn't separately downloadable at the moment,
because of a hitch dealing with the fact that it contains crypto code. We
are trying to sort that out urgently. (I believe some people have been sent
it directly, but can't be sure of that.)
And if you want to install on Windows XP you must get the new level, as the
earlier install code (which of course cannot be updated by CSD) explicitly
refused to allow you to put it on XP.

But when CSD02 arrives, you will be able to install it on top of a GA1
package, a GA2 package or a GA1+CSD01 package.

Mark Taylor.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
"{-®ç-Š‰ì~Šæjv Šx2¢êæj)bž	b²Û.nÇ+Š›b¢v«zšè¾'^v)í…ââ²Û®ñžêڕK®Á®‰×š½¨¥i¹^jØm¶ŸÿÃ%²‡ír‰€­Èb½èm¶Ÿÿ¾f¤‡ž§·óIêâzÆ«r¯

Large record size

2002-12-03 Thread Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
I have a programmer currently designing an MQ application who would like to
send 900,000 persistent messages through MQ.  The bytes per record is 1012.
It will run on OS/390 to a Window 2000 server both running 5.2 MQ.  Are
there any negative affects to sending this many records?  It is by far the
largest record size we have defined and I am concerned.


--- Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication may be
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and
may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original
message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. ---

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: Clustering on iSeries

2002-12-03 Thread Chan, Ian M



Ben,

Yes
for both questions. MQ5.2 suppports clustering. For remote administration
using MQ explore,.you can learn the details of remote admin on Chapter 3
of iSeries System Administration Guide.

Cheers,
Ian

  -Original Message-From: Pope, Ben
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2002 5:37
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Clustering on
  iSeries
  Apologies for such a simple question but the AS/400
  is as alien to me
  as walking on the moon. Does MQ 5.2 on the
  iSeries support clustering?
  Looking at the documentation (5th addition) it states
  the docs apply to 5.3 
  for iSeries but I haven't found anything that
  mentions the minimum version
  needed for clustering support on
  iSeries.
  
  Also, assuming 5.2 does support clustering can I plan
  on using MQExplorer
  to manage its cluster?
  
  Thanks, Ben