Pleasr try: pgp6.rc.

2000-03-13 Thread Thomas Roessler

Could someone please verify whether or not the attached
pgp6.rc works?  (Replace pgp6 by pgp!)

On 2000-03-13 22:10:26 +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 22:10:26 +0100
> From: Gero Treuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i
> Organization: FaVeVe, Students' Government, University of Stuttgart, Germany
> 
> Hi!
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes.  Unless
> > someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> > be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> > later that week.
> 
> A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 with mutt 1.1/1.2 is still missing.
> Would be nice if anyone who tried this makes a contribution ...
> 
> 
> Gero
> 

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/


# -*-muttrc-*-
#
# PGP command formats for PGP 2.
#
# $Id: pgp2.rc,v 1.3 1999/06/03 10:26:45 roessler Exp $
#

# decode application/pgp
set pgp_decode_command="%?p?PGPPASSFD=0; export PGPPASSFD;? cat %?p?-? %f | pgp6 
+compatible   +verbose=0 +batchmode -f"

# verify a pgp/mime signature
set pgp_verify_command="pgp6 +compatible   +verbose=0 +batchmode -t %s %f"

# decrypt a pgp/mime attachment
set pgp_decrypt_command="PGPPASSFD=0; export PGPPASSFD; cat - %f | pgp6 +compatible   
+verbose=0 +batchmode -f"

# create a pgp/mime signed attachment
set pgp_sign_command="PGPPASSFD=0; export PGPPASSFD; cat - %f | pgp6 +compatible   
+verbose=0 +batchmode -abfst %?a? -u %a?"

# create a pgp/mime encrypted attachment
set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgp6 +compatible   +verbose=0 +encrypttoself +batchmode 
-aeft %r < %f"

# create a pgp/mime encrypted and signed attachment
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="PGPPASSFD=0; export PGPPASSFD; cat - %f | pgp6 
+compatible   +verbose=0 +encrypttoself +batchmode +clearsig=off -aefts %?a?-u %a? %r"

# import a key into the public key ring
set pgp_import_command="pgp6 +compatible  -ka %f "

# export a key from the public key ring
set pgp_export_command="pgp6 +compatible  -kxaf  %r"

# verify a key
set pgp_verify_key_command="pgp6 +compatible  -kcc  %r"

# read in the public key ring
set pgp_list_pubring_command="pgpring -5 %r"

# read in the secret key ring
set pgp_list_secring_command="pgpring -s -5 %r"

# create a clearsigned message
set pgp_clearsign_command="PGPPASSFD=0; export PGPPASSFD; cat - %f | pgp6 +compatible  
 +verbose=0 +batchmode +clearsig -afst %?a? -u %a?"

# fetch keys
set pgp_getkeys_command="pkspxycwrap %r"



Re: selecting deleted messages

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:

Sorry about that.  I didn't see the new messages in the other thread
until after I sent that.  I've got to learn to read ALL the new messages
in the list before responding.

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: New Mail Polling

2000-03-13 Thread John P. Verel

In poking around the mutt manual, I discovered that a) opening mutt
with the -y switch opens the directory browser with (apparently)
updated N indicator.  Alternatively, pressing the tab key while in the
directory browser will do the same.

Over the next couple days, I intend to try some XWindow biff-like
clients and see how that goes.

On 03/13/00, 08:10:42AM +, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:13:59PM -0500 or thereabouts, John P. Verel wrote:
> > I am trying to understand how the status indicator in the folder list
> > (if I'm using the term correctly), gets updated to show new mail in a 
> > folder.  
> > 
> > I've got a half dozen folders created by procmail.  My mail_check is 
> > set to 5.  It often happens that I find new mail within a folder (and 
> > new since last opened) but no "N" indicator next to the folder...which 
> > is what I desire.
> 
> For what it's worth, I know exactly what you mean. This has happened to
> me for as long as I have used mutt. I also have mail_check at 5, with
> check_new set, and a bunch of procmail-created folders. And the N for
> "new mail" is very intermittent on the listing of folders (for which
> I too have forgotten the correct name).
> 
> There are one or two folders which never seem to show up as having
> new mail in them. They're listed in mailboxes in my .muttrc just like
> the rest.
> 
> I have no idea why this happens. 
> 
> Telsa



Re: selecting deleted messages

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:

> > Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.
> 
> Navigating isn't the problem, it's when i want to go to a message i
> just deleted.  Is there any way besides typing the message number?  It
> seems J and K only go to non-deleted messages.

That's odd.  I'm using "Mutt 1.0pre4us" and it has the following key
bindings (from the Index help):

J   next-entry move to the next entry
K   previous-entry move to the previous entry

j   next-undeleted move to the next undeleted message
k   previous-undeleted move to the last undelete message

So while 'j' and 'k' go to only undeleted messages, 'J' and 'K' allow me
to go to the deleted messages as well.  Maybe your 'J' and 'K' keys got
bound somehow to "next-undeleted" and "previous-undeleted".  Typing '?'
will display the current bindings.  If you want to set the 'J' and 'K'
bindings to their "normal" values, put the following in your ~/.muttrc:

bind index J next-entry
bind index K previous-entry

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: To CC and mailing list flags

2000-03-13 Thread Jeremy Blosser

J McKitrick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I understand that the C, T, and + symbols help identify when a message
> is also addressed to me specifically.  However, a couple of messages
> lately have not correctly shown bme to be recipients.  Now, i changed
> my from header a couple of times trying to get it exactly how i
> wanted.  How can i reset mutt to correctly idnetify my address?  I
> current set my_hdr From: to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

The value of $alternates controls which addresses Mutt thinks are you, see
the manual.

-- 
Jeremy Blosser   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://jblosser.firinn.org/

 PGP signature


Re: [jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:51:36PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> are bound to).  The default bindinds for these functions are "J" and
> "K", which are the shifted letters.  VI users will find these bindings
> convenient.  Others will likely not find them comprehensible.  :)

Actually, i just started on VI a month or so ago, and it makes perfect
sense.  Once i realized how powerful VI was, i checked out mutt again.
Now i'm hooked!


jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



To CC and mailing list flags

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick

I understand that the C, T, and + symbols help identify when a message
is also addressed to me specifically.  However, a couple of messages
lately have not correctly shown bme to be recipients.  Now, i changed
my from header a couple of times trying to get it exactly how i
wanted.  How can i reset mutt to correctly idnetify my address?  I
current set my_hdr From: to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.


jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



Re: selecting deleted messages

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> > after performing an action.  If i delete a message, is there any way
> > to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
> > index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
> 
> Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.

Navigating isn't the problem, it's when i want to go to a message i
just deleted.  Is there any way besides typing the message number?  It
seems J and K only go to non-deleted messages.



jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



Re: [jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick

Correction: my mistake.  I forgot shifted-J and K are different.
Thanks.

jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



Re: mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:19:29AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:

> > One other thing:  mutt has to be built with GNU make.  The standard SysV
> > UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
> 
>  Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with BSD makes.

Sure.  The problem has to do with the expansion of the $< macro.  For
the HP-UX make, $< is evaluated only for inference rules.  For GNU make,
$< is evaluated for both target and inference rules.  At least one of
mutt's Makefiles (I don't remember offhand which one) has a target rule
that uses sed and $<.  GNU make expands this $< to the source file name,
as the Makefile's author intended, and the build works fine.  When the
HP-UX make gets to this point, however, it replaces $< with an empty
string which then leaves sed waiting for input from stdin and the build
hangs.

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking

 
> CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
> LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
 
 Hhm, yes, I remember seeing this before :)

> One other thing:  mutt has to be built with GNU make.  The standard SysV
> UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.

 Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with BSD makes.



Re: mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:14:34PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
> > 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
> > system.  Is this still necessary?
> 
> I've never had trouble with the --with-slang or --with-curses configure
> directives, on HP-UX 10.20.  Building without slang or ncurses, though,
> has always failed, though.  Is this what you refer to?

Yes.  Neither slang nor ncurses are installed on this system, at least
as far as I can tell--they're not anywhere under /usr.  When my first
attempt at building mutt failed, I posted an article to an HP-internal
newsgroup and received the tip about editing the configure script.  I've
done that ever since.  The fix is to change the line

LIBS="$LIBS -lcurses"

to

CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"

One other thing:  mutt has to be built with GNU make.  The standard SysV
UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: selecting deleted messages

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> after performing an action.  If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
> index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.

Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread David DeSimone

Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
> 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
> system.  Is this still necessary?

I've never had trouble with the --with-slang or --with-curses configure
directives, on HP-UX 10.20.  Building without slang or ncurses, though,
has always failed, though.  Is this what you refer to?

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44



Re: %N in $folder_format

2000-03-13 Thread Drew Bloechl

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 10:26:09AM -0800, Drew Bloechl wrote:
> OS: Debian woody (Linux 2.2.13, i386)
> mutt 1.1.5
> MTA is Postfix 19991231.  
> Delivering to mailboxes with Procmail using locking rules.  
> FS is ext2.  

Duh.  I didn't know I had to specify them with "mailboxes".  I feel 
stupid now.  

-- 
Drew Bloechl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread David DeSimone

Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
> 'u'.  Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when
> there are too many other deleted mails above, though. 

This is really just a side-effect of the undelete operation, and it
won't work with $resolve is not set.  It is simpler to just use the
default keys that are bound to previous-message and next-message (as
opposed to previous-undeleted and next-undeleted, which the arrow keys
are bound to).  The default bindinds for these functions are "J" and
"K", which are the shifted letters.  VI users will find these bindings
convenient.  Others will likely not find them comprehensible.  :)

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44



Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Gary Johnson

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:24:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

> Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20

That's good news!  I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system.  Is this still necessary?  What curses/slang
library did you use?

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Thomas Roessler

On 2000-03-13 16:03:43 -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:

> I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only
> mailboxes on IMAP override ACLs incorrectly.
> Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly you can't set or
> unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
> according to the ACL.

What you describe sounds like the normal read-only
behaviour we have for all kinds of mailbox types.  I don't
think IMAP should be handled differently.



-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/




selecting deleted messages

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick

I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action.  If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.

jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Gero Treuner

Hi!

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes.  Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.

A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 with mutt 1.1/1.2 is still missing.
Would be nice if anyone who tried this makes a contribution ...


Gero



Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Brendan Cully

On Monday, 13 March 2000 at 20:03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
> and the usual mirror sites, see
> http://www.mutt.org/download.html.  
> 
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes.  Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
> 
> If someone objects, please speak up now or be silent
> forever. ;-)

Hi,

I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only mailboxes on
IMAP override ACLs incorrectly. Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly
you can't set or unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
according to the ACL. I'd like to get that fixed before 1.2 - I'll get
together a patch for him to test over the next couple of
days... 

-Brendan





 PGP signature


listing number of messages in folder view

2000-03-13 Thread Benjamin Korvemaker

Is there a way to list the number of messages that are in a folder when
listing the folders? (Checking the format strings in the manual doesn't
seem to indicate so, but I may have overlooked the right place.)  Even an
indicator of which folders have old messages would be nice.  I'm using mutt
1.0 (do I just need to upgrade to a development version?) and maildirs.

Ben
-- 
Benjamin Korvemaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.



Re: [jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread Peter Poeml

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:14:59PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> 
> I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> after performing an action.  If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
> index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.

You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
'u'. Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when there
are too many other deleted mails above, though. 

Another way is undelete-pattern (forgot the key binding for that)

Peter

-- 
 Dr Peter Poeml | Institute of epidemiology and social medicine
| Domagkstr. 3
| 48149 Muenster, Germany
| Tel +49-251-8356296



Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes.  Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.

Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Sysadmins don't go to hell; we're already doing our time in purgatory. 



Re: [jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen

J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
> index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.

With the previous-entry or next-entry functions perhaps?  They're bound
respectively to to K and J, by default.

No actual shortcut that I know of to get to the *exact* previous message
that you were in, regardless of which current new message ended up with
after a delete or save action with $resolve set.


Regards,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
I don't want the whole world, I just want your half.



[Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!

2000-03-13 Thread Thomas Roessler

Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.  

Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes.  Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
later that week.

If someone objects, please speak up now or be silent
forever. ;-)

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

 PGP signature


Re: %N in $folder_format

2000-03-13 Thread Drew Bloechl

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:11:16PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> > Can anyone come up with an explanation for this?  I can't.
> 
> Me either.  Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
> Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can reproduce the problem on
> my system.  If I have free time later today I might give it a go.
> 
> This folder was mbox format, not over NFS... do I remember right?
> Which OS and filesystem type?  Even if that really shouldn't matter.

OS: Debian woody (Linux 2.2.13, i386)
mutt 1.1.5
MTA is Postfix 19991231.  
Delivering to mailboxes with Procmail using locking rules.  
FS is ext2.  

-- 
Drew Bloechl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org: selecting deleted messages]

2000-03-13 Thread J McKitrick


I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action.  If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number?  The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.

jm
-- 
-
Jonathon McKitrick  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-



Re: %N in $folder_format

2000-03-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen

David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> Can anyone come up with an explanation for this?  I can't.

Me either.  Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can reproduce the problem on
my system.  If I have free time later today I might give it a go.

This folder was mbox format, not over NFS... do I remember right?
Which OS and filesystem type?  Even if that really shouldn't matter.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
ERROR!  CAT reader seems to be conflicting with the mouse.



Re: %N in $folder_format

2000-03-13 Thread David DeSimone

Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> $ ls -l Mail/livid-dev ; ls -lu Mail/livid-dev 
> -rw---1 drew drew  3219213 Mar 10 02:23 Mail/livid-dev
> -rw---1 drew drew  3219213 Mar  8 12:05 Mail/livid-dev
> 
> This particular folder has an mtime greater than its atime, but mutt 
> doesn't seem to realize that with or without BUFFY_SIZE.  

Can anyone come up with an explanation for this?  I can't.

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44



Re: problem with ignore

2000-03-13 Thread Thomas Roessler

On 2000-03-12 16:24:27 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:

> No, they use special kind of wildcards, it's not even shell
> globbing. For them the rules are:

> - "*" is a special entry which means "all headers"
> - "something-" means that every header which starts with
>   "something-", eg. "ignore X-"
> - everything else is taken literally

Actually, the rules are even more primitive.  "*" is indeed special.
All the rest is just matched with a simple "strncasecmp" call, and
with "unignore" taking precedence over "ignore".

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/




Re: Message/partial assembling

2000-03-13 Thread Raju K V

GASP is a preprocessor for assembly programs and is a part of binutils package.

Raju

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> 
> > > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
> > > learn about.  I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)
> > 
> > It's GNU Assembler if I remember right...  I've actually heard of one
> 
> GNU Assembler is "gas"...
> 
> -- 
> Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
> Like medieval peasants, computer manufacturers and millions of users
> are locked in a seemingly eternal lease with their evil landlord, who
> comes around every two years to collect billions of dollars of taxes
> in return for mediocre services. --Mark Harris, Electronics Times 



Re: Message/partial assembling

2000-03-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:

> > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
> > learn about.  I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)
> 
> It's GNU Assembler if I remember right...  I've actually heard of one

GNU Assembler is "gas"...

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Like medieval peasants, computer manufacturers and millions of users
are locked in a seemingly eternal lease with their evil landlord, who
comes around every two years to collect billions of dollars of taxes
in return for mediocre services. --Mark Harris, Electronics Times 



Re: Message/partial assembling

2000-03-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen

David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 12 Mar 2000:
> I dunno from message/partial, but did you try piping all of the segments
> thru good old munpack?

Getting punpack (which I didn't have installed on my workstation),
tagging all the parts, setting pipe-split, and piping to "munpack -t"
did result in the contents getting extracted.  Thanks!

The file was truncated :-(, but I think that's more of a sender problem
because munpack didn't complain and also because it only did the assembly
at the end when it had received all the message parts, so it's not due to
any parts going missing.  Although I'd be sort of curious to hear of a
way to check this, but it's not critical...

> I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
> learn about.  I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)

It's GNU Assembler if I remember right...  I've actually heard of one
system where the command worked. :-)  Yes, I know there are variations.


Thanks again,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
This sentence contains ten words, eighteen syllables, and sixty-four letters.



Re: New Mail Polling

2000-03-13 Thread Telsa Gwynne

On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:13:59PM -0500 or thereabouts, John P. Verel wrote:
> I am trying to understand how the status indicator in the folder list
> (if I'm using the term correctly), gets updated to show new mail in a 
> folder.  
> 
> I've got a half dozen folders created by procmail.  My mail_check is 
> set to 5.  It often happens that I find new mail within a folder (and 
> new since last opened) but no "N" indicator next to the folder...which 
> is what I desire.

For what it's worth, I know exactly what you mean. This has happened to
me for as long as I have used mutt. I also have mail_check at 5, with
check_new set, and a bunch of procmail-created folders. And the N for
"new mail" is very intermittent on the listing of folders (for which
I too have forgotten the correct name).

There are one or two folders which never seem to show up as having
new mail in them. They're listed in mailboxes in my .muttrc just like
the rest.

I have no idea why this happens. 

Telsa