Re: mailbox corruption

2000-07-21 Thread Thomas Roessler

On 2000-07-20 15:42:56 -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:

 I still have those examples of mailbox corruption,
 if anyone wants to look at them. I'd love to get it
 fixed, as I can't seem to predict when it will happen,
 or what course of events is necessary to cause it. 

Several reasons for this to happen should be fixed as of
1.2.4.  All these problems were related to disks running
full.

Do you happen to have insufficient free space in /tmp?

-- 
Thomas Roessler  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: decrypting using gpg

2000-07-21 Thread Dennis Robertson

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:55:32PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
 
 What's happening is that the message you're receiving doesn't have
 the MIME headers that mutt needs to be able to notice that it's
 encrypted.
 
 There are recipes in PGP-Notes.txt for procmail and maildrop, which
 recognize the old-style PGP messages and add MIME headers, but
 neither procmail nor maildrop is a MIME processing tool, and so the
 recipes take a very simple approach: they make sure the message
 isn't already a multipart of any sort. This message is a multipart,
 you indicated that you're seeing this as attachment #3, which means
 that those recipes can't help you.

I am using the recipe from the gnupg faq and thank you for explaining why it doesn't 
work
in all cases.
 
 The upshot is that you have only a couple of choices.
 
 You can do a smarter recipe, using a tool that includes a full MIME
 parser, to adjust the MIME types properly even for parts of existing
 multiparts. I've no clue how to pursue that one.

Too rich for me, I'm afraid.
 
 Or you can just live with it, and manually pipe the offending
 sections through gpg and then into a pager. Or you can save 'em out
 into external files, gpg 'em, and few the results. You might be able

This is what I have been doing.  I happened to be a message I had cc'd to myself, which
surprised me because the headers should have been correct.  It was the multipart which 
was
the problem, from what you say.  I have since sent tests to myself and had it work
properly.

  to simplify these things with macros, but I don't
know any way of  telling mutt to peek into the body and Do The Right Thing completely
 automatically; that'd require changes to the source. I haven't heard
 of anybody pursuing those changes, and since mutt is continuing to
 try to change the world on this point, by adamantly (or perhaps
 even "stridently") insisting on supporting nothing but RFC 2015
 PGP/MIME and demanding that the rest of the world follow suit, I
 wouldn't expect patches like that to be written by anybody who is
 following mutt's party line, nor would they be accepted into the
 main line of mutt.
 
 -Bennett

Thanks.  Interesting background.  Thanks, too, to David for your input.

Regards.
-- 
Dennis Robertson  2/2 Sylvia Street  NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Phone: 61 7 54742343  Mob: 0419 535539

 PGP signature


Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep for reoncilia*sql

2000-07-21 Thread Eric Smith




Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep for sfdgrwgrw

2000-07-21 Thread Eric Smith




Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep for fdsgghtd

2000-07-21 Thread Eric Smith




Re: Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep for fdsgghtd

2000-07-21 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan

Hi,

Eric Smith typed:
 nothing

Could you please stop these posts, whatever it may be?

-- 
Mrinal Kalakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mrinal.dhs.org/
Linux 2.2.12-20 || PGP:B1E86F5B || Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09) || VIM 5.6 
-- 



my apologies

2000-07-21 Thread Eric Smith

Please excuse my unintended postings from a script that I was
debugging - my sincere aplogies.

-- 
Eric Smith
Fruitcom.com



Re: Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep for fdsgghtd

2000-07-21 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Mrinal - judging by the random stuff in the quoted string, I think
this guy has been running an sql query of some sort - and that script
is broken.

For some fscking weird reason, all those error messages which should
be landing in his inbox are being gated to mutt-users.

I've procmailed him to dev/null ... do the same

:0:
* ^Subject: 'Eric, I am sorry no matches in rep'
/dev/null

Mrinal Kalakrishnan proclaimed on mutt-users that:

 Hi,
 
 Eric Smith typed:
  nothing
 
 Could you please stop these posts, whatever it may be?

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking.



Re: my apologies

2000-07-21 Thread Nils Vogels

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:28:08PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
 Please excuse my unintended postings from a script that I was
 debugging - my sincere aplogies.
 
You might want to make it mail to test-addresses, not live addresses ;-)

-- 
Don't be satisfied with yesterday, choose the right equipment, use it the right
way. Refuse to compromise. --Ron Dennis



Re: question concerning multiple addresses

2000-07-21 Thread Bob Bell

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:19:13AM +0300, Mikko Hnninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 20 Jul 2000:
  Or to have the option to 
  edit/change them in the send menu.
 
 You have that.  There's an "edit-from" function, by default bound to
 esc-f.  You're of course free to re-bind that to anything you want.
 It may also be possible to push esc-f into Mutt's keyboard buffer when
 sending new mail or replying, so that you automatically get into the
 "edit from" prompt after you exit the editor (unfortunately, not before
 -- although that too might be possible with some scripting magic,
 playing around with your $editor, and such...)
 
 You may also want to look at $edit_headers, which lets you edit your
 message headers together with the body.  That way editing your From
 header becomes very easy.

Alternatively, you could also create different macros.  Something
like:

macro index m ":my_hdr From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]entermail"
macro index M ":my_hdr From: Bob Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]entermail"

You'd also want to look into defining equivalent macros for other
places, or turn to a two key-stroke method: one to set the address,
another for the task.

-- 
Bob BellCompaq Computer Corporation
Software Engineer   110 Spit Brook Rd - ZKO3-3/U14
TruCluster GroupNashua, NH 03062-2698
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 603-884-0595



Re: question concerning multiple addresses

2000-07-21 Thread tech_related

Hello everyone,


Thank you all for your help on this; I'll try the different methods you
suggested.


Thanks!

Cheers,

Manuel



Re: my apologies

2000-07-21 Thread Eric Smith

According to Nils Vogels on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:32:23PM +0200:
| On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:28:08PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
|  Please excuse my unintended postings from a script that I was
|  debugging - my sincere aplogies.
|  
| You might want to make it mail to test-addresses, not live addresses ;-)
| 
$mutt=qq|mutt $user blah blah ...|; 
system "mutt $mutt";

grep mutt  mutt/aliases = alias mutt mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
changed to:
grep mutt  mutt/aliases = alias muttusers mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- thats how you may easily (in my case) embarrass yourself.

a lesson learnt ... enuf of that 

And now for my question ;)

how do I have two aliases allocated to the /same/ email address in a
mutt alias entry?

-- 
Eric Smith
Fruitcom.com
Landline: 00 27 21 426 5311
Mobile: 00 27 82 373 1224



Re: gvim

2000-07-21 Thread Michael Soulier

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 03:37:06PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:

 I doubt that's the problem he's having as I use vim and it works fine
 but if I change the vim line to gvim, it does the same thing he
 describes.  No signature and doesn't actually save the message...

Yes, that's because it's forking. The process that mutt is waiting to
return returns right away, and meanwhile gvim runs in a child process. Use the
-f option to prevent this. 

Mike

-- 
Michael P. Soulier, 1Z22, SKY  Tel: 613-765-4699 (ESN: 39-54699)
Optical Networks, Nortel Networks, SDE Pegasus
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort."  -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to UNIX
Nortel Linux User's Group Ottawa: (internal) http://nlug.ca.nortel.com:8080



Re: my apologies

2000-07-21 Thread Michael Elkins

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 05:20:38PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
 You may also simply be able to do:
 
   alias aliasname Description address1, address2
 
 ... but I've never tested that.

The syntax is:

alias aliasname Description: address1, address2 ;

This is defined by RFC822.

me

 PGP signature


Re: Changing index display based on From:

2000-07-21 Thread Benjamin Korvemaker

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:44:44AM +, George Klinich III wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a way to change what is displayed in the index line for a message
 based on what is in the header?  For example, if the From: matches a certain
 pattern, I'd like to see the the From field in the index line replaced by
 another header field.
 
 Thanks,
 George

What about abusing the x-label: field with procmail and using %y in the
index format?

Ben
-- 
Benjamin Korvemaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If God had a beard, he'd be a UNIX programmer.



Re: Changing index display based on From:

2000-07-21 Thread David T-G

Ben, et al --

...and then Benjamin Korvemaker said...
% On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:44:44AM +, George Klinich III wrote:
%  
%  based on what is in the header?  For example, if the From: matches a certain
%  pattern, I'd like to see the the From field in the index line replaced by
%  another header field.
% 
% What about abusing the x-label: field with procmail and using %y in the
% index format?

Oooh; that's clever.  I may have to get to work on that.  Who wants to
beat me to it?


% 
% Ben
% -- 
% Benjamin Korvemaker
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] If God had a beard, he'd be a UNIX programmer.


:-D
-- 
David T-G   * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001.  There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*


 PGP signature


Re: Changing index display based on From:

2000-07-21 Thread George Klinich III

Hmm...  I don't see the %y format documented in the manual, what is it
suppose to do?

Thanks,
Georg

* Benjamin Korvemaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07/21/2000 18:17] wrote:
| On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:44:44AM +, George Klinich III wrote:
|  Hi,
|  
|  Is there a way to change what is displayed in the index line for a message
|  based on what is in the header?  For example, if the From: matches a certain
|  pattern, I'd like to see the the From field in the index line replaced by
|  another header field.
|  
|  Thanks,
|  George
| 
| What about abusing the x-label: field with procmail and using %y in the
| index format?
| 
| Ben
| -- 
| Benjamin Korvemaker
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] If God had a beard, he'd be a UNIX programmer.
| 




subscribing

2000-07-21 Thread Johannes Zellner

hmm. I tried to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but this does not seem to be the correct address.
But the html manual states that it is ...

-- 
   Johannes




Questions not covered at www.mutt.org

2000-07-21 Thread Rob Watkin

Hi,

I'm new to mutt but I am lead to believe it's one of the most powerfull mail clients 
around. My system is standard Redhat 6.2 with very few customisations. There are a 
couple of things that don't seem to be working and some features I don't understand. 
Any help or pointers appreciated as I am hoping to give mutt some _real_ heavy use. :)

* Color does not work - I have tried all the suggestions in the FAQ.
* The 'screenshots' at http://www.mutt.org show an X enhanced menu but
  I can't figure out how to get that to work.
* How (or where) does mutt save my 'sent mail'.

I really thing that I must be missing some important piece of documentation which 
helps new users get oriented with mutt's philosophy.

Thanks

Rob Watkin