Re: latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?)
Eric Ekong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > try ftp.guug.de in the /pub/mutt/contrib directory. :) Are you sure ? As far as I know latest DEVELOPMENT version is 1.3.12 -- Keso Life is dead PGP signature
Re: Multiple commands in a macro?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 11:27:31AM -0500, Bruce A. Petro wrote: > Can this be done? What I want is to do a tag and then a save to mailbox... > >From my muttrc (sorry for the long line): folder-hook +Maillist/Mutt 'macro index "\CL" ":my_hdr to: Mutt-User-List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>^M:my_hdr Mail-Followup-To:Mutt-User-List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>^M:push m^M:unmy_hdr to mail-followup-to^M"' This is an example how I generate a new message to this list and set proper to and follow-up address manually. HTH Frank
Re: latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?)
try ftp.guug.de in the /pub/mutt/contrib directory. :)
Eric
* Paul A. Cheshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001129 14:52]:
> Can anyone tell me where to get this? I tried www.mutt.org and
> linux.tucows.com but they have only earlier versions.
>
> :-{
>
> MTIA
>
> ;-}
>
> --
> Paul A. Cheshire | "... all the modern inconveniences ..."
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
> No fences? |
> No Gates required.|
--
///
(. .)
===oOO-(_)-OOo===
Eric I. Ekong Internet Software Systems Engineer I
Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Dial Systems Ops[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office phone: 734-214-7435 pager:1-888-806-8347
=
PGP signature
latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?)
Can anyone tell me where to get this? I tried www.mutt.org and
linux.tucows.com but they have only earlier versions.
:-{
MTIA
;-}
--
Paul A. Cheshire | "... all the modern inconveniences ..."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
No fences?|
No Gates required.|
PGP signature
Multiple commands in a macro?
Can this be done? What I want is to do a tag and then a save to mailbox... For instance I thought it would be something like this: macro index .x "T~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n; ;s =bap-test" but that isn't seeming to do it. Any suggestions? Question2: How can I do the tag above but also tag those CC'd to mutt-users as well as those TO mutt-users? Thanks, Bruce.
Re: Automatic cc to me
Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:55:38AM -0800, Larry Spitz wrote: > A mutt newbie question. Apologies if this is not the correct forum for such a >question. If not, please advise me where I can find the answer. > > My need is simple: I want to automatically receive a Cc of every message I send. I >presume that there is a simple variable to set in my .muttrc, but I can't work out >which one. > > And BTW, what does "fcc" stand for? > > Larry > Document Recognition Technologies, Inc. > 616 Ramona Street, Suite 20, Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +1-650-688-0842 fax: +1-650-688-0841 > http://www.docrec.com Wouldn't saving a copy work better? This is what was suggested on the list to me for saving a copy: set record = ~/Mail/sent-mail -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]| "I can't complain, but -o) | sometimes I still do." -- Joe Linux, the Choice /\ | Walsh of a GNU generation _\_v | |
Re: saving message/rfc822 attachments to a folder
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:12:19AM +0100, Daniel González Gasull wrote:
> When reading the message, go to the attach menu,
> then you can save individual attachments. If the
> attachment is message/rfc822, you can save it in a
> mail folder. Try it. I do it usually.
Ok, I'm stupid. I was mislead by the fact that the prompt says
"Save to file" instead of "Save to mailbox" (as when you press 's'
from the message index), so I was afraid that it would overwrite the
whole mailbox. But it does in fact behave as desired.
There are still a few wishlist items:
- When you hit 's' on a message/rfc822 attachment, the prompt (and
the behavior) should be exactly the same as when you hit 's' on a
message in the message index.
- If you tag multiple message/rfc822 attachements and apply save
(";s"), it should save all messages to the same mailbox (like when
you do this from the message index), instead of prompting
separately for each attachment.
Thanks for the help,
Andrew
Re: Folder Collections in Mutt?
Ken Ficara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Wed, 29 Nov 2000]: > In pine, I can specify directories as folder-collections, and using the > command-line method of listing initial keystrokes to be executed, I can > Is there a way to do this in Mutt? Perhaps you could try something like mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/*` in your .muttrc. The command to open a folder is 'c'. You can then enter a letter and press (or press two keys to get a list of mailboxes under that folder) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI It usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech. -- Mark Twain
Folder Collections in Mutt?
This seems like an obvious newbie question but I cannot find answers to it in the FAQ or by searching the archives of this list. I use pine now and would like to switch to mutt for its richer customization abilities, mailing list handling, and so on, but there's a great feature of pine I cannot figure out how to replicate in Mutt. In pine, I can specify directories as folder-collections, and using the command-line method of listing initial keystrokes to be executed, I can have a short alias that immediately opens up a menu of all the mailboxes into which my mail is filtered. This is a separate directory from where my incoming mailspool is located. Is there a way to do this in Mutt? thanks ken
Re: threads, annoying threads
On a related note, I have a small but irritating problem with threads. Recently I sent an e-mail with subject like this: Subject: Konstituerande möte, FRV When a friend replied from a Mac, the subject looks like this in Mutt: Subject: Konstituerande möte , FRV Notice the extra space before the comma, which makes Mutt not recognize this as a reply to my original message. Now, in my editor, the header looks like this: Subject: Re: Konstituerande =?iso-8859-1?Q?m=F6te?= , FRV My guess would be that this means there is something wrong with the character encoding between the systems. But how would one correct this, apart from manually editing the header? Jesper -- "But how can one be warm alone?" Jesper Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp_getkeys_command
Hi list,
I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
configured in my gpg.rc is
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
--batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
which does not work. The output is not fully visible, but I think it says
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a valid ID.
Now, I expected %r to be the key ID (lots of hex digits) and gpg to accept
mail adresses ('<%r>' resulted in "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is not a valid ID").
Neither seem to work.
What's wrong?
Thorsten
Advanced searching revisited
Couldn't it be left as an exercise to the witted user or 3rd-party-developer to write a good search-enginge (probably based on grepmail) and PROVIDE A HOOK for invoking this search-function in conjunction with "limit". I'd like to press a key, invoke the search program which gets two arguments; the mailbox/dir and my search expression; it returns whatever mutt needs to do a mailbox limitation on the resulting message set. What about that? I use grepmail; but exiting and creating new mailboxes isn't that efficient. /magnus -- http://x42.com/
Re: pager scrolling question
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:02:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:45:35PM -0600, Jason wrote: > > > I'd like the pager to scroll one line at a time instead of a page at a time. > > Anyone got the trick? > > I don't use the internal pager myself, but according to the mutt manual, > > 6.4.3. pager > ... > next-lineRET scroll down one line > ... > previous-line BackSpace scroll up one line Actually, these bindings - Space for next screenful, Return for next line - are common for most Unix pagers. I think 'more' has been that way for a long time (possibly from the start), 'less' has certainly been that way since its very first version. G'luck, Peter -- This inert sentence is my body, but my soul is alive, dancing in the sparks of your brain.
