Re: Change into an mbox - like chdir
On (01:03 13/07/07), Peter Wiersig [EMAIL PROTECTED] put forth the proposition: On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:17:48PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote: macro generic Y change-folderlists/mutt-users@mutt.orgenter gives error: /home/dive/mail/lists/hange-folderlists/mutt-users@mutt.org: No such file or directory (errno = 2) This looks like you left out the before the c. Peter No I've had this problem before. Mutt sees the c of change-folder and assumes its c and everything after the 'c' is the folder name. -- Ignisecond, n.: The overlapping moment of time when the hand is locking the car door even as the brain is saying, my keys are in there! -- Rich Hall, Sniglets
Re: Change into an mbox - like chdir
* On 2007.07.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * David Woodfall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I've had this problem before. Mutt sees the c of change-folder and assumes its c and everything after the 'c' is the folder name. Specifically, since change-folder is not defined in the generic binding map, mutt interprets this as literal , c, h, etc. You'll need to write this macro once for index and once for pager, since those are the only binding maps that change-folder is defined in. -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: change mailbox focus
Am 2007-07-09 20:38:33, schrieb John K Masters: I am running mutt 1.5.13 on my desktop and 1.5.16 on my laptop. Mail is fetched from various sources to the desktop via getmail and delivered to appropriate folders (or /dev/null) via procmail. My laptop is setup to access mail from my desktop box via NFS when connected and the config files are the same apart from /home being replaced by /mnt/home on the laptop .muttrc When changing folders on my desktop the highlighted folder always defaults to the top folder; ie first in alphabetical order. On the laptop however, it always defaults to the last folder accessed. Is this a new feature in 1.5.16? Can it be changed in 1.5.13 .muttrc? It has something to do with your LOCALE settings. I have the same issue with my Workstation (de_DE.UTF-8) and Develstation (Xen instances with Unstable, Testing, Stable and OldStable, where I can switch locales). Maybe you create a wraper script which enforce mutt to run with a fixes locale? Greetings Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Crappy mailer and Message-ID:
# ATTENTION: I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because# # haveing the last 4 weeks of my military # # service and can not reply in short delays. # * * Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here.* * Keine Cc: an mich, bin auf DIESER Liste wenn ich hier schreibe. * * Ne me mettez pas en Cc:, je suis sur CETTE liste, si j'ecris ici. * * Hello *, I get messages over Mailinglists which break all the times threads and I like mutt ^6 feature to repare it. :-) However, I het tonns of messages which HAVE a Message-ID: header but can not repared becase they are broken. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I like to see mutt MORE failure redunant by aception the above one and NOT ONLY Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the right RFC thing (the around the ID). Greetings Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: Crappy mailer and Message-ID:
Michelle Konzack wrote: [Fri Jul 13 2007, 10:56:42AM EDT] * * Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here.* * Keine Cc: an mich, bin auf DIESER Liste wenn ich hier schreibe. * * Ne me mettez pas en Cc:, je suis sur CETTE liste, si j'ecris ici. * * This will be automatic for anybody using mutt if you have in your muttrc: set followup_to=yes # default subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org See http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#using-lists Unfortunately most MUAs don't respect these headers, but at least on this list it should work :-) Aron
Re: Crappy mailer and Message-ID:
Hello Aron, Am 2007-07-13 11:46:14, schrieb Aron Griffis: This will be automatic for anybody using mutt if you have in your muttrc: set followup_to=yes # default subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org See http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#using-lists Who tell you this? I use mutt since ages... nearly 8 years. Unfortunately most MUAs don't respect these headers, but at least on this list it should work :-) Right, unfortunatly to muck MUAs. Or even the Webmailer do not respect it. I get every day those crappy CCs. Also it is realy annoying, if you want to respond fast and keep not attention for the To/Cc/BCc headers if people hit Group-Reply which will mostly end in PMs which I do not realy like to send. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: match replies in a send-hook
Aron Griffis wrote: [Thu Jul 12 2007, 07:54:57PM EDT] 1. reply-hooks should run inline with send-hooks instead of before them. The only difference between reply-hooks and send-hooks should be which message they're matching against. 2. send-hooks should be able to recognize when they're running on a message that is a reply. Something better than the subject hack. Bob Bell pointed out to me ~Q, which according to the doc matches messages which have been replied to. This seems to be intended for us in limit or tag-pattern. Whether intentional or inadvertent, it also seems to work for #2 above... send-hook '~Q' 'my_hdr X-Q-Status: this is a reply' send-hook '!~Q' 'my_hdr X-Q-Status: this is not a reply' Thanks Bob! 3. send-hooks should be able to tell if reverse_name succeeded or failed. Right now there is no way to do this short of extremely ugly hacks (think of reply-hook . set from=bogus) 4. There should be a way to run send-hooks on ALL sent messages including bounced messages. Presently no hooks run when a message is bounced, so you just have to get lucky with the folder-hook settings when you hit 'b'.
Re: Crappy mailer and Message-ID:
Michelle Konzack wrote: [Fri Jul 13 2007, 12:02:41PM EDT] Hello Aron, Am 2007-07-13 11:46:14, schrieb Aron Griffis: This will be automatic for anybody using mutt if you have in your muttrc: set followup_to=yes # default subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org See http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#using-lists Who tell you this? I use mutt since ages... nearly 8 years. I don't understand the question. The manual tells me this. :-) See also http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html Unfortunately most MUAs don't respect these headers, but at least on this list it should work :-) Right, unfortunatly to muck MUAs. Or even the Webmailer do not respect it. I get every day those crappy CCs. Also it is realy annoying, if you want to respond fast and keep not attention for the To/Cc/BCc headers if people hit Group-Reply which will mostly end in PMs which I do not realy like to send. IMHO it's probably better to get used to it, or fight it by technical means, than to bother with large banners in your mail. Ultimately asking everybody who sends you mail to respect this-or-that-request is going to fail... *shrug* Aron
send-hook for replying to mailing lists
Hi Mutt users For mailing list I use an email address different from my private mail. To automatically use the correct from-header I inserted the following send-hook to my .muttrc: send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # private mail send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr From: Sven Bretfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]' I works will when I compose an original posting. But fails most of the time when I reply using group reply. When it works Mutt asks me if I want to reply to the mailing list, puts the list's address to the To-header and creater the correct from-header. When it fails, Mutt doesn't even ask me if I want to reply to the list, but inserts the personal address of the original posting in the To-header, the list's address in the CC, and my private Email address in the the From-header. What have I done wrong? Thank you very much for help. Sven
Re: send-hook for replying to mailing lists
Hi Sven, On Fri 13 Jul 2007 22:12, Sven Bretfeld wrote: send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # private mail send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr From: Sven Bretfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]' try send-hook ~l my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That should match any mailing list you've told Mutt about using subscribe or lists. Cheers, Jerry.
Re: send-hook for replying to mailing lists
Hello Jerry On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:27:59PM +0100, Jerry Walker wrote: try send-hook ~l my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's it. Thank you very much. Bye, Sven
