Command that I believe should work...

2004-10-15 Thread Robert Adkins
...but doesn't.
   I am attempting to create a table using the following...
   CREATE TABLE INVOICE (
   INV_NUMBER   INTPRIMARY KEY,
   CUS_CODEINT NOT NULL  REFERENCES 
CUSTOMER(CUS_CODE),
   INV_DATE DATETIME   DEFAULT NOW()   NOT NULL,
   );

   I receive an error message stating that there is an error with 'NOW()'
   Which doesn't make sense to me. I understand both Oracle and MS-SQL 
Server use a similar format for putting the date and time into a field 
when a new row is created. At least that is my goal.

   Is there a very different method of doing this under MySQL 4.0.21?
   Thanks for any assistance you may offer.
   -Rob
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Command that I believe should work...

2004-10-15 Thread Robert Adkins
   TIMESTAMP, at least by the book in front of me, is only valid from 
January 1, 1970 to December 31, 2037. I want to avoid using something 
that could create a Y2037 issue, if whatever I build ends up lasting 
that long. To me, that is a potential hazard and thus would be a bad 
habit to get into.

   Is there another method, besides relying on the application being 
built, to insert NOW() into a MySQL DB?

   Again, thanks for any assistance.
   -Rob
Peter Lovatt wrote:
hi
you might want to look at TIMESTAMP which does it all for you.
Peter
...but doesn't.
I am attempting to create a table using the following...
CREATE TABLE INVOICE (
INV_NUMBER INT PRIMARY KEY,
CUS_CODE INT NOT NULL REFERENCES
CUSTOMER(CUS_CODE),
INV_DATE DATETIME DEFAULT NOW() NOT NULL,
);
I receive an error message stating that there is an error with 'NOW()'
Which doesn't make sense to me. I understand both Oracle and MS-SQL
Server use a similar format for putting the date and time into a field
when a new row is created. At least that is my goal.
Is there a very different method of doing this under MySQL 4.0.21?
Thanks for any assistance you may offer.


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Serwer Hardware p4 or pIII ?

2002-12-06 Thread Robert Adkins
Helmut,

I suppose that depends really upon the composition of your database.   
Unfortunately, I am far from an expert when it comes to MySQL or   
virtually any other database, I just happen to know a little bit about   
hardware and some performance related information. All of that is only on   
the low-end commodity hardware of the personal computer.

If you know what size database, meaning how many tables and how much   
information you will have in the database then I am certain that other   
more database knowledgeable members of this list will be able to offer   
some suggestions.

The only other thing that I can add is if your database is going to be   
relatively small (In comparison to some of the databases discussed on   
this list.) you will probably see admirable performance on the fastest   
Pentium 4 and the fastest AMD Athlon XP+ system you can build or buy.   
(Based upon an earlier response that states how Intel beefed up the FPU   
in the Pentium 4.)

I feel as long as you don't skimp on the hardware, you shouldn't have   
too many issues.

Good luck.

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: Helmut Apfelholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Robert Adkins; andy thomas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Serwer Hardware p4 or pIII ?

   

Robert,
thank you for your answer. I will be using the server
strictly for MySQL database. That will be a backend
for several Web Applications written mostly in PHP.
What hardware is advised in such a configuration ?

 --- Robert Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I am running a few AMD based servers in our offices
 here and have no
 issues with them. The big question is, What kind of
 operations are you
 most likely to see with your servers?

   If the servers will be doing some heavy floating
 point operations stay
 away from the Intel P4. (Unless recent versions have
 been fixed.) The
 Pentium 4 has a TERRIBLE FPU. If you need high FPU
 and MUST stick with
 Intel, then by all means look for Pentium III CPUs
 or look from some
 Pentium Xeon CPUs.

   If you aren't brand specific, take a look at AMD.
 They perform admirably
 for FPU options. For instance, there is one
 workstation application that
 we have for developing CNC Mill cutter path that
 simply tears things up
 when it is run on an AMD chip. Our old system would
 take nearly an hour
 to generate the same cutter path that is generated
 in less then 30
 seconds on the AMD Chip. (Athlon 2000+ XP)

   In the tests performed by our vendor, a similar
 speed Pentium 4 takes
 quite a bit longer to generate the same cutter path.
 Something close to 5
 minutes longer. Of course, that's all FPU doing the
 work there.

   The one thing that the P4 has over the AMD Athlon
 XP and P3 CPUs is raw
 memory bandwidth. It can easily outpace both of
 those other processors
 for VERY specific operations, like video editing and
 other HIGH Memory
 bandwidth hungry applications.

   Depending upon what you are building, you might
 want to utilize more
 then one CPU type across several boxes to be able to
 utilize the
 strengths of each processor design.

   Good luck!

 Regards,
 Robert Adkins II
 IT Manager/Buyer
 Impel Industries, Inc.
 Ph. 586-254-5800
 Fx. 586-254-5804


  -Original Message-
 From: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Helmut
 Apfelholz; Robert Adkins
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Serwer Hardware p4 or pIII ?



 On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Helmut Apfelholz wrote:

  Hi,
  I am assembling mysql only server. I am planning
 2Gb
  RAM, 4 x 15k SCSI disks. However I cannot decide
 if I
  should get 2 p4 processors or 2 tuallatin pIII.
 
  I could not find any mysql specif?c benchmarks,
 that
  would show which processors I should use.
  I will be running linux on the server.
 
  Could anyone share his/hers experience with me ?

 I have often wondered about that myself so I would
 be interested in
 other people's views. I currently run a number of
 servers with dual
 1GHz P3's.

 Andy




 -
 Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list
 archive)

 To request this thread, e-mail
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, e-mail
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Trouble unsubscribing? Try:
 http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list

RE: Serwer Hardware p4 or pIII ?

2002-12-05 Thread Robert Adkins
I am running a few AMD based servers in our offices here and have no   
issues with them. The big question is, What kind of operations are you   
most likely to see with your servers?

If the servers will be doing some heavy floating point operations stay   
away from the Intel P4. (Unless recent versions have been fixed.) The   
Pentium 4 has a TERRIBLE FPU. If you need high FPU and MUST stick with   
Intel, then by all means look for Pentium III CPUs or look from some   
Pentium Xeon CPUs.

If you aren't brand specific, take a look at AMD. They perform admirably   
for FPU options. For instance, there is one workstation application that   
we have for developing CNC Mill cutter path that simply tears things up   
when it is run on an AMD chip. Our old system would take nearly an hour   
to generate the same cutter path that is generated in less then 30   
seconds on the AMD Chip. (Athlon 2000+ XP)

In the tests performed by our vendor, a similar speed Pentium 4 takes   
quite a bit longer to generate the same cutter path. Something close to 5   
minutes longer. Of course, that's all FPU doing the work there.

The one thing that the P4 has over the AMD Athlon XP and P3 CPUs is raw   
memory bandwidth. It can easily outpace both of those other processors   
for VERY specific operations, like video editing and other HIGH Memory   
bandwidth hungry applications.

Depending upon what you are building, you might want to utilize more   
then one CPU type across several boxes to be able to utilize the   
strengths of each processor design.

Good luck!

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -Original Message-
From: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Helmut Apfelholz; Robert Adkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Serwer Hardware p4 or pIII ?

   

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Helmut Apfelholz wrote:

 Hi,
 I am assembling mysql only server. I am planning 2Gb
 RAM, 4 x 15k SCSI disks. However I cannot decide if I
 should get 2 p4 processors or 2 tuallatin pIII.

 I could not find any mysql specif?c benchmarks, that
 would show which processors I should use.
 I will be running linux on the server.

 Could anyone share his/hers experience with me ?

I have often wondered about that myself so I would be interested in
other people's views. I currently run a number of servers with dual
1GHz P3's.

Andy


 -
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php