Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Machiel Richards
Hi All

Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however someone seems
to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be disabled, this
caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

Should this not rather have just resulted in an error allowing
to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the storage
engines?

Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix this? I
will look into the innodb not working soon.

Machiel


-Original Message-
From: Machiel Richards machi...@rdc.co.za
To: mysql mailing list mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


Good day all

Hope all is well. 

 I have something to ask as someone might have done this as
well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

During a database migration this weekend to move a MySQL
database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore of the
database.

However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking the
fact that the windows database was configured to use default storage
engine as Innodb.

On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

   This resulted in all the tables being restored to the new
system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

In order to fix this, I know you can use alter table to
change the storage engine, however I need to know the following:

1. this is a production system and can't afford any
downtime or as little performance degration as possible.

What is the best way to do this in order to
have the least amount of effect on the database and it's performance?


 Regards
Machiel




Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread John Daisley
I have frequently seen Innodb 'silently' disabled if the
innodb_log_file_size is different to the files size on disk (quite common
when moving systems about). You wont be able to use innodb until you resolve
this either by deleting the log files and restarting mysqld so they get
recreated or changing the innodb_log_file_size to match the size of the
files on disk.

If the Innodb engine is not available then MySQL will use the default
(usually MyISAM) storage engine even if Innodb was specified. You can stop
this behaviour by setting sql-mode=NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION

Regards

John


On 22 November 2010 10:12, Machiel Richards machiel.richa...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi All

Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however someone seems
 to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be disabled, this
 caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

Should this not rather have just resulted in an error allowing
 to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the storage
 engines?

Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix this? I
 will look into the innodb not working soon.

 Machiel


 -Original Message-
 From: Machiel Richards machi...@rdc.co.za
 To: mysql mailing list mysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


 Good day all

Hope all is well.

 I have something to ask as someone might have done this as
 well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

During a database migration this weekend to move a MySQL
 database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore of the
 database.

However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking the
 fact that the windows database was configured to use default storage
 engine as Innodb.

On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

   This resulted in all the tables being restored to the new
 system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

In order to fix this, I know you can use alter table to
 change the storage engine, however I need to know the following:

1. this is a production system and can't afford any
 downtime or as little performance degration as possible.

What is the best way to do this in order to
 have the least amount of effect on the database and it's performance?


 Regards
 Machiel





-- 
John Daisley

Certified MySQL 5 Database Administrator
Certified MySQL 5 Developer
Cognos BI Developer

Telephone: +44 (0)7918 621621
Email: john.dais...@butterflysystems.co.uk


Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Machiel Richards
Thank you John

  I have in the meantime fond this to be the case (** someone
changed config files without my knowledge it seems as this was setup
properly and working**)

Anyhow, in order for the innodb to be active again I need to
restart the database, however aftewards I assume the tables will still
be MyIsam.

In this event I will need to manually alter each table, and I am
concerned about the impact of this on the system performance.

Regards
Machiel


-Original Message-
From: John Daisley daisleyj...@googlemail.com
To: Machiel Richards machiel.richa...@gmail.com
Cc: mysql mailing list mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:51:23 +

I have frequently seen Innodb 'silently' disabled if the
innodb_log_file_size is different to the files size on disk (quite
common when moving systems about). You wont be able to use innodb until
you resolve this either by deleting the log files and restarting
mysqld so they get recreated or changing the innodb_log_file_size to
match the size of the files on disk. 
 
If the Innodb engine is not available then MySQL will use the default
(usually MyISAM) storage engine even if Innodb was specified. You can
stop this behaviour by setting sql-mode=NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION
 
Regards
 
John


On 22 November 2010 10:12, Machiel Richards machiel.richa...@gmail.com
wrote:

Hi All

   Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


   The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however
someone seems
to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be
disabled, this
caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

   Should this not rather have just resulted in an error
allowing
to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the
storage
engines?

   Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix
this? I
will look into the innodb not working soon.

Machiel




-Original Message-
From: Machiel Richards machi...@rdc.co.za
To: mysql mailing list mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


Good day all

   Hope all is well.

I have something to ask as someone might have done
this as
well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

   During a database migration this weekend to move a
MySQL
database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore
of the
database.

   However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking
the
fact that the windows database was configured to use default
storage
engine as Innodb.

   On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

  This resulted in all the tables being restored to
the new
system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

   In order to fix this, I know you can use alter
table to
change the storage engine, however I need to know the following:

   1. this is a production system and can't
afford any
downtime or as little performance degration as possible.

   What is the best way to do this in
order to
have the least amount of effect on the database and it's
performance?


Regards
Machiel






-- 
John Daisley

Certified MySQL 5 Database Administrator
Certified MySQL 5 Developer
Cognos BI Developer

Telephone: +44 (0)7918 621621
Email: john.dais...@butterflysystems.co.uk



Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Johan De Meersman
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Machiel Richards 
machiel.richa...@gmail.com wrote:

In this event I will need to manually alter each table, and I am
 concerned about the impact of this on the system performance.



That will indeed make for quite some locking time, depending on the size of
your tables. It's going to be hard to get around that, unfortunately.

What you could do, is create temporary tables, populate them with using
insert into...select and then alter table rename them into place. One
hell of a job if you have many tables, though, and even then you may feel
some impact on performance.

-- 
Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel


Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Tyler Poland

Machiel,

Each table will be write locked while it is being altered so this will 
most likely impact the application.  In addition to the write lock, the 
conversion causes each table to be completely rewritten in the new 
format so this will have a high impact on IO write activity and so it 
will impact overall IO throughput.  If your application is mostly reads, 
is well cached in memory, and the tables are small this should be pretty 
fast and relatively pain free.  If you aren't sure about the impact and 
conversion time you may want to restore a backup of the database to 
another location and run through the conversion while monitoring 
performance numbers.


Tyler


On 11/22/10 5:55 AM, Machiel Richards wrote:

Thank you John

   I have in the meantime fond this to be the case (** someone
changed config files without my knowledge it seems as this was setup
properly and working**)

 Anyhow, in order for the innodb to be active again I need to
restart the database, however aftewards I assume the tables will still
be MyIsam.

 In this event I will need to manually alter each table, and I am
concerned about the impact of this on the system performance.

Regards
Machiel


-Original Message-
From: John Daisleydaisleyj...@googlemail.com
To: Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
Cc: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:51:23 +

I have frequently seen Innodb 'silently' disabled if the
innodb_log_file_size is different to the files size on disk (quite
common when moving systems about). You wont be able to use innodb until
you resolve this either by deleting the log files and restarting
mysqld so they get recreated or changing the innodb_log_file_size to
match the size of the files on disk.

If the Innodb engine is not available then MySQL will use the default
(usually MyISAM) storage engine even if Innodb was specified. You can
stop this behaviour by setting sql-mode=NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION

Regards

John


On 22 November 2010 10:12, Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi All

Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however
 someone seems
 to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be
 disabled, this
 caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

Should this not rather have just resulted in an error
 allowing
 to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the
 storage
 engines?

Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix
 this? I
 will look into the innodb not working soon.

 Machiel




 -Original Message-
 From: Machiel Richardsmachi...@rdc.co.za
 To: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


 Good day all

Hope all is well.

 I have something to ask as someone might have done
 this as
 well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

During a database migration this weekend to move a
 MySQL
 database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore
 of the
 database.

However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking
 the
 fact that the windows database was configured to use default
 storage
 engine as Innodb.

On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

   This resulted in all the tables being restored to
 the new
 system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

In order to fix this, I know you can use alter
 table to
 change the storage engine, however I need to know the following:

1. this is a production system and can't
 afford any
 downtime or as little performance degration as possible.

What is the best way to do this in
 order to
 have the least amount of effect on the database and it's
 performance?


 Regards
 Machiel









--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org



Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Johan De Meersman
Another option, if your data hasn't changed in the mean time (I know, rare
scenario) could be to set up a secondary instance from the same binaries and
changing only the datafile location and the port in the config,
re-importing, shutting both instances down and switching out the datafiles.

You'll get some performance impact from the import's disk activity, but the
switch should take almost no time - if the datafiles are on the same
physical disk, of course.


On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Poland tpol...@engineyard.comwrote:

 Machiel,

 Each table will be write locked while it is being altered so this will most
 likely impact the application.  In addition to the write lock, the
 conversion causes each table to be completely rewritten in the new format so
 this will have a high impact on IO write activity and so it will impact
 overall IO throughput.  If your application is mostly reads, is well cached
 in memory, and the tables are small this should be pretty fast and
 relatively pain free.  If you aren't sure about the impact and conversion
 time you may want to restore a backup of the database to another location
 and run through the conversion while monitoring performance numbers.

 Tyler



 On 11/22/10 5:55 AM, Machiel Richards wrote:

 Thank you John

   I have in the meantime fond this to be the case (** someone
 changed config files without my knowledge it seems as this was setup
 properly and working**)

 Anyhow, in order for the innodb to be active again I need to
 restart the database, however aftewards I assume the tables will still
 be MyIsam.

 In this event I will need to manually alter each table, and I am
 concerned about the impact of this on the system performance.

 Regards
 Machiel


 -Original Message-
 From: John Daisleydaisleyj...@googlemail.com
 To: Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
 Cc: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:51:23 +

 I have frequently seen Innodb 'silently' disabled if the
 innodb_log_file_size is different to the files size on disk (quite
 common when moving systems about). You wont be able to use innodb until
 you resolve this either by deleting the log files and restarting
 mysqld so they get recreated or changing the innodb_log_file_size to
 match the size of the files on disk.

 If the Innodb engine is not available then MySQL will use the default
 (usually MyISAM) storage engine even if Innodb was specified. You can
 stop this behaviour by setting sql-mode=NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION

 Regards

 John


 On 22 November 2010 10:12, Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi All

Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however
 someone seems
 to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be
 disabled, this
 caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

Should this not rather have just resulted in an error
 allowing
 to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the
 storage
 engines?

Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix
 this? I
 will look into the innodb not working soon.

 Machiel




 -Original Message-
 From: Machiel Richardsmachi...@rdc.co.za
 To: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


 Good day all

Hope all is well.

 I have something to ask as someone might have done
 this as
 well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

During a database migration this weekend to move a
 MySQL
 database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore
 of the
 database.

However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking
 the
 fact that the windows database was configured to use default
 storage
 engine as Innodb.

On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

   This resulted in all the tables being restored to
 the new
 system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

In order to fix this, I know you can use alter
 table to
 change the storage engine, however I need to know the following:

1. this is a production system and can't
 afford any
 downtime or as little performance degration as possible.

What is the best way to do this in
 order to
 have the least amount of effect on the database and it's
 performance

Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.

2010-11-22 Thread Kyong Kim
Another thing to keep in mind is to make sure all your foreign keys
are re-created if you have any. We had a similar accident in our
prod box a few years back and converting MyIsam to InnoDB won't
necessarily re-create the foreign keys.
Kyong

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Johan De Meersman vegiv...@tuxera.be wrote:
 Another option, if your data hasn't changed in the mean time (I know, rare
 scenario) could be to set up a secondary instance from the same binaries and
 changing only the datafile location and the port in the config,
 re-importing, shutting both instances down and switching out the datafiles.

 You'll get some performance impact from the import's disk activity, but the
 switch should take almost no time - if the datafiles are on the same
 physical disk, of course.


 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Poland tpol...@engineyard.comwrote:

 Machiel,

 Each table will be write locked while it is being altered so this will most
 likely impact the application.  In addition to the write lock, the
 conversion causes each table to be completely rewritten in the new format so
 this will have a high impact on IO write activity and so it will impact
 overall IO throughput.  If your application is mostly reads, is well cached
 in memory, and the tables are small this should be pretty fast and
 relatively pain free.  If you aren't sure about the impact and conversion
 time you may want to restore a backup of the database to another location
 and run through the conversion while monitoring performance numbers.

 Tyler



 On 11/22/10 5:55 AM, Machiel Richards wrote:

 Thank you John

       I have in the meantime fond this to be the case (** someone
 changed config files without my knowledge it seems as this was setup
 properly and working**)

         Anyhow, in order for the innodb to be active again I need to
 restart the database, however aftewards I assume the tables will still
 be MyIsam.

         In this event I will need to manually alter each table, and I am
 concerned about the impact of this on the system performance.

 Regards
 Machiel


 -Original Message-
 From: John Daisleydaisleyj...@googlemail.com
 To: Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
 Cc: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Re: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:51:23 +

 I have frequently seen Innodb 'silently' disabled if the
 innodb_log_file_size is different to the files size on disk (quite
 common when moving systems about). You wont be able to use innodb until
 you resolve this either by deleting the log files and restarting
 mysqld so they get recreated or changing the innodb_log_file_size to
 match the size of the files on disk.

 If the Innodb engine is not available then MySQL will use the default
 (usually MyISAM) storage engine even if Innodb was specified. You can
 stop this behaviour by setting sql-mode=NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION

 Regards

 John


 On 22 November 2010 10:12, Machiel Richardsmachiel.richa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

         Hi All

            Sorry but things have now changed, and I found the following.


                The tables was in fact restored as Innodb, however
         someone seems
         to have gone and changed something causing innodb to be
         disabled, this
         caused the tables to be defaulted back to MyIsam.

                Should this not rather have just resulted in an error
         allowing
         to fix the problem in the first place instead of changing the
         storage
         engines?

                Anyone have some thoughts on the best solution to fix
         this? I
         will look into the innodb not working soon.

         Machiel




         -Original Message-
         From: Machiel Richardsmachi...@rdc.co.za
         To: mysql mailing listmysql@lists.mysql.com
         Subject: Changing database tables to different storage engine.
         Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:59:03 +0200


         Good day all

                    Hope all is well.

                     I have something to ask as someone might have done
         this as
         well and may have a good solution on how to fix this.

                    During a database migration this weekend to move a
         MySQL
         database from windows to linux, we created a backup and restore
         of the
         database.

                    However, form my part I made a mistake by overlooking
         the
         fact that the windows database was configured to use default
         storage
         engine as Innodb.

                    On the new server, the default was set to MyIsam.

                       This resulted in all the tables being restored to
         the new
         system as MyIsam instead of Innodb.

                        In order to fix this, I know you can use alter
         table to
         change the storage engine, however I need to know the following