RE: cluster or replication
I've 10 server in differents locations, I want to make a broadcast, I would like to have always datas synchronized between this network, each database have the same tables and same structure. Each insert or update in database will be executed for each server within this broadcast, what's the best choice ? At the moment, replication is your best option. Replication works very nicely over wide-area-networks, where the bandwidth between each node could be dramatically different. The only constraint you'll have here is that there can only be one MASTER that has to accept all the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (or anything that will make the data change). All other nodes would be considered SLAVEs and be READ-ONLY. Hope this helps. a -- Alan Williamson, Technology Evangelist SpikeSource Inc. Daily OS News @ http://compiledby.spikesource.com/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cluster or replication
Is it possible to have cluster and replication? (ie clusters at each location and replication to sync each location) Alan Williamson wrote: I've 10 server in differents locations, I want to make a broadcast, I would like to have always datas synchronized between this network, each database have the same tables and same structure. Each insert or update in database will be executed for each server within this broadcast, what's the best choice ? At the moment, replication is your best option. Replication works very nicely over wide-area-networks, where the bandwidth between each node could be dramatically different. The only constraint you'll have here is that there can only be one MASTER that has to accept all the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (or anything that will make the data change). All other nodes would be considered SLAVEs and be READ-ONLY. Hope this helps. a -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cluster or replication
This isn't a constraint, this is a limit, the goal is to have a bi-directional replication but I've not found solutions to my problem using mysql. I've a control access system with 9 minitowers which controls people access via RFID, each minitower is provided with linux and mysql synchronized with a main server, each machine is identical to others and can alive without connecting to main server if any problem hardware or software close the connection with the rest of the network and align again datas if connection go up, something like a survivor system. So now you can understand that with this scenario mysql actual replication MASTER/SLAVE isn't a solution. (Perhaps I'll think to modify sources :)) ) The only constraint you'll have here is that there can only be one MASTER that has to accept all the INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (or anything that will make the data change). All other nodes would be considered SLAVEs and be READ-ONLY. Hope this helps. a -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cluster or replication
I've 10 server in differents locations, I want to make a broadcast, I would like to have always datas synchronized between this network, each database have the same tables and same structure. Each insert or update in database will be executed for each server within this broadcast, what's the best choice ? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cluster or replication
Since MySQL-Cluster is not recommended over a WAN that's not an option. I soon will be looking for a method to syncronize real-time data between a active/passive datacenter setup. (One datacenter in Salt Lake City, Utah and another in Las Vegas, Nevada) At this time I don't think any 'out of the box' MySQL package will do what you want -- I could be wrong though. It seems to me that this is something that is going to become more and more popular so I'd be really surprised is MySQL-AB isn't already cooking something up. -Cory Robin, SkyVantage Corporation -Original Message- From: Lorenzo De Vito I've 10 server in differents locations, I want to make a broadcast, I would like to have always datas synchronized between this network, each database have the same tables and same structure. Each insert or update in database will be executed for each server within this broadcast, what's the best choice ? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
