Re: AS path fugliness?
It's back, same source as last time:
Aug 13 14:06:07 Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268
Aug 13 14:06:11 Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268
Aug 13 14:07:29 Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270
Aug 13 14:09:44 Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270
Aug 13 14:09:52 Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268
* 205.139.72.0 208.172.167.21100 0 3561 23037
{80,1239,1785,2379,2711,4181,4323,4513,4546,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,
6395,6453,6467,6571,6580,6993,7132,7381,7431,7633,7795,10346,10625,10674,10726,
10851,10877,10910,10937,10957,11101,11134,11169,11235,11589,11657,11853,12082,
12156,12163,12179,12180,12261,13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,
13815,13882,13904,13919,14021,14289,14359,14381,14412,14452,14549,14564,14625,
14677,14685,14787,14793,14929,14990,15062,15215,16477,16504,16640,16707,16759,
16782,16852,17033,17060,17064,17142,17304,18548,18586,18618,18886,19024,19541,
20303,20316,20333,20357,20457,20458,21536,22184,22191,22242,22299,22319,22389,
22728,22912,23087,23181,23195,23269,23306,23365,23453,23502,23547,25639,25707,
25905,25943,26004} ?
* 205.139.73.0 208.172.167.21100 0 3561 23037
{80,1239,1785,2379,2711,4181,4323,4513,4546,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,
6395,6453,6467,6571,6580,6993,7132,7381,7431,7633,7795,10346,10625,10674,10726,
10851,10877,10910,10937,10957,11101,11134,11169,11235,11589,11657,11853,12082,
12156,12163,12179,12180,12261,13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,
13815,13882,13904,13919,14021,14289,14359,14381,14412,14452,14549,14564,14625,
14677,14685,14787,14793,14929,14990,15062,15215,16477,16504,16640,16707,16759,
16782,16852,17033,17060,17064,17142,17304,18548,18586,18618,18886,19024,19541,
20303,20316,20333,20357,20457,20458,21536,22184,22191,22242,22299,22319,22389,
22728,22912,23087,23181,23195,23269,23306,23365,23453,23502,23547,25639,25707,
25905,25943,26004} ?
(plus a bunch of others for the same AS)
FYI, after the Jul 03 incident I received this response from CW:
Thank you for notifying us of the problem. We have put a filter in
place
and I believe we have been in touch with our customer.
Best Regards,
Cable Wireless US-IPGSOC
Mike
AS path fugliness?
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 274 Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 (per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml ) It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some kind of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out who, thus far longest I've found is about 20. Mike
Re: AS path fugliness?
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: Yes, but I saw it only once from four different sources: Through AS1: Jul 3 07:23:56: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 266 Through AS6461: Jul 3 07:22:51: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 266 Through AS2828: Jul 3 07:22:52: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 266 Through AS4513: Jul 3 07:22:47: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 266 -mark
Re: AS path fugliness?
Of course it would be towards the end of the table.
Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html
*i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* i a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* e.f.g.h 25 0 701 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're
getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lewinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: AS path fugliness?
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 274
Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
(per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml )
It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some
kind
of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out
who,
thus far longest I've found is about 20.
Mike
Re: AS path fugliness?
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Mike Lewinski wrote:
Of course it would be towards the end of the table.
Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html
*i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* i a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* e.f.g.h 25 0 701 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're
getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lewinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: AS path fugliness?
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 274
Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
(per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml )
It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some
kind
of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out
who,
thus far longest I've found is about 20.
Mike
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of
Multicast Technologies, Inc, subject to Non-Disclosure Agreements
T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail : [EMAIL
Re: AS path fugliness?
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
We've opened a ticket with CW. The tech I spoke with wasn't aware of this
issue. It does appear that all affected netblocks are IMC Internet, and that
CW provides the IP space to them.
Mike
Re: AS path fugliness?
We've had 4 crashes with chunk corruption On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:46, Mike Lewinski wrote: Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 274 Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 270 Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested size 268 (per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml ) It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some kind of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out who, thus far longest I've found is about 20. Mike -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
Re: AS path fugliness?
This has disappeared from here...
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Mike Lewinski wrote:
Of course it would be towards the end of the table.
Here's a sample of the more detailed log at
http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html
*i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* i a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
* e.f.g.h 25 0 701 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10
957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350,
13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428
9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15
215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060,
17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954
1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22
191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195,
23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ?
neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're
getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lewinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM
Subject: AS path fugliness?
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 274
Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
(per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml )
It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some
kind
of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out
who,
thus far longest I've found is about 20.
Mike
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of
Multicast Technologies, Inc, subject to Non-Disclosure Agreements
T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
