Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Rich Kulawiec wrote (on Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:25:20AM -0400):
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:38:17AM -0300, jim deleskie wrote:
> 
> As to his decision to block Gmail (or any other freemail provider),
> everyone with sufficient knowledge in the field knows that these
> operations are prolific and habitual sources of spam (via multiple
> vectors, not just SMTP; Google accounts for more Usenet spam hitting
> my filters than all other sources combined).  It's thus not at all
> unreasonable for some operations to revoke (some oor all of) their
> privileges by way of self-defense.  

And, even if it *is* unreasonable, well, his network, his rules, right?

"I block all SMTP traffic from IPV4 servers (clients?) which have odd 
numbers in the third octet." might not be a good idea for a high volume 
mail server with clients, but if it's your network, go for it.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Chase.com outage

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Zaid Ali wrote (on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:27:40AM -0700):
> Isn't that reserved for beer sessions at NANOG?

Bummer. I heard they don't lawyers into the beer sessions. :-)

> On 9/16/10 9:13 AM, "N. Yaakov Ziskind"  wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone have any information (beyond the wimpy statement that
> > "technical issues" were to blame) on the Chase outage?
> > 
> > It seems that when a multibillion dollar company's major web site is
> > down for more than a day, there must be juicy "technical issues" that
> > beg to be told. So, can anyone dish? :-)

The most intelligent thing I've found so far is this, bankingblog.celent.com:

"Actually, they did have maintenance scheduled for Sunday Morning. Sunday
afternoon and night site worked and crashed Monday evening before 4 pm
or so, also noteworthy is that the site crashed last month as well, but
made no news splash as the outage was mostly in the weekend. It did
captured by a few websites that collect Chase gripes..

"So, it is unlikely that this is an attack. if it is one, it was a
prolonged attack. It is more likely that they crashed and corrupted
databases, in which case, they are restoring from tape, and will likely
have to validate many things. That sort of suggests that we might see it
come back up sometime tomorrow afternoon, or later if the restore fails
and they have to revert to a different backup."
 

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Chase.com outage

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Does anyone have any information (beyond the wimpy statement that
"technical issues" were to blame) on the Chase outage?

It seems that when a multibillion dollar company's major web site is
down for more than a day, there must be juicy "technical issues" that 
beg to be told. So, can anyone dish? :-)

--  
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Jon Lewis wrote (on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0400):
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote:
> 
> >A friend brought this to my attention:
> >
> >http://ipq.co/
> >
> >He saw it at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1678324
> >
> >I'm not sure whether to shriek in joy or in pain. Will data from
> >this service - if it is a worthy service - propagate properly?
> >Play nicely with or break other people's toys? Is it a gimmick?
> 
> How's it going to break anything?  I just created one...
> 
> tentententen.ipq.co.86400   IN  A   10.10.10.10
> 
> so...now I can use tentententen.ipq.co as a name that resolves to 
> 10.10.10.10...assuming I trust ipq.co to keep that A record and not delete 
> or change it at some point.  Other than the fact that you can't change 
> it[1], how is this any different (other than being less useful) or scarier 
> than DynDNS?
> 
> 
> 1. EMAIL ADDRESS
> optional, but will allow you to update the record later (once we implement 
> it)

And now FF blocks it as a "reported attack page."
 
-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Lightly used IP addresses

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

[attribution removed, as I lost track of who said what]

> > Do you now. Unfortunately, the plain language of the LRSA does not
> > respect your belief.
> > 
> > ARIN makes only two promises about the application of existing and new
> > ARIN policies to LRSA signatories: "ARIN will take no action to reduce
> > the services provided for Included Number Resources _that are not
> > currently being utilized_ by the Legacy Applicant." (10.b) and "fee
> > shall be $100 per year until the year 2013; no increase per year
> > greater than $25." (6.b)
> > 
> > Except for those exclusions, the LRSA includes "the Policies which are
> > hereby incorporated by reference" (15.d). Those policies are "binding
> > upon Legacy Applicant immediately after they are posted on the
> > Website" (7).
> > 
> > In other words, if the ARIN board adopts a policy that legacy
> > registrants must install some of their addresses on a router on the
> > moon (or perhaps some requirement that's a little less extreme) then
> > failing to is cause for terminating the contract (14.b). Which revokes
> > the IP addresses (14.e.i).
> > 
> I think that is a rather bizarre and extreme construction of excerpts of the
> contract language. More rational construction would lead one to believe
> that the stated intent is to limit ARIN's ability to raise fees and prevent
> the revocation of legacy addresses absent a failure to pay fees.

You could think this 'bizarre', and you might be right. I read it, however,
and was convinced - at least to the point where I would advise a client
not to sign such an agreement without additional research.

Ritual disclaimer - IAAL, but not a very good one, and this isn't legal
advice, and, if you take legal advice from a stranger's internet
postings, you have bigger problems than ARIN can throw at you. :-)

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: SCO UNIX Errors

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

William Pitcock wrote (on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:45:18AM -0500):
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 23:40 -0700, jacob miller wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
> 
> They mean "use an operating system not made by crackheads."  There's a
> reason why SCO switched from UNIX sales to Intellectual Property
> trolling after all.
> 
> William

Te be pednatic, the *operating system* was not made by crackheads. The
crackheads who trashed the company (hint: it started a *long* time before
McBride) were always the suits. The operating system is quite solid, but
a bit dated, and (with the shift to IP trolling) became more and more
out of date.

But the coders were really nice people, and they did some really nice
things.

Operational content: never let the suits run your company. :-)
Or, if they do, keep your eye on the door.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: SCO UNIX Errors

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote (on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 06:27:09AM -0400):
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:39:43 EDT, "N. Yaakov Ziskind" said:
> > The best place to ask this question is on usenet:comp.unix.sco.misc.
> 
> This is, of course, if you can find a still-functional usenet server. ;)

If not, there's Google Groups, and I believe that CUSM is gated to a
mailing list.

I'm just saying.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: SCO UNIX Errors

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

The best place to ask this question is on usenet:comp.unix.sco.misc.

jacob miller wrote (on Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:40:27PM -0700):
> Hi,
> 
> Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
> 
> Any idea as to what they mean.
> 
> 
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191185
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags
> 
> :
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191200
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags
> 
> :
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191204
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.10.3 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags
> 
> :
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191206
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191249
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191250
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.10.3 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191264
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191268
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.10.3 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191270
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.3.12 172.16.1.254
> 
> route: got message of size 120
> 
> RTM_LOSING: Kernel Suspects Partitioning: len 120, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, 
> flags:
> 
> proto: 0, age: 1274191297
> 
> locks:  inits:
> 
> sockaddrs: 
> 
>  172.16.10.3 172.16.1.254 
> 
> Regards,
> Jacob 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Michael Dillon wrote (on Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 09:31:43PM +0100):
> On 9 April 2010 18:36, David Conrad  wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Michael Dillon wrote:
> >> All ARIN fees are set by the ARIN members.
> >
> > No they are not.
> 
> According to :
> 
>The Fee Schedule, is continually reviewed by ARIN's membership,
>and its Advisory Council, and Board of Trustees to identify ways in
>which ARIN can improve service to the community and to ensure
>that ARIN's operational needs are met
> 
> Since the AC and Board of Trustees are elected by the Members,
> ultimately the members have control of fees.
> 
> -- Michael Dillon

Uh, that's NOT the same thing.

Or, do you believe you have control of the taxes you pay? *I* sure
don't.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

David Hubbard wrote (on Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:07:05AM -0400):
> From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us] 
> > 
> > 
> > It's like government services for the elderly. Though today many are a
> > net drain on society, they've mostly earned their place with past
> > action and it's the decent and charitable thing to do for the folks
> > who created the possibility of the lives we enjoy today.
> > 
> 
> LOL!  I'm sure most legacy orgs are living on a fixed
> income and just trying to get by; here I was not
> even feeling sorry for them that they can't have some
> free IPv6 allocations when they're just trying to survive.
> 
> ARIN's fees are hardly unreasonable, they need to stop
> crying and join the rest of us that haven't had to
> make their businesses work without the luxury of a
> free handout.

Is this just an argument about the money? Or, are there other issues
("you agree that we can revoke your allocation at any time, for any
reason, as we see fit")?

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

I don't think the issue is *money* (at least the big issue; money is
*always* an issue), but rather the all-of-sudden jump from being
unregulated to regulated, whatever that means. I would think multiple
times before making that jump. Hence my suggestion to set up a separate
organization to request IPv6 space, and thus not 'endanger' whatever I
had before.


Owen DeLong wrote (on Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 02:06:54PM -0700):
> If you are an end-user type organization, the fee is only $100/year
> for all your resources, IPv4 and IPv6 included.  Is that really what
> you would call significant?
> 
> Owen
> 
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:59 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> 
> > Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only.
> > 
> > Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them
> > will result in the ceding of legacy rights. 
> > We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. 
> > Thanks everyone for the info.
> > 
> > John
> > - Original Message - From: "Joe Greco" 
> > To: "Owen DeLong" 
> > Cc: "NANOG list" 
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
> > 
> > 
> >> It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
> >> moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
> >> a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
> >> We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee.  As it stands, there
> >> isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the
> >> form of the fees.
> >> ... JG
> >> -- 
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Just curious: why not set up a separate entity to apply for IPv6 space?
Do you get a cheaper fee (or other brownie points) if you already have
an allocation?

John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote (on Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:59:30PM -0500):
> Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only.
> 
> Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them
> will result in the ceding of legacy rights. 
> 
> We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. 
> 
> Thanks everyone for the info.
> 
> John
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Joe Greco" 
> To: "Owen DeLong" 
> Cc: "NANOG list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM
> Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
> 
> >It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
> >moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
> >a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
> >
> >We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee.  As it stands, there
> >isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the
> >form of the fees.
> >
> >... JG

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Larry Sheldon wrote (on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28:03AM -0600):
> On 2/23/2010 4:39 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> 
> > Maybe politicians should just keep their nose out of things that they
> > can't understand.  Email addresses aren't phone numbers.
> 
> It occurs to me that maybe there is a reason why political conservatives
> get so excited about "minor, trivial" erosions of sanity; why they worry
> about "where this might lead"
> 
> It's been mentioned--why not "portable" street addresses.  Fire
> departments will just have to adapt.

If you want an example of just what would result, take a trip to Tokyo,
where house numbers were assigned in the order that building permits
were issued, and you need *extremely* detailed directions.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: DMCA takedowns of networks

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Jack Bates wrote (on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:52:01AM -0500):
> John van Oppen wrote:
> >I think that is a pretty standard procedure.   We generally give our
> >users 12 hours to remove the content before we null-route the IP...
> >The only time this does not apply is with active spam sources, simple
> >and quite effective.
> >
> 
> And yet, that may have been exactly what happened. Lack of information 
> always leads to much speculation.
> 
> 
> Jack

But, if HE *didn't* do that, why aren't they commenting? Like, on this
forum, for example? HE ppl seem to know the address of NANOG ...

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Cogent input

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Justin Shore wrote (on Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:46:45AM -0500):
> I'm in search of some information about Cogent, it's past, present and 
> future.  I've heard bits and pieces about Cogent's past over the years 
> but by no means have I actively been keeping up.

We've had Cogent for several years in NYC with no real problems. Their
tech support is clueless (more than a month so far to get new IP's, 
for instance)  but you can work around that.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: EU elections - piratenpartei.net censored

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

Why is there *never* a moderator around when you need one? :-)

Mike Lieman wrote (on Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 09:37:42PM -0400):
> Copyright Laws, are just that.  Laws.  And the can be changed if The People
> desire it.
> 
> The issue I see with copyright TODAY is that there is effectively no entry
> of anything into the Public Domain in any reasonable sort of time.
> Traditionally that's been the benefit derived by The People for giving
> special Copyright privileges.
> 
> So what do The People get out of all this?
> 
> There's that and the abuse, where content which clearly fails to advance
> neither Science nor Useful Arts -- the Constitutionally Mandated extent of
> Copyright authority granted to the Legislature -- is Copyrighted.
> 
> What Science or Useful Art is Hannah Montana's latest CD advancing, making
> it worthy of special privilege?
> 
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:18 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) 
> wrote:
> 
> > Thats fine - but one thing that I can't tolerate about the Pirates party is
> > this
> > apparent non-sense that there should be no such thing as copyright.
> > AFAIC, making an illegal download of software or music is stealing and is
> > no different from going into a shop and shoplifting some merchandise.
> >
> > Someone is making a living from writing that code or making that music.
> >
> > John
> > - Original Message - From: "Peter Dambier"  > >
> > To: 
> > Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 5:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: EU elections - piratenpartei.net censored
> >
> >
> >  Thank you Arnold.
> >>
> >> Yes, we have not put all our eggs in the same nest :)
> >>
> >> As far as we could find out somebody has put us into an adult filter.
> >> That is what triggered the reaction of the hoster.
> >>
> >> There is a movement of the governing parties in germany to install
> >> a mandatory adult filter controled only by a single policeman.
> >>
> >> That is excactly what the pirates party is opposing.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >> Peter

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

JC Dill wrote (on Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:02:25AM -0700):
> Ross wrote:
> 
> There seems to be a big misconception that he asked them to "hand over" 
> the info.  As I read the OP, he asked Comcast to do something about it 
> and Comcast said "we can't do anything about it because we don't have 
> logs".  Here's a quote from the OP:
> 
> >I've been nudging an operator at Covad about a handful of hosts from 
> >his DHCP pool that have been attacking - relentlessly port scanning - 
> >our assets. I've been informed by this individual that there's "no 
> >way" to determine which customer had that address at the times I list 
> >in my logs - even though these logs are sent within 48 hours of the 
> >incidents. 
> 
> IMHO, that's a bunch of BS from whoever he's talking with at Comcast.  
> In the normal course of business they would have logs of which customer 
> had that IP just 48 hours earlier.  They *can* do something about their 
> customer.  And they *should* do something about their customer who is 
> causing problems on another network, the same as if that customer was 
> spewing spam, or actually attacking (DDoS etc.) another network.
> 
> So the question circles back around to how does the OP get Comcast to 
> step up, internally identify and take care of their problem customer?  
> What path should he take to get connected with someone who has more clue 
> about this type of problem so that they can address it in a timely fashion?
> 
> Has it come to needing to get a lawyer to write a strongly worded letter 
> just to get this type of thing done today?
> 
> jc

[Disclaimer - I am a lawyer, and I write strongly worded letters to pay my 
bills.]

Not to disagree with any of your points, but the OP (which you quoted!)
was talking about Covad, while you're bashing Comcast.

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   aw...@ziskind.us
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants

Re: Coop Peering Fabric??

[N. Yaakov Ziskind]

> > That's one of the reasons many of them incorporate as non-profits...
> > Under the tax laws of most countries, the U.S. and Canada included,
> > non-profits are legaly protected against acquisition by for-profits.
> > 
> 
> Do any of these operations post their tax returns online?
> 
> -M<

They might be posted at http://www.guidestar.org/

-- 
_
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attorney and Counselor-at-Law   http://ziskind.us
Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com
Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants