Re: Question for Lucy Lynch, SC Candidate
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote: Lucy, What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List? He appears to be teasing me... I guess I can take it. Best, Martin
Re: Question for Lucy Lynch, SC Candidate
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 04:51 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: Lucy, What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List? Are you possibly referring to the one about Abha Ahuja? -Jim P.
RE: Question for Lucy Lynch, SC Candidate
Lucy, What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List? I wonder, was Randy's message so cryptic that you didn't realize he was memorializing a fallen comrade? I wonder why Randy is driven to make everyone of his postings a combined IQ and trivia test, but since they are so short, I don't see the need to make a fuss about them. Most people just scratch their heads, ignore him, and move to the next message. I would rather see the MLC make a small fuss about people who quote huge uneccessary amounts of text from the message to which they are replying, than to bother about Randy's incomprehensible postings. --Michael Dillon
Re: Question for Lucy Lynch, SC Candidate
Jim Popovitch wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 04:51 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: Lucy, What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List? Are you possibly referring to the one about Abha Ahuja? In the interests of those who may not have noticed Randy's amusement (*I* laughed, so I imagine that Lucy would too): The subject: bgp protection At the very end: kierkegaard nietzsche you are a stoopid schmuck kant :) See? Pretty innocent, and meaningless unless you also saw the stuff here on nanog-futures. -- We should not be building surveillance technology into standards. Law enforcement was not supposed to be easy. Where it is easy, it's called a police state. -- Jeff Schiller
Re: NANOG Elections
On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote: Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process .. Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 160 ballots cast. Steve asked me to stand up and say something election-rousing after Cathy and before the following panel. Hopefully that will help. Joe
want to vote? need username/password?
Since I've heard from a couple of people who are having problems, allow me to channel Betty: Follow: To create username and password: https://www.nanog.org/registration/ username.epl or To have username and password resent: https://www.nanog.org/ registration/password.epl If anybody has additional problems, find a friendly Merit person (e.g. on the registration desk) or send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joe
Re: want to vote? need username/password?
On 16 Oct 2007, at 11:38, Joe Abley wrote: Since I've heard from a couple of people who are having problems, allow me to channel Betty: Follow: To create username and password: https://www.nanog.org/ registration/username.epl or To have username and password resent: https://www.nanog.org/ registration/password.epl If anybody has additional problems, find a friendly Merit person (e.g. on the registration desk) or send mail to nanog- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and most importantly the voting forms are here : https:// www.nanog.org/election/ and this i believe should recognise you when you go to the page if you are on the meeting wireless (well, it did for me) Steve
Re: NANOG Elections
Hello, On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, at 10:50, Joe Abley wrote: On 16-Oct-2007, at 0950, Betty J. Burke wrote: Please encourage everyone to take advantage of the process .. Voting activity picked up a lot this morning, but if the level of participation doesn't increase rapidly, we may have a lower turnout than last year. I think last year we had about 160 ballots cast. Steve asked me to stand up and say something election-rousing after Cathy and before the following panel. Hopefully that will help. certainly not meant as a criticism: Perhaps what would have helped too, would have been to send a notice to nanog-futures _before_ the actual start of the online vote ? The first notice i see on the subject was sent 4 hrs before the closing. Too late
Re: NANOG Elections
Question, I wonder if we can get statistics on how many people who have registered at this nanog have voted vs those who are not physically here? This would help determine if putting a voting desktop outside of main conference room help increase voting participation? Also, possibly, instead of posting to -announce, a direct email to last-registered-email should be sent to each eligible voter reminding them to vote - Some people who attend aren't on any mailing list. (actually, it is an interesting data point, but probably impossible to gather correct data on). -alex
