Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-22 Thread Sean Figgins
On 9/21/10 5:46 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

 There is a trope among American entrepreneurs wherein one refers to a
 new, yet to be formally named company as NewCo or NewCorp.

Not just entrepreneurs, but existing companies that go through naming 
and branding changes.  They will use an obviously fake name to refer to 
the company before they formally announce the new name.  NewNOG is not 
able to use the NANOG brand at this time, as it has not yet been 
acquired by the company.

Whether the new company changes it's name to NANOG in the future is an 
academic exercise more than anything else.  I would think that it would 
be better to have company name different than the activity of NANOG, but 
this is just my opinion.

  -Sean

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-22 Thread Joel Jaeggli
I didn't get the chance to cruise through this as quickly as  I wanted
but I'll weigh in on at least part of it...

Despite my status as a sapphire-button mandarin in the current nanog
cabal I am not in general in favor of membership tiers or
classifications. If membership is required and I'm ok with that case
that has been been made for that, there should be two tiers at most,
members and non-members. student membership is a question of fee
schedule and not an issue of status, fellows are just another monkey on
the bus.


On 9/19/10 10:05 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
 The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published 
 a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found at:
 
   http://www.newnog.org/docs/newnog-bylaws.pdf
 
 Please take a few minutes to review these and make any comments or 
 suggestions.   
 
 There will be a question on the ballot during the NANOG election next month 
 to ratify these bylaws.  Everyone eligible to vote in the NANOG election will 
 also be eligible to vote on this.
 
 Thanks,
 Steve (for the NewNOG board)
 
 
 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
 


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth Eason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

Firstly, as a non-American I like the idea of codifying that there is a
clear international remit for the organisation - as per Michael's
previous mail.

Secondly, are you completely wedded to the name NewNOG - while it's
been a useful working title I'm coming to the opinion that as a
long-term name it lacks meaning (or subverts meaning over time, which is
arguably worse.) Remember that anything new will, with the passage of
time, cease to be new. I hope that the intent is that this new
organisation will be a long lived venture, living far beyond what anyone
might reasonably refer to as 'New' :)

Just my thoughts.
Best regards,
--Gar


On 20/09/10 22:05, Daniel Golding wrote:
 Just as an FYI - a lot of the membership stuff got cribbed from IEEE
 (thanks, IEEE guys!), as they are a related group and there's no need
 to reinvent the wheel. That being said, there will be a few cases like
 this, where we'll need to clean up the verbiage. There is nothing
 actually implied here - I don't think anyone will be screening
 people's membership apps and demanding resumes.
 
 In regard to Rose's comment on management - agreed. That was my omission.
 
 - Dan
 
 On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, J Springer j...@jspringer.net wrote:
 The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has 
 published a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found 
 at:

 If these issues have been resolved and I missed them, apologies in advance.

 Would you elaborate on 5.1 Membership Qualifications:

   ... who by experience or education give evidence ...

 Is this gathered during the application process?


 Regarding 5.2.3 Life Member:

   ... must maintain qualifications for membership to
remain in good standing.

 It's not a Life membership if that membership may be revoked and/or the
 application process has to be repeated even though dues have been paid.  
 Perhaps
 it should be labeled differently.

 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

 
 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyYXQIACgkQK36C50PvIR+65QCePewlhM5gNCKb6N5E1IgkRX0C
bw4An3+t09CrNt1mnj2loKCP2HhH/Gs4
=oOAD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth Eason
On 21/09/10 12:46, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
[snip]
 
 Hi Gareth,
 
 There is a trope among American entrepreneurs wherein one refers to a
 new, yet to be formally named company as NewCo or NewCorp.  This
[snip]

Thanks - that's not a convention I had come across, but very pleased to 
see
that it is merely a placeholder :)

Best regards,
--Gar

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-20 Thread J Springer
 The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published 
 a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found at:

If these issues have been resolved and I missed them, apologies in advance.

Would you elaborate on 5.1 Membership Qualifications:

   ... who by experience or education give evidence ...

Is this gathered during the application process?


Regarding 5.2.3 Life Member:

   ... must maintain qualifications for membership to
remain in good standing.

It's not a Life membership if that membership may be revoked and/or the 
application process has to be repeated even though dues have been paid.  
Perhaps 
it should be labeled differently.

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-20 Thread Rose Klimovich
Steve, overall good job. A few comments:

1. On life members, not sure you want to include that this is 10x membership in 
the bylaws since the fee here could change over time.
2. I think we do need a finance committee since you have this on most boards.
3. On legislation, I think if the government wants input on proposed laws and 
regulations, Nanog can give that even though we are not a lobbyist.
4. On membership, I think we should include management of these organizations 
not just technical staff. Also software and application vendors like those that 
do network management software should be OK as members.


Rose Klimovich

-Original Message-
From: Steve Feldman [mailto:feld...@twincreeks.net] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:06 AM
To: nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published a 
set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found at:

  http://www.newnog.org/docs/newnog-bylaws.pdf

Please take a few minutes to review these and make any comments or suggestions. 
  

There will be a question on the ballot during the NANOG election next month to 
ratify these bylaws.  Everyone eligible to vote in the NANOG election will also 
be eligible to vote on this.

Thanks,
Steve (for the NewNOG board)


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-20 Thread Steve Gibbard
Thanks for all the feedback received so far (and I'm sure there will be 
much more, which will also be very welcome).

The membership section of this is a product of the Membership Working 
Group, chaired by Kris Foster.  Everything else in the bylaws came from 
the Governance Working Group.  I'll leave addressing the 
membership-related questions to them.

On the other points:

Rose Klimovich said:

 3. On legislation, I think if the government wants input on proposed 
 laws and regulations, Nanog can give that even though we are not a 
 lobbyist.

I'm assuming Rose was referring to the part of section 6 that says, No 
substantial part of the activities of the corporation shall be the 
carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence 
legislation, and the corporation shall not participate in, or intervene in 
(including the publishing or distribution of statements) any political 
campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public 
office.

That part came from NewNOG's attorney.  I believe it is standard 501(c)3 
boilerplate, as it looks very similar to what I've seen in the bylaws of 
other 501(c)3 organizations.

My understanding is that there's a critical difference between giving 
advice, which is ok, and attempting to influence legislation, which 
is a disqualifier for 501(c)3 status.  I don't believe answering questions 
when asked for advice would run afoul of that section -- indeed, it's 
arguably an important educational function.  Handing out campaign 
contributions in an attempt to influence the Network Neutrality debate, 
for instance, would be.  There are certainly some grey areas inbetween, 
which might require seeking legal advice, but I don't think this provision 
restricts us any more than any of the other 501(c)3 organizations that 
regularly have representatives testifying before Congress are restricted.

Dan Golding says:

 I think there should be a codified budget and finance committee, to
 provide forward looking budgets as well as audit capability. I think
 these are important things to codify in the bylaws.

That sounds reasonable.

Should I use the following as the language for it, or would the current 
Working Group like the language to say something else?

  9.5 Budget and Finance Committee

  The Budget and Finance Committee will be responsible, along with the
  Executive Director and Board of Directors, for NewNOG's budgeting and
  financial planning.

  9.5.1 Budget and Finance Committee Membership and Selection

  The Budget and Finance Committee will consist of at least three members
  selected by the Board of Directors. Members of the Budget and Finance
  Committee may not serve concurrently on the Board of Directors. The
  chairperson of the Budget and Finance Committee will serve ex officio in
  a non-voting role on the Board of Directors, in order to facilitate
  communication between the two groups.

  Budget and Finance Committee members will serve a two-year term, with
  terms staggered such that as close to half as possible of the terms
  expire each year. No member will serve more than two consecutive terms,
  although additional terms may be served after a one-year interval.

  A Budget and Finance Committee member may be removed before the
  expiration of his or her term if at least five members of the Board of
  Directors  vote for the removal.

Michael Dillon wrote:

 Consider adding worldwide as follows:

 The purpose of NewNOG is to provide forums in the North American
 region for education and the sharing of knowledge for the
 worldwide Internet operations community.
 
 I think this helps clarify that although the focus for venues is on
 North America, that the focus of the work
 is not geographically restricted.

We kept the same language there that's in the current NANOG Charter.  It's 
certainly changable if there's a desire to do so, but I think the current 
language was the result of much negotiation five years ago when it was 
negotiated.

Does anybody else have a strong desire to change that?

Thanks,
Steve

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Steve Feldman wrote:

 The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has 
 published a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be 
 found at:

  http://www.newnog.org/docs/newnog-bylaws.pdf

 Please take a few minutes to review these and make any comments or 
 suggestions.

 There will be a question on the ballot during the NANOG election next 
 month to ratify these bylaws.  Everyone eligible to vote in the NANOG 
 election will also be eligible to vote on this.

 Thanks,
Steve (for the NewNOG board)


 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


--
Steve Gibbard
s...@gibbard.org
+1 415 717-7842 (cell)

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org

Re: [Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-20 Thread Daniel Golding
Just as an FYI - a lot of the membership stuff got cribbed from IEEE
(thanks, IEEE guys!), as they are a related group and there's no need
to reinvent the wheel. That being said, there will be a few cases like
this, where we'll need to clean up the verbiage. There is nothing
actually implied here - I don't think anyone will be screening
people's membership apps and demanding resumes.

In regard to Rose's comment on management - agreed. That was my omission.

- Dan

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, J Springer j...@jspringer.net wrote:
 The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published 
 a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found at:

 If these issues have been resolved and I missed them, apologies in advance.

 Would you elaborate on 5.1 Membership Qualifications:

   ... who by experience or education give evidence ...

 Is this gathered during the application process?


 Regarding 5.2.3 Life Member:

   ... must maintain qualifications for membership to
    remain in good standing.

 It's not a Life membership if that membership may be revoked and/or the
 application process has to be repeated even though dues have been paid.  
 Perhaps
 it should be labeled differently.

 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


[Nanog-futures] Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

2010-09-19 Thread Steve Feldman
The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published a 
set of proposed bylaws for the corporation.  These may be found at:

  http://www.newnog.org/docs/newnog-bylaws.pdf

Please take a few minutes to review these and make any comments or suggestions. 
  

There will be a question on the ballot during the NANOG election next month to 
ratify these bylaws.  Everyone eligible to vote in the NANOG election will also 
be eligible to vote on this.

Thanks,
Steve (for the NewNOG board)


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures