Just as an FYI - a lot of the membership stuff got cribbed from IEEE (thanks, IEEE guys!), as they are a related group and there's no need to reinvent the wheel. That being said, there will be a few cases like this, where we'll need to clean up the verbiage. There is nothing actually implied here - I don't think anyone will be screening people's membership apps and demanding resumes.
In regard to Rose's comment on management - agreed. That was my omission. - Dan On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:02 AM, J Springer <j...@jspringer.net> wrote: >> The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published >> a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation. These may be found at: > > If these issues have been resolved and I missed them, apologies in advance. > > Would you elaborate on 5.1 Membership Qualifications: > > "... who by experience or education give evidence ..." > > Is this gathered during the application process? > > > Regarding 5.2.3 Life Member: > > "... must maintain qualifications for membership to > remain in good standing." > > It's not a "Life" membership if that membership may be revoked and/or the > application process has to be repeated even though dues have been paid. > Perhaps > it should be labeled differently. > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > Nanog-futures@nanog.org > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
