[nant-dev] Bug tracking status
There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were submitted in the first half of May, nine in all of April. Of the nine in April, two were duplicates, one had already been fixed, one was user error, one has been fixed, two are pending more information. I've marked one of them postponed, because I don't believe it's needed for 0.85. Only one of the two May bugs looks like it needs to be addressed (1481841 exec task's commandline and arg eat = signs https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1481841group_id=31650atid=402868 ), but I suspect that arg value... can be made to work. In my opinion, that's enough to close out 0.85 and release it. Granted, I'm exploiting the fact that the default priority is 5, not 9. Nevertheless, 0.85 is still a pre-1.0 version number and there's more noise about getting a new release out than fixing any particular bug. Furthermore, a release is really necessary at this time to maintain credibility against MSbuild. Therefore, I propose that the next full build be declared the 0.85 final release, and that 0.86 be opened. The only exception to this would be any identified showstoppers, where showstopper is defined as: a) it affects most NAnt users; b) there is no workaround; and either c1) it prevents using NAnt for its primary purpose (building .Net projects) or c2) the fix would break many existing build files. I can even be convinced to remove c2, but I doubt that's an issue. Gary --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Feldman Sent: dinsdag 16 mei 2006 17:32 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were submitted in the first half of May, nine in all of April. Of the nine in April, two were duplicates, one had already been fixed, one was user error, one has been fixed, two are pending more information. I've marked one of them postponed, because I don't believe it's needed for 0.85. Only one of the two May bugs looks like it needs to be addressed (1481841 exec task's commandline and arg eat = signs https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=148 1841group_id=31650atid=402868 ), but I suspect that arg value... can be made to work. Gary, were you able to reproduce this issue ? It's working fine here. I think that the issue described by the submitter is due to the way command line arguments for batch files are processed, and as such this has nothing to do with NAnt itself. In my opinion, that's enough to close out 0.85 and release it. Granted, I'm exploiting the fact that the default priority is 5, not 9. Nevertheless, 0.85 is still a pre-1.0 version number and there's more noise about getting a new release out than fixing any particular bug. Furthermore, a release is really necessary at this time to maintain credibility against MSbuild. Therefore, I propose that the next full build be declared the 0.85 final release, and that 0.86 be opened. The only exception to this would be any identified showstoppers, where showstopper is defined as: a) it affects most NAnt users; b) there is no workaround; and either c1) it prevents using NAnt for its primary purpose (building .Net projects) or c2) the fix would break many existing build files. I can even be convinced to remove c2, but I doubt that's an issue. I'd still prefer to have one more release candidate before we ship a new final release. I hope to have time in the next two weeks, but I realise I've said that before :( We've also lost the instructions for our release procedure when the Wiki was killed (pfff), so it'll take a little longer than usually. Gert --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status
Gert Driesen wrote: Gary, were you able to reproduce this issue ? It's working fine here. I think that the issue described by the submitter is due to the way command line arguments for batch files are processed, and as such this has nothing to do with NAnt itself. I didn't try, because my intuition agrees with your analysis. I'd still prefer to have one more release candidate before we ship a new final release. OK, but let's pick a time frame for the interval between that and the real release, along with a policy of no checkins (on the trunk) during that period except for showstoppers. Gary --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status
Great! I think NAnt needs new release badly. The fact, it has no stable release for year or so hurt the project, imho. Next thing we should do is VS2005 projects. I prefer msbuild integration way, but its 0.86 or rather 0.9 matter! btw: it'd be better to release atleast 2 or 4 version a year, even that not so well tested, perhaps. We could always rerelease patched version. Regards, Martin Aliger In my opinion, that's enough to close out 0.85 and release it. Granted, I'm exploiting the fact that the default priority is 5, not 9. Nevertheless, 0.85 is still a pre-1.0 version number and there's more noise about getting a new release out than fixing any particular bug. Furthermore, a release is really necessary at this time to maintain credibility against MSbuild. Therefore, I propose that the next full build be declared the 0.85 final release, and that 0.86 be opened. The only exception to this would be any identified showstoppers, where showstopper is defined as: a) it affects most NAnt users; b) there is no workaround; and either c1) it prevents using NAnt for its primary purpose (building .Net projects) or c2) the fix would break many existing build files. I can even be convinced to remove c2, but I doubt that's an issue. Gary --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
