[newbie] Freeserve, trouble with mail

2001-12-19 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm having trouble subscribing to this list using Freeserve. I have all the
posts coming to my work account but people are complaining that 20,000
emails on the server is too much :O)

Hass anyone else had problem with them, they don't seem to answer my emails,
and it will pain me to call their help line. I am getting mail from them,
but I can't seem to get the subscription confirmation to come back. Is it a
problem with the list or should I hound Freeserver some more?

Thanks in advance people

Adrian Lynch
--
United Kingdom
http://www.thoughtbubble.co.uk/
Ph: +44 (0) 20 7387 8890
--
New Zealand
http://www.thoughtbubble.co.nz/
Ph: +64 (0) 9 488 9131



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] windows on linux

2001-10-23 Thread Adrian Lynch

Wine? If not, please go easy on me!! I have no work to do and I'm bored.
Has anyone read all of Sridhar's footer's, some are bloody funny :o)

-Original Message-
From: Dechao Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 21:44
To: newbie
Subject: [newbie] windows on linux


Does anybody know what and where is the program that I can run windows'
applications from linux box?


Cheers,
Dechao




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] AOL and Mandrake 8.0

2001-10-23 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm a bit late with this one! I had a chat with AOL's online help, I wrote a
large paragraph of my situation, saying what info I needed , or thought I
needed, to get AOL going in Win4Lin. His answer, AOL does not support
Linux, 10 minutes of arguing later and it ends with a thank you and good
bye. Now I know AOL aren't considered the best ISP around but I have no
other problems with them, and they're cheap! I'm going home to try it again,
the setup, not the arguing!! I'll let you know if it all goes t*ts up!!!

-Original Message-
From: Gordon Burgess-Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2001 21:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] AOL and Mandrake 8.0


Has anyone heard of aol being got running using WINE or WIN4LIN or 
something like that? I ask because I'm using aol as a dial-up (flat rate 
unmetered access) while waiting for NTL cable modem to come to my area!

Thanks

Gordon





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] windows on linux

2001-10-23 Thread Adrian Lynch

GO ON SON, HIT 'EM

He was only joking, sometimes there's no other way to say, or point
something out with out coming across like you're being a smart arse, thats
why you should litter your email with symbols, then you can only hope that
people take it as info and not someone having a go! Now shake hands and say
sorry. 

I think I'll change my name to Mum!!

-Original Message-
From: Matt Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 18:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] windows on linux


on 10/23/01 11:14 AM, Steve Borrett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 There's wine, the windows emulator. It takes a windows application and
 translates the calls it makes into something X can handle, so you can run
 the app right in X. www.winehq.com
 
 smug
 Just because I am in a pedantic mood, I would like to point out that
saying
 wine is a windows emulator is an oxymoron. WINE stands for
 Wine is not an emulator, therefore proving itself that your statement is
 woefully
 inaccurate. *grin*
 /smug
 
Yes, I'm well aware of that. But pointing out the technicalities of what
Wine is and isn't, isn't exactly necessary to inform the OP of a program
that will let him run Windows apps in a Linux environment (excuse me, a
GNU/Linux environment). Calling it an emulator probably gives him an idea
of what it does, a reference point. If he's really interested in what it
does, he can read up on it at the URL I gave him.

What's with the unnecessary attitude? Last I heard, being in a pedantic
mood and wrapping your post with cute little tags is not a viable excuse to
be an ass for no reason.


Matt


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] windows on linux

2001-10-23 Thread Adrian Lynch

I think he means the other way round!!

-Original Message-
From: russell hobman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 16:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] windows on linux


goodaye, the program you would be after is WIN4LIN3
you can find out more about it here 
http://www.netraverse.com/
regards, russell.

 --- Dechao Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Does
anybody know what and where is the program that
 I can run windows'
 applications from linux box?
 
 
 Cheers,
 Dechao
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
  


Nokia Game is on again. 
Go to http://uk.yahoo.com/nokiagame/ and join the new
all media adventure before November 3rd.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is the reply I posted to them.)

2001-10-18 Thread Adrian Lynch

I can't believe you lot take this so seriously. I'm very new to Linux yet I
found it funny, and there was probably more jokes in it than I'll ever
realise. No doubt they are all pating themselves on the back at such an out
cry by yourselves. This is exactly what they were hoping for I think!!

Ade

-Original Message-
From: Franki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 October 2001 22:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is the
reply I posted to them.)


lol, I titled this:  This guy is on Drugs or Works for Microsoft

here is what I posted, anyone correct me if anything I said was incorrect.

=
Hi,

First of all, the guys name was Linus not linux.

Second: M$ Office, Outlook and IE are Microsoft software, THEY choose not to
supply them for linux because they want people to use windows not linux.
Third: There is more then one linux app that will open and save in M$ office
file formats, anyone with half a brain can work out how to use them as its
pretty much a standard menu system. Try Star Office and Openoffice.

Forth:, Mozilla is almost word for word standards compliant, IE is not.
(although ie6 is close) so you lied.
Fifth: You don't need a Pentium with 32MB ram to run linux, you can do it on
a 386 with 8MB of ram. and boot it from a floppy (Trinix and others)you just
need 32mb and a pentium to run Mandrake linux, since they rightly assume
that people would rather have an OS that is optimised for the system they
have, rather then one that is optimised for old hardware, you want to run
linux on a 486, get Peanut or possibly Redhat. Also, try loading win2000 or
XP on your 486. the versions of linux that were out when 95 came out, ran on
486's just fine, and the fact that some current versions can still run on it
says alot, none of M$ recent versions will run on a 486 at all.

Sixth: RedHat, Caldera and others are not past names for linux distro's they
are Current other distro's. People chose the one they want. which had you
read up on, you wouldn't have tried to use Mandrake on a 486.

Seventh: Linux doesn't have virus software? thats probably because its
nearly impossible to infect a properly linux box with a virus because of
users,, you need root or admin access to do that. Windows XP home, like
win98,98,98SE and ME make everyone root, so they are affected by virus's
Also there are alot of linux virus scanners, like Trend Filescan, the thing
is that they all search for windows virus's because there are none on linux
that are a threat to anyone.

Eighth: Linux doesn't need firewalls like Zone Alarm because the abiltiy is
built into the OS, read ipchains and iptables, and Mandrake 8.1 has two
firewalls built into it. InteractiveBastille does far more then most just by
asking you a bunch of questions from a nice GUI interface.

Ninth: Software, Mandrake linux has server software that it would cost over
2000AUD to achieve with Microsoft(tm) software, and you wouldn't have been
effected by Code Red or Nimda if you weren't running M$ software. it also
comes standard with 2 or more versions of spreadsheets, word processors
presentation software, finance stuff, advanced text editors, time management
software email clients, graphing software, image editing software and more,
and it all comes WITH Mandrake, you don't have to buy it seperatly.

Tenth: Games, what to play Quake3 on linux? go ahead, you can buy it for
linux, ditto with many other titles. and with WINE, you can run a great many
actual windows titles as well.

Please, if you are going to review a product at least get someone who knows
what they are doing to review it objectively, you don't know because you
only know the microsoft way and have a closed mind to anything else.

Remember windows has been around in a semi decent form since 1992 or so,,
Unix, which is linux's parent has been around since the 60's... you just
didn't know about it.

That is not the fault of linux.

I use both linux and windows, I started with an open mind and I am tipping
more and more towards linux because it does everything I want, and I can
have the same machine running without a reboot for months just fine (I have
seen cases where it has run without reboot for well over a year.). and it
didn't cost me 500 bucks to buy.

Be objective when you review something, just because its not what you are
used to, doesn't mean that its not better, (or conversely that its worse.)


Rgds

Frank
Perth Australia.






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is the rep ly I posted to them.)

2001-10-18 Thread Adrian Lynch

Good point, at least some good, apart from a chuckle, has come out of it!!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October 2001 15:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is the
rep ly I posted to them.)



Actually, I'm not sure if Frank is taking it seriously or just adding some
real facts so the newbs (like myself) know the truths.

mitch



 

Adrian Lynch

adrian.l@thoughtbubbTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED], Newbie  
le.net  (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: cc:

newbie-owner@linux-maSubject: RE: [newbie]
Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is
ndrake.com   the rep  ly I posted to
them.)
 

 

10/18/01 08:41 AM

Please respond to

newbie

 

 





I can't believe you lot take this so seriously. I'm very new to Linux yet I
found it funny, and there was probably more jokes in it than I'll ever
realise. No doubt they are all pating themselves on the back at such an out
cry by yourselves. This is exactly what they were hoping for I think!!

Ade

-Original Message-
From: Franki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 October 2001 22:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Worst factual review of linux ever ( This is the
reply I posted to them.)


lol, I titled this:  This guy is on Drugs or Works for Microsoft

here is what I posted, anyone correct me if anything I said was incorrect.


=
Hi,

First of all, the guys name was Linus not linux.

Second: M$ Office, Outlook and IE are Microsoft software, THEY choose not
to
supply them for linux because they want people to use windows not linux.
Third: There is more then one linux app that will open and save in M$
office
file formats, anyone with half a brain can work out how to use them as its
pretty much a standard menu system. Try Star Office and Openoffice.

Forth:, Mozilla is almost word for word standards compliant, IE is not.
(although ie6 is close) so you lied.
Fifth: You don't need a Pentium with 32MB ram to run linux, you can do it
on
a 386 with 8MB of ram. and boot it from a floppy (Trinix and others)you
just
need 32mb and a pentium to run Mandrake linux, since they rightly assume
that people would rather have an OS that is optimised for the system they
have, rather then one that is optimised for old hardware, you want to run
linux on a 486, get Peanut or possibly Redhat. Also, try loading win2000 or
XP on your 486. the versions of linux that were out when 95 came out, ran
on
486's just fine, and the fact that some current versions can still run on
it
says alot, none of M$ recent versions will run on a 486 at all.

Sixth: RedHat, Caldera and others are not past names for linux distro's
they
are Current other distro's. People chose the one they want. which had you
read up on, you wouldn't have tried to use Mandrake on a 486.

Seventh: Linux doesn't have virus software? thats probably because its
nearly impossible to infect a properly linux box with a virus because of
users,, you need root or admin access to do that. Windows XP home, like
win98,98,98SE and ME make everyone root, so they are affected by virus's
Also there are alot of linux virus scanners, like Trend Filescan, the thing
is that they all search for windows virus's because there are none on linux
that are a threat to anyone.

Eighth: Linux doesn't need firewalls like Zone Alarm because the abiltiy is
built into the OS, read ipchains and iptables, and Mandrake 8.1 has two
firewalls built into it. InteractiveBastille does far more then most just
by
asking you a bunch of questions from a nice GUI interface.

Ninth: Software, Mandrake linux has server software that it would cost over
2000AUD to achieve with Microsoft(tm) software, and you wouldn't have been
effected by Code Red or Nimda if you weren't running M$ software. it also
comes standard with 2 or more versions of spreadsheets, word processors
presentation software, finance stuff, advanced text editors, time
management
software email clients, graphing software, image editing software and more,
and it all comes WITH Mandrake, you don't have to buy it seperatly.

Tenth: Games, what to play Quake3 on linux? go ahead, you can buy it for
linux, ditto with many other titles. and with WINE, you can run a great
many
actual windows titles as well.

Please, if you are going to review a product at least get someone who knows
what they are doing to review it objectively, you don't know because you
only know the microsoft way and have a closed mind to anything else.

Remember windows has been around

RE: [newbie] Grub problems

2001-10-01 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm not sure this is true, I have ME (God bless my soul) and I can, I think,
exit to DOS. Or am I thinking of something else?

-Original Message-
From: Hans N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 September 2001 21:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Grub problems


Just a Windohz warning, people with Windohz ME can't exit to DOS.
Restarting in DOS mode is not an option.

Hans N.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of d
What I am trying to say in all of this is I
did NOT use a WinBlow$ boot disk, did it directly from DOS by just exiting
to it.





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Test

2001-10-01 Thread Adrian Lynch

Bloody Outlook, just testing to see if this thing works







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re:[newbie] Video cards

2001-09-18 Thread Adrian Lynch

I was looking at the new KyroII cards but I haven't seen much info with
regards to compatability, anyone know any different?

So, with all the discussion about nVidia cards, what is a good card to 
run? I am going to upgrade cause my little 4mb ATI Rage doesn't even get 
tux down the hill.  I want a midrange card in the $60 to $100 range. Is 
there any hope? TIA for any suggestions. 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Video Cards, any good?

2001-09-14 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm about to buy a new video card, either a 3D Prophet 4500 PowerVR KyroII
64MB AGP, or a VIVID! XS Kyro II 32MB AGP. Can anyone tell me what the
compatability is like with these and Mandrake 8.0, or a place I can find
out? 

Lovely Jubbly :o)

Hey Ho...lets go



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] Grub problems

2001-09-14 Thread Adrian Lynch

Adam, not two weeks ago I did exactly the same thing, and it was a weekend
so I had no way of finding out how to fix it. you might want to wait for
someone to confirm this answer, but you use a Windoze Boot disk get into the
c drive ( dir c: and press enter) then fdisk /mbr this clears the Master
Boot Record.biut like I said, wait for confirmation from someone else

-Original Message-
From: Adam Cripps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 12:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Grub problems


I installed a lnx4win Mandrake 8.0 on a pc, which
would load a text bootloader fine. 

However, when I decided to uninstall, I deleted the
lnx4win folder (in windows) and rebooted.

Grub still starts and then, being a complete newbie, I
don't know how to get past it. 

Is there any way of getting rid of Grub, so that the
machine boots straight into Windows? 

Thanks

Adam

__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

2001-09-11 Thread Adrian Lynch

Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it needs
to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should have come
with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up lastnight, and what do I find? Two
64Mb chips, one PC133 the other PC100.

Not a happy bunny, see  :o(

Whats the point of giving me a mix of the two if the lower one brings the
higher one down?



Adrian Lynch
--
United Kingdom
http://www.thoughtbubble.co.uk/
Ph: +44 (0) 20 7387 8890
--
New Zealand
http://www.thoughtbubble.co.nz/
Ph: +64 (0) 9 488 9131

The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) . Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Thoughtbubble. This information may be
subject to legal, professional or other privilege and further distribution
of it is strictly prohibited without our authority. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are not authorised to disclose, copy, distribute, or
retain this message. Please notify us on +44 (0) 20 7387 8890





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

2001-09-11 Thread Adrian Lynch

So it's just a case of me changing the BIOS from auto to 133?
Does it really not matter what I get, surely there is some difference?
I would still like one 128MB stick instead of two 64's!

-Original Message-
From: Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 14:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?


On Tuesday 11 September 2001 04:47 am, Adrian Lynch escribió:
 Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but it
 needs to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it should
 have come with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up lastnight, and
 what do I find? Two 64Mb chips, one PC133 the other PC100.

 Whats the point of giving me a mix of the two if the lower one brings
 the higher one down?

   It doesn't bring[s] the higher one down.  pc66, pc100, and pc133 
are mostly nothin more than marketing labels. What is important is the 
nano second rating (ns) and the cas latency rating (CL), and of course 
the quality and design of the PCB the ram chips are on. The pcxxx label 
is practically meaningless.

   A rough gauge is that the ram should be 1000/133.3 = 7.5ns to run at 
133.3mhz.  Better 133mhz ram will also be non-ECC, and CL2. BUT most 
ram sold under the pc133 marketing label is 8ns (really 125mhz), CL3, 
on less than the best quality/design PCB. 

   Bottom line is ram is what'll do, according to what you set it to 
with bios settings. I've had ancient 66mhz ram, before the pcwhatever 
labels were invented, that would run reliably at 112mhz, CL3.  I've 
been using an old 128mb stick of 8ns CL2 ram (pc100) flawlessly for 
years at 135mhz CL2. It's in my system right now mixed with 2 other 
sticks of pc133, all running together at 135mhz CL2 with -0- errors.
-- 
Tom Brinkman   Galveston Bay




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

2001-09-11 Thread Adrian Lynch

Cheers Tom, it's just I get conflicting information. I'll get them to sort
the Ram out, set the BIOS to 133, cross my fingers, pray to God Almighty and
read read read. I think it's well out of order for companies to do this, you
expect to get what you paid for, but you are right, I'll be building my next
one, so I know exactly what's in it.

Thanks for the answer's, I know it wasn't exactly Linux related, but cheers
anyway!


-Original Message-
From: Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?


On Tuesday 11 September 2001 08:30 am, Adrian Lynch escribió:
 So it's just a case of me changing the BIOS from auto to 133?

 Yes. You should post what the system is (cpu/mobo) and what bios 
it uses. Unless there's a facility on the ram PCB to signal the bios 
what speed to run the ram at, 'auto' doesn't have any effect.  It's 
usually better to manually set the ram timings anyhow.  Also, the 
quality and stabiity of the motherboard is, IMO, more important to ram 
performance, than what the ram is labeled.

 Does it really not matter what I get, surely there is some
 difference? I would still like one 128MB stick instead of two 64's!

 You probly have some gripe with the vendor. BUT I'll tell you 
right now that ALL ready made vendors, even the most popular ones like 
Dell, Gatway, Compaq, etc., routinely substitute lower spec parts into 
their systems.  As I said below, most ram sold as pc133  really 
isn't 7.5ns ram. It's just capable of running at 133.3mhz, CL3.  I 
suspect you've got 2 sticks of 8ns CL3 ram. Both of which will do 
133mhz, regardless of the label on them.

 What you've run across is actually the best reason to learn about 
hardware, and build your own system.
-- 
Tom Brinkman   Galveston Bay 

 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 11 September 2001 14:24
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

 On Tuesday 11 September 2001 04:47 am, Adrian Lynch escribió:
  Speaking of RAM, I hope nobody minds me slating a PC company, but
  it needs to be said. I bought a PC from Evesham a while back, it
  should have come with 128Mb PC133 SDRAM, just opened it up
  lastnight, and what do I find? Two 64Mb chips, one PC133 the other
  PC100.
 
  Whats the point of giving me a mix of the two if the lower one
  brings the higher one down?

It doesn't bring[s] the higher one down.  pc66, pc100, and pc133
 are mostly nothin more than marketing labels. What is important is
 the nano second rating (ns) and the cas latency rating (CL), and of
 course the quality and design of the PCB the ram chips are on. The
 pcxxx label is practically meaningless.

A rough gauge is that the ram should be 1000/133.3 = 7.5ns to run
 at 133.3mhz.  Better 133mhz ram will also be non-ECC, and CL2. BUT
 most ram sold under the pc133 marketing label is 8ns (really 125mhz),
 CL3, on less than the best quality/design PCB.

Bottom line is ram is what'll do, according to what you set it to
 with bios settings. I've had ancient 66mhz ram, before the
 pcwhatever labels were invented, that would run reliably at 112mhz,
 CL3.  I've been using an old 128mb stick of 8ns CL2 ram (pc100)
 flawlessly for years at 135mhz CL2. It's in my system right now mixed
 with 2 other sticks of pc133, all running together at 135mhz CL2 with
 -0- errors.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] 486/66ST Vectra

2001-09-11 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm hoping to get this machine working, it's a HP Vectra 486/66ST, just
bought some RAM for it, Two 16Mb SIMMs. It has a floppy(thank the lord), a
scsi HD(not sure how big, 500mb I think), scsi card, and the other
trimmings. Although not technically a Linux question, it willl lead to many
more, I want to put a lightweight Linux on this
(is lightweight the wrong term?) machine. I can't seem to get beyond the
start up menu, it runs through a check of the components, floppy, keyboard
ect. I get an error for System Configuration, I have tried booting from the
floppy, with various disks. Also the CD, I'm not even sure I can get into
the BIOS to have a tinker. What it all boils down to is, it asks for a
Diskette named Vectra #1, I thought I had downloaded the right thing from
a site, but all I get is the same message, insert diskette Vectra #1 into
drive A...press any key to continue

The error message prior to this says,
The record of your configuration that is saved in your CMOS memory does not
match the components that are installed on your computer

Can anyone tell me,
a) can I get into the BIOS
b) where can I get the disk Vectra #1 from (tried HP site but very little
info on what I have)
c) a place or person that can help me.

PS, I checked the floppy was working in another machine, so it shouldn't be
that.

Cheers

Adrian Lynch
--
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) . Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Thoughtbubble. This information may be
subject to legal, professional or other privilege and further distribution
of it is strictly prohibited without our authority. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are not authorised to disclose, copy, distribute, or
retain this message. Please notify us on +44 (0) 20 7387 8890
--








Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

2001-09-10 Thread Adrian Lynch

Sorry about the lateness of this post, but £30 buys you 256Mb of SDRAM and
even DDR! Whats the problem? Unless of course you're after some older memory
type!

-Original Message-
From: Warren Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2001 04:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?


I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
it. I know I need to get more RAM, but how much is enough?

Box 1 is a Celeron 366 MHz with 32 MB, box 2 is a K5 100 MHz with 16 MB.
Both will be used for public Internet access: IceWM, Konqueror and/or
Netscape, KOffice and/or StarOffice, a messenger program... and no doubt
a whole bunch of other stuff I don't even know about yet.

Thanks,
Warren
--
http://sites.netscape.net/srcopan/







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?

2001-09-10 Thread Adrian Lynch

I wish I had read the other answers before sending that last one. Sorry :o(

-Original Message-
From: Warren Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2001 04:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] RAM: How much is enough?


I will be installing LM8.0 on two PCs as soon as I finish downloading
it. I know I need to get more RAM, but how much is enough?

Box 1 is a Celeron 366 MHz with 32 MB, box 2 is a K5 100 MHz with 16 MB.
Both will be used for public Internet access: IceWM, Konqueror and/or
Netscape, KOffice and/or StarOffice, a messenger program... and no doubt
a whole bunch of other stuff I don't even know about yet.

Thanks,
Warren
--
http://sites.netscape.net/srcopan/







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] Which Linux?

2001-08-22 Thread Adrian Lynch


Cheers for the answers. Mandrake it is then. 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Which Linux?

2001-08-20 Thread Adrian Lynch

I'm new to Linux but I'm ready to make the giant leap forward and chop my HD
up to make room for Linux. My question is, I've used Mandrake, 7.2 I think,
and I would like to know if this is known to be easy to use. I liked what I
saw, but does anyone have a better suggestion. I liked the installation
process, nice and easy. Is there any reasons to choose this over Corel, Red
Hat ect Thanks, and go easy on me, it's my first post :o) 

Adrian Lynch
--
United Kingdom
http://www.thoughtbubble.co.uk/
Ph: +44 (0) 20 7387 8890
--







Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com