Re: [newbie] RE: Windows can't be written in VB

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Paul wrote:
 
 Not to whine or bitch, but...
 
 isn't it amazing how much Microsoft goes around on the Mandrake list
 lately? You can't escape from it, eh?  ;-)
 
 (grin)
 Paul
 
 --
 God must love crazy people.
 He made so many of them!
 
 http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  Linux Mandrake 7.2 - Pine 4.30


we are educating ourselves as to our past mistakes :)




Re: [newbie] RE: Windows can't be written in VB

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Mark Weaver wrote:
 
 No...No...no...you're all wrong. Windows is written in pig latin. It's the
 only thing that could possibly explain its terribly slow performance,
 frequent lockups and crashes, and of course who could forget the beloved
 "blue screen of death" which arrives nanoseconds before you actually get
 your finger on the CTRL-S keys to save your document.
 
 damn the torpedos man and storm the Gates mansion. Hang the silly bugger
 from his VisualBasic scribbling finger tips till he resites the anti-trust
 laws backwards in Jappanese!
 
 --
 Mark


i agree mark, i agree :)



 
 / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat
   * in order to get the rats up from below decks
   * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned!
   *
   * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496
   */
 
 *REPLY SEPERATOR*
 
 On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 pablito had this to say!
 
  windows is written in assembly language??  Jeez, if it is, why does it take
  up so much space?  I thought it was written in compiled batch language.
 
  :  No, Windows isn't written in VB.  Windows is written in assembly
  language.
  : 
 
 
 




Re: [newbie] KDE Desktop problems Solved

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Dennis Myers wrote:
 
 Just wanted to let the list know that I finally have the full kde
 desktop. I decided that there must be something wrong with my home
 burned disks and went online and downloaded the kdebase, kdeadmin,
 kdesupport and a bunch of other libc files that weren't wanting to load
 properly from rpmdrake. Voila! a desktop with icons and the big K. Now I
 am impressed and will quite badmouthing the 7.2 release. It looks pretty
 good so far. Time will tell, but it looks like I will be off to buy the
 boxed set.
 
 Dennis M. registered linux user #180842


hasta la vista


i cant wait for 7.3 already :)




Re: [newbie] Reinstall

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Riker wrote:
 
 Hello, again!
 
 I really screwed something up on my wife's Linux box (yes, she loves
 Linux and now she hates me!) and need to reinstall. It's a duel boot
 system with Win ME. If I do a fresh install of Linux, will it still see
 WinME? And if not, how do I go about keeping ME recognized on boot up?
 
 Thanks a million,
 
 Riker


format your drive under dos. install linux forget windoes 

thats really good advice u know :)




Re: [newbie] V7.2 questions!

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Robin Regennitter wrote:
 
 On Saturday 02 December 2000 12:59 am, you wrote:
 
 I have an i810 machine and it works just fine for me with my Linux box.
 XFree86 4.0.1 does support i810 with acceleration as it produced the 24bit
 color versus 8bit on XFree 3.3.6.  I was surprised that the 3D games were
 playing nice and fast. however, after playing it few times, the games became
 super slow.  I stop playing the games on Linux.  I'm sure that the next
 version of XFree86 bug for i810 will be fix.  There is an upgrade i810 driver
 for windows at the intel site.
 
 Rob
 
  I have an i810e and I can tell you that if its at all like the i810 you
  have no problem. The 810 chipset really is slow. There so called
  acceleretion on my windows box is actually slower than software rendering!
 
  On the plus side the 810 chipset has a built in video out. But you cant use
  it without drivers and linus hasn't got them.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Mandrake Newbie Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 7:15 PM
  Subject: [newbie] V7.2 questions!
 
   A friend of mine installed the download version of 7.2 on his Pentium
 
  machine
 
   with 64 megs of RAM and a i810 video setup. (its a 667mhz machine).
 
  Anyways, he
 
   has an external modem and no matter what we do, it does not show up under
   hardware configuration, even though its working fine. Also, I thought
 
  hardware
 
   acceleration was automatic with certain card/chipsets under 7.2.
 
  (including the
 
   i810). However, any games we play are dead slow... ;-(
  
   Any ideas? Thanks!
  
   --
  
  /\
 
  DarkLord



is that the way u can tell by the 24 or 32 bit color. i just learned
something if this is true, well is it ?



 
  \/




Re: [newbie] Linux v Windows

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Mr Monster wrote:
 
 Right, Ive been reading the mails about the pros and cons of
 Linux/Windows...
 
 Im running Mandrake 7.2 now, with not so much as a hiccup, everything is
 doing what it should, when it should - just the way i like it, and the way i
 suspect most other folks do too.
 
 I have one little problem.. I have a Primax USB scanner, and on visiting
 their website - have discovered they dont support linux drivers for their
 hardware, which is a little dissapointing to say the least...
 So I went searching, and found another site...probably run by a couple of
 guys in their own time, and unpaid, who are writing source and trying their
 best to get drivers for Primax scanners under Linux - These guys deserve a
 big jug of beer!!!

and if they dont like beer a big glass of juice :)



 
 The Point


and now a drum roll

 Linux will never win its way into peoples homes until
 manufacturers decide to start porting their code to linux,  so us people at
 home can use our digicams, scanners etc... just as easy as ever! (without
 even so much as a chmod etc)

i would ag4ee. for linux to really take off there must be some sort
of install shield for it. without it linux will never dominiate the
world. i cant believe hasnt thought of it before.

   :)



 
 I dunno if this means anything, or indeed if it makes sensebut dont all
 shout at me at once :-)
 And just in case you are all wondering ... yep I had to use M$ to scan my
 pics tonight :(
 

ok, there are a few areas where linux is still catching up. there are a
few
areas in which linux is ahead. scanners unfortunately for u are one of
the
behind places


 Graham Kerr
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.btinternet.com/~kerr.monster
 
 Reg. User 153258




Re: [newbie] Want something better for resume

2000-12-02 Thread onepatrick

Vic wrote:
 
 Klyx don't work, tex is too hard
 I would like something easier
 if you please
 
 Thank you



have u tried k-word yet ?




Re: [newbie] Might be OTResume software

2000-12-01 Thread onepatrick

Vic wrote:
 
 Sorry about the ot message,
 Does anyone know of a decent software
 package that one can write a resume on?
 
 I have star office 5 so that might
 work, except I have not seen how
 to cause it to make a resume,
 or else I am asleep.
 
 Just wondering.
 
 Oh and it must be able to print
 to an old HP Deskjet
 no numbers or anything, just HP Deskjet
 it is an old black and white inkjet printer.
 
 Thanks


if u have mandrake 7.2 use k-word, it goes with k-everything
else. if u dont have 7.2 i would suggest u get it :)




Re: [newbie] gates gets Linux

2000-12-01 Thread onepatrick

Mark Johnson wrote:
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Benjamin Sher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 6:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] gates gets Linux
 
 Bottom line: Until Linux, which is rich in thousands of applications,
 has an equally vast and varied collection of CONSUMER applications of
 every sort, it won't quite be ready for prime time. And this won't
 happen till Linux is much more popular. The old chicken and egg problem:
 no consumer applications until there is a consumer market for Linux big
 enough to justify it, and no consumer market until there are
 applications.
 
 And this won't happen until it's easy enough for my mom, wife, and brother
 to use and until the elite hacker attitude subsides.


i cant imagine the elite hacker attitude ever subsiding. there will
always
be a place inlinux for hackers. yep, they have those little things
called
terminals . they dont need shells or kde's or gnomes. im starting to
think they dont even need operating systems of any kind.  but...
linux is moving to include the rest of us that dont want to be
programmers or hackers or whatever. mandrake 7.2 is very easy to use.
i bet even your mom could run it.




  Linux is still a
 paradise for coders not users..


linux will always be a paradise for coders. it it more and more a
paradise
for users too.




. However, most linux users don't care about
 running Quicken and such, for linux to win they must pull users off of
 Windows and onto linux (these are the only converts, you won't get a lot of
 MAC users to give up their OS).  The intrinsic road block of linux is the
 "cult" personality, like MAC and BSD, us folks are generally emotionally
 tied to the OS.  Most windows users couldn't give a flying flip that they
 are using Windows they just want integrated office products and the facility
 offered by those products (and to be able to run their games). 


i would agree and disagree. i know many people who wouldnt even think
of leaving windoes. i know of some that use it because its because
what most other people use. most people seem to be unaware of just
dont care that windoes would destroy them as quickly as any one else
to make a profit. its like they are brainless. that of course is my
opinion.

with the relase of kernal 2.4 i believe linux kernal stands superior
to microsofts. time will tell


They don't
 want to be system administrators, just like I don't want to be a car
 mechanic.  I want my car to work when I drive it off the lot. I will never
 upgrade the stereo or engine or interior, i'm just not interested in doing
 that.  But this isn't a morally depraved behavior, it's just the way it is.
 
 Meanwhile, Linux as an OS, with its great and beautiful and configurable
 new graphical KDE and Gnome desktops
 
 The thing is most ordinary users don't care what the OS is they care about
 the interface and how easy it is to get their job done and how easy it is to
 integrate their favorite apps.  I don't think most folks even mess with
 their Windows settings. (Just showing my wife the "Send To" mechanism in
 Explorer is like pulling teeth!) Having said that, may the gods be praised
 for the efforts of the KDE and Gnome folks but there is still much road to
 build.
 
 The thing that should strike fear into the marrow of our bones is that if MS
 decided to build a flavor of Linux I think it would be a reasonable
 assumption that people like my mom and brother would ditch the Windows
 environment and adopt the linux platform because they don't care out the OS,



tell them about micosofts behavior to other companies. and if they dont
care what os they are using why would they care if they had linux. this
doesnt make any sense to me. i would think that many people in the
future
would want linux just because its practically free and get updated on
such
a regular basis and because there are people that want to help them with
it.
i would agree that some people just wouldnt care no matter what.

 they care about the usabilty of the products and the availablity of the
 products.  We laugh about the MS Linux website parody, but really, if MS
 ever decided to distribute a flavor of linux I believe they would give
 Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat, and etc. a very hard run for their money. 


if they did that, who would buy it. the people that are happey with
windoes woundt want it and the linux community wouldnt buy it. why not.
because we know if they did that it would possibly lead to real linux
being ruined. i would never purchase microsoft linux. yuck.



 People
 would actually be willing to give their hard earned money for this new very
 stable linux distrbution version of "Windows", very few of us have probably
 given a dime to Mandrake for all their hard work. If MFC, VB, and COM was
 made available for linux you can be sure that applications would start to
 appear like crazy.
 

i believe we will see microsoft software for linux in the future. where
is  gates 

Re: [newbie] 2 questions

2000-11-30 Thread onepatrick

Anthony wrote:
 
  1. is it possible to combine kmail into konquerer
 
 As in use Kmail to send email from Konquerer? Mine is set up like that from
 installation.
 
 
  2. what is magellan
 
 I'm pretty sure that it is the next generation of Kmail, and is supposed to
 be like Outlook for Linux. Basically it's a really good mail client that is
 still in extreme beta, if it is even still being worked on.
 
 --
 Anthony
 http://binaryfusion.net
 Press any key to continue, or any other key to quit.
thanks




Re: [newbie] 2 questions

2000-11-30 Thread onepatrick

Mark Weaver wrote:
 
 Patrick,
 
 If I remember correctly Magellan was/is a lightweight Konquerer type
 browser based on the Mozilla "gecko" rendering engine. I'm not sure if it
 ever really got out of the beta stage. For a while there was a lot of talk
 about it, but then as the release of mandrake 7.2 came closer and closer
 much of the browser talk shifted towards Konquerer. I've tried it and it
 is lightweight, but very feature limited and somewhat unstable after a
 short time running.
 
 As far as combining kmail with Konquerer all I can say is...why?
 
 Why would you want to? One is for browsing the net and the other is for
 reading/sending email and corresponding with the newsgroups.
 
 --
 Mark
 
 / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat
   * in order to get the rats up from below decks
   * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned!
   *
   * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496
   */
 
 *REPLY SEPERATOR*
 
 On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 patrick had this to say!
 

i was just wanting to dock the icon in konquer. 
i was also just curious about majellan

i am sticking with Konquerer by all means.
its the best and getting better
  i have 2 questions.
 
 
  1. is it possible to combine kmail into konquerer
 
 and
 
 
  2. what is magellan
 
 
 
 
 




Re: [newbie] Anti-Microsoft Sentiment

2000-11-30 Thread onepatrick

Dale Kosan wrote:
 
 Well,lets get this war going! I come from a Windoze 98,NT 4.0,2000
 background,I love Linux,more stable than the above,but.When a company
 sells software as complete and it is beta.I think it is a true shame
 that Mandrake has let the other company make them look bad.I still use
 Windows at home for some functions,when is the last time you upgraded your
 cd burners firmware in Linux?I have yet to see it done.That is about the
 only time I have booted to Windows in the last three months at home.At work
 my workstation is running 98,NT Server 4.0,Windows 2000 Server and Mandrake
 7.2, every os works fine and have never had any trouble doing this.I think
 instead of bashing Microsoft we should all stick together and help each
 other every chance we get.I was and still consider myself a newbie,but allot
 of the man pages make more sense now than they did then,it just has to
 progress


i think we do help each other. i have been helped a lot by the 
other newbies, and as far as windoes bashing. what the heck, gates
gots lots of money. i dont think he minds. and as far as mandrake,
well i dont think they would release like they just did again.
do u :)




Re: [newbie] Video Cards

2000-11-30 Thread onepatrick

"Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
 What do you guys think of G-force Video Cards? What do you think the best
 Video card for a Linux box is?
 
 Thanks,
 Chris Kelly
 Registered Linux user 185775


i have a guillemot proher ddr geforce. i love it. linux finally
loads my gforce driver and it works with my monitors, we dont
have even 1.0 drivers yet, but it works great anyway for me 
at least :)




Re: [newbie] Linux and TFT screens

2000-11-30 Thread onepatrick

Spoonman wrote:
 
 Since I didn't really get a reply to my rather broad question last time, let
 me word it this way:
 Should a laptop TFT be considered a LCD display or VGA/SVGA?
 
 Thanks,
 Mark


i hope someone helps u. i dont know