Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-10 Thread Vic

Many thanks!!

On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, maxtorator mewed:
 On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, you wrote:
  Thanks, thats what I thought.
  I forgot where the firewall howto is,
  when I do find out or when you or someone
  tells me, I'm gonna go and snoop through it
  and see what I can do.
 
 Heres a link  to FirewallHow-To
 
 http://howto.tucows.com/LDP/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO.html
 
 
 Hope this helps you.
 
 
 --Maxtor
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.maxtors.com
 ICQ: 68275472
 Still learning this thing...
-- 
My new linux web server with Apache
http://kittypuss.dnydns.org

Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss




Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-10 Thread Vic

What "script kiddies" mean?

On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, Stephen F. Bosch mewed:
 Jaguar wrote:
  
  After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning, and
  many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with trace-route,
  and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse.  They
  replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls, or
  protection of their clients data.
 
 Were said "script-kiddies" on the @home network? If so, then they *are*
 responsible for dealing with them, not matter what they did.
 
 @Home abuse has already successfully eliminated many a threat for me =)
 
 But if they weren't @home customers, @home can't do much about it...
 
 -Stephen-
-- 
My new linux web server with Apache
http://kittypuss.dnydns.org

Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss




Re: [Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]]

2000-04-10 Thread Vic

In that case providing you saw my earlier post,
you will know that I was a victim of script kiddies
just this morning.

Firewall time, off to read the howto's.


On Fri, 16 May 2036, Jaguar mewed:
 Script-kiddies=pin-head kids with more software than brains trying to CRACK
 into someone elses computer for less than legal intent.
 IMO
 Jaguar
 
 Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What "script kiddies" mean?
  
  On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, Stephen F. Bosch mewed:
   Jaguar wrote:

After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning,
 and
many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with
 trace-route,
and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse. 
 They
replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls,
 or
protection of their clients data.
   
   Were said "script-kiddies" on the @home network? If so, then they *are*
   responsible for dealing with them, not matter what they did.
   
   @Home abuse has already successfully eliminated many a threat for me =)
   
   But if they weren't @home customers, @home can't do much about it...
   
   -Stephen-
  -- 
  My new linux web server with Apache
  http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
  
  Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
  http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss
 
 
 
 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.
-- 

Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss




Re: [Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]]

2000-04-10 Thread jfmurphy

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, you wrote:
 In that case providing you saw my earlier post,
 you will know that I was a victim of script kiddies
 just this morning.
 
 Firewall time, off to read the howto's.

I have been following cable post as it's coming to my area soon. Security is a
big issue with it.  Following quite a few messages on it in a different area it
was suggested that a firewall will do little to protect you on a cable network.
The cable connection is acting like a bridge in most cases. A bridge does not
route packets, it passes packets from one interface to the other. Everyone is
sharing all the traffic of all nodes.  A router was suggested in between you
and the cable provider from one post. A little elaborate for just a simple home
network or computer user.

I don't have cable and have little experience with networking. I'm just
monitoring the messages on it to make a decision when the time comes if I want
to travel down that road. There is a big security issue with it that most don't
consider.  Be interested in hearing from others on the subject to get some
education on how best to handle it. 





Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-09 Thread Jaguar

After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning, and
many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with trace-route,
and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse.  They
replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls, or
protection of their clients data. 
So in other words...YES, set up a firewall, and whatever other security you
think is appropriate.
HTH
Jaguar

Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a cablemodem on a dynamic address,
 not static, should I set up a firewall?
 
 I'm connected all the time,
 and if my server is ever cracked, what should
 I look for?
 
 Like logins in my logfiles that I know I
 did not do like when I was asleep or away?
 
 
 -- 
 My new linux web server with Apache
 http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
 
 Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
 http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss



Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.




Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-09 Thread Vic

Thanks, thats what I thought.
I forgot where the firewall howto is,
when I do find out or when you or someone
tells me, I'm gonna go and snoop through it
and see what I can do.


On Thu, 15 May 2036, Jaguar mewed:
 After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning, and
 many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with trace-route,
 and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse.  They
 replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls, or
 protection of their clients data. 
 So in other words...YES, set up a firewall, and whatever other security you
 think is appropriate.
 HTH
 Jaguar
 
 Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have a cablemodem on a dynamic address,
  not static, should I set up a firewall?
  
  I'm connected all the time,
  and if my server is ever cracked, what should
  I look for?
  
  Like logins in my logfiles that I know I
  did not do like when I was asleep or away?
  
  
  -- 
  My new linux web server with Apache
  http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
  
  Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
  http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss
 
 
 
 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.
-- 
My new linux web server with Apache
http://kittypuss.dnydns.org

Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss




Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-09 Thread Stephen F. Bosch

Jaguar wrote:
 
 After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning, and
 many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with trace-route,
 and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse.  They
 replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls, or
 protection of their clients data.

Were said "script-kiddies" on the @home network? If so, then they *are*
responsible for dealing with them, not matter what they did.

@Home abuse has already successfully eliminated many a threat for me =)

But if they weren't @home customers, @home can't do much about it...

-Stephen-




Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]

2000-04-09 Thread maxtorator

On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, you wrote:
 Thanks, thats what I thought.
 I forgot where the firewall howto is,
 when I do find out or when you or someone
 tells me, I'm gonna go and snoop through it
 and see what I can do.

Heres a link  to FirewallHow-To

http://howto.tucows.com/LDP/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO.html


Hope this helps you.


--Maxtor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.maxtors.com
ICQ: 68275472
Still learning this thing...




Re: [Re: [[newbie] dumb firewall question]]

2000-04-09 Thread Jaguar

Some of the script attacks were from the @Home ( or flavors of @Home (ie:
@Roadrunner) meaning the 24.x.x.x IP set.  But there were quite a few who were
on other ISP's but I had a trace route of their IP#, heheh I could even trace
a private network ( 192.168.x.x) node back to a specific city/town.  But all
they said was they weren't responsible for MY security.  I have even seen the
'@Home security "AUTHORIZED" scan' of their own running and turning up in the
BlackICE logs.  And yes I realise some of the IP's that were atacking me were
ALREADY compromised by the script kiddies, but @Home should at least
acknowledge some responsibility.

Linux content:
Is Linux vulnerable to similar Port Flooding, ICMP Port Scan's, etc???

Jaguar

"Stephen F. Bosch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jaguar wrote:
  
  After having "script-kiddies" try to "DNS Malformed", Trojan Scanning,
and
  many other attcks on my static IP, I captured the attempts with
trace-route,
  and the BlackICE Defender log files, and sent them to @Home Abuse.  They
  replied that they are __NOT__, I repeat _NOT_ responsible for firewalls,
or
  protection of their clients data.
 
 Were said "script-kiddies" on the @home network? If so, then they *are*
 responsible for dealing with them, not matter what they did.
 
 @Home abuse has already successfully eliminated many a threat for me =)
 
 But if they weren't @home customers, @home can't do much about it...
 
 -Stephen-



Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.