[newbie] bad signatures

2005-03-19 Thread Carlton Matthew
Why Do I get bad signatures when attempting to upgrade packages using 
mandrakelinux update ?
shouldn't this be the safest plave to get the software from
Carlton



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] bad signatures

2005-03-19 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Carlton Matthew wrote:
Why Do I get bad signatures when attempting to upgrade packages using 
mandrakelinux update ?
shouldn't this be the safest plave to get the software from
Carlton

It should be. Do you get it for all packages? One thing to watch for - 
it will give you the bad signature error, and go on to say that it could 
not open the package. This error could be worded better. What actualy 
happened is that the download of the package failed, so the signature 
could not be tested. I think it is two standard error messages, 
generated by two different parts of the program. The bad signature error 
is true, but is not the real problem.

Mikkel
--
  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



RE: [newbie] Bad signatures when trying to update via Rpmdrake.

2004-12-26 Thread SteveGoodey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Myers
Sent: 24 December 2004 16:07
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad signatures when trying to update via Rpmdrake.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

I have been updating 10.1 OE via the rpmdrake tool with no problems 
till now. On several packages I am now getting bad signature errors.

For example:- The following packages have bad signatures:
   kdebase-common-3.2.3-134.3.101mdk.i586.rpm: Missing signature
(Unable 
to read rpm file)

Is this telling me the rpm file is screwed? Any help would be 
appreciated. Thanks.

Steve Goodey

  

---
-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

  

No, it just means the package sig is not there or you don't have the 
signature key. I have used all of the packages and no problems. HTH

-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842 

Thanks for the help. It turned out I had a bad update source. Once I changed
that using easyurpmi and had deleted the cached files it updated ok.

--
Regards, Steve Goodey
Colchester, England.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stevegoodey.com
http://www.bbcfactual.com
Registered Linux user #372670 http://counter.li.org

  






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] Bad signatures when trying to update via Rpmdrake.

2004-12-24 Thread steve.goodey
Hello,

I have been updating 10.1 OE via the rpmdrake tool with no problems till
now. On several packages I am now getting bad signature errors.

For example:- The following packages have bad signatures:
kdebase-common-3.2.3-134.3.101mdk.i586.rpm: Missing signature
(Unable to read rpm file)

Is this telling me the rpm file is screwed? Any help would be
appreciated. Thanks.

Steve Goodey


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures when trying to update via Rpmdrake.

2004-12-24 Thread Dennis Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been updating 10.1 OE via the rpmdrake tool with no problems till
now. On several packages I am now getting bad signature errors.
For example:- The following packages have bad signatures:
kdebase-common-3.2.3-134.3.101mdk.i586.rpm: Missing signature
(Unable to read rpm file)
Is this telling me the rpm file is screwed? Any help would be
appreciated. Thanks.
Steve Goodey
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

 

No, it just means the package sig is not there or you don't have the 
signature key. I have used all of the packages and no problems. HTH

--
Dennis M. linux user #180842 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Hoyt Bailey
On Monday 02 August 2004 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm getting a lot of bad signature messages when I try to
 install packages from the CD's.  Should I be worried?  Or is this
 simply a matter of bad packaging?

 Brenda Bell
 Henniker (the only one on earth)
What is a Henniker.
I dont worry about 'bad signature messages.
-- 
Regards;
Hoyt


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:48:20 -0500
Hoyt Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Monday 02 August 2004 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  I'm getting a lot of bad signature messages when I try to
  install packages from the CD's.  Should I be worried?  Or is
  this simply a matter of bad packaging?
 
  Brenda Bell
  Henniker (the only one on earth)
 What is a Henniker.
 I dont worry about 'bad signature messages.
 -- 
 Regards;
 Hoyt
 
 
Me too.  I don't worry about bad sigs and what's a Henniker?

Lee


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread JoeHill
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:58:02 +
Lee Wiggers disseminated the following:

   Brenda Bell
   Henniker (the only one on earth)
  What is a Henniker.
  I dont worry about 'bad signature messages.
  -- 
  Regards;
  Hoyt
  
  
 Me too.  I don't worry about bad sigs and what's a Henniker?

As always, Google is your best friend:

http://www.hennikerhistory.org/

-- 
JoeHill RLU #282046 /  www.freeyourmachine.org
19:40:57 up 19 days, 11:55, 6 users, load average: 1.57, 1.58, 1.44
+++
Saddam killed his own people, just like general Pinochet, and once upon a time
both these evil men were supported by the U.S.A.; and whisper it, even Bin Laden
once drank from America's cup just like that election down in Florida this shit
doesn't all add up.. -- Billy Bragg, 'The Price of Oil'


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Job Evers
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Lee Wiggers wrote:
LW: what's a Henniker?

Google says it is a town in New Hampshire - and apparently the only town
in the world with the name Henniker

http://www.hennikerhistory.org/

-- 
Job Evers
--
Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.  At best he
is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear shoes, bathe and not
make messes in the house.
-- Lazarus Long, Time Enough for Love


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread JoeHill
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:42:25 -0400 (EDT)
Job Evers disseminated the following:

 Google says it is a town in New Hampshire - and apparently the only town
 in the world with the name Henniker
 
 http://www.hennikerhistory.org/

Ha! Beatcha by 1 minute! Do I win a trip to...Henniker?

-- 
JoeHill RLU #282046 /  www.freeyourmachine.org
19:48:07 up 19 days, 12:03, 7 users, load average: 1.61, 1.56, 1.47
+++
It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes, to blind you from the
truth... -- Morpheus, in The Matrix, describing Fox News


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:49:38 -0400
JoeHill wrote:

 Do I win a trip to...Henniker?

Why?

We don't have anything against Brenda and you are a punishment of last
resort



Charles

-- 
I can't complain, but sometimes I still do.
-- Joe Walsh
--
Mandrake Linux 10.0 on BigBoy #184142
Registered Linux user #182463 *http://www.eslrahc.com*
2.6.5-1.tmb.6mdkenterprise
--


pgpVPytY0a70C.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread b311b-mandrake
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:05:59 -0400
Charles A Edwards wrote:

 On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:49:38 -0400
 JoeHill wrote:
 
  Do I win a trip to...Henniker?
 
 Why?
 
 We don't have anything against Brenda and you are a punishment of last
 resort

I mention shooting tourists in my sig and someone wants to win a
trip here!?!? Just because it's illegal doesn't mean we don't do
it anyway :)


Brenda Bell
Henniker (the only one on earth)
New Hampshire (the state with 5 seasons: black fly, tourist, foliage, ski and mud)
... but we're not allowed to shoot the tourists :)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 08:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm getting a lot of bad signature messages when I try to
 install packages from the CD's.  Should I be worried?  Or is this
 simply a matter of bad packaging?
 
 Brenda Bell
 Henniker (the only one on earth)
 New Hampshire (the state with 5 seasons: black fly, tourist, foliage, ski and mud)
 ... but we're not allowed to shoot the tourists :)

The issue is that in New HampSHER, ya ain't allowed to run linux.

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Mandrake GNU/Linux 10.0 OE/Kernel 2.6.3-7/ No Viruses here. 

You can't survive by sucking the juice from a wet mitten. -- Charles
Schulz, Things I've Had to Learn Over and Over and Over



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Stephen Kühn
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 09:42, Job Evers wrote:
 On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Lee Wiggers wrote:
 LW: what's a Henniker?
 
 Google says it is a town in New Hampshire - and apparently the only town
 in the world with the name Henniker
 
 http://www.hennikerhistory.org/

Friggin far out - and where else does one find Windan or Wollongong?

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Mandrake GNU/Linux 10.0 OE/Kernel 2.6.3-7/ No Viruses here. 

Illiterate? Write today, for free help!



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread JoeHill
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:05:59 -0400
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:

  Do I win a trip to...Henniker?
 
 Why?
 
 We don't have anything against Brenda and you are a punishment of last
 resort

Zzing!

-- 
JoeHill RLU #282046 /  www.freeyourmachine.org
20:48:35 up 19 days, 13:03, 7 users, load average: 1.91, 1.58, 1.44
+++
The Chretien government's decision not to enter the Iraq war is a defining
moment in Canada's foreign-policy history. It is now supported, according to a
recent CBC poll, by a staggering 79 per cent of the population. -- Globe and
Mail, June 3, 2004


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread JoeHill
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:17:25 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] disseminated the following:

  We don't have anything against Brenda and you are a punishment of last
  resort
 
 I mention shooting tourists in my sig and someone wants to win a
 trip here!?!? Just because it's illegal doesn't mean we don't do
 it anyway :)

Reminds me of a funny I heard long ago, in reference to another place not so
blessed as your home:

1st prize: A trip to Henniker

2nd prize: Two trips to Henniker!

-- 
JoeHill RLU #282046 /  www.freeyourmachine.org
20:49:46 up 19 days, 13:04, 7 users, load average: 1.64, 1.58, 1.45
+++
It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes, to blind you from the
truth... -- Morpheus, in The Matrix, describing Fox News


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Aron Smith
JoeHill wrote:
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:17:25 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] disseminated the following:

We don't have anything against Brenda and you are a punishment of last
resort
I mention shooting tourists in my sig and someone wants to win a
trip here!?!? Just because it's illegal doesn't mean we don't do
it anyway :)

Reminds me of a funny I heard long ago, in reference to another place not so
blessed as your home:
1st prize: A trip to Henniker
2nd prize: Two trips to Henniker!
3d prize three weeks with Stephen



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures

2004-08-02 Thread Todd Slater
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:19:28AM +1000, Stephen Kühn wrote:
 On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 08:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm getting a lot of bad signature messages when I try to
  install packages from the CD's.  Should I be worried?  Or is this
  simply a matter of bad packaging?
  
  Brenda Bell
  Henniker (the only one on earth)
  New Hampshire (the state with 5 seasons: black fly, tourist, foliage, ski and mud)
  ... but we're not allowed to shoot the tourists :)
 
 The issue is that in New HampSHER, ya ain't allowed to run linux.

Hell if ya ain't, ain't the state motto Live free or die? Sounds like
a good match to me :)

Todd

-- 
Zinn-Chomsky 2004


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-29 Thread Keith Powell
On Friday 28 Nov 2003 2:19 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
 On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:15:57 +

 Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You will get that error if you are not using ../base for your
  contrib source.
 
  The whatever/contrib/i586/ contains a synthesis.hdlist2.cz and
  the rpms can be installed using such, But, it does not contain a
  list or hdlist as does base so you get the 'invalid list'

 Thanks Charles,

 My original contrib url is
 ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake/9.2/contrib/i586
 path to hdlist: ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz
 (this was the urpmi.addmedia given by easy urpmi on plf)
 that path to hdlist was the only /base dir i could find.  So as far
 as I can tell it was reading the right hdlist.  I'll mess around with
 it and see.  I even tried updating the contrib source or using a
 different one and it still gives me that error when installing from
 contrib.  I'll report back after trying a few things.

 Jerry.

Thanks for the information, Charles.

I was just about to reply, when I read Jerry's reply to you. I use 
rediris, but its path to hdlist is the same as the one Jerry gave.

I too will experiment over the week-end.

Cheers

Keith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Keith Powell
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 8:54 am, Jerry Barton wrote:
 On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 +

 Keith Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I was wondering why the Contrib repository was giving the error
  messages with Mandrake9.2, when it didn't with earlier versions.
  Should I try to solve the bad signature message problem, or ignore
  it? That was the reason for my posting. I hadn't seen anyone else
  reporting this happening.

 Keith, same thing happens here.  I just didn't think much of it since
 i got so used to texstar and plf rpms doing it.  I too haven't ever
 had a signature problem with contrib before until now.  That and i
 get some kind of mirror uses invalid list trying alternate method
 message when I install packages from contrib.  but so far i haven't
 had any that haven't installed.

Jerry

I too get the Mirror uses invalid list try alternative method message 
when installing packages from contrib. I didn't mention it, though, as 
I did not want to confuse things even more!

It's still there after a contrib update.

Things install OK, so I ignore it. 

Cheers

Keith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Keith Powell
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 7:48 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 +, Keith Powell
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad
 signatures in

 9.2:
 I installed the download edition of 9.2 from magazine cover disks,
  but KPPP did not install. So I installed it from the CDs using MCC.
  When I installed it, there was the bad signature message, which I
  ignored. I could not understand why there was this message with a
  package which was on the CDs. I then downloaded and installed the
  security updates (which were clear of the error message). Next I
  downloaded and installed a package from Contrib and got the error
  message.
 
 Then I downloaded and installed all the other updates. These too
  were clear of the signature error message.
 
 Now, installing packages from the CDs don't give the bad signature
 message, but installing packages from Contrib do.
 
 I was wondering why the Contrib repository was giving the error
 messages with Mandrake9.2, when it didn't with earlier versions.
  Should I try to solve the bad signature message problem, or ignore
  it? That was the reason for my posting. I hadn't seen anyone else
  reporting this happening.
 
 Hope this is a bit clearer.

 Okay clear. There are 2 separate things here: packages on CD for
 which the signature checks and packages on the same CD`s for which
 the signature does not check. In principle that ought not to be
 possible, but, I have the same CD`s and see on Installation CD No. 2:
 kdenetwork-kppp-3.1.3-37mdk.i586.rpm

 when I go to /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS and
 type (as root)
 rpm -K *kppp* I get:
 kdenetwork-kppp-3.1.3-37mdk.i586.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK

 so the signature *is* okay.

 If I go into MCC - Software management - Software Media Manager -
 Manage Keys I see that CD # 2 has the original MD key # 70771FF3 next
 to it.

 So I can only assume that if and when you have bad signature message
 that at that time your rpm database was corrupt or the key was not
 associated to CD # 2.

 As far as the Contrib  Cooker packages are concerned, I understood
 that had been a lot of discussion about those, and it will apparently
 not be possible to authenticate them all (this isn`t new, the same
 applied to 9.1 packages in these categories).

 However if you look at the information page per rpm in rpmsearch
 (e.g. on MandrakeClub) you should see already mention of the key with
 which it has been signed, if any and if so which. In the latter case
 you can obtain the key as previously described and add it to your
 rpm-keyring. If it is not signed at all, you should consider whether
 or not you want to install it. If it has a high securety impact for
 you, you should not install an unsigned package.

 In such case, PH you might ask the contributor to add his personal
 GnuPG signature to the package.


Thanks for the extra information, Dick.

I'll work on it over the week-end and see follow your advice.

Been too busy the last couple of days to do anything about it.

Cheers

Keith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:37:35 +
Keith Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I too get the Mirror uses invalid list try alternative method
 message when installing packages from contrib. I didn't mention it,
 though, as I did not want to confuse things even more!

You will get that error if you are not using ../base for your contrib
source.

The whatever/contrib/i586/ contains a synthesis.hdlist2.cz and the
rpms can be installed using such, But, it does not contain a list or
hdlist as does base so you get the 'invalid list' 


Charles

-- 
Fortune's real live weird band names #130:

Cherry Poppin' Daddies
-
Mandrake Linux 10.0 on PurpleDragon
Kernel-2.6.0-0.1mdkenterprise
http://www.eslrahc.com
-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Jerry Barton
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:15:57 +
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 You will get that error if you are not using ../base for your contrib
 source.
 
 The whatever/contrib/i586/ contains a synthesis.hdlist2.cz and the
 rpms can be installed using such, But, it does not contain a list or
 hdlist as does base so you get the 'invalid list' 

Thanks Charles, 

My original contrib url is
ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake/9.2/contrib/i586
path to hdlist: ../../i586/Mandrake/base/hdlist2.cz
(this was the urpmi.addmedia given by easy urpmi on plf)
that path to hdlist was the only /base dir i could find.  So as far as I
can tell it was reading the right hdlist.  I'll mess around with it and
see.  I even tried updating the contrib source or using a different one
 and it still gives me that error when installing from contrib.  I'll
report back after trying a few things.

Jerry.
-- 
_||_  Registered linux user #300600 
 (o_  Registered linux machine # 185855  
 //\at   
 V_/_ http://counter.li.org  

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-26 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 +, Keith Powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in
9.2:

I installed the download edition of 9.2 from magazine cover disks, but 
KPPP did not install. So I installed it from the CDs using MCC. When I 
installed it, there was the bad signature message, which I ignored. I 
could not understand why there was this message with a package which 
was on the CDs. I then downloaded and installed the security updates 
(which were clear of the error message). Next I downloaded and 
installed a package from Contrib and got the error message. 

Then I downloaded and installed all the other updates. These too were 
clear of the signature error message.

Now, installing packages from the CDs don't give the bad signature 
message, but installing packages from Contrib do.

I was wondering why the Contrib repository was giving the error 
messages with Mandrake9.2, when it didn't with earlier versions. Should 
I try to solve the bad signature message problem, or ignore it? That 
was the reason for my posting. I hadn't seen anyone else reporting this 
happening.

Hope this is a bit clearer.

Okay clear. There are 2 separate things here: packages on CD for which the
signature checks and packages on the same CD`s for which the signature does
not check. In principle that ought not to be possible, but, I have the same
CD`s and see on Installation CD No. 2:
kdenetwork-kppp-3.1.3-37mdk.i586.rpm

when I go to /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS and
type (as root)
rpm -K *kppp* I get:
kdenetwork-kppp-3.1.3-37mdk.i586.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK

so the signature *is* okay.

If I go into MCC - Software management - Software Media Manager - Manage
Keys I see that CD # 2 has the original MD key # 70771FF3 next to it.

So I can only assume that if and when you have bad signature message that at
that time your rpm database was corrupt or the key was not associated to CD
# 2.

As far as the Contrib  Cooker packages are concerned, I understood that had
been a lot of discussion about those, and it will apparently not be possible
to authenticate them all (this isn`t new, the same applied to 9.1 packages
in these categories). 

However if you look at the information page per rpm in rpmsearch (e.g. on
MandrakeClub) you should see already mention of the key with which it has
been signed, if any and if so which. In the latter case you can obtain the
key as previously described and add it to your rpm-keyring. If it is not
signed at all, you should consider whether or not you want to install it. If
it has a high securety impact for you, you should not install an unsigned
package.

In such case, PH you might ask the contributor to add his personal
GnuPG signature to the package. 

Regards,
=Dick Gevers=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encryption is an envelope - the contents are private.

iD8DBQE/xQOZwC/zk+cxEdMRAmj/AKCB98v5S0+b+GhiHG+3mHUr9UYjnACgiSR6
IyXG6GniGqAKCJGgfxdXKI8=
=VhDI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-25 Thread Keith Powell
On Sunday 23 Nov 2003 7:40 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
 On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:56:07 +, Keith Powell

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about [newbie] Bad signatures in 
9.2:
 However, if I try to install anything from the rediris contrib
  mirror, I get the Invalid Signature message on each package. But
  they will install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these
  errors with 9.1

 First of all you might want to check out the errata page. Then you
 could use the trusted method (as root) of rpm -K foobar.rpm, which
 will tell you if the signature is there or not and valid or not, and
 the md5 sum is okay or not.

 If you urpmi packages, any signatures they contain should
 automagically be added to the keyring, which is now in a database
 managed by rpm, and no longer uses root`s GnuPG keyring.

 Moreover, it might help to update the rpm* packages, which have been
 published since 9.2 was distributed, should you not have done so yet.

 Under Mandrake Control Center the keys can be managed via `Software
 Manager` - -- `Software Media Manager` -- Manage keys...

 If you use rpm on the console, obtain the key (or export to file from
 keyring) and import the key to the rpm-keyring with: rpm --import
 foo.bar(.asc).

 HTH
 =Dick Gevers=

Dick, thanks for your reply. The help is appreciated. 

I have now installed all the updates (which took several hours - hence 
the delay in replying to you) and have then installed a package from 
the CDs. There is still the same bad signature message. As I wrote 
before, I haven't had this with the CDs from earlier versions. Not 
tried installing any more packages from Contrib yet. 

So I will now go through all you have suggested and see if it can be 
solved. Otherwise I will have to ignore the error messages, but I would 
rather not get them! 

Cheers and thanks again.

Keith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-25 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:44:59 +, Keith Powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in
9.2:

 However, if I try to install anything from the rediris contrib
  mirror, I get the Invalid Signature message on each package. But
  they will install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these
  errors with 9.1

Dick, thanks for your reply. The help is appreciated. 

I have now installed all the updates (which took several hours - hence 
the delay in replying to you) and have then installed a package from 
the CDs. There is still the same bad signature message. As I wrote 
before, I haven't had this with the CDs from earlier versions. Not 
tried installing any more packages from Contrib yet. 

So I will now go through all you have suggested and see if it can be 
solved. Otherwise I will have to ignore the error messages, but I would 
rather not get them! 

Maybe I`m daft, but I don`t understand what you`re trying to do: you say you
have already installed the updates (presumably ignoring the error messages
for absebce of sigs.) and now you want to check the signatures *afterward*?

I understand it will give a sense of comfort afterward, but the security
would be in checking during (or in my previous example before) installing
the package.

If rpm does not have the sig. in the keyring it must be imported, otherwise
the sig. can`t be checked. You asked for the simplest way, so that`s what I
gave you, IMO. 

But you might also manage the keys via MCC -- Software management --
Software media manager-- Manage keys.

HTH
regards,
=Dick Gevers=

.
Mandrake visibility? See header
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encryption is an envelope - the contents are private.

iD8DBQE/w87mwC/zk+cxEdMRAuz6AKCqqq7AnNYXdsi6c9F/M/UWHKAyXwCeMgLR
jSPAvxBxz7wnagi7M4QcgtA=
=Uuzi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Keith Powell
Greetings all.

For family reasons, I have been off the list (and rarely on the 
computer) for about ten weeks, and have just joined again.

I wanted to try Mandrake9.2 so, before spending my hard-earned pension 
on the package, I have installed it from three magazine cover disks 
just to test.

KPPP wasn't installed, so when I installed it from the CD, I got the 
error message that the signature was invalid. I ignored the message. 

I have downloaded and installed all the upgrades and they were without 
errors. 

However, if I try to install anything from the rediris contrib mirror, 
I get the Invalid Signature message on each package. But they will 
install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these errors with 9.1

My query is, are the errors likely to be caused by some file missing on 
the cover disks, or is it a known problem with 9.2? I can't find 
anything in the archives about it.  What do I need to do to overcome 
this little problem, or do I just always ignore it?

Otherwise, I am very impressed with 9.2 and will save up my pennies for 
the package version!!!

Many thanks for any help.

Keith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:56, Keith Powell wrote:

snip
 However, if I try to install anything from the rediris contrib
 mirror, I get the Invalid Signature message on each package.
 But they will install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these
 errors with 9.1

 My query is, are the errors likely to be caused by some file
 missing on the cover disks, or is it a known problem with 9.2? I
 can't find anything in the archives about it.  What do I need to
 do to overcome this little problem, or do I just always ignore
 it?
/snip

That's a well known issued with the Contrib mirrors. The contrib 
packages aren't supported by Mandrake and thusly do not contain the 
signature. You can do two things :

1. Ignore it. As long as the md5sum is OK it doesn't matter.
2. Get the Signature from the server. I don't know how, and don't 
care, but others on this list know the procedure.

HTH

Kaj Haulrich.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:56:07 +, Keith Powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2:

However, if I try to install anything from the rediris contrib mirror, 
I get the Invalid Signature message on each package. But they will 
install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these errors with 9.1

First of all you might want to check out the errata page. Then you could use
the trusted method (as root) of rpm -K foobar.rpm, which will tell you if
the signature is there or not and valid or not, and the md5 sum is okay or
not.

If you urpmi packages, any signatures they contain should automagically be
added to the keyring, which is now in a database managed by rpm, and no
longer uses root`s GnuPG keyring. 

Moreover, it might help to update the rpm* packages, which have been
published since 9.2 was distributed, should you not have done so yet.

Under Mandrake Control Center the keys can be managed via `Software Manager`
- -- `Software Media Manager` -- Manage keys...

If you use rpm on the console, obtain the key (or export to file from
keyring) and import the key to the rpm-keyring with: rpm --import
foo.bar(.asc).

HTH
=Dick Gevers=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encryption is an envelope - the contents are private.

iD8DBQE/wQ0/wC/zk+cxEdMRArWuAKDrJreKuCLp9XTNnZAclpsvv+7SswCgpGAS
wfavRXpWz15/toiz0PfNubU=
=+MzV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com