Re: [newbie] Oh say can you C??

2000-06-03 Thread Eric MC DECLERCK

vern wrote:
 
 Hello,
 Where to start?
 I am still in the transition mode, coming over from the
 darkside (microsoft/DOS/windows/BASIC etc.) I tried to learn
 C about 10 years ago, when everyone had their own version.
 Before ANSI C was in full use. I had parts of a Borland compiler
 and did a few simple "Hello World!" type programs. Now I wonder if
 I need all new C reference manuals?? Since the advent of Linux and
 the GNU compilers and such. I'm leaning toward an O'Reilly book I
 just purchased a PERL manual (the camel book), and would like a
 similar book for modern day C.  Do they still use "linker" processes,
 and what became of a.out??  Does C still equal C, or are there "flavors"
 of C??
 Thanks,
 vern
C stay's C, in dos as in linux.
The only diff. is the compiler = GNU
(gcc, egcs).With the 'make' and
'makefile'
+/- as a *.bat file in dos for easy
compiling.
Get a good book like 'Programming
Linux', here you'll find the necessary
basics to programming the shell, tc/tcl,
perl, C, etc..
Get a good friendly, Xdebugger like
'PFix86Plus' for dos 
and an editer you like. Test severals
before continuing with one.
Eric
-- 
FRANCE (Be careful, my English can hurt
you)





Re: [newbie] Oh say can you C??

2000-06-03 Thread Pete Clapham

Hi -- My two cents worth

C is C (for the most part, except when you get to C++).  The biggest difference 
between C distributions is the programming 
environment.  In the NT world, Borland C++ and Microsoft C++ (for example) both work, 
but you set up the "++" part of the 
programs differently.  And the programming environment is an important part of C++ 
programming.

If you want to learn (relearn) C, try the book by Stephan Kochan.  It's green, with a 
diamond on the cover.  

On Thu, 01 Jun 2000 09:09:39 -0400, vern wrote:

Hello,
Where to start?
I am still in the transition mode, coming over from the
darkside (microsoft/DOS/windows/BASIC etc.) I tried to learn
C about 10 years ago, when everyone had their own version.
Before ANSI C was in full use. I had parts of a Borland compiler
and did a few simple "Hello World!" type programs. Now I wonder if
I need all new C reference manuals?? Since the advent of Linux and
the GNU compilers and such. I'm leaning toward an O'Reilly book I
just purchased a PERL manual (the camel book), and would like a
similar book for modern day C.  Do they still use "linker" processes,
and what became of a.out??  Does C still equal C, or are there "flavors"
of C??
Thanks,
vern



Pete Clapham
Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences
Cleveland State University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44115
Voice: [216] 687-4820
Fax: [216] 523-7200
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





[newbie] Oh say can you C??

2000-06-02 Thread vern

Hello,
Where to start?
I am still in the transition mode, coming over from the
darkside (microsoft/DOS/windows/BASIC etc.) I tried to learn
C about 10 years ago, when everyone had their own version.
Before ANSI C was in full use. I had parts of a Borland compiler
and did a few simple "Hello World!" type programs. Now I wonder if
I need all new C reference manuals?? Since the advent of Linux and
the GNU compilers and such. I'm leaning toward an O'Reilly book I
just purchased a PERL manual (the camel book), and would like a
similar book for modern day C.  Do they still use "linker" processes,
and what became of a.out??  Does C still equal C, or are there "flavors"
of C??
Thanks,
vern